The Semiformal Organization

References

• Adler PS (2001) Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organ. Sci. 12(2):215–234.Link, Google Scholar
• Aiken M, Bacharach SB, French JL (1980) Organizational structure, work process, and proposal making in administrative bureaucracies. Acad. Management J. 23(4):631–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen TJ (1977) Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Andersen PH (2012) Participation in innovation communities: Strategies and contingencies. Bøllingtoft A, Donaldson L, Huber GP, Håkonsson DD, Snow CC, eds. Collaborative Communities of Firms: Purpose, Process, and Design (Springer, New York), 59–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bahrami H (1996) The emerging flexible organization: Perspectives from Silicon Valley. Myers PS, ed. Knowledge Management and Organizational Design (Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston), 55–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnard CI (1938) The Functions of the Executive (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Biancani E (2013) Semiformal organizational structures at Johnson & Johnson provided to authors by email, August 20.Google Scholar
• Blau PM, ed. (1955) Dynamics of Bureaucracy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Blau PM, Scott WR (1962) Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. 2(1):40–57.Link, Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA (1983) A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28(2):223–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns T, Stalker GM (1966) The Management of Innovation, 2nd ed. (Tavistock Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL (2011) Robust inference with multiway clustering. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29(2):238–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooley CH (1956) Social Organization: A Study of the Larger Mind (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, McFarland DA (2013) Ties that last: Tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(1):69–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis SM, Lawrence PR (1977) Matrix (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Dixon NM (2000) Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Feld SL (1981) The focused organization of social ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 86(5):1015–1035.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):443–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey BS, Bohnet I (1995) Institutions affect fairness: Experimental investigations. J. Inst. Theoret. Econom. 151(2):286–303.Google Scholar
• Galbraith JR (1971) Matrix organizational designs: How to combine functional and project forms. Bus. Horizons 14(1):29–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith JR (1993) Competing with Flexible Lateral Organizations, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Galunic DC, Eisenhardt KM (2001) Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1229–1249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geiger R (1993) Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities Since World War II (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Gmur M (2003) Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation. Scientometrics 57(1):27–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grandori A (2009) Poliarchic governance and the growth of knowledge. Michailova S, Foss NJ, eds. Knowledge Governance: Processes and Perspectives (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 81–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gratton L (2007) Hot Spots: Why Some Teams, Workplaces, and Organizations Buzz with Energy—And Others Don’t (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Guzzo RA, Dickson MW (1996) Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Rev. Psych. 47:307–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoegl M, Weinkauf K, Gemuenden HG (2004) Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organ. Sci. 15(1):38–55.Link, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H (1993) Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Acad. Management J. 36(3):471–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein JT (1990) Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory and Practice (Wayne State University Press, Detroit).Google Scholar
• Klein JT (1996) Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities and Interdisciplinarities (University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville).Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM, Stuart TE, Tushman ML (2013) Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1316–1336.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1996) What do firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. 7(5):502–518.Link, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D, Hanson JR (1993) Informal networks: The company behind the chart. Harvard Bus. Rev. 71(4):104–111.Google Scholar
• Larson EW, Gobeli DH (1987) Matrix management: Contradictions and insights. Calif. Management Rev. 29(4):126–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler EE, Cohen SG (1992) Designing pay systems for teams. Amer. Compensation Assoc. J. 1(1):6–19.Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin M, Krawczyk S, Bethard S, Jurafsky D (2012) Citation-based bootstrapping for large-scale author disambiguation. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 63(5):1030–1047.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li L (2005) The effects of trust and shared vision on inward knowledge transfer in subsidiaries’ intra- and inter-organizational relationships. Internat. Bus. Rev. 14(1):77–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFarland DA (2005) Why work when you can play? Dynamics of formal and informal organization in classrooms. Hedges L, Schneider B, eds. The Social Organization of Schooling (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 147–174.Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27:415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mediratta B, Bick J (2007). The Google way: Give engineers room. New York Times (October 21) http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/21/jobs/21pre.html?_r=0.Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management J. 23(2):242–266.Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG (1980) Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Admin. Sci. Quart. 25(1):129–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Platt J (1996) A History of Sociological Research Methods in America, 1920–1960 (University of Sussex, Sussex, UK).Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):116–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rerup C, Feldman MS (2011) Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Acad. Management J. 54(3):577–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhoten D (2003) A multi-method analysis of the social and technical conditions for interdisciplinary collaboration. Report BCS-0129573, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
• Robins G, Pattison P, Kalish Y, Lusher D (2007) An introduction to exponential random graph (p∗) models for social networks. Soc. Networks 29(2):173–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roethlisberger FJ, Dickson WJ (1964) Management and the Worker: An Account of a Research Program Conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Ross D (1992) The Origins of American Social Science (Cambridge Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Small H (1999) Visualizing science by citation mapping. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 50(9):799–813.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Small HG, Crane D (1979) Specialties and disciplines in science and social science: An examination of their structure using citation indexes. Scientometrics 1(5):445–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snijders TAB (2001) The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociol. Methodol. 31(1):361–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snijders TAB (2005) Models for longitudinal network data. Carrington P, Scott J, Wasserman S, eds. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 215–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundstrom E, Mclntyre M, Halfhill T, Richards H (2000) Work groups: From the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990s and beyond. Group Dynam.: Theory, Res. Practice 4(1):44–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson M (2005) Structural and epistemic parameters in communities of practice. Organ. Sci. 16(2):151–164.Link, Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M, Reagans R, McEvily B (2012) Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1024–1039.Link, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML (1977) Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(4):587–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Spiro J (2005) Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(2):447–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Delbecq AL, Koenig RK Jr (1976) Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 41(2):322–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang S, He Y (2008) Compensating nondedicated cross-functional teams. Organ. Sci. 19(5):753–765.Link, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Robins G (2005) An introduction to random graphs, dependence graphs, and p∗. Carrington P, Scott J, Wasserman S, eds. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 148–161.Crossref, Google Scholar