Social Network Ties, Transactive Memory, and Performance in Groups

References

• Adler PS, Kwon S-W (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. 27:17–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45:425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akgun AE, Byrne J, Keskin H, Lynn GS, Imamoglu SZ (2005) Knowledge networks in new product development process. Inform. Management 42:1105–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS (1999) The impact of information technology on coordination: Evidence from the B-2 “Stealth” bomber. Organ. Sci. 10:162–180.Link, Google Scholar
• Austin JR (2003) Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. J. Appl. Psych. 88:866–878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bachrach DG, Bendoly E, Podsakoff PM (2001) Attributions of the “causes” of group performance as an alternative explanation of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and organizational performance. J. Appl. Psych. 86:1285–1293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker WE, Obstfeld D (1999) Social capital by design: Structure, strategies, and institutional context. Leenders RT, Gabbay SM, eds. Corporate Social Capital and Liability (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston), 89–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin TT, Bedell MD, Johnson JL (1997) The social fabric of a team-based MBA program: Network effects of student satisfaction and performance. Acad. Management J. 40:1369–1397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51:1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batjargal B (2007) Network triads: Transitivity, referral, and venture capital decisions in China and Russia. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 38:998–1012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1986) The forms of capital. Richardson JG, ed. Handbook for Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (Greenwood, New York), 241–258.Google Scholar
• Brandon DP, Hollingshead AB (2004) Transactive memory systems in organization: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organ. Sci. 15:633–644.Link, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1990) Detecting role equivalence. Soc. Networks 12:83–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2000) The network structure of social capital. Sutton RI, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 22 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 345–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2001) Structural holes versus nework closure as social capital. Lin N, Cook K, Burt RS, eds. Social Capital: Theory and Research (Aldine de Gruyter, New York), 31–56.Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2005) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Sanders G (2002) Top management team compensation: The missing link between CEO pay and firm performance? Strategic Management J. 23:367–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi TY, Wu Z (2009) Triads in supply networks. J. Supply Chain Management 45:8–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of Social Theory (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Contractor NS, Monge PR (2002) Managing knowledge networks. Management Comm. Quart. 16:249–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Contractor NS, Wasserman S, Faust K (2006) Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytical framework and emprical example. Acad. Management Rev. 31:681–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cross R, Sproull L (2004) More than an answer: Information relationship for actionable knowledge. Organ. Sci. 15:446–462.Link, Google Scholar
• Freeman L (1979) Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1:215–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garner JT (2006) It’s not what you know: A transactive memory analysis of knowledge networks at NASA. J. Tech. Writing Comm. 36:329–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glick WH (1985) Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls of multilevel research. Acad. Management Rev. 10:601–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granger CWJ (1990) Aggregation of time series variables: A survey. Barker TS, Pesaran MH, eds. Disaggregation in Economictric Modeling (Routledge, London), 17–34.Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 6:1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91:481–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld DH, Mannix EA, Williams KY, Neale MA (1996) Group composition and decision-making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 67:1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46:1251–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman JA, Taylor W (1981) Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica 49:1377–1398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heider F (1946) Attitudes and cognitive organization. J. Psych. 21:107–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heider F (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho VT, Wong S-S (2009) Knowlng who knows what and who knows whom: Expertise recognition, network recognition, and individual work performance. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 82:147–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland P, Leinhardt L (1976) Local structure in social networks. Sociol. Methodol. 7:1–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead AB (1998) Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 34:423–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead AB, Fraidin SN (2003) Gender stereotypes and assumptions about expertise in transactive memory. J. Experiment. Psych. 39:355–363.Google Scholar
• Hollingshead AB, McGrath JE, O’Conner KM (1993) Group task performance and communication technology: A longitidinal examination of computer-mediated vs. face-to-face groups. Small Group Res. 24:307–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homans GC (1950) The Human Group (Harcourt, Brace & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Homans GC (1974) Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms (Harcourt, Brace & World, New York).Google Scholar
• Hsiao C, Mountain DC, Ho-Illman K (1995) Bayesian integration of end-use metering and conditional demand analysis. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 13:315–326.Google Scholar
• James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. 69:85–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnston J, Dinardo J (1997) Economietric Methods, 4th ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Kanawattanachai P, Yoo Y (2007) The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Quart. 31:783–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz R (1982) The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 27:81–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein KJ, Lim BC, Saltz JL, Mayer DM (2004) How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Acad. Management J. 47:952–963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1998) Simmelian ties: Super, strong, and sticky. Kramer R, Neale M, eds. Power and Influence in Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 21–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1999) The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Nohria N, Eccles RG, eds. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (Harvard Business School Press, Boston), 216–239.Google Scholar
• Lance CE, Butts MM, Michels LC (2006) The sources of four commmonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organ. Res. Methods 9:202–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson JR, Foster-Fishman PG, Keys CB (1994) Information sharing in decision-making groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67:446–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson JR, Christensen C, Franz TM, Abbott AS (1998) Diagnosing groups: The pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision making. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75:93–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K (2003) Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. J. Appl. Psych. 88:587–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K (2004) Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longtitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Sci. 50:1519–1533.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis K, Herndon B (2011) Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organ. Sci. 22:1254–1265.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis K, Belliveau M, Herndon B, Keller J (2007) Group cognition, membership change, and performance investigating the benefits of detriments of colletive knowledge. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103:159–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang DW, Moreland R, Argote L (1995) Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 21:384–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marwell G, Oliver P (1993) The Critical Mass in Collective Action: A Micro-Social Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marwell G, Oliver PE, Prahl R (1988) Social networks and collective action: A theory of the critical mass. III. Amer. J. Sociol. 94:502–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1988) An economic approach to influence activities in organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(Supplement):S154–S179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1990) The efficiency of equity in organizational decision processes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80:1–31.Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1992) Economics, Organization and Management (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Monge PR, Contractor NS (2003) Theories of Communication Networks (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland RL (1999) Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. Thompson L, Messick D, Levine J, eds. Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 3–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland RL, Myaskovsky L (2000) Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82:117–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland RL, Argote L, Krishnan R (1996) Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. Nye JL, Brower AM, eds. What’s Social About Social Cognition? Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups (Plenum Press, New York), 57–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland RL, Argote L, Krishnan R (1998) Training people to work in groups. Tindale RS, Heath L, eds. Theory and Research on Small Groups: Social Psychological Applications to Social Issues (Plenum Press, New York), 37–60.Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23:242–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nerlove M (2002) Essays in Panel Data Econometrics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50:100–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh H, Chung M-H, Labianca G (2004) Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Acad. Management J. 47:860–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Organ DW, Greene CN (1981) The effects of formalization on professional involvement: A compensatory process approach. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26:237–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palazzolo ET (2005) Organizing for informaion retrieval in transactive memory systems. Comm. Res. 32:726–761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palazzolo ET, Serb DA, She Y, Su C, Contractor NS (2006) Coevolution of communication and knowledge networks in transactive memory system: Using computational models for theoretical development. Comm. Theory 16:223–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Portes A, Sensenbrenner J (1993) Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. Amer. J. Sociol. 98:1320–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman EW (2001) Network, diversity and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D units. Organ. Sci. 12:502–517.Link, Google Scholar
• Samuelson PA (1954) The pure theory of public expenditure. Rev. Econom. Statist. 36:387–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott J (1991) Social Network Analysis: A Handbook (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Shen W, Cannella AA Jr (2002) Visiting the performance consequences of CEO succession: The impacts of successor type, postsuccession senior executive turnover, and departing CEO tenure. Acad. Management J. 45:717–733.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmel G (1950) The triad. Wolff KH, ed. The Sociology of George Simmel (Free Press, Glencoe, IL), 145–169.Google Scholar
• Sobel M (1982) Asymptotic confidence interval for indirect effects in structural equation models. Leinhardt S, ed. Sociological Methodology (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 290–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soda G, Usai UA, Zaheer A (2004) Network memory: The influence of past and current neworks on performance. Acad. Management J. 47:893–906.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sparrowe RT, Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Kraimer ML (2001) Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad. Management J. 44:316–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stasser G, Titus W (2003) Hidden profiles: A brief history. Psych. Inquiry 14:302–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stasser G, Taylor LA, Hanna C (1989) Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 57:67–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart DD, Stasser G (1995) The sampling of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: The role of an informed minority. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 28:28–95.Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18:509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M, Krackhardt D (2010) Activiating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Acad. Management J. 53:167–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt GS, Janssen O (2003) Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. J. Management 29:729–751.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Der Vegt GS, Emans B, Van De Vliert E (2000) Team members’ affective responses to patterns of intragroup interdependence and job complexity. J. Management 26:633–655.Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Pattison PE (1996) Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks. I. An introduction to Markov graphs and p*. Psychometrika (61):401–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner DM (1987) Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Mullen B, Goethals GR, eds. Theories of Group Behavior (Springer, New York), 185–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner DM (1995) A computer network model of human transactive memory. Soc. Cognition 13:319–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner DM, Giuliano T, Hertel P (1985) Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. Ickes WJ, ed. Compatiable and Incompatible Relationships (Springer, New York), 253–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersema MF, Bantel KA (1992) Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Acad. Management J. 35:91–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersema MF, Bantel KA (1993) Top management team turnover as an adaptation mechanism: The role of the environment. Strategic Management J. 14:485–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wittenbaum GM, Hollingshead AB, Botero I (2004) From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Going beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Comm. Monogr. 71:286–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wittenbaum GM, Vaughan SI, Stasser G (2002) Coordination in task-performing groups. Tindale RS, Heath L, Edwards J, Posavac EJ, Bryant FB, Suarez-Balcazar Y, Henderson-King E, Myers J, eds. Theory and Research on Small Groups (Springer, New York), 177–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yuan YC, Fulk J, Monge PR (2007) Access to information in connective and communcal transactive memory system. Comm. Res. 34:131–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yuan YC, Fulk J, Monge PR, Contractor NS (2010) Expertise directory development, shared task interdependence, and strength of communication network ties as multilevel predictors of expertise exchange in transactive memory work groups. Comm. Res. 37:20–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Fulk J, Shumate M, Monge P, Bryant JA, Matsaganis M (2005) Individual participation in organizational information commons: The impact of team level social influence and intranet competency. Human Comm. Res. 31:212–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Rajagopalan N (2004) When the known devil is better than an unknown God: An empirical study of the antecedents and consequences of relay CEO successions. Acad. Management J. 47:483–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Hempel PS, Han Y, Tjosvold D (2007) Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance. J. Appl. Psych. 92:1722–1730.Crossref, Google Scholar