The Impact of Stakeholder Power on Corporate Reputation: A Cross-Country Corporate Governance Perspective

References

• Acharya VV, Subramanian KV (2007) Bankruptcy codes and innovation. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(12):4949–4988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acharya V, Amihud Y, Litov V (2011) Creditor rights and corporate risk taking. J. Financial Econom. 102(1):150–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilera RV, Jackson G (2003) The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):447–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilera RV, Jackson G (2010) Comparative and international corporate governance. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):485–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen WT (1992) Our schizophrenic conception of the business corporation. Cardozo Law Rev. 19:216–281.Google Scholar
• Allen F, Carletti E, Marquez R (2009) Stakeholder capitalism, corporate governance and firm value. EUI Working Paper ECO 2009/10, European University Institute, San Domenico di Fiesole, Italy.Google Scholar
• Amemiya T (1984) Tobit models: A survey. J. Econometrics 24(1–2):3–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Apéria T, Simcic-Brønn P, Schultz M (2004) A reputation analysis of the most visible companies in the Scandinavian countries. Corporate Reputation Rev. 7(3):218–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck N (2001) Time-series—Cross-section data: What have we learned in the past few years? Annual Rev. Political Sci. 4: 271–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berle AA Jr (1931) Corporate powers as powers in trust. Harvard Law Rev. 44(7):1049–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berle AA Jr, Means G (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Bettis RA, Mahajan V (1985) Risk/return performance of diversified firms. Management Sci. 31(7):785–799.Link, Google Scholar
• Blair MM, Stout LA (1999) A team production theory of corporate law. Virginia Law Rev. 85(2):247–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Botero JC, Djankov S, La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2004) The regulation of labor. Quart. J. Econom. 119(4): 1339–1382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brammer S, Jackson G (2012) How regulatory institutions influence corporate reputations: A cross-country comparative approach. Barnett M, Pollock T, eds. Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 297–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brammer SJ, Pavelin S (2006) Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. J. Management Stud. 43(3):435–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell J (2007) Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):946–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capron L, Guillén M (2009) National corporate governance institutions and post-acquisition target reorganization. Strategic Management J. 30(8):803–833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chacar AS, Newburry W, Vissa B (2010) Bringing institutions into performance persistence research: Exploring the impact of product, financial, and labor market institutions. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41(7):1119–1140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen D, Newburry W, Park S (2009) Improving sustainability: An international evolutionary framework. J. Internat. Management 15(3):317–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chih H-L, Chih H-H, Chen T-Y (2010) On the determinants of corporate social responsibility: International evidence on the financial industry. J. Bus. Ethics 93(1):115–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung C-N, Luo X (2008) Institutional logics or agency costs: The influence of corporate governance models on business group restructuring in emerging economies. Organ. Sci. 19(5): 766–784.Link, Google Scholar
• Collis D, Montgomery C (2005) Corporate Strategy: A Resource-Based Approach (McGraw-Hill, Boston).Google Scholar
• Davis G (2005) New directions in corporate governance. Annual Rev. Sociol. 31:143–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis G (2009) Managed by the Markets: How Finance Re-Shaped America (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Davis G, Marquis C (2005) The globalization of stock markets and convergence in corporate governance. Swedberg R, Nee V, eds. The Economic Sociology of Capitalism (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 352–390.Google Scholar
• Davis G, Stout S (1992) Organization theory and the market of corporate control: A dynamic analysis of the characteristics of large takeover targets, 1980–1990. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis G, Thompson T (1994) A social movement perspective on corporate control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(1):141–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deakin S (2005) The coming transformation of shareholder value. Corporate Gov. 13(1):11–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse D, Carter S (2005) An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. J. Management Stud. 42(2):329–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL, Jaskiewicz P (2013) Do family business have better reputations than non-family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. J. Management Stud. 50(3):337–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL, Li L, Newburry W (2009) Institutional and national culture effects on corporate reputation. Solomon GT, ed. Acad. Management Proc. (Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY), 1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demsetz H, Lehn K (1985) The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequence. J. Political Econom. 93(6):1155–1177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Djankov S, McLiesh C, Shleifer A (2007) Private credit in 129 countries. J. Financial Econom. 84(2):299–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Djankov S, La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2008) The law and economics of self-dealing. J. Financial Econom. 88(3):430–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dodd ME Jr (1932) For whom are corporate managers trustees? Harvard Law Rev. 45(7):1145–1163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donaldson T, Preston E (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad. Management Rev. 20(1):65–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dowling GR, Gardberg NA (2012) Keeping score: The challenges of measuring corporate reputation. Barnett M, Pollock T, eds. Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 34–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss P (2008) Institutions and corporate governance. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Sudda R, eds. Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, London), 389–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss P, Zajac E (2004) The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(4):501–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fligstein N (1990) The Transformation of Corporate Control (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Fligstein N (2001) The Architecture of Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fombrun C (1996) Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Fombrun C, Rindova V (1996) Who’s tops and who decides? The social construction of corporate reputations. Working paper, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
• Fombrun C, Shanley M (1990) What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Acad. Management J. 33(2):233–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fombrun C, van Riel C (1997) The reputational landscape. Corporate Reputation Rev. 1(1&2):5–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman RE, Wicks AC, Parmar B (2004) Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organ. Sci. 15(3):364–369.Link, Google Scholar
• Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase profits. New York Times Magazine (September 13) 32–33.Google Scholar
• Gabbioneta C, Ravasi D, Mazzola P (2007) Exploring the drivers of corporate reputation: A study of Italian securities analysts. Corporate Reputation Rev. 10(2):99–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardberg NA (2006) Reputatie, reputation, réputation, reputazione, ruf: A cross-cultural qualitative analysis of construct and instrument equivalence. Corporate Reputation Rev. 9(1):39–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gedajlovic ER, Shapiro DM (1998) Management and ownership effects: Evidence from five countries. Strategic Management J. 19(6):533–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gompers PA, Metrick A (2001) Institutional investors and equity prices. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):229–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greening D, Turban D (2000) Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Bus. Soc. 39(3):254–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guillén MF (2000) Corporate governance and globalization: Is there convergence across countries? Cheng JLC, Petersen RB, eds. Advances in Comparative International Management, Vol. 13 (JAI Press, Stamford, CT), 175–204.Google Scholar
• Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Hall R (1992) The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management J. 13(2):135–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall J, Soskice D, eds. (2001) Varieties of Capitalism (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harzing A-W (2005) Does the use of English-language questionnaires in cross-national research obscure national differences? Internat. J. Cross Cultural Management 5(2):213–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1981) The incidental parameters problem and the problem of initial conditions in estimating a discrete time-discrete data stochastic process and some Monte Carlo evidence. Manski CF, McFadden DL, eds. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, Chapter 4 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ, Borjas GJ (1980) Does unemployment cause future unemployment: Definitions, questions and answers for a continuous time model of heterogeneity and state dependence. Econometrica 47(187):247–283.Google Scholar
• Hess D (2008) The three pillars of corporate social reporting as new governance regulation: Disclosure, dialogue and development. Bus. Ethics Quart. 18(4):447–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsiao C (2003) Analysis of Panel Data, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC (2002) Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Bus. Ethics Quart. 12(2):235–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kabbach de Castro LR, Aguilera RV, Crespí-Cladera R (2011) Uncertainty awareness and corporate ownership concentration: Evidence from Latin America. Presentation at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, August 15, Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY.Google Scholar
• King B (2008) A social movement perspective of stakeholder collective action and influence. Bus. Soc. 47(1):21–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King B, Soule S (2007) Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protest on stock price returns. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):413–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kucera D (2002) Core labour standards and foreign direct investment. Internat. Labour Rev. 141(1–2):31–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwok CCY, Tadesse S (2006) National culture and financial systems. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 37(6):227–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lange D, Lee P, Dai Y (2011) Organizational reputation: A review. J. Management 37(1):153–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1998) Law and finance. J. Political Econom. 106(6):1113–1155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazonick W, O’Sullivan M (2000) Maximizing shareholder value: A new ideology for corporate governance. Econom. Soc. 29(1):13–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Love E, Kraatz M (2009) Character, conformity, or the bottom line? How and why downsizing affected corporate reputation. Acad. Management J. 52(2):314–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maignan I, Ralston D (2002) Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses’ self-representations. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 33(3):497–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Glynn M, Davis G (2007) Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):925–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Guthrie D, Almandoz J (2012) State activism and the hidden incentives behind bank acquisitions. Soc. Sci. Res. 41(1): 130–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGuire J, Schneeweis T, Hill J (1986) An analysis of alternative measures of strategic performance. Lamb R, Shrivastava P, eds. Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 4 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 107–153.Google Scholar
• Meyer M (1994) Measuring performance in economic organizations. Smeker N, Swedberg R, eds. Handbook of Economic Sociology (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 556–580.Google Scholar
• Miller JI, Guthrie D (2011) Communities, labor, and the law: The rise of corporate social responsibility in the United States. Marquis C, Lounsbury M, Greenwood R, eds. Communities and Organizations, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 33 (Emerald Group Publishing, Binkley, UK), 143–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mills CW (1956) The Power Elite (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Mizruchi M (2004) Berle and Means revisited. The governance and power of large U.S. corporations. Theor. Soc. 33(5):579–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mosley L, Uno S (2007) Racing to the bottom or climbing to the top? Economic globalization and collective labor rights. Comparative Political Stud. 40(8):923–948.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neumayer E, de Soysa I (2005) Globalization and the right to free association and collective bargaining: An empirical analysis. World Dev. 34(1):31–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neumayer E, de Soysa I (2007) Globalisation, women’s economic rights and forced labour. World Econom. 30(10):1510–1535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newburry W (2010) Reputation and supportive behavior: Moderating impacts of foreignness, industry and local exposure. Corporate Reputation Rev. 12(4):388–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newburry W (2012) Waving the flag: The influence of country of origin on corporate reputation. Barnett M, Pollock T, eds. Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 240–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newburry W, Gardberg NA, Belkin LY (2006) Organizational attractiveness is in the eye of the beholder: The interaction of demographic characteristics with foreignness. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 37(5):666–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• North DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1994) Political dynamics and the circulation of power: CEO succession in US industrial firms, 1960–1990. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(2):285–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional process. Acad. Management Rev. 16(1):145–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan M (2003) The political economy of comparative corporate governance. Rev. Internat. Political Econom. 10(1):23–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perrow C (1986) Complex Organizations (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1981) Power in Organizations (Pitman, Marshfield, MA).Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik G (1978) The External Control of Organizations (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Pistor K (2000) Patterns of legal change: Shareholder and creditor rights in transition economies. Eur. Bus. Organ. Law Rev. 1(1):59–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock T, Rindova V (2003) Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. 46(5):631–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ponzi LJ, Fombrun CJ, Gardberg NA (2011) RepTrak™ Pulse: Conceptualizing and validating a short-form measure of corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Rev. 14(1):15–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Posner RA (1997) Social norms and the law: An economic approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(2):365–369.Google Scholar
• Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A (2012) Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata, 3rd ed. (Stata Press, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
• Reputation Institute (2012) 2012—Global RepTrak™ 100: The World’s Most Reputable Companies (Reputation Institute, New York).Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Williamson IO, Petkova AP, Sever JM (2005) Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Acad. Management J. 48(6):1033–1049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Martins LL (2012) Show me the money: A multidimensional perspective on reputation as an intangible asset. Barnett M, Pollock T, eds. Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 16–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roe M (2003) Political Determinants of Corporate Governance: Political Context, Corporate Impact (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Hess AM (2007) Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organ. Sci. 18(6):898–921.Link, Google Scholar
• Runhaar H, Lafferty H (2009) Governing corporate social responsibility: An assessment of the contribution of the UN global compact to CSR strategies in the telecommunications industry. J. Bus. Ethics 84(4):479–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scandura T, Williams E, Hamilton B (2001) Measuring invariance using confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Schriesheim C, Neider L, eds. Equivalence in Measurement (Information Age, Greenwich, CT), 99–130.Google Scholar
• Scherer AG, Palazzo G (2007) Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1096–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneper WD (2006) When goals collide: Essays on corporate governance, stakeholders, and the concept of the firm. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Schneper WD, Guillén M (2004) Stakeholders rights and corporate governance: A cross-national study of hostile takeovers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(2):263–295.Google Scholar
• Seifert B, Gonenc H (2012) Creditor rights and R&D expenditures. Corporate Gov. 20(1):3–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1997) A survey of corporate governance. J. Financial 52(2):737–783.Google Scholar
• Staw BM, Epstein LD (2000) What bandwagons bring: Effects of popular management techniques on corporate performance, reputation, and CEO pay. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):523–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stout LA (2002) Bad and not-so-bad arguments for shareholder primacy. Southern Calif. Law Rev. 75(5):1189–1210.Google Scholar
• Suchman M (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Management J. 20(3):571–610.Google Scholar
• Sundaram AK, Inkpen A (2004) The corporate objective revisited. Organ. Sci. 15(3):350–363.Link, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H (1978) Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Thomsen S, Rose C (2004) Foundation ownership and financial performance: Do companies need owners? Eur. J. Law Econom. 18(3):343–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W (1999) Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(3):801–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tobin J (1958) Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica 26(1):24–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vitols S (2001) The origins of bank-based and market-based financial systems: Germany, Japan, and the United States. Streeck W, Yamamura K, eds. The Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan in Comparison (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY), 171–199.Google Scholar
• Vogel D (1992) The globalization of business ethics: Why America remains distinctive. Calif. Management Rev. 35(1):30–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• v. Werder A (2011) Corporate governance and stakeholder opportunism. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1345–1358.Link, Google Scholar
• Waddock S, Graves S (1997) The corporate social performance—Financial performance link. Strategic Management J. 18(4): 303–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh J, Weber K, Margolis J (2003) Social issues and management: Our lost cause found. J. Management 29(6):859–881.Google Scholar
• Walsh G, Mitchell V, Jackson P, Beatty S (2009) Examining the antecedents and consequences of corporate reputation: A customer perspective. British J. Management 20(2):187–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weaver G (2001) Ethics programs in global businesses: Culture’s role in managing ethics. J. Bus. Ethics 30(1):3–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M (1978) Economy and Society (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Weber K, Davis G, Lounsbury M (2009) Policy as myth and ceremony? The global spread of stock exchanges, 1980–2005. Acad. Management J. 52(6):1319–1347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winn M, MacDonald P, Ziestsma C (2008) Managing industry reputation: The dynamic tension between collective and competitive reputation management strategies. Corporate Reputation Rev. 11(1):35–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood D (2007) Corporate social performance (CSP). Visser W, Matten D, Pohl M, Tolhurst N, eds. The A to Z of Corporate Social Responsibility (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 104–106.Google Scholar
• World Bank (2012) Doing business 2012: Doing business in a more transparent world. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Yoshikawa T, Tsui-Auch LS, McGuire J (2007) Corporate governance reform as institutional innovation: The case of Japan. Organ. Sci. 18(6):973–988.Link, Google Scholar