Trade-offs in a Tempest: Stakeholder Influence on Hurricane Evacuation Decisions

References

• Ackerman T, Markley M (2005) Officials admit better plans needed for elderly, frail. Houston Chronicle (September 30) http://www.chron.com/news/hurricanes/article/Officials-admit-better-plans-needed-for-elderly-1931058.php.Google Scholar
• Agle BR, Mitchell RK, Sonnenfeld JA (1999) Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Acad. Management J. 42(5):507–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allison GT (1971) Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (Little, Brown and Company, Boston).Google Scholar
• Argote L (1999) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).Google Scholar
• Argote L, Greve HR (2007) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm—40 years and counting: Introduction and impact. Organ. Sci. 18(3):337–349.Link, Google Scholar
• Baker EJ (1991) Hurricane evacuation behavior. Internat. J. Mass Emergencies Disasters 9(2):287–310.Google Scholar
• Baker EJ (1995) Public response to hurricane probability forecasts. Professional Geographer 47(2):137–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett ML (2007) Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responibility. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):794–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron J, Hershey JC (1988) Outcome bias in decision evaluation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(4):569–579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger E (2009) Ike’s surges wash away traditional storm scale. Houston Chronicle (May 30) http://www.chron.com/news/hurricanes/article/Ike-s-surges-wash-away-traditional-storm-scale-1645084.php.Google Scholar
• Berger E (2010) One aspect of a storm keeps them guessing: Forecasters improve tacking hurricane paths, but not strengths. Houston Chronicle (April 1) http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Forecasters-improve-tracking-storm-paths-but-not-1696074.php.Google Scholar
• Berman SL, Wicks AC, Kotha S, Jones TM (1999) Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Acad. Management J. 42(5):488–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blake ES, Rappaport EN, Jarrell JD, Landsea CW (2005) The deadliest, costliest, and most intense United States tropical cyclones from 1851 to 2004 (and other frequently requested hurricane facts). NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS TPC-4, National Hurricane Center, Miami.Google Scholar
• Boyd BK, Dess GG, Rasheed AMA (1993) Divergence between archival and perceptual measures of the environment: Causes and consequences. Acad. Management Rev. 18(2):204–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brinkley D (2006) The Great Deluge: Hurican Katrina, New Orleans, and the Mississippi Gulf Coast (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
• Bundy J, Shropshire C, Buchholtz AK (2013) Strategic cognition and issue salience: Towards an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns. Acad. Management Rev. 38(3):352–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins R (2002) Personal interview with the Hurricane Preparedness Planning Manager, Division of Emergency Management, Department of Community Affairs, August 6, Tallahassee, FL.Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2012) Organizational structure as a determinant of performance: Evidence from mutual funds. Strategic Management J. 33(6):611–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Eggers JP (2013) Organizational decision making: An information aggregation view. Management Sci. 59(10):2257–2277.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Siggelkow N (2010) How much to copy? Determinants of effective imitation breadth. Organ. Sci. 21(3):661–676.Link, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Deephouse D, Heugens P (2009) Linking social issues to organizational impact: The role of infomediaries and the infomediary process. J. Bus. Ethics 86(4):541–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einhorn H, Hogarth R (1978) Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. Psych. Rev. 85(5):395–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Zbaracki M (1992) Strategic decision making. Strategic Management J. 13(S2):17–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fairchild AL, Colgrove J, Jones MM (2006) The challenge of mandatory evacuation: Providing for and deciding for. Health Affairs 25(4):958–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer J (1986) Key figure for shuttle will retire; criticized Mulloy not taking new NASA post. Orlando Sentinel (July 17) http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/1986-07-17/news/0240020068_1_mulloy-nasa-officials-launch-decision.Google Scholar
• Fox FV, Staw BM (1979) The trapped administrator: Effects of job insecurity and policy resistance upon commitment to a course of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(3):449–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman RE, Harrison JS, Wicks AC, Parmar BL, DeColle S (2010) Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frooman J (1999) Stakeholder influence strategies. Acad. Management Rev. 24(2):191–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garmaise MJ, Moskowitz TJ (2009) Catastrophic risk and credit markets. J. Finance 64(2):657–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D, Ocasio W (2007) Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie school’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organ. Sci. 18(3):523–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Gilpin F, Shaw R (1998) Evacuations appropriate, officials say. Tampa Tribune (September 27) 1.Google Scholar
• Giordano PC (1983) Sanctioning the high-status deviant: An attributional analysis. Soc. Psych. Quart. 46(4):329–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gladwin CH, Gladwin H, Peacock WG (2001) Modeling hurricane evacuation decisions with ethnographic methods. Internat. J. Mass Emergencies Disasters 19(2):117–143.Google Scholar
• Goldenberg SB, Landsea CW, Mestas-Nunez AM, Gray WM (2001) The recent increase in Atlantic hurricane activity: Causes and implications. Science 293(5529):474–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graffin SD, Bundy J, Porac JF, Wade JB, Quinn DP (2013) Falls from grace and the hazards of high status: The 2009 British MP expense scandal and its impact on parliamentary elites. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(3):313–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green D, Swets J (1966) Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Greening DW, Gray B (1994) Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Acad. Management J. 37(3):467–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hampson R (2001) Calling evacuations is a risky job. USA Today (May 21) http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2001-05-21-hurricane.htm.Google Scholar
• Harper JW (2011) Are category 6 hurricanes coming soon? Sci. Amer. (August 23) http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=are-category-6-hurricanes-coming.Google Scholar
• Hastie R, Kameda T (2005) The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisions. Psych. Rev. 112(2):494–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild PR, Miner AS (1997) Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):472–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henisz WJ, Delios A (2001) Uncertainty, imitation, and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990–1996. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):443–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill CWL, Jones TM (1992) Stakeholder-agency theory. J. Management Stud. 29(2):131–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard RA, Matheson JE, North DW (1972) The decision to seed hurricanes. Science 176(4040):1191–1202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janis IL (1972) Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes (Houghton Mifflin, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Jonsson S, Greve HR, Fujiwara-Greve T (2009) Undeserved loss: The spread of legitimacy loss to innocent organizations in response to reported corporate deviance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(2):195–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Julian SD, Ofori-Dankwa JC, Justis RT (2008) Understanding strategic responses to interest group pressures. Strategic Management J. 29(9):963–984.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamin KA, Rachlinski JJ (1995) Ex post ≠ ex ante: Determining liability in hindsight. Law Human Behav. 19(1):89–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr NL, MacCoun RJ, Kramer GP (1996) Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. Psych. Rev. 103(4):687–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. 7(5):502–518.Link, Google Scholar
• Kunreuther H, Michel-Kerjan EO (2009) At War with the Weather: Managing Large-Scale Risks in a New Era of Catastrophes (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lampel J, Shapira Z (2001) Judgmental errors, interactive norms, and the difficulty of detecting strategic surprises. Organ. Sci. 12(5):599–611.Link, Google Scholar
• Lanir Z, Shapira Z (1984) Analysis of decisions concerning the defense of rear areas in Israel: A case study in defense decision making. Lanir Z, ed. Israel’s Security Planning in the 1980s (Prager, New York).Google Scholar
• Lerner JS, Tetlock PE (1999) Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psych. Bull. 125(2):255–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberman MB, Asaba S (2006) Why do firms imitate each other? Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):366–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindell M, Prater C (2007) A hurricane evacuation management decision support system (EMDSS). Natural Hazards 40(3):627–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1962) The business firm as a political coalition. J. Politics 24(04):662–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Shapira Z (1987) Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Sci. 33(11):1404–1418.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Marcus AA, Nichols ML (1999) On the edge: Heeding the warnings of unusual events. Organ. Sci. 10(4):482–499.Link, Google Scholar
• Massey WR (2002) Personal interview with the Hurricane Program Manager, FEMA, August 22, National Hurricane Center, Miami.Google Scholar
• McQuaid J, Schleifstein M (2002) Left behind. Times-Picayune (New Orleans) (June 24) 11.Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159(3810):56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad. Management Rev. 22(4):853–886.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan C, Johnson J (2009) Evacuation calls for Keys won’t be made so quickly. Miami Herald (July 6) http://www.miamiherald.com/news/southflorida/story/1128787.html.Google Scholar
• Murphy J (2011) Gov. Tom Corbett tells midstate residents not to let their guard down as Hurricane Irene approaches. Patriot-News (August 26) http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/08/pa_gov_tom_corbett_tells_midst.html.Google Scholar
• Nagin R (2011) Katrina’s Secrets: Storms After the Storm (Amazon Digital Services, Seattle).Google Scholar
• Norcross B (2002) Hurricanes: Remembering and rebuilding. Presentation at the Historical Museum of Southern Florida, August 15, Miami.Google Scholar
• Nolan B (2005) Katrina takes aim. Times-Picayune (New Orleans) (August 28) 1.Google Scholar
• Parry W (2011) Hurricane Irene cost Atlantic City’s Borgata $10 M in lost revenue due to 3-day closure. AP Newswire (October 25) http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Hurricane-Irene-cost-Borgata-apf-3776168807.html.Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Pontikes E, Negro G, Rao H (2010) Stained red: A study of stigma by association to blacklisted artists during the “red scare” in Hollywood, 1945 to 1960. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(3):456–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Powell BC, Singh H (2006) Due diligence failure as a signal detection problem. Strategic Organ. 4(4):319–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Regnier E, Haar P (2006) A dynamic decision model applied to hurricane landfall. Weather Forecasting 21(5):764–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reynolds S, Schultz F, Hekman D (2006) Stakeholder theory and managerial decision-making: Constraints and implications of balancing stakeholder interests. J. Bus. Ethics 64(3):285–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sah RK, Stiglitz JE (1986) The architecture of economic systems: Hierarchies and polyarchies. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):716–727.Google Scholar
• Schleifstein M, McQuaid J (2002) Advance warning. Times-Picayune (New Orleans) (June 27) 16.Google Scholar
• Schultz J (2006) South Florida Counties push for Ernesto aid. Palm Beach Post (September 1).Google Scholar
• Sheets R, Williams J (2001) Hurricane Watch: Forecasting the Deadliest Storms on Earth (Vintage Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Simonson I, Staw BM (1992) Deescalation strategies: A comparison of techniques for reducing commitment to losing courses of action. J. Appl. Psych. 77(4):419–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith R (2002) Personal interview with the former Emergency Management Director of Chatham County, Georgia, August 22, National Hurricane Center, Miami.Google Scholar
• Smith SK, Cody S (2010) An analysis of annual migration flows in Florida, 1980–2008. Florida Focus 6(1) http://www.bebr.ufl.edu/files/FL%20Focus6_1_2010.pdf.Google Scholar
• Soll JB, Larrick RP (2009) Strategies for revising judgment: How (and how well) people use others’ opinions. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory Cognition 35(3):780–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorkin RD, Hays CJ, West R (2001) Signal-detection analysis of group decision making. Psych. Rev. 108(1):183–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starbuck WH, Milliken FJ (1988) Challenger: Fine-tuning the odds until something breaks. J. Management Stud. 25(4):319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tetlock PE, Skitka L, Boettger R (1989) Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: Conformity, complexity, and bolstering. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 57(4):632–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967/2003) Organizations in Action (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (2009) Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of “The Digital Photography Company”. Organ. Sci. 20(2):441–460.Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Hueristics and biases. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, eds. Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 3–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Garud R (1993) Innovation and industry development: The case of cochlear implants. Burgelman RA, Rosenbloom RS, eds. Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 1–46.Google Scholar
• Washington Post (2006) Two months before 9/11, an urgent warning to Rice. Washington Post (October 1) A17.Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld BM, Wurthmann KA, Hambrick DC (2008) The stigmatization and devaluation of elites associated with corporate failures: A process model. Acad. Management Rev. 33(1):231–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilkens G (1995) Citrus flees Allison. Tampa Tribune (June 5) 1.Google Scholar
• Yu T, Sengul M, Lester RH (2008) Misery loves company: The spread of negative impacts resulting from an organizational crisis. Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):452–472.Crossref, Google Scholar