Cognitive Control Capabilities, Routinization Propensity, and Decision-Making Performance

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0899

References

  • Argote L (2006) Introduction to mindfulness. Organ. Sci. 17(4):501.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Atkinson R, Holmgren J, Juola J (1969) Processing time as influenced by the number of elements in a visual display. Perception Psychophysics 6(6):321–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baba V, Jamal M (1991) Routinization of job context and job content as related to employees’ quality of working life: A study of Canadian nurses. J. Organ. Behav. 12(5):379–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bargh JA, Chartrand TL (1999) The unbearable automaticity of being. Amer. Psych. 54(7):462–479.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barkley RA (2001) Executive functions and self-regulation: An evolutionary neuropsychological perspective. Neuropsych. Rev. 11(1):1–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barkley RA, Murphy KR, Fischer M (2007) ADHD in Adults: What the Science Says (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) Moderator-mediator variables distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Muraven M, Tice DM (1998) Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(5):1252–1265.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bazerman M, Neale M (1983) Heuristics in negotiation: Limitations to effective dispute resolution. Baxerman MH, Lewicki RJ, eds. Negotiating in Organizations (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA), 311–321.Google Scholar
  • Beach LR, Potter RE (1992) The pre-choice screening of options. Acta Psych. 81(2):115–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechara A, Damasio AR (2005) The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games Econom. Behav. 52(2):336–372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Betsch T, Haberstroh S (2005) The Routines of Decision Making (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Betsch T, Haberstroh S, Molter B, Glöckner A (2004) Oops, I did it again—Relapse errors in routinized decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 93(1):62–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Betsch T, Haberstroh S, Glöckner A, Haar T, Fiedler K (2001) The effects of routine strength on adaptation and information search in recurrent decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 84(1):23–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birnholtz JP, Cohen MD, Hoch SV (2007) Organizational character: On the regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove. Organ. Sci. 18(2):315–332.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bishop SR, Lau M, Shapiro S, Carlson L, Anderson ND, Carmody J, Segal ZV, Abbey S, Speca M, Velting D (2004) Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psych.: Sci. Practice 11(3):230–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Black DS, Semple RJ, Pokhrel P, Grenard JL (2011) Component processes of executive function—Mindfulness, self-control, and working memory—and their relationships with mental and behavioral health. Mindfulness 2(3):179–185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollen KA, Stine R (1990) Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Soc. Methodol. 20(1):115–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR (1999) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School (National Academy Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Brown KW, Ryan RM (2003) The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 84(4):822–848.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown KW, Ryan RM, Cresswell JD (2007) Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psych. Inquiry 18(4):211–237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cacioppo JT, Petty RE (1982) The need for cognition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 42(1):116–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carnevale JJ, Inbar Y, Lerner JS (2011) Individual differences in need for cognition and decision-making competence among leaders. Personality Individual Differences 51(3):274–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carnevale PJ, Pruitt DG (1992) Negotiation and mediation. Annual Rev. Psych. 43(1):531–582.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll JS, Payne JW (1991) An information processing approach to two-party negotiation. Res. Negotiation Organ. 3:3–34.Google Scholar
  • Cavanagh P, Labianca AT, Thornton IM (2001) Attention-based visual routines: Sprites. Cognition 80(1):47–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen CM, Shih WC (2008) Strategic innovation simulation: Back Bay Battery. Teaching Note 2565-HTM-ENG, Harvard Business School Publishing, Watertown, MA.Google Scholar
  • Cloninger R (1994) The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): A Guide to Its Development and Use (Center for Psychobiology of Personality, Washington University, St. Louis).Google Scholar
  • Cohen JD (2005) The vulcanization of the human brain: A neural perspective on interactions between cognition and emotion. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(4):3–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen MD (2007) Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organ. Stud. 28(5):773–786.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen MD, Bacdayan P (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. 5(4):554–568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen JD, Aston-Jones G, Gilzenrat MS (2004) A systems-level perspective on attention and cognitive control: Guided activation, adaptive gating, conflict monitoring, and exploitation versus exploration. Posner MI, ed. Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention (Guilford, New York), 71–90.Google Scholar
  • Cohen MD, Burkhart R, Dosi G, Egidi M, Marengo M, Warglien M, Winter S (1996) Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Indust. Corporate Change 5(3):653–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dane E (2011) Paying attention to mindfulness and its effects on task performance in the workplace. J. Management 27(4):997–1018.Google Scholar
  • Daw ND, O’Doherty JP, Dayan P, Seymour B, Dolan RJ (2006) Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans. Nature 441(15):876–879.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Dreu CKW (2003) Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 91(2):280–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Descartes R (1641/1931) Meditations on First Philosophy: The Philosophical Works of René Descartes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Desimone R, Duncan J (1995) Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Rev. Neurosci. 18:193–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dewey J (1922) Human Nature and Conduct (H. Holt and Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. 32(3):543–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Zbaracki MJ (1992) Strategic decision making. Strategic Management J. 13(S2):17–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Furr NR, Bingham CB (2010) Microfoundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1263–1273.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11(6):611–629.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fernandez-Duque D, Baird JA, Posner MI (2000) Executive attention and metacognitive regulation. Consciousness Cognition 9(2):288–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forgas JP (1983) Episode cognition and personality: A multidimensional analysis. J. Personality 51(1):34–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frederick S (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(4):25–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Levinthal DA (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Levinthal DA (2004) The strategy field from the perspective of Management Science: Divergent strands and possible integration. Management Sci. 50(10):1309–1318.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Levinthal DA, Ocasio W (2007) Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organ. Sci. 18(3):523–536.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Geenen MM, Cardous-Ubbink MC, Kremer LC, van den Bos C, van der Pal HJ, Heinen RC, Jaspers MWet al. (2007) Medical assessment of adverse health outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood cancer. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 297(24):2705–2715.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gersick CJG, Hackman RJ (1990) Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 47(1):65–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittell JH (2002) Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Management Sci. 48(11):1408–1426.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goldberg E (2001) The Executive Brain: Frontal Lobes and the Civilized Mind (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Goldberg E (2009) The New Executive Brain (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2014) Cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic managerial capabilities. Working paper, Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH. http://www.tuck.dartmouth.edu/faculty/faculty-directory/constance-e-helfat.Google Scholar
  • Hoeft F, Watson CL, Kesler SR, Bettinger KE, Reiss AL (2007) Gender differences in the mesocorticolimbic system during computer game-play. J. Psychiatric Res. 42(4):253–258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horne JA, Ostberg O (1976) A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. Internat. J. Chronobiol. 4(2):97–110.Google Scholar
  • James W (1899/1925) Talks to Teachers on Psychology: And to Students on Some of Life’s Ideals (Henry Holt and Company, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D (1973) Attention and Effort (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Kastenbaum RJ (1980) Habituation as a model of human aging. Internat. J. Aging Human Development 12(3):159–170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirchner WK (1958) Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. J. Experiment. Psych. 55(4):352–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knudsen EI (2007) Fundamental components of attention. Annual Rev. Neurosci. 30(1):57–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kolb B, Whishaw IQ (1998) Brain plasticity and behavior. Annual Rev. Psych. 49:43–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kovach CK, Daw ND, Rudrauf D, Tranel D, O’Doherty JP, Adolphs R (2012) Anterior prefrontal cortex contributes to action selection through tracking of recent reward trends. J. Neuroscience 32(25):8434–8442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kruglanski AW, Freund T (1983) The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 19(5):448–468.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langer E (1989) Mindfulness (Addison-Wesley, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Levinthal D, Rerup C (2006) Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 17(4):502–513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loasby BJ (1976) Choice, Complexity and Ignorance: An Enquiry into Economic Theory and the Practice of Decision-Making (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Loring DW (1999) INS Dictionary of Neuropsychology (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Louis MR, Sutton RI (1991) Switching cognitive gears: From habits of mind to active thinking. Human Relations 44(1):55–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lubatkin MH, Simsek Z, Ling Y, Veiga JF (2006) Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. J. Management 32(5):646–672.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lundeberg MA, Fox PW, Punćcochaŕ J (1994) Highly confident but wrong: Gender differences and similarities in confidence judgments. J. Educational Psych. 86(1):114–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Miller EK, Cohen JD (2001) An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Rev. Neurosci. 24:167–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H, Raisinghani D, Théorêt A (1976) The structure of “unstructured” decision processes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 21(2):246–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mollick E (2012) People and process, suits and innovators: The role of individuals in firm performance. Strategic Management J. 33(9):1001–1015.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muraven M, Tice DM, Baumeister RF (1998) Self-control as limited resource: Regulatory depletion patterns. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(3):774–789.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narduzzo A, Rocco E, Warglien M (2000) Talking about routines in the field. Dosi G, Nelson RR, Winter SG, eds. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (Oxford University Press, New York), 27–50.Google Scholar
  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Neuberg SL, Newsom JT (1993) Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simple structure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 65:113–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Norman DA, Shallice T (1986) Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. Davidson R, Schwartz R, Shapiro D, eds. Consciousness and Self-Regulation, Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 4 (Plenum Press, New York), 1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Norman DA, Shallice T (2000) Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. Gazzaniga MS, ed. Cognitive Neuroscience: A Reader (Blackwell, Malden, MA), 376–390.Google Scholar
  • Ohly S, Sonnentag S, Pluntke F (2006) Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. J. Organ. Behav. 27(3):257–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pashler H (1998) The Psychology of Attention (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Pentland BT, Rueter HH (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):484–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT, Hærem T, Hillison D (2010) Comparing organizational routines as recurrent patterns of action. Organ. Stud. 31(7):917–940.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT, Hærem T, Hillison D (2011) The (n)ever-changing world: Stability and change in organizational routines. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1369–1383.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Posner MI, Petersen SE (1990) The attention system of the human brain. Annual Rev. Neurosci. 13:25–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Posner MI, Snyder C (1975) Attention and Cognitive Control (Lawrence Erlbawm Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirecct effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3):879–891.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raven J, Raven J, Court JH (2003) Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales (Harcourt Assessment, San Antonio, TX).Google Scholar
  • Raz A, Buhle J (2006) Typologies of attentional networks. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 7(5):367–379.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reich JW, Zautra AJ (1991) Analyzing the trait of routinization in older adults. Internat. J. Aging Human Development 32(3):161–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rerup C (2009) Attentional triangulation: Learning from unexpected rare crises. Organ. Sci. 20(5):876–893.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rerup C, Feldman MS (2011) Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Acad. Management J. 54(3):577–610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson-Riegler GL, Robinson-Riegler B (2013) Cognitive Psychology: Applying the Science of the Mind, 3rd ed. (Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Salvato C (2009) Capabilities unveiled: The role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Organ. Sci. 20(2):384–409.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Salvato C, Rerup C (2011) Beyond collective entities: Multilevel research on organizational routines and capabilities. J. Management 37(2):468–490.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwartz JM, Begley S (2002) The Mind and the Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
  • Shallice T, Fletcher P, Frith C, Grasby P, Frackowiak R, Dolan R (1994) Brain regions associated with acquisition and retrieval of verbal episodic memory. Nature 368(6472):633–635.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shiffrin RM, Schneider W (1977) Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psych. Rev. 84(2):127–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singley MK, Anderson JR (1989) The Transfer of Cognitive Skill (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Sohlberg M, Mateer C (2001) Cognitive Rehabilitation: An Integrative Neuropsychological Approach (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Tripsas M (2009) Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of “The Digital Photography Company.” Organ. Sci. 20(2):441–460.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2003) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Helfat CE, ed. The SMS Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Capabilities (Blackwell, Malden, MA), 393–412.Google Scholar
  • Verplanken B, Orbell S (2003) Reflections on past behavior: A self-report index of habit strength. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 33(6):1313–1330.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Verplanken B, Aarts H, Van Knippenberg A (1997) Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 27(5):539–560.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Verplanken B, Myrbakk V, Rudi E (2005) The measurement of habit. Betsch T, Haberstroh S, eds. The Routines of Decision Making (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 231–247.Google Scholar
  • Weiss HM, Ilgen DR (1985) Routinized behavior in organizations. J. Behav. Econom. 14(1):57–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM (2006) Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organ. Sci. 17(4):514–524.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 16(4):409–421.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wershbale A, Pleskac TJ (2010) Making assessments while taking sequential risks. Ohlsson S, Catrambone R, eds. 32nd Annual Conf. Cognitive Sci. Soc., Austin, TX, 326–331.Google Scholar
  • Whitehead AN (1911) Introduction to Mathematics (Williams and Northgate, London).Google Scholar
  • Winter S (1985) The case for “mechanistic” decision making. Pennings JM, ed. Organizational Strategy and Change (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 99–113.Google Scholar
  • Zhao X, Lynch JG, Chen Q (2010) Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. J. Consumer Res. 37(2):197–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zisberg A, Zysberg L, Young H, Schepp K (2009) Trait routinization, functional and cognitive status in older adults. Internat. J. Aging Human Development 69(1):17–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of organizational capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13(3):339–352.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.