Contact and Group Structure: A Natural Experiment of Interracial College Roommate Groups

References

• Allport GW (1954) The Nature of Prejudice (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Amir Y (1976) The role of intergroup contact in the change of prejudice and ethnic relations. Katz PA, ed. Towards the Elimination of Racism (Pergamon, New York), 245–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aronson E, Bridgeman D (1979) Jigsaw groups and the desegregated classroom: In pursuit of common goals. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 5:438–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banaji M, Greenwald A (1995) Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 68:181–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS, Landes EM, Michael RT (1977) An economic analysis of marital instability. J. Political Econom. 85:1141–1187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Cohen BP, Zelditch M Jr (1972) Status characteristics and social interaction. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 37:241–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Murray W, Ridgeway C, Rosenholtz SJ (1986) Status cues, expectations, and behavior. Lawler EJ, ed. Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 3 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 1–22.Google Scholar
• Blascovich J, Mendes WB, Hunter S, Lickel B, Kowai-Bell N (2001) Perceiver threat in social interactions with stigmatized others. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80:253–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Bogardus ES (1947) Measurement of personal-group relations. Sociometry 10:306–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowen WG, Bok D (1998) The Shape of the River: Long-Term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer MB, Brown J (1998) Intergroup relations. Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., (McGraw-Hill, Boston), 554–594.Google Scholar
• Brewer MB, Miller N (1984) Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. Miller N, Brewer M, eds. Groups in Contact: The Psychology of Desegregation (Academic Press, Orlando, FL), 281–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brickson SL (2000) The impact of identity orientation on individual and organizational outcomes in demographically diverse settings. Acad. Management Rev. 25:82–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brickson SL (2008) Reassessing the standard: The positive expansive potential of a relational identity in diverse organizations. J. Positive Psych. 3:40–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brickson S, Brewer M (2001) Identity orientation and intergroup relations in organizations. Hogg MA, Terry DJ, eds. Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts (Psychology Press, Philadelphia), 49–66.Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrne D (1971) The Attraction Paradigm (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Caplow T (1968) Two Against One: Coalitions in Triads (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay P (1999) Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behavior. Acad. Management J. 42:273–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay P, Tluchowska M, George E (2004) Identifying the in-group: A closer look at the influence of demographic dissimilarity on employee social identity. Acad. Management Rev. 29:180–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Malloy C (2010) The power of alumni networks. Harvard Bus. Rev. 88(10) http://hbr.org/2010/10/the-power-of-alumni-networks/ar/1.Google Scholar
• Cook S (1985) Experimenting on social issues: The case of school desegregation. Amer. Psych. 40:452–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis FJ (1991) Who Is Black? (Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park).Google Scholar
• Davidson MN (2011) The End of Diversity as We Know It: Why Diversity Efforts Fail and How Leveraging Difference Can Succeed (Berrett-Koehler Press, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Davidson MN, James EH (2007) The engines of positive relationships across difference: Conflict and learning. Dutton J, Ragins BR, eds. Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 137–158.Google Scholar
• Denrell J (2005) Why most people disapprove of me: Experience sampling in impression formation. Psych. Rev. 112:951–978.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch M, Collins M (1951) Interracial Housing: A Psychological Evaluation of a Social Experiment (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).Google Scholar
• Dixon J, Durrheim K, Tredoux C (2005) Beyond the optimal contact strategy: A reality check for the contact hypothesis. Amer. Psych. 60:697–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duguid M (2012) Female tokens in high-prestige work groups: Catalysts or inhibitors of group diversification? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 116:104–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duguid MM, Loyd DL, Tolbert PS (2012) The impact of categorical status, numeric representation, and work group prestige on preference for demographically similar others: A value threat approach. Organ. Sci. 23:386–401.Link, Google Scholar
• Ely RJ (1994) The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39:203–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely RJ, Thomas D (2001) Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46:229–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fazio RH, Jackson JR, Dunton BC, Williams CJ (1995) Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 69:1013–1027.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L, Schachter S, Back KW (1950) Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing (Harper & Brothers, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisman R, Iyengar S, Kamenica E, Simonson I (2008) Racial preferences in dating. Rev. Econom. Stud. 75:117–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank R, Cook P (1995) The Winner Take All Society: Why the Few at the Top Get So Much More Than the Rest of Us (Penguin Books, London).Google Scholar
• Goodman L (1975) A new model for scaling response patterns: An application of the quasi-independence concept. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 70:755–768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Price KH, Gavin JH, Florey AT (2002) Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of diversity on group functioning. Acad. Management J. 45:1029–1045.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvard University Archives (2014) Using the collections. Accessed April 5, 2014, http://library.harvard.edu/university-archives/using-the-collections/homepage.Google Scholar
• Harvard University Board of Trustees (1993) The President’s Report (1991–1993). Report, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hirschfeld L (1995) Do children have a theory of race? Cognition 54:209–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoyle R (2005) Design and analysis of experimental research on groups. Wheelan S, ed. The Handbook of Group Research and Practice (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 223–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (1977a) Men and Women of the Corporation (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (1977b) Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. Amer. J. Sociol. 82:965–990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kashy DA, Kenny D (2000) The analysis of data from dyads and groups. Reis H, Judd C, eds. Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 451–477.Google Scholar
• LaPiere RT (1934) Attitudes vs. actions. Soc. Forces 13:230–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau DC, Murnighan JK (2005) Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Acad. Management J. 48:645–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loyd DL, White JB, Kern M (2008) Duo status: Disentangling the complex interactions within a minority of two. Neale M, Mannix E, Phillips K, eds. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Vol. 11: Diversity in Groups (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 75–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marmaros D, Sacerdote B (2006) The importance of race versus location in determining social interactions. Quart. J. Econom. 121:79–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendoza-Denton R, Downey G, Purdie V, Davis A, Pietrzak J (2002) Sensitivity to status-based rejection: Implications for African–American students’ college experience. J. Perspect. Soc. Psych. 83:896–918.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menon T, Phillips KW (2011) Getting even or being at odds? Cohesion in even- and odd-sized small groups. Organ. Sci. 22:738–753.Link, Google Scholar
• Menon T, Thompson L, Choi H-S (2006) Tainted knowledge vs. tempting knowledge: People avoid knowledge from internal rivals and seek knowledge from external rivals. Management Sci. 52:1129–1144.Link, Google Scholar
• O’Leary MB, Mortensen M (2010) Go (con)figure: Subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Organ. Sci. 21:115–131.Link, Google Scholar
• Oliver JE, Mendelberg T (2000) Reconsidering the environmental determinants of white racial attitudes. Amer. J. Political Sci. 44:574–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettigrew TF (1998) Intergroup contact theory. Annual Rev. Psych. 49:65–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettigrew TF, Tropp LR (2006) A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90:751–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelps RE, Altschul DB, Wisenbaker JM, Day JF, Cooper D, Potter CG (1998) Roommate satisfaction and ethnic identity in mixed-race and white university roommate dyads. J. College Student Development 39:194–203.Google Scholar
• Phillips K, Loyd D (2006) When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 99:143–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Rothbard N, Dumas TL (2009) To disclose or not to disclose? Status distance and self-disclosure in diverse environments. Acad. Management Rev. 34:710–732.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravlin EC, Thomas D (2005) Status and stratification processes in organizational life. J. Management 31:966–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Burks J (2005) Protestant relational ideology: The cognitive underpinnings and organizational implications of an American anomaly. Kramer R, Staw B, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 26 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 265–305.Google Scholar
• Shelton JN (2003) Interpersonal concerns in social encounters between majority and minority group members. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 6:171–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shelton JN, Richeson JA (2005) Pluralistic ignorance and intergroup contact. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88:91–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shook N, Fazio R (2008) Roommate relationships: A comparison of interracial and same-race living situations. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 11:425–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmel G, Wolff KH (1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel (Part I: Quantitative Aspects of the Group) (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
• Singh J, Hansen MT, Podolny JM (2010) The world is not small for everyone: Inequity in searching for information in organizations. Management Sci. 56:1415–1438.Link, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner J (1986) The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. Worchel S, Austin LW, eds. The Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Nelson-Hall, Chicago), 2–24.Google Scholar
• Thomas-Hunt MC, Phillips KW (2004) When what you know is not enough: The effects of gender on expert’s influence within work groups. Perspect. Soc. Psych. Bull. 30:1585–1598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Towles-Schwen T, Fazio RH (2006) Automatically-activated racial attitudes as predictors of the success of interracial roommate relationships. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 42:698–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Laar C, Levin S, Sinclair S, Sidanius J (2005) The effect of university roommate contact on ethnic attitudes and behavior. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 41:329–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson W, Kumar K, Michaelsen L (1993) Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Acad. Management J. 36:590–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilner DM, Walkley RO, Cook SW (1955) Human Relations in Interracial Housing (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).Google Scholar
• Wittenbaum F, Moreland R (2008) Small groups research in social psychology. Social Personality Psych. Compass 2:187–203.Crossref, Google Scholar