Organizational Obsolescence, Drifting Tastes, and Age Dependence in Organizational Life Chances

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0910

References

  • Alter AL, Oppenheimer DM (2008) Easy on the mind, easy on the wallet: The roles of familiarity and processing fluency in valuation judgments. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 15(5):985–990.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alter AL, Oppenheimer DM (2009) Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 13(3):219–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amburgey TL, Kelly D, Barnett WP (1993) Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(1):51–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Antonelli GA (2012) Non-monotonic logic. Zalta EN, ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2012 ed. Accessed April 21 2014, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/logic-nonmonotonic/.Google Scholar
  • Barnett WP (1990) The organizational ecology of a technological system. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):31–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett WP, Hansen MT (1996) The Red Queen in organizational evolution. Strategic Management J. 17(S1):139–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett WP, Pontikes EG (2008) The Red Queen, success bias, and organizational inertia. Management Sci. 54(7):1237–1251.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett WP, Sorenson O (2002) The red queen in organizational creation and development. Indust. Corporate Change 11(2):289–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barron DN, West E, Hannan MT (1994) A time to grow and a time to die: Growth and mortality of credit unions in New York City 1914–1990. Amer. J. Sociol. 100(2):381–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum JAC (1996) Organizational ecology. Clegg S, Hardy C, Nord WR, eds. Handbook of Organization Studies (Sage, London), 77–114.Google Scholar
  • Berger J, Le Mens G (2009) How adoption speed affects the abandonment of cultural tastes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(20): 8146–8150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacharjee S, Gopal RD, Lertwachara K, Marsden JR, Telang R (2007) The effect of digital sharing technologies on music markets: A survival analysis of albums on ranking charts. Management Sci. 53(9):1359–1374.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brüderl J, Schüssler R (1990) Organizational mortality: The liabilities of newness and adolescence. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(3):530–547.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burago D, Burago Y, Ivanov S (2001) A Course in Metric Geometry, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 33 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll GR (1983) A stochastic model of organizational mortality: Review and reanalysis. Soc. Sci. Res. 12(4):303–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll GR, Delacroix J (1982) Organizational mortality in the newspaper industries of Argentina and Ireland: An ecological approach. Admin. Sci. Quart. 27(2):169–198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll GR, Hannan MT (1989) Density delay in the evolution of organizational populations: A model and five empirical tests. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):524–541.Google Scholar
  • Carroll GR, Hannan MT (2000) The Demography of Corporations and Industries (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll GR, Huo PY (1988) Organizational and electoral paradoxes of the knights of labor. Carroll GR, ed. Ecological Models of Organizations (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA), 175–193.Google Scholar
  • Carroll GR, Swaminathan A (2000) Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the U.S. brewing industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):715–762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll GR, Wheaton DR (2009) The organizational construction of authenticity: An examination of contemporary food and dining in the U.S. Staw BM, Brief A, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 29 (Elsevier, New York), 255–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen CM, Suárez FF, Utterback JM (1998) Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries. Management Sci. 44(12, Part 2): S207–S220.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J, Le Mens G (2007) Interdependent sampling and social influence. Psych. Rev. 114(2):398–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobrev SD, Kim T-Y, Hannan MT (2001) Dynamics of niche width and resource partitioning. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(5):1299–1337.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dry MJ, Storms G (2009) Similar but not the same: A comparison of the utility of directly rated and feature-based similarity measures for generating spatial models of conceptual data. Behav. Res. Methods 41(1):889–900.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fichman M, Levinthal DA (1991) Honeymoons and the liability of adolescence: A new perspective on duration dependence in social and organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 16(2):442–468.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiedler K (2000) Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psych. Rev. 107(4):659–676.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman J, Carroll GR, Hannan MT (1983) The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(5):692–710.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT (1998) Rethinking age dependence in organizational mortality: Logical formalizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(1):85–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT (2010) Partiality of memberships in categories and audiences. Annual Rev. Sociol. 36:159–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT, Freeman J (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(2):149–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT, Freeman J (1989) Organizational Ecology (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT, Pólos L, Carroll GR (2004) The evolution of inertia. Indust. Corporate Change 13(1):213–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT, Pólos L, Carroll GR (2007) Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koçak Ö, Hannan MT, Hsu G (2014) Emergence of market orders: Audience interaction and vanguard influence. Organ. Stud. 35(5):765–790.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Le Mens G, Hannan MT, Pólos L (2011) Founding conditions, learning, and organizational life chances: Age dependence revisited. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(1):95–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Le Mens G, Hannan MT, Pólos L (2013) The geometry of organizational adaptation. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • Levinthal DA (1991) Random walks and organizational mortality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(3):397–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lieberson S (2000) A Matter of Taste: How Names, Fashions, and Culture Change (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Negro G, Koçak Ö, Hsu G (2010) Research on categories in the sociology of organizations. Hsu G, Koçak Ö, Negro G, eds. Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 31 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 3–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Oppenheimer DM, Frank MC (2008) A rose in any other font would not smell as sweet: Effects of perceptual fluency on categorization. Cognition 106(3):1178–1194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Péli G, Pólos L, Hannan MT (2000) Back to inertia: Theoretical implications of alternative styles of logical formalization. Sociol. Theory 18(2):193–213.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pólos L, Hannan MT (2002) Reasoning with partial knowledge. Sociol. Methodol. 32(1):133–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pólos L, Hannan MT (2004) A logic for theories in flux: A model-theoretic approach. Logique et Analyse 47:85–121.Google Scholar
  • Pontikes EG (2012) Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audience evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ranger-Moore J (1997) Bigger may be better, but is older wiser? Organizational age and size in the New York life insurance industry. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 62(6):903–920.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reber R, Schwarz N, Winkielman P (2004) Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 8(4):364–382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosch EH (1973) On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. Moore TE, ed. Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (Academic Press, New York), 111–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosch EH (1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 104(3):192–233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rossman G (2012) Climbing the Charts: What Radio Airplay Tells Us About the Diffusion of Innovation (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schumpeter JA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Shepard RN (1987) Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science 237(4820):1317–1323.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simmel G (1904) Fashion. Internat. Quart. 10:130–155.Google Scholar
  • Smith EB (2011) Identities as lenses: How organizational identity affects audiences’ evaluation of organizational performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(1):61–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen JB, Stuart TE (2000) Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):81–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stinchcombe AL (1965) Organizations and social structure. March JG, ed. Handbook of Organizations (Rand McNally, Chicago), 142–193.Google Scholar
  • Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technoloigcal discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Utterback JM, Abernathy WJ (1975) A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 3(6):639–656.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Veltman F (1996) Defaults in update semantics. J. Philos. Logic 25(3):221–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Volpato G, Stocchetti A (2008) Managing product life cycle in the auto industry: Evaluating carmakers effectiveness. Internat. J. Automotive Tech. Management 8(1):22–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zajonc RB (1968) Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 92(2, Part 2):1–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.