A Social Composition View of Team Creativity: The Role of Member Nationality-Heterogeneous Ties Outside of the Team

References

• Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45:425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen TJ (1984) Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1983) The Social Psychology of Creativity (Springer-Verlag, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in Context (Westview, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Hill KG, Hennessey BA, Tighe EM (1994) The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 66:950–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992a) Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37:634–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992b) Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. 3:321–341.Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Ingram P, Levine JM, Moreland RL (2000) Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82:1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baer M (2010) The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: A comprehensive examination and extension. J. Appl. Psych. 95:592–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin TT, Bedell MD, Johnson JL (1997) The social fabric of a team-based MBA program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Acad. Management J. 40:1369–1397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balkundi P, Harrison DA (2006) Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about the effects of network structure on team viability and performance. Acad. Management J. 49:49–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Barron F, Harrington DM (1981) Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Rev. Psych. 32:439–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Halgin DS (2011) On network theory. Organ. Sci. 22:1168–1181.Link, Google Scholar
• Brass DJ (1985) Men’s and women’s networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Acad. Management J. 28:327–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass DJ (1995) Creativity: It’s all in your social networks. Ford CM, Gioia DA, eds. Creative Action in Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 94–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1995) Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. 20:343–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burkhardt ME (1994) Social integration effects following a technological change: A longitudinal investigation. Acad. Management J. 37:869–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110:349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Gallivan MJ (2007) Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: A multilevel perspective. MIS Quart. 31:657–679.Google Scholar
• Byrne D (1971) The Attraction Paradigm (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Converse SA (1993) Shared mental models in expert team decision making. Castellan NJ Jr, ed. Current Issues in Individual and Group Decision Making (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 221–246.Google Scholar
• Catmull E (2008) How Pixar fosters collective creativity. Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(September):65–72.Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Ferriani S (2008) A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: A social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organ. Sci. 19:824–844.Link, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, Polzer JT, Barsade SG, Neale MA (1998) Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43:749–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Price B (1991) Regression Analysis by Example, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Coser R (1975) The complexity of roles as a seedbed of individual autonomy. Coser L, ed. The Idea of Social Structure: Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton (Harcourt Brace, New York), 237–263.Google Scholar
• Cox TH, Lobel SA, McLeod PL (1991) Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative versus competitive behavior on a group task. Acad. Management J. 34:827–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cross R, Sproull L (2004) More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organ. Sci. 14:446–462.Link, Google Scholar
• Cummings JN (2004) Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. 50:352–364.Link, Google Scholar
• Dahlin KB, Weingart LR, Hinds PJ (2005) Team diversity and information use. Acad. Management J. 48:1107–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dane E (2010) Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 35:579–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diehl M, Stroebe W (1987) Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 53:497–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drazin R, Glynn MA, Kazanjian RK (1999) Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 24:286–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earley PC, Mosakowski E (2000) Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Acad. Management J. 43:26–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erez M, Earley PC (1993) Culture, Self-Identity, and Work (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farmer SM, Tierney P, Kung-McIntyre K (2003) Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Acad. Management J. 46:618–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Taylor SE (2008) Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52:443–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geletkanycz MA, Hambrick DC (1997) The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42:654–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, Gibbs JL (2006) Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51:451–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilson LL, Shalley CE (2004) A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. J. Management 30:453–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gong Y, Huang JC, Farh JL (2009) Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Acad. Management J. 52:765–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 6:1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Davison SC, Snell SA, Snow CC (1998) When groups consist of multiple nationalities: Towards a new understanding of the implications. Organ. Stud. 19:181–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37:422–447.Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Bechky BA (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving in groups. Organ. Sci. 17:484–502.Link, Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42:716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
• House RJ, Hanges PJ, Javidan M, Dorfman PW, Gupta V, eds. (2004) Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Hulsheger UR, Anderson N, Salgado JF (2009) Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. J. Appl. Psych. 94:1128–1145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• IBM (2010) Capitalizing on complexity: Insights from the global chief executive officer study. Report, IBM Global Business Services, Somers, NY.Google Scholar
• James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G (1993) rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. J. Appl. Psych. 78:306–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Roh H (2009) The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Acad. Management J. 52:599–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane GC, Borgatti SP (2011) Centrality-IS proficiency alignment and workgroup performance. MIS Quart. 35:1063–1078.Google Scholar
• Keller RT (2001) Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Acad. Management J. 44:547–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koestler A (1964) The Act of Creation (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SWJ, Klein KJ (2000) A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations (Josey-Bass, San Franisisco), 3–90.Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D, Stern RN (1988) Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Soc. Psych. Quart. 51:123–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leung AK, Maddox W, Galinsky AD, Chiu CY (2008) Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. Amer. Psychologist 63:169–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin DZ, Cross R (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. 50:1477–1491.Link, Google Scholar
• Lin N, Ensel WM, Vaughn JC (1981) Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 46:393–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lount RB, Phillips KW (2007) Working harder with the out-group: The impact of social category diversity on motivational gains. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103:214–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovelace K, Shapiro DL, Weingart LR (2001) Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Acad. Management J. 44:779–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lydon JE, Jamieson DW, Holmes JG (1997) The meaning of social interactions in the transition from acquaintanceship to friendship. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 73:536–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maddux WW, Galinsky AD (2009) Cultural borders and the mental barriers: The relationship between living abroad and creativity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 96:1047–1061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus HR, Kitayama S (1991) Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psych. Rev. 98:234–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsden PV (1990) Network data and measurement. Annual Rev. Sociol. 16:435–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsden PV, Campbell KE (1984) Measuring tie strength. Soc. Forces 63:482–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu M, Maynard MT, Rapp T, Gilson LG (2008) Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J. Management 34:410–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Dixon AL, Brass DJ, Robertson B (2006) The social network ties of group leaders: Implications for group performance and leader reputation. Organ. Sci. 17:64–79.Link, Google Scholar
• Mesner-Magnus JR, DeChurch LA (2009) Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 59:535–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mueller JS, Kamdar D (2011) Why seeking help from teammates is a blessing and a curse: A theory of help seeking and individual creativity in team contexts. J. Appl. Psych. 96:263–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mumford MD, Gustafson SB (1988) Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psych. Bull. 103:27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F (2004) The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the laboratory life. Res. Policy 33:643–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RE (1989) The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. Acad. Management J. 32:377–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh H, Chung M, Labianca G (2004) Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Acad. Management J. 47:860–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oldham GR, Cummings A (1996) Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Acad. Management J. 39:607–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2002) Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organization. Organ. Sci. 13:249–273.Link, Google Scholar
• Osborn AF (1957) Applied Imagination, revised ed. (Scribner, New York).Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE (2006) Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad. Management J. 49:85–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE, Shalley CE (2003) The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 28:89–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettigrew TF (1998) Intergroup contact theory. Annual Rev. Psych. 49:65–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW (2003) The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence: The importance of congruence. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 29:3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Loyd DL (2006) When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects of dissenting group members. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 99:143–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Mannix EA, Neale MA, Gruenfield DH (2004) Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 40:497–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (2001) Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. 107:33–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1991) Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. J. Management 12:95–117.Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41:116–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quinn RW (2005) Flow in knowledge work: High performance experience in the design of national security technology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50:610–641.Google Scholar
• Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48:240–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman EW (2001) Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. 12:502–517.Link, Google Scholar
• Reis H, Shaver P (1988) Intimacy as an interpersonal process. Duck SW, ed. Handbook of Personal Relationships (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 367–389.Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (1983) Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Runco MA (2004) Creativity. Annual Rev. Psych. 55:657–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Burks J, Bartel CA, Blount S (2009) Performance in intercultural interactions at work: Cross-cultural differences in response to behavioral mirroring. J. Appl. Psych. 94:216–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schon DA (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J (1934) The Theory of Economic Development (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Scott J (2000) Social Network Analysis: A Handbook (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Seibert SE, Kraimer ML, Liden RC (2001) A social capital theory of career success. Acad. Management J. 44:219–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selfhout M, Denissen J, Branje S, Meeus W (2009) In the eye of the beholder: Perceived, actual, and peer-rated similarity in personality, communication, and friendship intensity during the acquaintanceship process. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 96:1152–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalley CE (1995) Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Acad. Management J. 38:483–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Perry-Smith JE (2001) Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 84:1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Perry-Smith JE (2008) The emergence of team creative cognition: The role of diverse outside ties, sociocognitive network centrality, and team evolution. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 2:23–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Zhou J (2008) Organizational creativity research: A historical review. Zhou J, Shalley CE, eds. Handbook of Organizational Creativity (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 3–31.Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Gilson LL, Blum TC (2000) Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: Effects of satisfaction and intention to leave. Acad. Management J. 43:215–2323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singley MK, Anderson JR (1989) The Transfer of Cognitive Skill (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sommers SR (2006) On racial diversity and group decision making: Identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90:597–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sparrowe R, Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Kraimer ML (2001) Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad. Management J. 44:316–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Austin WG, Worchel S, eds. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA), 7–24.Google Scholar
• Tan BCY, Wei K-K, Watson RT, Clapper DL, McLean ER (1998) Computer-mediated communication and majority influence: Assessing the impact in an individualistic and collectivistic culture. Management Sci. 44:1263–1278.Link, Google Scholar
• Tierney P, Farmer SM, Graen GB (1999) An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psych. 52:591–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Triandis HC (1989) The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psych. Rev. 96:269–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W (2001) Knowledge transfer in intra-organizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Management J. 44:996–1004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner JC (1975) Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behavior. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 5:5–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Der Vegt GS, Bunderson JS (2005) Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Acad. Management J. 48:532–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Dick R, van Knippenberg D, Hägele S, Guillaume YRF, Brodbeck FC (2008) Group diversity and group identification: The moderating role of diversity beliefs. Human Relations 61:1463–1492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward TB (1995) What’s old about new ideas? Smith SM, Ward TB, Finke RA, eds. The Creative Cognition Approach (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 157–178.Google Scholar
• Ward TB, Smith SM, Finke RA (1999) Creative cognition. Sternberg J, ed. Handbook of Creativity (Cambridge University Press, New York), 189–212.Google Scholar
• Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, Griffin RW (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad. Management Rev. 18:293–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yuan F, Woodman RW (2010) Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Acad. Management J. 53:323–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou J (1998) Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects of creative performance. J. Appl. Psych. 83:261–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou J (2003) When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. J. Appl. Psych. 99:413–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou J, George JM (2001) When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Acad. Management J. 44:682–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Shalley CE (2008) Expanding the scope and impact of organizational creativity research. Zhou J, Shalley CE, eds. Handbook of Organizational Creativity (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York), 347–368.Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Shin SJ, Brass DJ, Choi J, Zhang ZX (2009) Social networks, personal values, and creativity: Evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects. J. Appl. Psych. 29:1544.Crossref, Google Scholar