The Replication Dilemma Unravelled: How Organizations Enact Multiple Goals in Routine Transfer

References

• Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1999) Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. 10(1):43–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Akrich M (1992) The de-scription of technical objects. Bijker WE, Law J, eds. Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 205–224.Google Scholar
• Argote L, Darr E (2000) Repositories of knowledge in franchise organizations: Individual, structural and technological. Dosi G, Nelson RR, Winter SG, eds. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (Oxford University Press, New York), 51–68.Google Scholar
• Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: A basis for the competitive advantage of firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartlett CA, Ghoshal S (1989) Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tushman ML (2003) Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. 28(2):238–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birnholtz JP, Cohen MD, Hoch SV (2007) Organizational character: On the regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove. Organ. Sci. 18(2):315–332.Link, Google Scholar
• Blau P (1955) The Dynamics of Bureaucracy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. 2(1):40–57.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, Burkhart R, Dosi G, Egidi M, Marengo L, Warglien M, Winter SG (1996) Routines and other recurring patterns of organisations: Contemporary research issues. Indust. Corp. Change 5(3):653–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1992) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA). [Orig. published 1963.]Google Scholar
• D’Adderio L (2008) The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Res. Policy 37(5):769–789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Adderio L (2011) Artifacts at the centre of routines: Performing the material turn in routines theory. J. Inst. Econom. 7(2):197–230.Google Scholar
• D’Adderio L, Feldman MS, Lazaric N, Pentland BT (2012) Call for papers—Special issue on routine dynamics: Exploring sources of stability and change in organizations. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1782–1783.Link, Google Scholar
• Darr ED, Argote L, Epple D (1995) The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. 41(11):1750–1762.Link, Google Scholar
• Dionysios D, Tsoukas H (2013) Understanding the (re)creation of routines from within: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 38(2):181–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2009) Hoping for A to Z while rewarding only A: Complex organizations and multiple goals. Organ. Sci. 20(1):4–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Farjoun M (2010) Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Acad. Management Rev. 35(2):202–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11(6):611–629.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2003) A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Indust. Corp. Change 12(4):727–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2004) Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organ. Sci. 15(3):295–309.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman M, Orlikowski W (2011) Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1240–1253.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Rafaeli A (2002) Organizational routines as sources of connections and understandings. J. Management Stud. 39(3):309–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson JJ (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies of Qualitative Research (Wiedenfeld & Nicholson, London).Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):481–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta AK, Smith KG, Shalley CE (2006) The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. 49(4):693–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville JA (2005) The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. 16(6):618–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Hutchby I (2001) Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology 35(2):441–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M, West J (2003) Experience, experimentation, and the accumulation of knowledge: The evolution of R&D in the semiconductor industry. Res. Policy 32(5):809–825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen RJ, Szulanski G (2007) Template use and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Management Sci. 53(11):1716–1730.Link, Google Scholar
• Langley A, Tsoukas H (2010) Introducing “perspectives on process organization studies.” Hernes T, Maitlis S, eds. Process, Sensemaking, and Organizing (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latour B (1987) Science in Action (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Latour B (1992) Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artefacts. Bijker WE, Law J, eds. Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 225–258.Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Love JF (1995) McDonald’s: Behind the Arches, revised ed. (Batnam Books, New York).Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• March JG (1996) Continuity and change in theories of organizational learning. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(2):278–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus ML, Silver MS (2008) A foundation for the study of IT effects: A new look at DeSanctis and Poole’s concepts of structural features and spirit. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 9(10/11):609–632.Google Scholar
• McDonald CJ (1998) The evolution of Intel’s Copy EXACTLY! technology transfer method. Intel Tech. J. 4(Quarter 4):1–6.Google Scholar
• Meyer MW (2002) Rethinking Performance Measurement: Beyond the Balanced Scorecard (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Nag R, Corley KG, Gioia DA (2007) The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Acad. Management J. 50(4):821–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Okhuysen GA, Bechky BA (2009) Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):463–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2002) Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3):249–273.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2008) Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):433–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS (2005) Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Indust. Corp. Change 14(5):793–815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS (2008) Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Inform. Organ. 18(4):235–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Rueter HH (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):484–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS, Becker MC, Liu P (2012) Dynamics of organizational routines: A generative model. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1484–1508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raisch S, Birkinshaw JB, Probst G, Tushman ML (2009) Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ. Sci. 20(4):685–695.Link, Google Scholar
• Rerup C, Feldman MS (2011) Routines as a source of change in organizational schema: The role of trial-and-error learning. Acad. Management J. 54(3):577–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW (2001) Reproducing knowledge: Replication without imitation at moderate complexity. Organ. Sci. 12(3):274–293.Link, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69:99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suchman L (1987) Plans and Situated Action: The Problem of Human-Machine Interaction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Suchman L (2007) Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Suddaby R (2006) What grounded theory is not. Acad. Management J. 49(4):633–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G, Jensen RJ (2004) Overcoming stickiness: An empirical investigation of the role of the template in the replication of organizational routines. Managerial Decision Econom. 25(6–7):347–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G, Jensen RJ (2006) Presumptive adaptation and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. 27(10):937–957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G, Jensen RJ (2008) Growing through copying: The negative consequences of innovation on franchise network growth. Res. Policy 37(10):1732–1741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H, Chia R (2002) On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organ. Sci. 13(5):567–582.Link, Google Scholar
• Turner SF, Rindova V (2012) A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organ. Sci. 23(1):24–46.Link, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Poole MS (1995) Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):510–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J (1979) The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):539–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter SG (1995) Four Rs of profitability: Rents, resources, routines, and replication. Montgomery C, ed. Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm—Towards a Synthesis (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), 147–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter SG (2010) The replication perspective on productive knowledge. Itami H, Kusunoki K, Numagami T, Takeishi A, eds. Dynamics of Knowledge, Corporate Systems and Innovation (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 93–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter SG, Szulanski G (2001) Replication as strategy. Organ. Sci. 12(6):730–743.Link, Google Scholar
• Winter SG, Szulanski G, Ringov D, Jensen RJ (2012) Reproducing knowledge: Inaccurate replication and failure in franchise organizations. Organ. Sci. 23(3):672–685.Link, Google Scholar
• Zbaracki MJ, Bergen M (2010) When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price adjustment routines. Organ. Sci. 21(5):955–972.Link, Google Scholar