Paying It Forward vs. Rewarding Reputation: Mechanisms of Generalized Reciprocity

References

• Adler PS, Kwon S-W (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. 27(1):17–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexander RD (1987) The Biology of Moral Systems (de Gruyter, New York).Google Scholar
• Baker W (2012) A dual model of reciprocity in organizations: Moral sentiments and reputation. Cameron K, Spreitzer GM, eds. Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (Oxford University Press, New York), 412–422.Google Scholar
• Baker W, Dutton JE (2007) Enabling positive social capital in organizations. Dutton JE, Ragins BR, eds. Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 325–345.Google Scholar
• Bartlett MY, DeSteno D (2006) Gratitude and prosocial behavior: Helping when it costs you. Psych. Sci. 17(4):319–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendersky C, Shah NP (2012) The cost of status enhancement: Performance effects of individuals’ status mobility in task groups. Organ. Sci. 23(2):308–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Bergeron DM (2007) The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost? Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1074–1095.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blalock HM Jr (1994) Why have we failed to systematize reality’s complexities? Hage J, ed. Formal Theory in Sociology: Opportunity or Pitfall (State University of New York Press, Albany), 121–136.Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1963) The Dynamics of Bureaucracy: A Study of Interpersonal Relationships in Two Government Agencies (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Bolino MC (1999) Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):82–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1989) The evolution of indirect reciprocity. Soc. Networks 11(3):213–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron KS, Spreitzer GM (2012) Introduction: What is positive about positive organizational scholarship? Cameron K, Spreitzer GM, eds. Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (Oxford University Press, New York), 1–14.Google Scholar
• Carlson M, Charlin V, Miller N (1988) Postive mood and helping behavior: A test of six hypotheses. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 55(2):211–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen D, Prusak L (2001) In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Constant D, Sproull L, Kiesler S (1996) The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organ. Sci. 7(2):119–135.Link, Google Scholar
• Cook KS, Rice E (2003) Social exchange theory. DeLamater J, ed. Handbook of Social Psychology (Springer, New York), 53–76.Google Scholar
• Cosslett SR (1981) Maximum likelihood estimator for choice-based samples. Econometrica 49(5):1289–1316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coyle-Shapiro JA-M, Kessler I, Purcell J (2004) Exploring organizationally directed citizenship behaviour: Reciprocity or “it’s my job”? J. Management Stud. 41(1):85–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):448–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cross R, Parker A (2004) The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Das TK, Teng B-S (2002) Alliance constellations: A social exchange perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 27(3):445–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deckop JR, Cirka CC, Andersson LM (2003) Doing unto others: The reciprocity of helping behavior. J. Bus. Ethics 47(2):101–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSteno D, Barlett MY, Baumann J, Williams LA, Dickens A (2010) Gratitude as moral sentiment: Emotion-guided cooperation in economic exchange. Emotion 10(2):289–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Waal FBM (2008) Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Rev. Psych. 59:279–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dufwenberg M, Gneezt U, Güth W, van Damme E (2001) Direct versus indirect reciprocity: An experiment. Homo Oeconomicus 18:19–30.Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2008) Plott CR, Smith VL, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, Vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 509–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel C, De Oliveira ACM, Grossman PJ (2008) Gender and negotiation in the small: Are women (perceived to be) more cooperative than men? Negotiation J. 24(4):429–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ekeh PP (1974) Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Emmons RA, McCullough ME (2003) Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 84(2):377–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fredrickson BL (2001) The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. Amer. Psychologist 56(3):218–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fredrickson BL, Cohn MA (2008) Positive emotions. Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Barrett LF, eds. Handbook of Emotions (Guildford Press, New York), 777–796.Google Scholar
• Gittell JH (2003) The Southwest Airlines Way (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Gouldner AW (1960) The norm of reciprocity. Amer. J. Sociol. 25(2):161–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM (2013) Give and Take: A Revolutionary Approach to Success (Viking, New York).Google Scholar
• Grant A, Gino F (2010) A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 98(6):946–955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray P, Ranta D (2010) Networks of excellence. Cross R, Thomas RJ, Singer J, Colella S, Silverstone Y, eds. The Organizational Network Fieldbook: Best Practices, Techniques, and Exercises to Drive Organizational Innovation and Performance (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 11–21.Google Scholar
• Greiner B, Levati MV (2005) Indirect reciprocity in cyclical networks: An experimental study. J. Econom. Psych. 26(5):711–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg MS (1980) A theory of indebtedness. Gergen KJ, Greenberg MS, Wills RH, eds. Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research (Plenum, New York), 3–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Güth W, Königstein M, Marchand N, Nehring KT (2001) Trust and reciprocity in the investment game with indirect reward. Homo Oeconomicus 18:241–262.Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(2):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C, Sitkin S (2001) Big-B versus Big-O: What is organizational about organizational behavior? J. Organ. Behav. 22(1):43–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck JR, Beersma B, Schouten ME (2012) Beyond team types and taxonomies: A dimensional scaling conceptualization for team description. Acad. Management Rev. 37(1):82–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hyde CR (2000) Pay It Forward (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Imbens GW (1992) An efficient method of moments estimator or discrete choice models with choice-based sampling. Econometrica 60(5):1187–1214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isen AM, Clark M, Schwartz ME (1976) Duration of the effect of good mood on helping: Footprints in the sands of time. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 34(3):385–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2003) The role of network resources in market entry: Commerical banks’ entry into investment banking, 1991–1997. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(3):466–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katzenbach JR, Smith DK (1993) The Wisdom of Teams (Harvard Business School, Boston).Google Scholar
• King G, Zeng L (2001) Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Anal. 9(2):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korsgaard MA, Meglino BM, Lester SW, Jeong SS (2010) Paying you back or paying me forward: Understanding rewarded and unrewarded organizational citizenship behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 95(2):277–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D, Stern NS (1988) Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Soc. Psych. Quart. 51(2):123–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lancaster T, Imbens G (1996) Efficient esimtation and stratified sampling. J. Econometics 74(2):289–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine SS, Prietula MJ (2012) How knowledge transfer impacts performance: A multi-level model of benefits and liabilities. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1748–1766.Link, Google Scholar
• McCullough ME, Kimeldorf MB, Cohen AD (2008) An adaptation for altruism: The social causes, social effects, and social evolution of gratitude. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 17(4):281–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDermott R, Archibald D (2010) Harnessing your staff’s informal networks. Harvard Bus. Rev. 88(March):82–89.Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27:415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meglino BM, Korsgaard MA (2004) Considering rational self-interest as a disposition: Organizational implications of other orientation. J. Appl. Psych. 89(6):946–959.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milinski M, Semmann D, Bakker TCM, Krambeck H (2001) Cooperation through indirect reciprocity: Image scoring or standing strategy? Proc. Biol. Sci. 268(1484):2495–2501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molm LD, Collett JL, Schaefer DR (2007) Building solidarity through generalized exchange: A theory of reciprocity. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(1):205–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW (1994) Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective. Acad. Management J. 37(6):1543–1567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mueller JS, Kamdar D (2011) Why seeking help from teammates is a blessing and a curse: A theory of help seeking and individual creativity in team contexts. J. Appl. Psych. 96(2):263–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nowak MA, Roch S (2007) Upstream reciprocity and the evolution of gratitude. Proc. Biol. Sci. 274(1610):605–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nowak MA, Sigmund K (1998a) Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature 393(6685):573–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nowak MA, Sigmund K (1998b) The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. J. Theoret. Biol. 194(4):561–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nowak MA, Sigmund K (2005) Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature 437(7063):1291–1298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Organ DW (1988) Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Solider Syndrome (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA).Google Scholar
• Organ DW (1997) Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance 10(2):85–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penner LA, Dovidio JF, Piliavin JA, Schroeder DA (2005) Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Rev. Psych. 56:365–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Paine JB, Bachrach DG (2000) Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. J. Management 26(3):513–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff NP, Whiting SW, Podsakoff PM, Mishra P (2010) Effects of organizational citizenship behaviors on selection decisions in employment interviews. J. Appl. Psych. 96(2):310–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putnam RD (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (Simon & Schuster, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts LM (2005) Changing faces: Professional image construction in diverse organizational settings. Acad. Management Rev. 30(4):685–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Sönmez T, Ünver MU (2004) Kidney exchange. Quart. J. Econom. 119(2):457–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seinen I, Schram A (2006) Social status and group norms: Indirect reciprocity in a repeated helping experiment. Eur. Econom. Rev. 50(3):581–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheldon KM, Lyubomirsky S (2006) How to increase and sustain positive emotion: The effects of expressing gratitude and visualizing best possible selves. J. Positive Psych. 1(2):73–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simpson B, Willer R (2008) Altruism and indirect reciprocity: The interaction of person and situation in prosocial behavior. Soc. Psych. Quart. 71(1):37–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Stuart TE (2001) Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(6):1546–1588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spreitzer GM, Cameron KS (2012) A path forward: Assessing progress and exploring core questions for the future of positive organizational scholarship. Cameron K, Spreitzer GM, eds. Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (Oxford University Press, New York), 1034–1048.Google Scholar
• Tomz M, King G, Zeng L (2003) ReLogit: Rare events logistic regression. J. Statist. Software 8(2):137–163.Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wedekind C, Milinski M (2000) Cooperation through image scoring in humans. Science 288(5467):850–852.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Weick K (1992) Agenda setting in organizational behavior: A theory-focused approach. J. Management Inquiry 1(3):171–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinzweig A (2010) A Lapsed Anarchist’s Approach to Building a Great Business (Zingerman’s Press, Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
• Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder WM (2002) Cultivating Communities of Practice (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Zinko R, Ferris GR, Humphrey SE, Meyer CJ, Aime F (2012) Personal reputation in organizations: Two-study constructive replication and extension of antecedents and consequences. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 85(1):156–180.Crossref, Google Scholar