Knowing Your Place: Social Performance Feedback in Good Times and Bad Times

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0923

References

  • Adner R, Helfat CE (2003) Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management J. 24:1011–1025.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alesina A, La Ferrara E (2002) Who trusts others? J. Political Econom. 85:207–234.Google Scholar
  • Anderson HH, Brandt HF (1939) Study of motivation involving self-announced goals of fifth grade children and the concept of level of aspiration. J. Soc. Psych. 10:209–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Audia PG, Greve HR (2006) Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Sci. 52:83–94.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barros CP, Ibrahimo M, Symanski S, eds. (2002) The Comparative Economics of North American and European Sports (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Google Scholar
  • Baum JAC, Dahlin KB (2007) Aspiration performance and railroads’ patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organ. Sci. 18:368–385.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baum JAC, Rowley TJ, Shipilov AV, Chuang Y-T (2005) Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50:536–575.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beck N, Meyer M (2012) Modeling team performance. Empirical Econom. 43:335–356.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beck N, Brüderl J, Woywode M (2008) Momentum or deceleration? Theoretical and methodological reflections on the analysis of organizational change. Acad. Management J. 51:413–435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berman SL, Down J, Hill CWL (2002) Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the National Basketball Association. Acad. Management J. 45:13–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bothner MS, Kang J, Stuart TE (2007) Competitive crowding and risk taking in a tournament: Evidence from NASCAR racing. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52:208–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyle E, Shapira Z (2012) The liability of leading: Battling aspiration and survival goals in the Jeopardy! Tournament of Champions. Organ. Sci. 23:1100–1113.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brenner L, Rottenstreich Y, Sood S (1999) Comparison, grouping, and preference. Psych. Sci. 10:225–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bromiley P (1991) Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. 34:37–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buunk AP, Gibbons FX (2007) Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 102:3–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen WR, Miller KD (2007) Situational and institutional determinants of firms’ R&D search intensity. Strategic Management J. 28:369–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cleaver J (2003) Lust for lists. Workforce 82(5):44.Google Scholar
  • Connelly BL, Tihanyi L, Crook TR, Gangloff KA (2014) Tournament theory: Thirty years of contests and competitions. J. Management 40:16–47.Google Scholar
  • Corley K, Gioia D (2000) The rankings game: Managing business school reputation. Corporate Reputation Rev. 3:319–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, 2nd ed. (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
  • Deutsche Fußball Liga GmbH (2006) Bundesliga report 2006. Report, CLAUSEN + REITSMA Medienwerkstatt GmbH, Euskirchen, Germany.Google Scholar
  • DiPrete TA, Eirich GM, Pittinsky M (2010) Compensation benchmarking, leapfrogs, and the surge in executive pay. Amer. J. Sociol. 115:1671–1712.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsbach KD, Kramer RM (1996) Members’ response to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the Business Week rankings. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41:442–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7:117–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiegenbaum A, Thomas H (1990) Strategic groups and performance: The U.S. insurance industry, 1970–84. Strategic Management J. 11:197–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiegenbaum A, Thomas H (1995) Strategic groups as reference groups: Theory, modeling, and empirical examination of industry and competitive strategy. Strategic Management J. 16:461–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiegenbaum A, Hart S, Schendel D (1996) Strategic reference point theory. Strategic Management J. 17:219–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fombrun CJ, Zajac EJ (1987) Structural and perceptual influences on intraindustry stratification. Acad. Management J. 30:33–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Förster J, Grant H, Idson LC, Higgins ET (2001) Success/failure feedback, expectanices, and approach/avoidance motivation: How regulatory focus moderates classic relations. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 37:253–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garcia SM, Tor A, Gonzalez R (2006) Ranks and rivals: A theory of competition. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 32:970–982.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson C, Vermeulen F (2003) A healthy divide: Subgroup strength as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48:202–239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gioia DA, Corley KG (2002) Being good versus looking good: Business school rankings and the Circean transformation from substance to image. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 1:107–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goethals GR, Darley J (1977) Social comparison theory: An attributional approach. Suls JM, Miller RL, eds. Social Comparison Process: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives (Hemisphere, Washington, DC), 259–278.Google Scholar
  • Gooding RZ, Goel S, Wiseman M (1996) Fixed versus variable reference points in the risk-return relationship. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 29:331–350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene WH (2008) Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Greve HR (1998) Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43:58–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR (2003a) A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Acad. Management J. 46:685–702.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR (2003b) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hammer M (1996) Beyond Reengineering: How the Process-Centered Organization Is Changing Our Work and Our Lives (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
  • Heath C, Huddart S, Lang M (1999) Psychological factors and stock option exercise. Quart. J. Econom. 114:601–627.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman PJ, Festinger L, Lawrence DH (1954) Tendencies toward group comparability in competitive bargaining. Human Relations 7:141–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holcomb TR, Holmes RM Jr, Connelly BL (2009) Making the most of what you have: Managerial ability as a source of resource value creation. Strategic Management J. 30:457–485.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu S, Blettner D, Bettis RA (2011) Adaptive aspirations: Performance consequences of risk preferences at extremes and alternative reference groups. Strategic Management J. 32:1426–1436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hunt MS (1972) Competition in the major home appliance industry, 1960–1970. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Isaac MS, Schindler RM (2014) The top-ten effect: Consumers’ subjective categorization of ranked lists. J. Consumer Res. 40:1181–1202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jordan AH, Audia PG (2012) Self-enhancement and learning from performance feedback. Acad. Management Rev. 37:211–231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelley HH (1952) Two functions of reference groups. Swanson G, Newcomb T, Hartley E, eds. Readings in Social Psychology (Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, New York), 410–414.Google Scholar
  • Ketchen DJ Jr, Palmer TB (1999) Strategic responses to poor organizational performance: A test of competing perspectives. J. Management 25:683–706.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Labianca G, Fairbank JF, Andrevski G, Parzen M (2009) Striving toward the future: Aspiration-performance discrepancies and planned organizational change. Strategic Organ. 7:433–466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lant TK (1992) Aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Sci. 38:623–644.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lehner JM (2000) Shifts of reference points for framing of strategic decisions and changing risk-return associations. Management Sci. 46:63–76.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D, March JG (1981) A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 2:307–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Shapira Z (1987) Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Sci. 33:1404–1418.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Shapira Z (1992) Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psych. Rev. 99:172–183.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Martins LL (2005) A model of the effects of reputational rankings on organizational change. Organ. Sci. 16:701–720.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Massini S, Lewin AY, Greve HR (2005) Innovators and imitators: Organizational reference groups and adoption of organizational routines. Res. Policy 34:1550–1569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Medvec VH, Madey SF, Gilovich T (1995) When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medalists. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 69:603–610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mezias SJ, Chen Y-R, Murphy PR (2002) Aspiration-level adaptation in an American financial services organization: A field study. Management Sci. 48:1285–1300.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miller KD, Chen WR (2004) Variable organizational risk preferences: Test of the March-Shapira model. Acad. Management J. 47:105–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moliterno TP, Beckman CM (2011) Behavioral and cognitive microfoundations of dynamic managerial capabilities: A multilevel structure. Working paper, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst.Google Scholar
  • Moliterno TP, Wiersema MF (2007) Firm performance, rent appropriation, and the strategic resource divestment capability. Strategic Management J. 28:1065–1087.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nyberg AJ, Moliterno TP, Hale D, Lepak DP (2014) Resource-based perspectives on unit-level human capital: A review and integration. J. Management 40:316–346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18:187–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olson CA, Schwab A (2000) The performance effects of human resource practices: The case of interclub networks in professional baseball, 1919–1940. Indust. Relations 39:553–577.Google Scholar
  • Panagiotou G (2007) Reference theory: Strategic groups and competitive benchmarking. Management Decision 45:1595–1621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J (1985) Organizational demography: Implications for management. Calif. Management Rev. 28:76–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ployhart RE, Moliterno TP (2011) Emergence of the human capital resource: A multilevel model. Acad. Management Rev. 36:127–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porac JF, Thomas H, Baden-Fuller C (1989) Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of the Scottish knitwear industry. J. Management Stud. 26:397–416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porac JF, Wade JB, Pollock TG (1999) Industry categories and the politics of the comparable firm in CEO compensation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44:112–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reger RK, Huff AS (1993) Strategic groups: A cognitive perspective. Strategic Management J. 14:103–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sauder M, Espeland WN (2009) The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74:63–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schimmer M, Brauer M (2012) Firm performance and aspiration levels as determinants of a firm’s strategic repositioning within strategic group structures. Strategic Organ. 10:406–435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shibutani T (1955) Reference groups as perspectives. Amer. J. Sociol. 60:562–569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shinkle GA (2012) Organizational aspirations, reference points, and goals: Building on the past and aiming for the future. J. Management 31:415–455.Google Scholar
  • Shoham A, Fiegenbaum A (2002) Competitive determinants of organisational risk-taking attitude: The role of strategic reference points. Management Decision 40:127–141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Short JC, Palmer TB (2003) Organizational performance referents: An empirical examination of their content and influences. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 9:209–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sirmon DG, Hitt MA (2009) Contingencies within dynamic managerial capabilities: Interdependent effects of resource investment and deployment on firm performance. Strategic Management J. 30:1375–1394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sirmon DG, Gove S, Hitt MA (2008) Resource management in dyadic competitive rivalry: The effects of resource bundling and deployment. Acad. Management J. 51:919–935.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sirmon DG, Hitt MA, Ireland RD (2007) Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Acad. Management Rev. 32:273–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw BM, Sandelands LE, Dutton JE (1981) Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26:501–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuttgarter Nachrichten (2007) Drei Clubs entfliehen der Tristesse. Die halbe Liga zittert vor dem Absturz, aber der HSV, Hannover and Mainz setzen zum Höhenflug an. (February 26) 27.Google Scholar
  • Washburn M, Bromiley P (2012) Comparing aspiration models: The role of selective attention. J. Management Stud. 49:896–917.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams KY, O’Reilly CAI (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Cummings LL, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 20 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 77–140.Google Scholar
  • Wiseman RM, Bromiley P (1996) Toward a model of risk in declining organizations: An empirical examination of risk, performance and decline. Organ. Sci. 7:524–543.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wood JV (1989) Theory and research concerning social comparison of personal attributes. Psych. Bull. 106:231–248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.