Identity Orientation, Social Exchange, and Information Technology Use in Interorganizational Collaborations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0924

References

  • Albert S, Ashforth BE, Dutton JE (2000) Organizational identity and identification: Charting new waters and building new bridges. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):13–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alvesson M, Ashcraft KL, Thomas R (2008) Identity matters: Reflections on the construction of identity scholarship in organization studies. Organization 15(1):5–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anteby M (2008) Identity incentives as an engaging form of control: Revisiting leniencies in an aeronautic plant. Organ. Sci. 19(2):202–220.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barrett M, Walsham G (1999) Electronic trading and work transformations in the London insurance market. Inform. Systems Res. 10(1):1–22.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baxter R (2008) Developing middle range accounts of IT impact: Theoretical analysis and a study of 3D CAD use within architecture, engineering, and construction. Ph.D. dissertation, Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland.Google Scholar
  • Beck P (2001) The AEC dilemma—Exploring the barriers to change. Leadership Management Engrg. 1(2):31–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau PM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Boland RJ Jr, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2007) Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering and construction. Organ. Sci. 18(4):631–647.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer MB, Gardner W (1996) Who is the “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 71(1):83–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brickson SL (2005) Organizational identity orientation: Forging a link between organizational identity and organizations’ relations with stakeholders. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(4):576–609.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brickson SL (2007) Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):864–888.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlo JL, Lyytinen K, Boland RJ Jr (2012) Dialectics of collective minding: Contradictory appropriations of information technology in a high-risk project. MIS Quart. 36(4):1081–1108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Creed WED, Scully MA, Austin JR (2002) Clothes make the person? The tailoring of legitimating accounts and the social construction of identity. Organ. Sci. 13(5):475–496.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton JE, Dukerich JM (1991) Keeping an eye on the mirror: The role of image and identity in organizational adaptation. Acad. Management J. 34(3):517–554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case studies. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Google Scholar
  • Emirbayer M (1997) Manifesto for a relational sociology. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(2):281–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S, Azad B (2012) The Materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. Leonardi PM, Nardi BA, Kallinikos J, eds. Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, Chapter 12 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiol CM, Huff AS (1992) Maps for manager: Where are we? Where do we go from here? J. Management Stud. 29(3):267–285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flynn FJ (2005) Identity orientation and forms of social exchange in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 30(4):737–750.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gal U, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2008) The dynamics of IT boundary objects, information infrastructures, and organizational identities: The introduction of 3D modeling technologies into the architecture, engineering, and construction industry. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 17(3):290–304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson JJ (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Gioia DA, Schultz M, Corley KG (2000) Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):63–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glynn MA (2000) When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organ. Sci. 11(3):285–298.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hall S (1996) Who needs “identity”? Hall S, du Gay P, eds. Questions of Cultural Identity (Sage, London), 1–17.Google Scholar
  • Hinds PJ, Mortensen M (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. 16(3):290–307.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu G, Hannan MT (2005) Identities, genres, and organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 16(5):474–490.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hutchby I (2003) Affordances and the analysis of technologically mediated interaction: A response to Brian Rappert. Sociology 37(3):581–589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein HK, Myers MD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quart. 23(1):67–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lamb R, Davidson E (2005) Information and communication technology challenges to scientific professional identity. Inform. Soc. 21(1):1–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2011) When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordances, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quart. 35(1):147–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2012) Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they related? Do we need them? Leonardi PM, Nardi BA, Kallinikos J, eds. Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 25–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra D, Murnighan JK (2002) The effects of contracts on interpersonal trust. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(3):534–559.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus ML, Silver MS (2008) A foundation for the study of IT effects: A new look at DeSanctis and Poole’s concepts of structural features and spirit. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 9(10):609–632.Google Scholar
  • Molm LD, Takahashi N, Peterson G (2000) Risk and trust in social exchange: An experimental test of a classical proposition. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(5):1396–1427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Norman DA (2002) The Design of Everyday Things, 1st Basic paperback ed. (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ (2007) Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organ. Stud. 28(9):1435–1448.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ravasi D, Schultz M (2006) Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Acad. Management J. 49(3):433–458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reger RK, Gustafson LT, DeMarie SM, Mullane JV (1994) Reframing the organization: Why implementing total quality is easier said than done. Acad. Management Rev. 19(3):565–584.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tripsas M (2009) Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of “The Digital Photography Company.” Organ. Sci. 20(2):441–460.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Walsham G (1993) Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
  • Walsham G (1998) IT and changing professional identity: Micro-studies and macro-theory. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 49(12):1081–1089.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yap AY, Ngwenyama O, Osei-Bryson K-M (2003) Leveraging knowledge representation, usage, and interpretation to help reengineer the product development life cycle: Visual computing and the tacit dimensions of product development. Comput. Industry 51(1):89–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yin KR (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Yoo Y, Boland RJ Jr, Lyytinen K (2006) From organization design to organization designing. Organ. Sci. 17(2):215–229.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yoo Y, Boland RJ Jr, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1389–1408.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zammuto RF, Griffith TL, Majchrzak A, Dougherty DJ, Faraj S (2007) Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18(5):749–762.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.