Institutional Logics and Interorganizational Learning in Technological Arenas: Evidence from Standard-Setting Organizations in the Mobile Handset Industry

References

• Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Gittelman M (2006) Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(4):774–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1123–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tushman ML (2002) Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(4):676–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouty I (2000) Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Acad. Management J. 43(1):50–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cawson A (1986) Corporatism and Political Theory (Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Conway P, Nicoletti G (2006) Product market regulation in non-manufacturing sectors in OECD countries: Measurement and highlights. OECD Economics Department Working Paper 530, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin FR (1994) Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain and France in the Railway Age (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedland R, Alford RR (1991) Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 223–262.Google Scholar
• Funk JL (2009) The co-evolution of technology and methods of standard setting: The case of the mobile phone industry. J. Evolution. Econom. 19(1):73–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Funk JL, Methe D (2001) Market- and committee-based mechanisms in the creation and diffusion of global industry standards: The case of mobile communication. Res. Policy 30(4):589–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Greve HR, Levinthal DA, Ocasio W (2012) The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodrick E, Reay T (2011) Constellations of institutional logics: Changes in the professional work of pharmacists. Work Occupations 38(3):372–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (1997) Econometric Analysis (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Suddaby R (2006) Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Acad. Management J. 49(1):27–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Raynard M, Kodeih F, Micelotta ER, Lounsbury M (2011) Institutional complexity and organizational response. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):317–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Gargiulo M (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1439–1493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA (2003) Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. 1(1):51–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hicks A, Kenworthy L (1998) Cooperation and political economic performance in affluent democratic capitalism. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(6):1631–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• International Telecommunications Union (2004) World Telecommunication Indicators (International Telecommunications Union, Geneva).Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):984–1001.Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):577–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jepperson RL (2002) Political modernities: Disentangling two underlying dimensions of institutional differentiation. Sociol. Theory 20(1):61–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jepperson RL, Meyer JW (1991) The public order and the construction of formal organizations. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 204–231.Google Scholar
• Katila R, Chen EL (2008) Effects of search timing on innovation: The value of not being in sync with rivals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):593–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katzenstein PJ (1985) Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
• Kenworthy L (2000) Quantitative indicators of corporatism: A survey and assessment. Discussion paper, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, Germany.Google Scholar
• Kraatz MS, Block ES (2008) Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin-Andersson K, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 243–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Miller SR (2008) Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 19(4):623–646.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee LF (1983) Generalized econometric models with selectivity. Econometrica 51(2):507–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiponen AE (2006) National styles in the setting of global standards: The relationship between firms’ standardization strategies and national origin. Zysman J, Newman A, eds. How Revolutionary was the Revolution? National Responses, Market Transitions, and Global Technology in the Digital Era (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 338–360.Google Scholar
• Leiponen AE (2008) Competing through cooperation: The organization of standard setting in wireless telecommunications. Management Sci. 54(11):1904–1919.Link, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14(1):319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebeskind JP, Oliver AL, Zucker L, Brewer M (1996) Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organ. Sci. 7(4):428–443.Link, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M (2007) A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalization of mutual funds. Acad. Management J. 50(2):289–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo X (2007) Continuous learning: The influence of national institutional logics on training attitudes. Organ. Sci. 18(2):280–296.Link, Google Scholar
• Macher J, Mowery DC, Di Minin A (2007) The “non-globalization” of innovation in the semiconductor industry. Calif. Management Rev. 50(1):217–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• McPherson CM, Sauder M (2013) Logics in action: Managing institutional complexity in a drug court. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(2):165–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2008) Networks and institutions. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, Sahlin K, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 594–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pache A-C, Santos P (2013) Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Acad. Management J. 56(4):972–1001.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelps C (2010) A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Acad. Management J. 53(4):890–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ranganathan R, Rosenkopf L (2014) Do ties really bind? The effect of knowledge and commercialization networks on opposition to standards. Acad. Management J. 57(2):515–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Régibeau P, Rockett K (2010) Innovation cycles and learning at the patent office: Does the early patent get the delay? J. Indust. Econom. 58(2):222–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49(6):751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Metiu A, George VP (2001) From the bottom up? Technical committee activity and alliance formation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):748–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rysman M, Simcoe T (2008) Patents and the performance of voluntary standard setting organizations. Management Sci. 54(11):1920–1934.Link, Google Scholar
• Sampson RC (2007) R&D alliances and firm performance: The impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Acad. Management J. 50(2):364–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmitter PC (1981) Interest intermediation and regime governability in contemporary Western Europe and North America. Berger SD, ed. Organizing Interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism and the Transformation of Politics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 287–330.Google Scholar
• Schofer V, Fourcade-Gourinchas M (2001) The structural contexts of civic engagement: Voluntary association membership in comparative perspective. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 66(6):806–828.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (1998) Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Sci. 44(4):571–585.Link, Google Scholar
• Simcoe T (2012) Standard setting committees: Consensus governance for shared technology platforms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):305–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spencer JW, Murtha TP, Lenway SA (2005) How governments matter to new industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. 30(2):321–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stryker S, Burke PJ (2000) The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Soc. Psych. Quart. 63(4):284–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Podolny JM (1996) Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management J. 17(1):21–38.Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(1):27–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tate J (2001) National varieties of standardization. Hall PA, Soskice D, eds. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 442–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH (2002) The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity institutional logics. Acad. Management J. 45(1):81–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W (1999) Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(3):801–844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML (1977) Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(4):587–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1992) Global Standards: Building Blocks for the Future, TCT-512 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Polley DE, Garud R, Venkataraman S (1999) The Innovation Journey (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Vasudeva G, Anand J (2011) Unpacking absorptive capacity: A study of knowledge utilization from alliance portfolios. Acad. Management J. 54(3):611–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vasudeva G, Spencer JW, Teegen HJ (2013) Bringing the institutional context back in: A cross-national comparison of alliance partner selection and knowledge acquisition. Organ. Sci. 24(2):319–338.Link, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, Ireland RD, Hitt MA (2000) International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Acad. Management J. 43(5):925–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeng M, Chen X (2003) Achieving cooperation in multiparty alliances: A social dilemma approach to partnership management. Acad. Management Rev. 28(4):587–605.Crossref, Google Scholar