Is It Me or Her? How Gender Composition Evokes Interpersonally Sensitive Behavior on Collaborative Cross-Boundary Projects

References

• Aguinis H, Pierce CA, Culpepper SA (2009) Scale coarseness as a methodological artifact: Correcting correlation coefficients attenuated from using coarse scales. Organ. Res. Methods 12(4):623–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ambady N, Koo J, Lee F, Rosenthal R (1996) More than words: Linguistic and nonlinguistic politeness in two cultures. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 70(5):996–1011.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psych. Bull. 103(3):411–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Rothbard NP, Piderit SK, Dutton JE (1998) Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):23–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atkins PWB, Parker SK (2012) Understanding individual compassion in organizations: The role of appraisals and psychological flexibility. Acad. Management. Rev. 37(4):524–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP, Edwards JR (1998) A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organ. Res. Methods 1(1):45–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP, Yi Y, Phillips LW (1991) Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(3):421–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barclay P (2010) Altruism as a courtship display: Some effects of third-party generosity on audience perceptions. British J. Psych. 101(1):123–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barreto M, Ellemers N, Piebinga L, Moya M (2010) How nice of us and how dumb of me: The effect of exposure to benevolent sexism on women’s task and relational self-descriptions. Sex Roles 62(7–8):532–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel CA, Wrzesniewski A, Wiesenfeld B (2012) Knowing where you stand: Physical isolation, perceived respect, and organizational identification among virtual employees. Organ. Sci. 23(3):743–757.Link, Google Scholar
• Bartunek JM, Walsh K, Lacey CA (2000) Dynamics and dilemmas of women leading women. Organ. Sci. 11(6):589–610.Link, Google Scholar
• Batson CD (2011) Altruism in Humans (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Batson CD, Turk CL, Shaw LL, Klein TR (1995) Information function of empathic emotion: Learning that we value the other’s welfare. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 68(2):300–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker JC, Glick P, Ilic M, Bohner G (2011) Damned if she does, damned if she doesn’t: Consequences of accepting versus confronting patronizing help for the female target and male actor. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 41(6):761–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belton LB (2012) CREW (Civility, Respect, and Engagement in the Workplace). Presentation at the 3rd Annual Finger Lakes Dialog on Relational Workplaces, June 2–3, Watkins Glen, NY.Google Scholar
• Betancourt H (1990) An attribution-empathy model of helping behavior: Behavioral intentions and judgments of help-giving. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 16(3):573–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bies RJ, Moag JS (1986) Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Bazerman MH, Lewicki R, Sheppard B, eds. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol. 1 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 43–55.Google Scholar
• Bies RJ, Tripp T (1996) Beyond distrust: “Getting even” and the need for revenge. Kramer RM, Tyler TR, eds. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 246–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blader SL, Chen YR (2012) Differentiating the effects of status and power: A justice perspective. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 102(5):994–1014.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Block JH (1976) Issues, problems and pitfalls in assessing sex differences: A critical review of the psychology of sex differences. Merrill-Palmer Quart. 22(4):283–308.Google Scholar
• Bowles HR, Babcock L, Lai L (2007) Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(1):84–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broverman IK, Broverman DM, Vogel V, Clarkson FE, Rosenkrantz PS (1972) Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. J. Soc. Issues 28(2):59–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown P, Levinson SC, Gumperz JJ (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Studies in Interactional Sciolinguistics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Calhoun C (2000) The virtue of civility. Philos. Public Affairs 29(3):251–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carr A (2010) The most important leadership quality for CEOs? Creativity. Fast Company (May 18) http://www.fastcompany.com/1648943/most-important-leadership-quality-ceos-creativity.Google Scholar
• Catalyst (2009a) 2009 Catalyst census: Fortune 500 women board directors. Report, Catalyst, New York. http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/2009-catalyst-census-fortune-500-women-board-directors-0.Google Scholar
• Catalyst (2009b) 2009 Catalyst census: Fortune 500 women executive officers and top earners. Report, Catalyst, New York. http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/2009-catalyst-census-fortune-500-women-executive-officers-and-top-earners.Google Scholar
• Cejka MA, Eagly AH (1999) Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 25(4):413–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, O’Reilly CA (2004) Asymmetric reactions to work group sex diversity among men and women. Acad. Management J. 47(2):193–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen CC, Choi J, Chi S (2002) Making justice sense of local-expatriate compensation disparity: Mitigation by local referents, ideological explanations, and interpersonal sensitivity in China-foreign joint ventures. Acad. Mangement J. 45(4):807–817.Google Scholar
• Chen Y-R, Blount S, Sanchez-Burks J (2004) The role of status differentials in group synchronization. Mannix EA, Neale MA, eds. Time in Groups, Research on Managing Group and Teams, Vol. 6 (Elsevier, London), 111–133.Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psych. Bull. 112(1):155–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA (2001) On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. J. Appl. Psych. 86(3):386–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, Scott BA, Lepine JA (2007) Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. J. Appl. Psych. 92(4):909–927.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter CO, Ng KY (2001) Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J. Appl. Psych. 86(3):425–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cortina LM, Magley VJ, Williams JH, Langhout RD (2001) Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. J. Occupational Health Psych. 6(64):64–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cottrell NB, Wack DL, Sekerak GJ, Rittle RH (1968) Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audience and the mere presence of others. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 9(3):245–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Wright TA (2003) Procedural justice and organizational staffing: A tale of two paradigms. Human Res. Management Rev. 13(1):7–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cuddy AJC, Fiske ST, Glick P (2004) When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. J. Soc. Issues 60(4):701–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cuddy AJC, Glick P, Beninger A (2011) The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 31(1):73–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cuddy AJC, Fiske ST, Kwan VSY, Glick P, Demoulin S, Leyens JP, Bond MHet al. (2009) Stereotype content model across cultures: Universal similarities and some differences. British J. Soc. Psych. 48(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dardenne B, Dumont M, Bollier T (2007) Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(5):764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darley JM, Latané B (1968) Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 8(4):377–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis MH (1996) Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach (Westview Press, Madison, WI).Google Scholar
• Decety J, Batson CD (2007) Social neuroscience approaches to interpersonal sensitivity. Soc. Neurosci. 2(3–4):151–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Kwaadsteniet EW, van Dijk E (2010) Social status as a cue for tacit coordination. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 46(3):515–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dufwenberg M, Muren A (2006) Generosity, anonymity, gender. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 61(1):42–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duguid MM, Loyd DL, Tolbert PS (2012) The impact of categorical status, numeric representation and work group prestige on preference for demographically similar others: A value threat approach. Organ. Sci. 23(2):386–401.Link, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Ashford SJ, Lawrence KA, Miner-Rubino K (2002) Red light, green light: Making sense of the organizational context for issue selling. Organ. Sci. 13(4):355–372.Link, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH (1987) Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Johnson BT (1990) Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 108(2):233–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Karau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3):573–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Mladinic A (1994) Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 5(1):1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Wood W (1999) The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. Amer. Psych. 54(6):408–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Johannesen-Schmidt MC, van Engen ML (2003) Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psych. Bull. 129(4):569–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely RJ, Meyerson DE (2010) An organizational approach to undoing gender: The unlikely case of offshore oil platforms. Res. Organ. Behav. 30(1):3–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely RJ, Padavic I (2007) A feminist analysis of organizational research on sex differences. Acad. Managment Rev. 32(4):1121–1143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Estes B, Wang J (2008) Workplace incivility: Impacts on individual and organizational performance. Human Res. Development Rev. 7(2):218–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans MG (1985) A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 36(3):305–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST (1993) Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. Amer. Psych. 48(6):621–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Taylor SE (1991) Social Cognition (McGraw-Hill, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P, Xu J (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 82(6):878–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fletcher J (1998) Relational practice: A feminist reconstruction of work. J. Management Inquiry 7(2):163–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• French JRP, Raven B (1959) The bases of social power. Cartwright D, ed. Studies in Social Power (Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI), 150–167.Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Ku G, Wang CS (2005) Perspective-taking and self-other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Process Intergroup Relations 8(2):109–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Magee JC, Inesi ME, Gruenfeld DH (2006) Power and perspectives not taken. Psych. Sci. 17(12):1068–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghiselli E, Campbell J, Zedeck S (1981) Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences (W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Gilligan C (1982) In a Different Voice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Glick P, Fiske ST (1996) The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 70(3):491–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glick P, Fiske ST (2001) An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. Amer. J. Psych. 56(2):109–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glick P, Fiske ST (2011) Ambivalent sexism revisited. Psych. Women Quart. 35(3):530–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glick P, Wilk K, Perreault M (1995) Images of occupations: Components of gender and status in occupational stereotypes. Sex Roles 32(9–10):565–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glick P, Zion C, Nelson C (1988) What mediates sex discrimination in hiring decisions? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 55(2):178–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glick P, Diebold J, Bailey-Werner B, Zhu L (1997) The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes towards women. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 23(12):1323–1334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goetz JL, Keltner D, Simon-Thomas E (2010) Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psych. Bull. 136(3):351–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Good JJ, Rudman LA (2010) When female applicants meet sexist interviewers: The costs of being a target of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles 62(7–8):481–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J (1990) Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. J. Appl. Psych. 75(5):561–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J (1993) Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 54(1):81–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J (2006) Losing sleep over organizational injustice: Attenuating insomniac reactions to underpayment inequity with supervisory training in interactional justice. J. Appl. Psych. 91(1):58–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall JA (1978) Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psych. Bull. 85(4):845–857.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall JA, Schmid Mast M (2008) Are women always more interpersonally sensitive than men? Impact of goals and content domain. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 34(1):144–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardy CL, Van Vugt M (2006) Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 32(10):1402–1413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hebl MR, King EB, Glick P, Singletary SL, Kazama S (2007) Hostile and benevolent reactions toward pregnant women: Complementary interpersonal punishments and rewards that maintain traditional roles. J. Appl. Psych. 92(6):1499–1511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (1983) Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Res. Organ. Behav. 5(1):269–298.Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Chen JJ (2005) Same behavior, different consequences: Reactions to men’s and women’s altruistic citizenship behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 90(3):431–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodson R (2004) Organizational trustworthiness: Findings from the population of organizational ethnographies. Organ. Sci. 15(4):432–445.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoel H, Sheehan MJ, Cooper CL, Einarsen S (2010) Organizational effects of workplace bullying. Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL, eds. Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace (CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL), 129–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, Mangione S, Veloski JJ, Magee M (2002) The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: Further psychometric data and differences by gender and specialty at item level. Acad. Medicine 77(10, Supplement):58–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackman MR (1994) The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations (University of California Press, Berkeley).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K (1995) A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):256–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1997) LISREL 8.14: Analysis of Linear Structural Relations (Scientific Software International, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Jost JT, Kay AC (2005) Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88(3):498–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn WA (1998) Relational systems at work. Res. Organ. Behav. 20(1):39–76.Google Scholar
• Kanov J, Maitlis S, Worline MC, Dutton JE, Frost PJ, Lilius J (2004) Compassion in organizational life. Amer. Behav. Sci. 47(6):808–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy C (2003) Gender differences in committee decision-making: Process and outputs in an experimental setting. J. Women Politics Policy 25(3):27–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King EB, Botsford W, Hebl MR, Kazama S, Dawson JF, Perkins A (2012) Benevolent sexism at work: Gender differences in the distribution of challenging developmental experiences. J. Management 38(6):1835–1866.Google Scholar
• Kline RB (2005) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd ed. (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Konrad A, Winter S, Gutek B (1992) Diversity in work group sex composition: Implications for majority and minority members. Res. Sociol. Organ. 10(1):115–140.Google Scholar
• Latané B (1970) Field studies of altruistic compliance. Representative Res. Soc. Psych. 1(1):49–61.Google Scholar
• LePine JA, Hollenbeck JR, Ilgen DR, Colquitt JA, Ellis A (2002) Sex composition, situational strength, and team decision making accuracy: A criterion decomposition approach. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 88(1):445–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin DZ, Cross R (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. 50(11):1477–1490.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewin K (1943) Defining the “field at a given time”. Psych. Rev. 50(3):292–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lilius J, Worline M, Maitlis S, Kanov J, Dutton J, Frost P (2008) The Contours and consequences of compassion at work. J. Organ. Behav. 29(2):193–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim S, Cortina LM (2005) Interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace: The interface and impact of general incivility and sexual harassment. J. Appl. Psych. 90(3):483–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindell MK, Whitney JD (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. 86(1):114–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maccoby EE, Jacklin CN (1974) The Psychology of Sex Differences (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Magee JC, Galinsky AD (2008) Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):351–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maister D (1997) True Professionalism: The Courage to Care About Your People, Your Clients and Your Career (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Mayer RC, Davis JH (1999) The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. J. Appl. Psych. 84(1):123–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAllister DJ (1995) Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad. Management J. 38(1):24–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molinsky A, Margolis J (2005) Necessary evils and interpersonal sensitivity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 30(2):245–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molinsky A, Margolis J (2006) The emotional tightrope of downsizing: Hidden challenges for leaders and their organizations. Organ. Dynam. 35(2):145–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morand DA (1996) Dominance, deference, and egalitarianism in organizational interaction: A sociolinguistic analysis of power and politeness. Organ. Sci. 7(5):544–556.Link, Google Scholar
• Nielsen MB, Matthiesen SB, Einarsen S (2010) The impact of methodological moderators on prevalence rates of workplace bullying: A meta-analysis. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 83(4):955–979.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Okimoto T, Brescoll V (2010) The price of power: Power seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 36(7):923–936.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly J, Aquino K (2011) A model of third parties’ morally motivated responses to mistreatment in organizations. Acad. Management. Rev. 36(3):526–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osatuke K, McNamara B, Fishman J, Dyrenforth S (2010) Workplace civility perceptions relate to equal employment opportunity complaint rates. Paper presented at the 116th Annual National Convention by the American Psychological Association, August 12, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osatuke K, Judkins S, Teclaw R, Leiter MP, Dyrenforth SR (2012) Civility, respect, and engagement in the workplace (CREW) in the USA Veterans Affairs: Predictors of successful outcomes. Paper presented at the 10th Conference of the European Academy of Occupational Health Psychology, April 13, European Academy of Occupational Health Psychology, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
• Peacock L (2012) Skirting the issue: “You can swear in front of me, gentlemen—I don’t give a *%?^”!! Telegraph (December 12) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/9718824/Skirting-the-Issue-You-can-swear-in-front-of-me-gentlemen-I-dont-give-a-.html.Google Scholar
• Pearson C, Porath CL (2009) The Cost of Bad Behavior: How Incivility Is Damaging Your Business and What to Do About It (Penguin Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Pearson CM, Andersson LM, Wegner JW (2001) When workers flout convention: A study of workplace incivility. Human Relations 54(11):1387–1419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce J (1995) Gender Trials: Emotional Lives in Contemporary Law (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Podolny JM, Baron JN (1997) Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 62(5):673–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porath C (2012) Civility. Cameron K, Spreitzer G, eds. Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (Oxford University Press, New York), 439–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porath CL, Erez A (2009) Overlooked but not untouched: How rudeness reduces onlookers’ performance on routine and creative tasks. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 109(1):29–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porath CL, Overbeck JR, Pearson CM (2008) Picking up the gauntlet: How individuals respond to status challenges. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 38(7):1945–1980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prentice DA, Carranza E (2002) What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psych. Women Quart. 26(4):269–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prentice DA, Miller DT (2006) Essentializing differences between women and men. Psych. Sci. 17(2):129–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragins BR, Winkel D (2011) Gender, emotion and power in work relationships. Human Res. Management Rev. 21(4):377–393.Google Scholar
• Ramarajan L, Barsade SG, Burack O (2008) The influence of organizational respect on emotional exhaustion in the human services. J. Positive Psych. 3(1):4–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raven BH, Schwarzwald J, Koslowsky M (1998) Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 28(4):307–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (2001) Gender, status, and leadership. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):637–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Correll SJ (2004) Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender Soc. 18(4):510–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C, Erickson KG (2000) Creating and spreading status beliefs. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):579–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Glick P (1999) Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77(5):1004–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Phelan JE (2008) Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 28(1):61–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salovey P, Mayer JD (1990) Emotional intelligence. Imagination Cognition Personality 9(3):185–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sommers SR (2006) On racial diversity and group decision making: Identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90(4):597–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spector PE (2006) Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organ. Res. Methods 9(2):221–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spreitzer G, Porath CL, Gibson CB (2012) Toward human sustainability: How to enable more thriving at work. Organ. Dynam. 41(2):155–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spreitzer G, Sutcliffe K, Dutton J, Sonenshein S, Grant AM (2005) A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organ. Sci. 16(5):537–549.Link, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC (1986) The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. Worchel S, Austin LW, eds. Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 2nd ed. (Nelson-Hall, Chicago), 7–24.Google Scholar
• Thomas-Hunt MC, Phillips KW (2004) When what you know is not enough: Expertise and gender dynamics in task groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 30(12):1585–1598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler TR (1993) The social psychology of authority. Murnighan JK, ed. The Winner’s Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life (Free Press, New York), 101–113.Google Scholar
• Valian V (1998) Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Van Vugt M, Iredale W (2013) Men behaving nicely: Public goods as peacock tails. British J. Psych. 104(1):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Vugt M, Hogan R, Kaiser RB (2008) Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. Amer. Psych. 63(3):182–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber Shandwick (2011) Civility in America 2011. Report, Weber Shandwick, Baltimore. http://www.webershandwick.com/resources/ws/flash/civilityinamerica2011.pdf.Google Scholar
• Whitman JQ (2000) Enforcing civility and respect: Three societies. Yale Law J. 109(6):1279–1398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams M (2007) Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: A threat regulation model of trust and collaboration across boundaries. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):595–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams M (2012) Perspective taking: Building positive interpersonal connections and trustworthiness one interaction at a time. Cameron K, Spreitzer G, eds. Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (Oxford University Press, New York), 462–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW, Chambris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330(6004):686–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wubben MJJ, De Cremer D, van Dijk E (2008) When emotions of others affect decisions in public good dilemmas: An instrumental view. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 38(5):823–835.Crossref, Google Scholar