Being a Catalyst of Innovation: The Role of Knowledge Diversity and Network Closure

References

• Anastasi A, Urbina S (1997) Psychological Testing, 7th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Casciaro T (2013) Overcoming resistance to organizational change: Strong ties and affective cooptation. Management Sci. 59(4):819–836.Link, Google Scholar
• Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsh RE (1980) Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonacich P (1987) Power and centrality: A family of measures. Amer. J. Sociol. 92(5):1170–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP (1997) Structural holes: Unpacking Burt’s redundacy measures. Connections 20(1):35–38.Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Cross R (2003) A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. 49(4):432–445.Link, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis (Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA).Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2005) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL (2011) Robust inference with multi-way clustering. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29(2):238–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell DT, Fiske DW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psych. Bull. 56(2):81–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR, Rebentisch ES (2003) Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Sci. 49(9):1180–1195.Link, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H (2003) Open Innovation (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(Supplement):S95–S120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramton C (2002) Finding common ground in dispersed collaboration. Organ. Dynam. 30(4):356–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings JN (2004) Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. 50(3):352–364.Link, Google Scholar
• Ellis HC (1965) The Transfer of Learning (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):443–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman LC, Romney AK, Freeman SC (1987) Cognitive structure and informant accuracy. Amer. Anthropol. 89(2):310–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1983) The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociol. Theory 1(1):201–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galunic C, Ertug G, Gargiulo M (2012) The positive externalities of social capital: Benefiting from senior brokers. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1213–1231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haas MR (2006) Acquiring and applying knowledge in transnational teams: The roles of cosmopolitans and locals. Organ. Sci. 17(3):367–384.Link, Google Scholar
• Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):82–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A (2002) Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation. Staw BM, Kramer RM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 24 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 41–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A (2003) How Breakthroughs Happen: The Surprising Truth About How Companies Innovate (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Bechky BA (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ. Sci. 17(4):484–500.Link, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber GP, Lewis K (2010) Cross-understanding and shared social theories. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):422–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H (1993) Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Acad. Management J. 36(3):471–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM, Stuart TE, Tushman ML (2013) Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1316–1336.Link, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1988) Predicting with networks: A multiple regression approach to analyzing dyadicdata. Soc. Networks 10(4):359–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1990) Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(2):342–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. 27(2):131–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsden PV (1990) Network data and measurement. Annual Rev. Sociol. 16:435–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin RL (2011) The innovation catalysts. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(6):82–87.Google Scholar
• McEvily B, Jaffee J, Tortoriello M (2012) Not all bridging ties are equal: Network imprinting and firm growth in the Nashville legal industry, 1933–1978. Organ. Sci. 23(2):547–563.Link, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):100–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE (2006) Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad. Management J. 49(1):85–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelps C, Heidl R, Wadhwa A (2011) Networks, knowledge, and knowledge networks: A critical review and research agenda. J. Management 38(4):1115–1166.Google Scholar
• Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, McEvily B (2008) Contradictory or compatible? Reconsidering the “trade-off” between brokerage and closure on knowledge sharing. Baum JAC, Rowley TJ, eds. Network Strategy, Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 25 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 275–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman EW (2001) Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D units. Organ. Sci. 12(4):502–517.Link, Google Scholar
• Rodan S, Galunic C (2004) More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management J. 25(6):541–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1985) What we know about the creative process. Kuhn RL, ed. Frontiers in Creative and Innovative Management (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA), 3–20.Google Scholar
• Sosa ME (2011) Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Organ. Sci. 22(1):1–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M (2014) The social underpinnings of absorptive capacity: The moderating effects of structural holes on innovation generation based on external knowledge. Strategic Management J., ePub ahead of print February 12, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.2228.Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M, Krackhardt D (2010) Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Acad. Management J. 53(1):167–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M, Reagans R, McEvily B (2012) Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1024–1039.Link, Google Scholar
• Urbina S (2004) Essentials of Psychological Testing (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):35–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. 27(2):185–203.Crossref, Google Scholar