Triggering Faultline Effects in Teams: The Importance of Bridging Friendship Ties and Breaching Animosity Ties

References

• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Allen NJ, Stanley DJ, Williams HM, Ross SJ (2007) Assessing the impact of nonresponse on work group diversity effects. Organ. Res. Methods 10:262–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balkundi P, Harrison DA (2006) Ties, leaders and time in teams: Strong influence about network structure’s effects on team viability and performance. Acad. Management J. 49:49–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell ST (2007) Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Acad. Management J. 92:595–615.Google Scholar
• Bell ST, Villado AJ, Lukasik MA, Belau L, Briggs AL (2011) Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: A meta-analysis. J. Management 37:709–743.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bezrukova K, Jehn KA, Zanutto EL, Thatcher SMB (2009) Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organ. Sci. 20:35–50.Link, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory and Social Structure (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (1992) UCINET IV: Network analysis software. Connections 15:12–15.Google Scholar
• Boyacigiller NA, Adler NJ (1991) The parochial dinosaur: The organizational sciences in a global context. Acad. Management Rev. 16:262–290.Google Scholar
• Brass DJ (1995) A social network perspective on human resources management. Ferris GR, ed. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 13 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT),39–79.Google Scholar
• Brewer MB (1991) The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 17:475–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS, Knez M (1996) Trust and third-party gossip. Kramer RM, Tyler TR, eds. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 68–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox T Jr (1991) The multicultural organization. Acad. Management Executive 5:34–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cronin MA, Bezrukova K, Weingart LR, Tinsley CH (2011) Subgroup within a team: The role of cognitive and affective integration. J. Organ. Behav. 32:831–849.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlin KB, Weingart LR, Hinds PJ (2005) Team diversity and information use. Acad. Management J. 48:1107–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earley PC, Mosakowski E (2000) Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Acad. Management J. 43:26–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedkin N (1980) A test of structural features of Granovetter’s strength of weak ties theory. Soc. Networks 2:411–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaertner SL, Dovidio JF (2000) Reducing intergroup bias. Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model (Psychology Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Gersick GJG (1989) Marking time: Predictable transitions in work groups. Acad. Management J. 32:274–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giambatista RC, Bhappu AD (2010) Diversity’s harvest: Interactions of diversity sources and communication technology on creative group performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 111:116–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson C, Vermeulen F (2003) A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48:202–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78:360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray B, Susman G, Ren H (2005) Brokers’ roles in knowledge management in teams: Expertise, influence and schema conflicts. Acad. Management Proc. 2005(Meeting abstract supplement): 1–5.Google Scholar
• Greer LL, Jehn KA (2007) Where perception meets reality: The effects of different types of faultline perceptions, asymmetries, and realities on intersubgroup conflict and workgroup outcomes. Acad. Management Proc. 2007(Meeting abstract supplement):1–6.Google Scholar
• Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44:82–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32:1199–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Price KH, Bell MP (1998) Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Acad. Management J. 41:96–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Price KH, Gavin JH, Florey AT (2002) Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Acad. Management J. 45:1029–1045.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Mohammed S, McGrath JE, Florey AT, Vanderstoep S (2003) Time matters in team task performance: Effects of member familiarity, entrainment, and task discontinuity on speed and quality. Personnel Psych. 56:633–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Bezrukova K (2010) The faultline activation process and the effects of activated faultlines on coalition formation, conflict, and group outcomes. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Process 112:24–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Roh HH (2009) The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Acad. Management J. 52:599–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz N, Lazer D, Arrow H, Contractor N (2004) Network theory and small groups. Small Group Res. 35:307–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1992) The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos. Nohria N, Eccles R, eds. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action (Harvard University Press, Boston), 216–239.Google Scholar
• Labianca G (2014) Negative ties in organizational networks. Brass DJ, Labianca G, Mehra A, Halgin DS, Borgatti SP, eds. Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 40 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 239–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Labianca G, Brass D (2006) Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 31:596–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Labianca G, Brass DJ, Gray B (1998) Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: The role of negative relationships and third parties. Acad. Management J. 41:55–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau DC, Murnighan JK (1998) Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad. Management Rev. 23:325–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau DC, Murnighan JK (2005) Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Acad. Management J. 48:645–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence BS (1997) The black box of organizational demography. Organ. Sci. 8:1–22.Link, Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld PF, Merton RK (1954) Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Berger M, Abel T, Page CH, eds. Freedom and Control in Modern Society (D. Van Nostrand Company, Toronto), 18–66.Google Scholar
• Leonard D, Straus S (1997) Putting your company’s whole brain to work. Harvard Bus. Rev. 75(4):110–121.Google Scholar
• Li J, Hambrick DC (2005) Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Acad. Management J. 48:794–813.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mannix E, Neale M (2005) What differences make a difference? Psych. Sci. 6:31–55.Google Scholar
• Martins LL, Gilson LL, Maynard MT (2004) Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? J. Management 30:805–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martins LL, Milliken FJ, Wiesenfeld BM, Salgado SR (2003) Racioethnic diversity and group members’ experiences: The role of the racioethnic diversity of the organizational context. Group Organ. Management 28:75–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maznevski ML (1994) Understanding our differences: Performance in decision-making groups with diverse members. Human Relations 47:531–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE, Berdahl JL, Arrow H (1995) Traits, expectations, culture, and clout: The dynamics of diversity in work groups. Jackson SE, Ruderman MN, eds. Diversity in Work Teams: Research Paradigms for a Changing Workplace (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 17–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson JM, Smith-Lovin L (1987) Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 52:370–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mesmer-Magnus JR, DeChurch LA (2009) Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 94:535–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller DJ, Fern MJ, Cardinal LB (2007) The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms. Acad. Management J. 50:308–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molleman E (2005) Diversity in demographic characteristics, abilities and personality traits: Do faultlines affect team functioning? Group Decision Negotiation 14:173–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mollica KA, Gray B, Treviño LK (2003) Racial homophily and its persistence in newcomers’ social networks. Organ. Sci. 14:123–136.Link, Google Scholar
• Nelson RE (1989) The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. Acad. Management J. 32:377–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newcomb TM (1961) The Acquaintance Process (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearsall MJ, Ellis AP, Evans JM (2008) Unlocking the effects of gender faultlines on team creativity: Is activation the key? J. Appl. Psych. 93:225–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE, Shalley CE (2003) The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 28:89–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pieterse N, van Knippenberg D, Van Dierendonck D (2013) Cultural diversity and team performance: The role of team member goal orientation. Acad. Management J. 56:782–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polzer JT, Milton LP, Swann WB Jr (2002) Capitalizing on diversity: Congruence in small work groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47:296–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Price KH, Harrison DA, Gavin JH (2006) Withholding inputs in team contexts: Member composition, interaction processes, evaluation structure, and social loafing. J. Appl. Psych. 91:1375–1384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman EW (2001) Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. 12:502–517.Link, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman E, McEvily B (2004) How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49:101–133.Google Scholar
• Rokeach M (1973) The Nature of Human Values (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Sawyer JE, Houlette MA, Yeagley EL (2006) Decision performance and diversity structure: Comparing faultlines in convergent, crosscut, and racially homogeneous groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 99:1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schulte M, Cohen NA, Klein KJ (2012) The coevolution of network ties and perceptions of team psychological safety. Organ. Sci. 23:564–581.Link, Google Scholar
• Shin SJ, Kim T, Lee J, Bian L (2012) Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Acad. Management J. 55:197–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith KK (1989) The movement of conflict in organizations: The joint dynamics of splitting and triangulation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 34:1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl GK, Maznevski ML, Voigt A, Jonsen K (2010) Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41:690–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Worchel S, Austineds WG, eds. Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Nelson-Hall, Chicago), 7–24.Google Scholar
• Thatcher SMB, Patel PC (2011) Demographic faultlines: A meta-analysis of the literature. J. Appl. Psych. 96:1119–1139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thatcher SMB, Jehn KA, Zanutto E (2003) Cracks in diversity research: The effects of faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision Negotiation 12:217–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner JC, Oakes PJ, Haslam SA, McGarty C (1994) Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 20:454–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, Schippers MC (2007) Work group diversity. Annual Rev. Psych. 58:515–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, De Dreu CKW, Homans AC (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. J. Appl. Psych. 89:1008–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson WE, Kumar K, Michaelsen LK (1993) Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Acad. Management J. 36:590–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in the production of knowledge. Science 316:1036–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar