Moving from an Exception to a Rule: Analyzing Mechanisms in Emergence-Based Institutionalization

References

• Abrahamson E, Rosenkopf L (1993) Institutional and competitive bandwagons: Using mathematical modeling as a tool to explore innovation diffusion. Acad. Management Rev. 18:487–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abrahamson E, Rosenkopf L (1997) Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organ. Sci. 8:289–309.Link, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Dewatripont M, Hoxby CM, Mas-Colell A, Sapir A (2010) The governance and performance of research universities: Evidence from Europe and the U.S. Econom. Policy 25:7–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich H (2010) Beam me up Scott(ie)! Institutional theorists’ struggles with the emergent nature of entrepreneurship. Res. Sociol. Work 20:329–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich H, Ruef M (2006) Organizations Evolving (Sage, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allison PD, Long JS, Krauz TK (1982) Cumulative advantage and inequality in science. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 47:615–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson PJ, Blatt R, Christianson MK, Grant AM, Marquis C, Neuman EJ, Sonenshein S, Sutcliffe KM (2006) Understanding mechanisms in organizational research: Reflections from a collective journey. J. Management Inquiry 15:102–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansari SM, Fiss PC, Zajac EJ (2010) Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse. Acad. Management Rev. 35:67–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Liu CC, Stuart TE (2009) Social influence given (partially) deliberate matching: Career imprints in the creation of academic entrepreneurs. HBS Working Paper 09-136, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Observations on CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31:78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley S, Tolbert P (1997) Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organ. Stud. 18:93–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J (2011) The enabling role of social position in diverging from the institutional status quo: Evidence from the UK National Health Service. Organ. Sci. 22:817–834.Link, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Leca B, Boxenbaum E (2009) How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Acad. Management Ann. 3:65–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bearman PS, Moody J, Stovel K (2004) Chains of affection: The structure of adolescent romantic and sexual networks. Amer. J. Sociol. 110:44–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker MC (2004) Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Indust. Corporate Change 13:643–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bercovitz J, Feldman M (2008) Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organ. Sci. 19:69–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Berman EP (2012) Explaining the move toward the market in US academic science: How institutional logics can change without institutional entrepreneurs. Theory Soc. 41:261–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1987) Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. Amer. J. Sociol. 92:1287–1335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton RM, Obel B (2011) Computational modeling for what-is, what-might-be, and what-should-be studies—and triangulation. Organ. Sci. 22:1195–1202.Link, Google Scholar
• Carley KM, Gasser L (1999) Computational organization theory. Weiss G, ed. Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Chap. 7 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Clemens ES, Cook JM (1999) Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25:441–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen KJ, Cyert RM (1965) Simulation of organizational behavior. March JG, ed. Handbook of Organizations (Rand McNally, Chicago), 305–334.Google Scholar
• Cole JR, Cole SR (1973) Social Stratification in Science (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS, Katz E, Menzel H (1966) Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study (Bobbs-Merill Co., Indianapolis).Google Scholar
• Colyvas JA (2007a) Factories, hazards, and contamination: metaphors and recombinant DNA in university and biotechnology. Minerva 45:143–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colyvas JA (2007b) From divergent meanings to common practices: The early institutionalization of technology transfer in the life sciences at Stanford University. Res. Policy 36:456–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colyvas JA, Jonsson S (2011) Ubiquity and legitimacy: Disentangling diffusion and institutionalization. Sociol. Theory 29:27–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colyvas JA, Maroulis S (2012) Academic laboratories and the reproduction of proprietary science: Modeling organizational rules through autocatalytic networks. Padgett J, Powell WW, eds. The Emergence of Organizations and Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 496–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colyvas JA, Powell WW (2006) Roads to institutionalization: The remaking of boundaries between public and private science. Staw BM, ed. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 27 (JAI Press, Oxford, UK), 315–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colyvas JA, Powell WW (2007) From vulnerable to venerated: The legitimation of academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences. Ruef M, Lounsbury M, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 25 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 219–259.Google Scholar
• Colyvas JA, Powell WW (2008) Measures, metrics, and myopia: The challenges and ramifications of sustaining academic entrepreneurship. Liebcap GD, eds. Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth, Vol. 19 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 79–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P, David P (1994) Toward a new economics of science. Res. Policy 23:487–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis GF, Marquis C (2005) Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organ. Sci. 16:332–343.Link, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ (1988) Interest and agency in institutional theory. Zucker L, ed. Institutional Patterns and Organizations (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA), 3–32.Google Scholar
• Ding W, Stuart T (2006) When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 112:97–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F (2009) Inventing Equal Employment (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Drori GS, Meyer JW, Hwang H, eds. (2006) Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Drori GS, Meyer JW, Hwang H (2009) Global rationalization and “organization” as scripted actorhood. Res. Sociol. Organ. 27:1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunn MB, Jones C (2010) Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55:114–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elster J (1998) Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein JM, Axtell R (1996) Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fligstein N (2001) Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociol. Theory 19:105–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans J, Murray F, Stern S (2008) Patents, papers, pairs, and secrets: Contracting over the disclosure of scientific knowledge. Working paper, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D, Ocasio W (2007) A neo-Carnegie perspective on organization theory and strategy. Organ. Sci. 18:523–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DE (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45:113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geiger RL (1993) Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities Since World War II (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Gilbert RL (2008) Agent-Based Models (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Greif A (2006) Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gross N (2009) A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74:358–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hallett T (2010) The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75:52–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hallett T, Ventresca M (2006) Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s patterns of industrial bureaucracy. Theory Soc. 35:213–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison R, Lin Z, Carroll G, Carley K (2007) Simulation in modeling in organizational and management research. Acad. Management Rev. 32:1229–1245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hedstrom P, Swedberg R (1998) Social Mechanisms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hedstrom P, Ylikoski P (2010) Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Rev. Sociol. 36:49–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heimer C (2010) Governing medicine or guiding medicine? Rules, regulations, and guidelines in HIV clinics. Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
• Hernes G (1998) Real virtuality. Hedström P, Swedberg R, eds. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 74–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang KG, Murray FE (2009) Does patent strategy shape the long-run supply of public knowledge? Evidence from human genetics. Acad. Management J. 52:1193–1221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hughes SS (2001) Making dollars out of DNA: The first major patent in biotechnology and the commercialization of molecular biology 1974–1980. Isis 92:541–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang H, Colyvas JA (2011) Problematizing actors and institutions in institutional work. J. Management Inquiry 20:62–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang H, Powell WW (2005) Institutions and entrepreneurship. Alvarez SA, Agarwal R, Sorenson O, eds. Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: Disciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 2 (Springer, New York), 201–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jepperson R (1991) Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 143–163.Google Scholar
• Jones C, Maoret M, Massa FG, Svejenova S (2012) Rebels with a cause: Formation, contestation, and expansion of the de novo category “modern architecture,” 1870–1975. Organ. Sci. 23:1523–1545.Link, Google Scholar
• Jonsson S (2008) Refraining from imitation: Professional resistance and limited diffusion in a financial market. Organ. Sci. 20:172–186.Link, Google Scholar
• Jonsson S, Greve H, Fujiwara-Greve T (2009) Undeserved loss: The spread of legitimacy loss to innocent organizations in response to reported corporate deviance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54:195–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J, Miner AS (2007) Vicarious learning from the failure and near-failure of others. Evidence from the U.S. commercial banking industry. Acad. Management J. 50:687–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence TB, Suddaby R (2006) Institutions and institutional work. Clegg SR, Hardy C, Lawrence TB, Nord WR, eds. Handbook of Organization Studies, 2nd ed. (Sage, London), 215–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence TB, Suddaby R, Leca B (2009) Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence TB, Suddaby R, Leca B (2011) Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. J. Management Inquiry 20:52–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leblebici H, Salancik GR, Copay A, King T (1991) Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the U.S. radio broadcasting industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36:333–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein J, Ocasio W, Jones C (2012) Vocabularies and vocabulary structure: A new approach linking categories, practices, and institutions. Acad. Management Ann. 6:41–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lok J, de Rond M (2013) On the plasticity of institutions: Containing and restoring practice breakdowns at the Cambridge University Boat Club. Acad. Management J. 56:185–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Crumley ET (2007) New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organ. Stud. 28:993–1012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1994) A Primer on Decisionmaking: How Decisions Happen (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• March JG (1999) The Pursuit of Organizational Intelligence: Decisions and Learning in Organizations (Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• March JG, Olsen JP (1984) The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 78:734–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon H (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• March JG, Schulz M, Zhou X (2000) The Dynamics of Rules: Change in Written Organizational Codes (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Sproull LS, Tamuz M (1991) Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organ. Sci. 2:1–13.Link, Google Scholar
• Maroulis S, Wilensky U (2014) Social and task interdependencies in the street-level implementation of innovation. J. Public Admin. Theory Res., ePub ahead of print March 7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut084.Google Scholar
• McAdam D, Tarrow S, Tilly C (2008) Methods for measuring mechanisms. Qualitative Sociol. 31:307–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1973) The Sociology of Science (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Miller JH, Page SE (2007) Complex Adaptive Social Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Moody J (2002) The importance of relationship timing for diffusion. Soc. Forces 81:25–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery D, Nelson R, Sampat BN, Ziedonis A (2004) Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Nanda R, Sørensen JB (2010) Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Sci. 56:1116–1126.Link, Google Scholar
• Nelson A, Irwin J (2014) Defining what we do—all over again: Occupational identity, technological change, and the librarian-Internet search relationship. Acad. Management J. 57:892–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1999) Institutionalized action and corporate governance: The reliance on rules of CEO succession. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44:348–416.Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J (2003) From separate systems to a hybrid order: Accumulative advantage across public and private science at research one universities. Res. Policy 32:1081–1104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2001a) Careers and contradictions: Faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences. Res. Sociol. Work 10:109–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2001b) To patent or not: Faculty decisions and institutional success in academic patenting. J. Tech. Transfer 26:99–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF (1997) The emergence of simple ecologies of skill: A hypercycle approach to economic organization. Arthur WB, Durlauf SN, Lane DA, eds. The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA), 199–221.Google Scholar
• Padgett JF, Powell WW (2012) The problem of emergence. Padgett J, Powell WW, eds. The Emergence of Organizations and Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF, Lee D, Collier N (2003) Economic production as chemistry. Indust. Corporate Change 12:843–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF, McMahan P, Zhong X (2012) Economic production as chemistry II. Padgett JF, Powell WW, eds. The Emergence of Organizations and Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 92–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Colyvas JA (2008) Microfoundations of institutional theory. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 276–298 Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Sandholtz KW (2012) Amphibious entrepreneurs and the emergence of new organizational forms. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 6:94–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Railsback SF, Grimm V (2012) Agent-Based and Individual-Based Modeling: A Practical Introduction (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Rand WM, Rust RT (2011) Agent-based modeling in marketing: Guidelines for rigor. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 28:181–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhoten D, Powell WW (2007) The frontiers of intellectual property: Expanded protection vs. new models of open science. Annual Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 3:345–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1990) Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)? Res. Policy 19:165–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneiberg M, Clemens ES (2006) The typical tools for the job: Research strategies in institutional analysis. Sociol. Theory 24:195–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneiberg M, Lounsbury M (2008) Social movements and institutional analysis. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin-Andersson K, Suddaby R, eds. The Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, London), 650–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schulz M (2002) Organizational learning. Baum JAC, ed. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 415–441.Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2001) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Scott WR, Ruef M, Mendel P, Caronna CA (2000) Institutional Change and Organizations: Transformation of a Healthcare Field (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Shane S (2004) Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation (Edward Elgar, Northhampton, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapin S (2008) The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith-Doerr L (2005) Institutionalizing the network form: How life scientists legitimate work in the biotechnology industry. Sociol. Forum 20:271–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephan PE (2008) Tracking the placement of students as a measure of technology transfer. Measuring the Social Value of Innovation: A Link in the Unviersity Technology Transfer and Entrepreneurship Equation, Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth, Vol. 19 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 113–140.Google Scholar
• Sterman JD (2000) Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World (Irwin/McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (1968) Constructing Social Theories (Harcourt, Brace & World, New York).Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (1991) The conditions of fruitfulness of theorizing about mechanisms in social science. Philos. Soc. Sci. 21:367–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (2005) The Logic Social Research (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Strang D, Meyer JW (1993) Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory Soc. 22:487–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Ding W (2006) When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 11:97–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton P, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vallas SP, Kleinman DL (2008) Contradiction, convergence, and the knowledge economy: The confluence of academic and industrial biotechnology. Socio-Econom. Rev. 6:283–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaughan D (2002) Signals and interpretive work: The role of culture in a theory of practical action. Cerulo K, ed. Culture in Mind: Toward a Sociology of Culture and Cognition (Routledge, New York), 28–54.Google Scholar
• Weber K (2006) From nuts and bolts to toolkits: On theorizing with mechanisms. J. Management Inquiry 15:119–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber K, Glynn MA (2006) Making sense with institutions: Context, thought and action in Karl Weick’s theory. Organ. Stud. 27:1639–1660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 16:409–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Wilensky U (1999) NetLogo. (Software). Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo.Google Scholar
• Winter SG (1990) Survival, selection, and evolution. Eatwell J, Milgate M, Newman P, eds. The New Palgrave of Economics, Vol. 3 (Macmillan, London), 614–617.Google Scholar
• Zald MN, Denton P (1963) From evangelism to general service: The transformation of the YMCA. Admin. Sci. Quart. 8:214–234.Crossref, Google Scholar