Perspective—The Flaring of Intellectual Outliers: An Organizational Interpretation of the Generation of Novelty in the RAND Corporation

References

• Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1999) Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. 10(1):43–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Alchian AA, Kessel RA (1954) A proper role for systems analysis. RAND Document D-2057, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Alchian AA, Bodenhord GD, Enke S, Hitch CJ, Hirschleifer J, Marshall AW (1951) What is the best system? RAND Document D-860, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Aldrich HE, Auster ER (1986) Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications. Res. Organ. Behav. 8:165–198.Google Scholar
• Augier M (2001) Simon says: Bounded rationality matters—Introduction and interview. J. Management Inquiry 10(3):268–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Augier M (2013) Thinking about war and peace: Andrew Marshall and the early development of the intellectual foundations for net assessment. Comparative Strategy 32(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Augier M, March JG (2011) The Roots, Rituals, and Rhetorics of Change (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellman RE (1984) Eye of the Hurricane: An Autobiography (World Scientific, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-David J (1971) The Scientist’s Role in Society: A Comparative Study (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Bornet V (1961) RAND: The first fifteen years. RAND Document D-9461, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Bornet V (1962) John Williams: A personal reminiscence. RAND Document D-19036, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Brown H (2012) Star Spangled Security: Applying Lessons Learned Over Six Decades Safeguarding America (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA (1992) Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Christensen CM (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Dennis MA (1994) “Our first line of defense”: Two university laboratories in the postwar American state. ISIS 85(3):427–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, March JG (2001) Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organ. Sci. 12(5):523–538.Link, Google Scholar
• DeWeerd HA (1959) An outline history of RAND. Draft paper, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Digby J (2001) Early RAND: Personalities and projects as recalled in the alumni bulletin. RAND Paper P-8055, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Enke S (1967) Think tanks for better government. Working paper, TEMPO Center for Advanced Studies, General Electric Company, Santa Barbara, CA.Google Scholar
• Enthoven AC (1995) Tribute to Charles J. Hitch. OR/MS Today 22(6) http://www.lionhrtpub.com/orms/orms-12-95/hitch-tribute.html.Google Scholar
• Enthoven AC, Rowen HS (1961) Defense Planning and Organization (National Bureau of Economic Research, New York).Google Scholar
• Feiwel GR, ed. (1987) Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory (New York University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flexner A (1910) Medical Education in the United States and Canada (Science and Health Publications, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Flexner A (1930) Universities: American, English, German (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Flexner A (1939) The usefulness of useless knowledge. Harper’s (October):544–552.Google Scholar
• Flood MM (1951) Report of a seminar on organization science. Research Memorandum RM-709, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Forman P (1987) Behind quantum electronics: National security as a basis for physical research in the United States, 1940–1960. Hist. Stud. Physical Biol. Sci. 18(1):149–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gehani N (2003) Bell Labs: Life in the Crown Jewel (Silicon Press, Summit, NJ).Google Scholar
• George AL (1969) The “operational code”: A neglected approach to the study of political leaders and decision making. Internat. Stud. Quart. 13(2):190–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldhamer H (1950) Human factors in systems analysis. RAND Research Memorandum RM-388-PR, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Goldhamer H (1972) RAND after 25 years: A personal view. Talk given to the RAND Management Committee, October 30, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Goldstein JR (1961) RAND: The history, operations, and goals of a nonprofit corporation. RAND Paper P-2236-1, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Hall RC (1963) Early U.S. satellite proposals. Tech. Culture 4(4):410–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall RL, Hitch CH (1939) Price theory and business behavior. Oxford Econom. Papers (2):12–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heinze T, Bauer G (2007) Characterizing creative scientists in nano S&T: Productivity, multidisciplinarity, and network brokerage in a longitudinal perspective. Scientometrics 70(3):811–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heinze T, Shapira P, Senker J, Kuhlmann S (2007) Identifying creative research accomplishments: Methodology and results for nanotechnology and human genetics. Scientometrics 70(1):125–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heinze T, Shapira P, Rogers JD, Senker JM (2009) Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research. Res. Policy 38(4):610–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heller MA, Eisenberg RS (1998) Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 280(5364): 698–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiltzik MA (2000) Dealers of Lightning: Xerox PARC and the Dawn of the Computer Age (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
• Hitch C (1953) Sub-optimization in operations problems. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Amer. 1(3):87–99.Link, Google Scholar
• Hitch CJ (1955) An appreciation of systems analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. America 3(4):466–481.Link, Google Scholar
• Hitch CJ (1958) The character of research and development in a competitive economy. RAND Paper P-1297, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Hitch CJ (1960) The uses of economics. RAND Paper P-2179, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Hitch CJ (1996) Management problems of large organizations. Oper. Res. 44(2):257–264.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoddeson L (1981) The entry of the quantum theory of solids into the Bell Telephone Laboratories, 1925–40: A case-study of the industrial application of fundamental science. Minerva 18(3): 422–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hounshell DA (1997) The Cold War, RAND, and the generation of knowledge, 1946–1962. Hist. Stud. Physical Biol. Sci. 27(2): 237–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hounshell DA (2000) The medium is the message. Hughes T, Hughes A, eds. Systems, Experts, and Computers (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 255–305.Google Scholar
• Jelinek M, Schoonhoven CB (1990) The Innovation Marathon: Lessons from High Technology Firms (Wiley-Blackwell, London).Google Scholar
• Kahn H, Marshall AW (1953) Methods of reducing sample size in Monte Carlo computations. Oper. Res. 1(5):263–278.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Lovallo D (1993) Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Sci. 39(1): 17–31.Link, Google Scholar
• Kay LE (1993) The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, The Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Kay LE (1997) Rethinking institutions: Philanthropy as an histiographic problem of knowledge and power. Minerva 35(3): 283–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly CC, ed. (2006) Oppenheimer and the Manhattan Project: Insights into J. Robert Oppenheimer, “Father of the Atomic Bomb” (World Scientific, London).Google Scholar
• Koopman BO, Hitch CJ (1956) Fallacies in operations research. Oper. Res. 4(4):422–430.Link, Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Leavitt H (1996) The old days, hot groups, and managers’ lib. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(2):288–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2): 95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindblom CE (1959) Trends at RAND. Memorandum to Charles Hitch, (December 16), Yale University Archives, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Lindblom CE (1997) Political science in the 1940s and 1950s. Daedelus 126(1):225–252.Google Scholar
• Lumsden CJ, Singh JV (1990) The dynamics of organization speciation. Singh JV, ed. Organizational Evolution: New Directions (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), 145–163.Google Scholar
• March JG (2010) The Ambiguities of Experience (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marshall AW (1989) There’s no one like him. Goldhamer J, Wolf C, eds. Remembering Nathan Leites, An Appreciation: Recollections of Some Friends, Colleagues, and Students (RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA), 27–31.Google Scholar
• Marshall AW (1991) Strategy as a profession for future generations. Marshall AW, Martin JJ, Rowen HS, eds. On Not Confusing Ourselves: Essays on National Security Strategy in Honor of Albert and Roberta Wohlstetter (Westview Press, Boulder, CO), 302–312.Google Scholar
• McCoy J (2005) Linking the physical work environment to creative context. J. Creative Behav. 39(3):167–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton R (1938) Social structure and anomie. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 3(5):672–682.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mirowski P (2002) Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Murmann JP (2003) Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Nelson K (2002) Technology, institutions and innovation systems. Res. Policy 31(5):265–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human Problem Solving (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Noble DF (1977) America by Design (Knopf, New York).Google Scholar
• Padgett JF, Powell WW (2012) The Emergence of Organizations and Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• RAND (1948) U.S. Air Force Project RAND: Conference of Social Scientists—September 14 to 19, 1947, New York. Report R-106, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• RAND (1973) RAND annual report: 25 years. Report, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Rédei M, ed. (2005) John von Neumann: Selected Letters (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1998) Chemical engineering as a general purpose technology. Helpman E, ed. General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 167–192.Google Scholar
• Rowen H (1968) An introduction to RAND. Paper presented at RAND Board of Trustees session, November 14, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Rowen HS (1970) Assessing the role of systematic decision making in the public sector. Margolis J, ed. The Analysis of Public Output (National Bureau of Economic Research, Chicago), 219–277.Google Scholar
• Sakakibara M, Branstetter LG (2001) Do stronger patents induce more innovation: Evidence from the 1988 Japanese patent law reforms. RAND J. Econom. 32(1):77–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlesinger JR (1973) The uses and abuses of systems analysis. Nomination of James R. Schlesinger to be Secretary of Defense: Hearing Before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, Ninety-Third Congress, First Session (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC), 3–12.Google Scholar
• Schlesinger JR (1989) Nathan Leites: An old world figure in a new world setting. Goldhamer J, Wolf C, eds. Remembering Nathan Leites, An Appreciation: Recollections of Some Friends, Colleagues, and Students (RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA), 55–62.Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1986) Some design and research methodologies in business administration. Audet M, Malouin J-L, eds. La production des connaissances scientifique l’administration (Les Presses de L’Université Laval, Québec), 239–279.Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1991) Models of My Life (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Smith BLR (1966) The Rand Corporation: Case Study of a Nonprofit Advisory Corporation (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smits FM, ed. (1985) A History of Engineering and Science in the Bell System (AT&T Bell Labs Publishing, Indianapolis).Google Scholar
• Sørensen O, Stuart TE (2000) Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):81–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Specht RD (1958) RAND: A Personal View of Its History (RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA).Google Scholar
• Tetlock PE (1999) Theory-driven reasoning about plausible pasts and probable futures in world politics. Amer. J. Political Sci. 43(2): 335–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker SA, ed. (1966) A Modern Design for Defense Decision: A McNamara-Hitch-Enthoven-Anthology (Industrial College of the Armed Forces, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Wallis WA (1980) The Statistical Research Group, 1942–1945. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 75(370):320–330.Google Scholar
• Weaver W (1970) Scene of Change: A Lifetime in American Science (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• White HC (1970) Chains of Opportunity: System Models of Mobility in Organizations (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitehead AN (1925) Science and the Modern World (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Williams JD (1950) Comments on the RAND Building Program. Memorandum to staff (December 26), RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. http://www.rand.org/pubs/classics/building.html.Google Scholar
• Williams J (1961) What is the RAND Corporation? RAND Document D-9446, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Williams J (1962) An overview of RAND. RAND Document D-10053, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Zachary GP (2004) Endless Frontier: Vannevar Bush, Engineer of the American Century (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar