Interpersonal Perceptions and the Emergence of Leadership Structures in Groups: A Network Perspective

References

• Aime F, Humphrey SE, DeRue DS, Paul J (2014) The riddle of heterarchy: Power transitions in cross-functional teams. Acad. Management J. 57(2):327–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1977) Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psych. Bull. 84(5):888–918.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Mael F (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):20–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balkundi P, Harrison DA (2006) Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure’s effects on team viability and performance. Acad. Management J. 49(1):49–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1990) The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):61–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barry B, Stewart GL (1997) Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. J. Appl. Psych. 82(1):62–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bedeian AG, Hunt JG (2006) Academic amnesia and vestigial assumptions of our forefathers. Leadership Quart. 17(2):190–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendersky C, Shah NP (2012) The cost of status enhancement: Performance effects of individuals’ status mobility in task groups. Organ. Sci. 23(2):308–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Berdahl JL, Anderson C (2005) Men, women, and leadership centralization in groups over time. Group Dynam. Theory Res. Practice 9(1):45–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Zelditch M (1985) Status, Rewards, and Influence, 1st ed. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS (2003) Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(4):557–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1980) Models of network structure. Annual Rev. Sociol. 6:79–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campion MA, Medsker GJ, Higgs AC (1993) Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psych. 46(4):823–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carson JB, Tesluk PE, Marrone JA (2007) Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1217–1234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan D (1998) Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. J. Appl. Psych. 83(2):234–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Cuddy AJC, Glick P, Beninger A (2011) The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 31:73–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeRue DS (2011) Adaptive leadership theory: Leading and following as a complex adaptive process. Res. Organ. Behav. 31:125–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeRue DS, Ashford SJ (2010) Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 35(4):627–647.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeRue DS, Nahrgang JD, Wellman N, Humphrey SE (2011) Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psych. 64(1):7–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske AP (1992) The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psych. Rev. 99(4):689–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Taylor SE (1991) Social Cognition (McGraw-Hill, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P (2007) Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends Cognitive Sci. 11(2):77–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman LC, Borgatti SP, White DR (1991) Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow. Soc. Networks 13(2):141–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furst SA, Reeves M, Rosen B, Blackburn RS (2004) Managing the life cycle of virtual teams. Acad. Management Executive 18(2):6–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):481–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Polzer JT, Elfenbein HA (2011) Too many cooks spoil the broth: How high-status individuals decrease group effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 22(3):722–737.Link, Google Scholar
• Heifetz RA (1994) Leadership Without Easy Answers (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Hogg MA (2001) A social identity theory of leadership. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 5(3):184–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg MA, Turner JC (1985) Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 15(1):51–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg MA, van Knippenberg D (2003) Social identity and leadership processes in groups. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 35:1–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck JR, Beersma B, Schouten ME (2012) Beyond team types and taxonomies: A dimensional scaling conceptualization for team description. Acad. Management Rev. 37(1):82–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Bono JE, Ilies R, Gerhardt MW (2002) Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. J. Appl. Psych. 87(4):765–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ (2000) Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SWJ, Gully SM, Nason ER, Smith EM (1999) Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. Ilgen DR, Pulakos ED, eds. The Changing Nature of Work Performance: Implications for Staffing, Personnel Actions, and Development (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 240–292.Google Scholar
• Lincoln JR, Miller J (1979) Work and friendship ties in organizations: Comparative analysis of relational networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(2):181–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Littlepage GE, Mueller AL (1997) Recognition and utilization of expertise in problem-solving groups: Expert characteristics and behavior. Group Dynam.: Theory, Res. Practice 1(4):324–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lord RG, Foti RJ, Devader CL (1984) A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information-processing, and leadership perceptions. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 34(3):343–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lord RG, Brown DJ, Harvey JL, Hall RJ (2001) Contextual constraints on prototype generation and their multilevel consequences for leadership perceptions. Leadership Quart. 12(3):311–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ (2001) A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad. Management Rev. 26(3):356–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu J, Maynard MT, Rapp T, Gilson L (2008) Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J. Management 34(3):410–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Heffner TS, Goodwin GF, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (2005) Scaling the quality of teammates’ mental models: Equifinality and normative comparisons. J. Organ. Behav. 26(1):37–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer RC, Davis JH (1999) The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. J. Appl. Psych. 84(1):123–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayo M, Meindl JR, Pastor JC (2003) Shared leadership in work teams: A social network approach. Pearce CL, Conger JA, eds. Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 193–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE (1964) Groups: Interaction and Performance (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27:415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Smith BR, Dixon AL, Robertson B (2006) Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. Leadership Quart. 17(3):232–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montoya RM, Horton RS, Kirchner J (2008) Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. J. Soc. Personal Relationships 25(6):889–922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA (1999) The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Acad. Management Rev. 24(2):249–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgeson FP, DeRue DS, Karam EP (2010) Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. J. Management 36(1):5–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Offermann LR, Kennedy JKJr, Wirtz PW (1994) Implicit leadership theories: Content, structure, and generalizability. Leadership Quart. 5(1):43–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh HS, Chung MH, Labianca G (2004) Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Acad. Management J. 47(6):860–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Opsahl T, Agneessens F, Skvoretz J (2010) Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Soc. Networks 32(3):245–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearce CL, Conger JA, Locke EA (2007) Shared leadership theory. Leadership Quart. 18(3):281–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (2001) Gender, status, and leadership. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):637–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Small EE, Rentsch JR (2010) Shared leadership in teams: A matter of distribution. J. Personnel Psych. 9(4):203–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smidts A, Pruyn ATH, van Riel CBM (2001) The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Acad. Management J. 44(5):1051–1062.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sparrowe RT, Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Kraimer ML (2001) Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad. Management J. 44(2):316–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss AL (1978) Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order, 1st ed. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Swann WB (1984) Quest for accuracy in person perception: A matter of pragmatics. Psych. Rev. 91(4):457–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taggar S, Hackett R, Saha S (1999) Leadership emergence in autonomous work teams: Antecedents and outcomes. Personnel Psych. 52(4):899–926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson LL (2001) Making the Team: A Guide for Managers (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Tofighi D, MacKinnon DP (2011) RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behav. Res. Methods 43(3):692–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner JC, Haslam SA (2001) Social identity, organizations and leadership. Turner ME, ed. Groups at Work: Advances in Theory and Research (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ),25–65.Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt GS, Bunderson JS, Oosterhof A (2006) Expertness diversity and interpersonal helping in teams: Why those who need the most help end up getting the least. Acad. Management J. 49(5):877–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D (2000) Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Appl. Psych 49(3):357–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkataramani V, Dalal RS (2007) Who helps and harms whom? Relational antecedents of interpersonal helping and harming in organizations. J. Appl. Psych. 92(4):952–966.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, translated by Henderson AM, Parsons T (Wm. Hodge & Co., London).Google Scholar
• Wellman N, Ashford SJ, DeRue DS, Sanchez-Burks J (2014) How many should lead? leadership structure schemas and informal leadership emergence in groups. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
• Wojciszke B, Bazinska R, Jaworski M (1998) On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 24(12):1251–1263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yukl GA (2006) Leadership in Organizations, 6th ed. (Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Zellmer-Bruhn ME, Maloney MM, Bhappu AD, Salvador R (2008) When and how do differences matter? An exploration of perceived similarity in teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 107(1):41–59.Crossref, Google Scholar