Integrating Personality and Social Networks: A Meta-Analysis of Personality, Network Position, and Work Outcomes in Organizations

References

• Anderson MH (2008) Social networks and the cognitive motivation to realize network opportunities: A study of managers’ information gathering behaviors. J. Organ. Behav. 29:51–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asendorpf JB, Wilpers S (1998) Personality effects in social relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74:1531–1544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashton MC, Lee K, Paunonen SV (2002) What is the central feature of extraversion? Social attention versus reward sensitivity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83:245–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin TT, Bedell MD, Johnson JL (1997) The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Acad. Management J. 40:1369–1397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balkundi P, Kilduff M, Harrison DA (2011) Centrality and charisma: comparing how leader networks and attributions affect team performance. J. Appl. Psych. 96:1209–1222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Mount MK, Judge TA (2001) Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? Internat. J. Selection Assess. 9:9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Stewart GL, Piotrowski M (2002) Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. J. Appl. Psych. 87:43–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RA (1989) Personality and organizational conflict: Effects of the type A behavior pattern and self-monitoring. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 44:281–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beal DJ, Corey DM, Dunlap WP (2002) Identifying outlier studies in meta-analysis: Alternatives to Huffcutt and Arthur’s 1995 approach. J. Appl. Psych. 87:583–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendersky C, Shah NP (2013) The downfall of extraverts and the rise of neurotics: The dynamic process of status allocation in task groups. Acad. Management J. 56:387–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bono JE, Judge TA (2004) Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 89:901–910.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bossard JH (1945) The law of family interaction. Amer. J. Sociol 50:292–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass DJ (1981) Structural relationships, job characteristics, and worker satisfaction and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26:331–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass DJ (1984) Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29:518–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass DJ (1995) A social network perspective on human resources management. Res. Personnel and Human Resources Management 31:39–79.Google Scholar
• Brass DJ, Burkhardt ME (1993) Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Acad. Management J. 36:441–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burkhardt ME, Brass DJ (1990) Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effect of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35:104–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2005) Brokerage and Closure (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2007) Secondhand brokerage: Evidence on the importance of local structure for managers, bankers, and analysts. Acad. Management J. 50:119–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2012) Network-related personality and the agency question: Multi-role evidence from a virtual world. Amer. J. Sociol. 118:543–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS, Jannotta JE, Mahoney JT (1998) Personality correlates of structural holes. Soc. Networks 20:63–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS, Kilduff M, Tasselli S (2013) Social network analysis: Foundations and Frontiers on advantage. Annual Rev. Psych. 64:527–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng C, Bond MH, Chan SC (1995) The perception of ideal best friends by Chinese adolescents. Internat. J. Psych. 30:91–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiaburu DS, Oh IS, Berry CM, Li N, Gardner RG (2011) The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 96:1140–1166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cross R, Cummings JN (2004) Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Acad. Management J. 47:928–937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dabbs JM, Evans MS, Hopper CH, Purvis JA (1980) Self-monitors in conversation: What do they monitor? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 39:278–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalal RS, Meyer RD, Bradshaw RP, Green JP, Kelly ED, Zhu M (2015) Personality strength and situational influences on behavior: A conceptual review and research agenda. J. Management 41:261–287.Google Scholar
• Day DV, Schleicher DJ, Unckless AL, Hiller NJ (2002) Self-monitoring personality at work: A meta-analytic investigation of construct validity. J. Appl. Psych. 87:390–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denissen JJA, Penke L (2008) Neuroticism predicts reactions to cues of social inclusion. Eur. J. Personality 22:497–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Pascalis V, Arwari B, Matteucci M, Mazzocco A (2005) Effects of emotional visual stimuli on auditory information processing: A test of J.A. Gray’s reinforcement sensitivity theory. Personality Individual Differences 38:163–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Digman JM (1990) Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Rev. Psych. 41:417–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dudley NM, Orvis KA, Lebiecki JE, Cortina JM (2006) A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. J. Appl. Psych. 91:40–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emerson RM (1962) Power-dependence relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 27:31–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang R, Shaw JD (2009) Self-monitoring, status, and justice-related information flow. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 82:405–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang R, Chi L, Chen M, Baron RA (2015) Bringing political skill into social networks: Findings from a field study of entrepreneurs. J. Management Stud. 52:175–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleeson W, Gallagher P (2009) The implications of big five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 97:1097–1114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1:215–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman LC, Roeder D, Mulholland RR (1980) Centrality in social networks, II: Experimental results. Soc. Networks 2:119–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuglestad PT, Snyder M (2010) Status and motivational foundations of self-monitoring. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 4:1031–1041.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furnham A, Capon M (1983) Social skills and self-monitoring processes. Personality Individual Differences 4:171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gargiulo M, Ertug G, Galunic C (2009) Two faces of control: Network closure and individual performance among knowledge workers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54:299–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbons DE (2004) Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49:238–262.Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Carley KM, Krackhardt D, Wholey D (2000) Choosing work group members: Balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 81:226–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmes JG (2002) Interpersonal expectations as the building blocks of social cognition: An interdependence theory perspective. Personal Relationships 9:1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hough LM, Ones DS (2001) The structure, measurement, validity, and use of personality variables in industrial, work, and organizational psychology. Anderson N, Ones DS, Sinagil HK, Viswesvaran C, eds. Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1 (Sage, London), 233–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huffcutt AI, Arthur W (1995) Development of a new outlier statistic for meta-analytic data. J. Appl. Psych. 80:327–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunter JE, Schmidt FL (2004) Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunter JE, Schmidt FL, Jackson GB (1982) Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
• Ickes WJ, Reidhead S, Patterson M (1986) Machiavellianism and self-monitoring: As different as “me” and “you.” Soc. Cognition 4:58–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen-Campbell LA, Gleason KA, Adams R, Malcolm KT (2003) Interpersonal conflict, agreeableness, and personality development. J. Personality 71:1059–1086.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson JW (2000) A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behav. Res. 35:1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Heller D, Mount MK (2002) Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 87:530–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Simon LS, Hurst C, Kelley K (2014) What I experienced yesterday is who I am today: Relationship of work motivations and behaviors to within-individual variation in the five-factor model of personality. J. Appl. Psych. 99:199–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalish Y, Robins G (2006) Psychological predispositions and network structure: The relationship between individual predispositions, structural holes and network closure. Soc. Networks 28:56–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kashdan TB, McKnight PE, Fincham FD, Rose P (2011) When curiosity breeds intimacy: Taking advantage of intimacy opportunities and transforming boring conversations. J. Personality 79:1369–1402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Brass DJ (2010) Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. Acad. Management Ann. 4:317–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Krackhardt D (1994) Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations. Acad. Management J. 37:87–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Tsai W (2003) Social Networks and Organizations (Sage, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein KJ, Lim B, Saltz JL, Mayer DM (2004) How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team network. Acad. Management J. 47:952–963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM (2012) Organizational misfits and the origins of brokerage in intrafirm networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57:407–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knoke D, Burt RS (1983) Prominence. Burt RS, Miner MJ, eds. Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA), 195–222.Google Scholar
• Lennox RD, Wolfe RN (1984) Revision of the self-monitoring scale. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 46:1349–1364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKinnon DP (2008) Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V (2002) A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psych. Methods 7:83–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCrae RR (1996) Social consequences of experiential openness. Psych. Bull. 120:323–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, John OP (1992) An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. J. Personality 60:175–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Kilduff M, Brass DJ (2001) The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46:121–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mund M, Neyer FJ (2014) Treating personality-relationship transactions with respect: Narrow facets, advanced models, and extended time frames. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 107:352–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nettle D (2006) The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. Amer. Psychologist 61:622–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng TWH, Eby LT, Sorensen KL, Feldman DC (2005) Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psych. 58:367–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Boyle EH Jr, Forsyth DR, Banks GC, McDaniel MA (2012) A meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. J. Appl. Psych. 97:557–579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh H, Kilduff M (2008) The ripple effect of personality on social structure: Self-monitoring origins of network brokerage. J. Appl. Psych. 93:1155–1164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollet TV, Roberts SGB, Dunbar RIM (2011) Extraverts have larger social network layers: But do not feel emotionally closer to individuals at any layer. J. Individual Differences 32:161–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prentice DA, Miller DT (1992) When small effects are impressive. Psych. Bull. 112:160–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sasovova Z, Mehra A, Borgatti SP, Schippers MC (2010) Network churn: The Effects of self-monitoring personality on brokerage dynamics. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55:639–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seibert SE, Kraimer ML, Liden RC (2001) A social capital theory of career success. Acad. Management J. 44:219–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selfhout M, Burk W, Branje S, Denissen J, van Aken M, Meeus W (2010) Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. J. Personality 78:509–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaffer JA, Postlethwaite BE (2012) A matter of context: A meta-analytic investigation of the relative validity of contextualized and noncontextualized personality measures. Personnel Psych. 65:445–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaffer DR, Smith JE, Tomarelli M (1982) Self-monitoring as a determinant of self-disclosure reciprocity during the acquaintance process. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 43:163–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw JD, Duffy MK, Johnson JL, Lockhart DE (2005) Turnover, social capital losses, and performance. Acad. Management J. 48:594–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snyder M (1974) The self-monitoring of expressive behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 30:526–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snyder M (1979) Self-monitoring processes. Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 12 (Academic Press, New York), 85–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snyder M (1987) Public Appearances, Private Realities: The Psychology of Self-Monitoring (W. H. Freeman & Company, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Snyder M, Gangestad S, Simpson JA (1983) Choosing friends as activity partners: The role of self-monitoring. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51:181–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sparrowe RT, Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Kraimer ML (2001) Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad. Management J. 44:316–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stokes RC (1985) The effects of price, package design, and brand familiarity on perceived quality. Jacoby J, Olson J, eds. Perceived Quality: How Consumers View Stores and Merchandise (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA), 233–246.Google Scholar
• Stovel K, Shaw L (2012) Brokerage. Annual Rev. Sociol. 38:139–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toegel G, Anand N, Kilduff M (2007) Emotion helpers: The role of high positive affectivity and high self-monitoring managers. Personnel Psych. 60:337–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner RG (1980) Self-monitoring and humor production. J. Personality 48:163–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Viswesvaran C, Ones DS (1995) Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modelling. Personnel Psych. 48:865–885.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitener EM (1990) Confusion of confidence intervals and credibility intervals in meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 75:315–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yamagata S, Suzuki A, Ando J, Ono Y, Kijima N, Yoshimura K, Ostendorf Fet al. (2006) Is the genetic structure of human personality universal? A cross-cultural twin study from North America, Europe, and Asia. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90:987–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Peterson SJ (2011) Advice networks in teams: The role of transformational leadership and members’ core self-evaluations. J. Appl. Psych. 96:1004–1017.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Seibert SE (2006) The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. J. Appl. Psych. 91:259–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zimmerman RD (2008) Understanding the impact of personality traits on individuals’ turnover decisions: A meta-analytic path model. Personnel Psych. 61:309–348.Crossref, Google Scholar