Can Informal Communication Networks Disrupt Coordination in New Product Development Projects?

References

• Allen TJ (1977) Managing the Flow of Technology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Allen TJ (2004) Communication networks in R&D laboratories. Katz R, ed. The Human Side of Managing Technological Innovation: A Collection of Readings, Chapter 26 (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992) Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4):634–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules: Volume 1: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1995) Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. 20(2):343–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2001) Bandwidth and echo: Trust, information, and gossip in social networks. Rauch JE, Casella A, eds. Networks and Markets (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 30–74.Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2005) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS, Knez M (1995) Kinds of third-party effects on trust. Rationality Soc. 7(3):255–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cataldo M, Wagstrom P, Herbsleb JD, Carley KM (2006) Identification of coordination requirements: Implications for the design of collaboration and awareness tools. Proc. ACM Conf. Comput.-Supported Cooperative Work (ACM, New York), 353–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of Social Theory (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Colfer L, Baldwin C (2010) The mirroring hypothesis: Theory, evidence, and exceptions. HBS Working Paper 10-058, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Contractor NS, Wasserman S, Faust K (2006) Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. Acad. Management. Rev. 31(3):681–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eppinger SD, Whitney DE, Smith RP, Gebala DA (1994) A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development. Res. Engrg. Design 6(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith JR (1973) Designing Complex Organizations (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Gargiulo M, Benassi M (2000) Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organ. Sci. 11(2):183–196.Link, Google Scholar
• Gokpinar B, Hopp WJ, Iravani SMR (2010) The impact of misalignment of organizational structure and product architecture on quality of complex product development. Management. Sci. 56(3):468–484.Link, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):481–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R (2010) Reorganize for Resilience: Putting Customers at the Center of Your Business (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Clark K (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunter DR, Goodreau SM, Handcock MS (2008) Goodness of fit of social network models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 103(481):248–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lessard DR, Zaheer S (1996) Breaking the silos: Distributed knowledge and strategic responses to volatile exchange rates. Strategic Management J. 17(7):513–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lomi A, Pattison P (2006) Manufacturing relations: An empirical study of the organization of production across multiple networks. Organ. Sci. 17(3):313–332.Link, Google Scholar
• Lomi A, Lusher D, Pattison PE, Robins G (2014) The focused organization of advice relations: A study in boundary crossing. Organ. Sci. 25(2):438–457.Link, Google Scholar
• Lusher D, Koskinen J, Robins G (2013) Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, Methods, and Applications (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Marsden PV (1990) Network data and measurement. Annual Rev. Sociol. 16:435–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCord KR, Eppinger SD (1993) Managing the integration problem in concurrent engineering. Sloan School of Management Working Paper 3594, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• McEvily B, Soda G, Tortoriello M (2014) More formally: Rediscovering the missing link between formal organization and informal social structure. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):299–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mihm J, Loch C, Huchzermeier A (2003) Problem-solving oscillations in complex engineering projects. Management Sci. 46(6):733–750.Link, Google Scholar
• Morelli MD, Eppinger SD, Gulati RK (1995) Predicting technical communication in product development organizations. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 42(3):215–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadler DA, Tushman M (1997) Competing by Design: The Power of Organizational Architecture (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson J, Cagan J, Kotovsky K (2009) Unlocking organizational potential: A computational platform for investigating structural interdependence in design. ASME J. Mech. Design 131(3): 031001–031001-13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rank ON, Robins G, Pattison P (2010) Structural logic of intraorganizational networks. Organ. Sci. 21(3):745–764.Link, Google Scholar
• Raub W, Weesie J (1990) Reputation and efficiency in social interactions: An example of network effects. Amer. J. Sociol. 96(3):626–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman EW (2001) Networks, diversity, and performance: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. 12(4):502–517.Link, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman E, McEvily B (2004) How to make the team: Social networks: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(1):101–133.Google Scholar
• Robins GL, Pattison PE, Wang P (2009) Closure, connectivity and degree distributions: Exponential random graph (p*) models for directed social networks. Soc. Networks 31(2):105–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowles CM (1999) System integration analysis of a large commercial aircraft engine. Master’s dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• Simmel G (1950) The triad. Wolff KH, ed., trans. The Sociology of Georg Simmel (Simon & Schuster, New York), 145–169.Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Smith RP, Eppinger SD (1997) Identifying controlling features of engineering design iteration. Management Sci. 43(3):276–293.Link, Google Scholar
• Snijders TAB, Pattison PE, Robins GL, Handcock MS (2006) New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociol. Methodol. 36(1):99–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sosa ME (2008) A structured approach to predicting and managing technical interactions in software development. Res. Engrg. Design 19(1):47–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sosa ME, Eppinger SD, Rowles CM (2004) The misalignment of product and organizational structures in complex product development. Management Sci. 50(12):1674–1689.Link, Google Scholar
• Sosa ME, Eppinger SD, Rowles CM (2007) A network approach to define modularity of components in complex products. ASME J. Mech. Design 129(11):1118–1129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sosa ME, Mihm J, Browning TR (2013) Linking cyclicality and product quality. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(3):473–491.Link, Google Scholar
• Sosa ME, Eppinger SD, Pich M, McKendrick D, Stout S (2002) Factors that influence technical communication in distributed product development: An empirical study in the telecommunications industry. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 49(1):45–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Loch CH, De Meyer A (2002) Exchanging preliminary information in concurrent engineering: Alternative coordination strategies. Organ. Sci. 13(4):402–419.Link, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M, Reagans R, McEvily B (2012) Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1024–1039.Link, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML (1977) Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(4):587–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M, Katz R (1980) External communication and project performance: An investigation into the role of gatekeeper. Management Sci. 26(11):1071–1085.Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Moenaert RK (1998) The effects of R&D team co-location on communication patterns among R&D, marketing, and manufacturing. Management Sci. 44(11, Part 2):S1–S19.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang P, Robins G, Pattison P (2009) PNet: A program for the simulation and estimation of exponential random graph (p*) models. (Software.) University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. http://sna.unimelb.edu.au/PNet.Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Pattison P (1996) Logit models and logistic regression for social networks: I. an introduction to Markov graphs and p*. Psychometrika 61(3):401–425.Crossref, Google Scholar