Transactive Memory Systems and Firm Performance: An Upper Echelons Perspective

References

• Adler PS, Kwon SW (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. 27(1):17–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilar FJ (1967) Scanning the Business Environment (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert CM (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Akgun AE, Byrne JC, Keskin H, Lynn GS (2006) Transactive memory system in new product development teams. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 53(1):95–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amason AC, Sapienza HJ (1997) The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. J. Management 23(4):495–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992) Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. 3(3):321–341.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice—A review and recommended 2-step approach. Psych. Bull. 103(3):411–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman ML (2001) Organizational environments and industry exit: The effects of uncertainty, munificence and complexity. Indust. Corporate Change 10(3):675–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima K, Li HY (2004) Strategic decision comprehensiveness and new product development outcomes in new technology ventures. Acad. Management J. 47(4):583–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Austin JR (2003) Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):866–878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP, Yi YJ, Phillips LW (1991) Assessing construct-validity in organizational research. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(3):421–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bliese PD (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 349–381.Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS, Sutcliffe KM (2002) Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Acad. Management J. 45(5):875–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buyl T, Boone C, Matthyssens P (2011) Upper echelons research and managerial cognition. Strategic Organ. 9(3):240–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannella AA Jr, Park J-H, Lee H-U (2008) Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty. Acad. Management J. 51(4):768–784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao Q, Simsek Z, Zhang HP (2010) Modelling the joint impact of the CEO and the TMT on organizational ambidexterity. J. Management Stud. 47(7):1272–1296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan D (1998) Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. J. Appl. Psych. 83(2):234–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi JN (2002) External activities and team effectiveness review and theoretical development. Small Group Res. 33(2):181–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Collins CJ, Clark KD (2003) Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management J. 46(6):740–751.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummins RC (1972) Leader-member relations as a moderator of the effects of leader behavior and attitude. Personnel Psych. 25(4):655–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Weick KE (1984) Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):284–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danneels E, Sethi R (2011) New product exploration under environmental turbulence. Organ. Sci. 22(4):1026–1039.Link, Google Scholar
• Dawson JF, Richter AW (2006) Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. J. Appl. Psych. 91(4):917–926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dess GG, Robinson RB (1984) Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures—The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management J. 5(3):265–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eden D (2002) Replication, meta-analysis, scientific progress, and AMJ’s publication policy. Acad. Management J. 45(5):841–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. 32(3):543–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans MG (1985) A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 36(3):305–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Sproull L (2000) Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. 46(12):1554–1568.Link, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Xiao Y (2006) Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Sci. 52(8):1155–1169.Link, Google Scholar
• Forbes DP (2007) Reconsidering the strategic implications of decision comprehensiveness. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):361–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(1):39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geletkanycz MA, Hambrick DC (1997) The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):654–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1973) Strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC (1989) Putting top managers back in the strategy picture. Strategic Management J. 10(S1):5–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC (1994) Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the “team” label. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 16 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 171–213.Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC (1995) Fragmentation and the other problems CEOs have with their top management teams. Calif. Management Rev. 37(3):110–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC (2007) Upper echelons theory: An update. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):334–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Fukutomi GDS (1991) The seasons of a CEOs tenure. Acad. Management Rev. 16(4):719–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons—The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):82–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He Z-L, Wong P-K (2004) Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ. Sci. 15(4):481–494.Link, Google Scholar
• Heavey C, Simsek Z (2014) Distributed cognition in top management teams and organizational ambidexterity: The influence of transactive memory systems. J. Management, ePub ahead of print August 20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206314545652.Google Scholar
• Heavey C, Simsek Z, Fox BC (2015) Managerial social networks and ambidexterity of SMEs: The moderating role of a proactive commitment to innovation. Human Resource Management, ePub ahead of print March 2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson AD, Miller D, Hambrick DC (2006) How quickly doe CEOs become obsolete? Industry dynamism, CEO tenure, and company performance. Strategic Management J. 27(5):447–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead AB (2000) Perceptions of expertise in and transactive memory in work relationships. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 3(3):257–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber GP, Daft RL (1987) The information environments of organizations. Jablin FM, Putnam LL, Roberts KH, Porter LW, eds. Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 130–164.Google Scholar
• Ingram P, Roberts PW (2000) Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(2):387–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. 69(1):85–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G (1993) Rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. J. Appl. Psych. 78(2):306–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janis IL (1982) Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Angelmar R, Mehra A (2000) Top management-team diversity and firm performance: Examining the role of cognitions. Organ. Sci. 11(1):21–34.Link, Google Scholar
• Kline RB (1998) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• LeBreton JM, Senter JL (2008) Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organ. Res. Methods 11(4):815–852.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K (2003) Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4):587–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K (2004) Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Sci. 50(11):1519–1533.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis K, Herndon B (2011) Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1254–1265.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis K, Lange D, Gillis L (2005) Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organ. Sci. 16(6):581–598.Link, Google Scholar
• Liang DW, Moreland R, Argote L (1995) Group versus individual training and group-performance—The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 21(4):384–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Littlepage GE, Hollingshead AB, Drake LR, Littlepage AM (2008) Transactive memory and performance in work groups: Specificity, communication, ability differences, and work allocation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Res., Practice 12(3):223–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lubatkin MH, Simsek Z, Ling Y, Veiga JF (2006) Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. J. Management 32(5):646–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald ML, Westphal JD (2003) Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs’ advice networks and firms’ strategic responses to poor performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald ML, Khanna P, Westphal JD (2008) Getting them to think outside the circle: Corporate governance, CEOs’ external advice networks, and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 51(3):453–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Dixon AL, Brass DJ, Robertson B (2006) The social network ties of group leaders: Implications for group performance and leader reputation. Organ. Sci. 17(1):64–79.Link, Google Scholar
• Milkovich GT (1987) Compensation systems in high technology companies. Balkin DB, Gomez-Mejia LR, eds. New Perspectives on Compensation (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ),269–277.Google Scholar
• Miller CC (2008) Decisional comprehensiveness and firm performance: Towards a more complete understanding. J. Behav. Decision Making 21(5):598–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller CC, Washburn NT, Glick WH (2013) The myth of firm performance. Organ. Sci. 24(3):948–964.Link, Google Scholar
• Narayanan VK, Zane LJ, Kemmerer B (2011) The cognitive perspective in strategy: An integrative review. J. Management 37(1):305–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W (1996) Applied Linear Statistical Models, 4th ed. (Irwin, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Organ DW (1971) Linking pins between organizations and environment. Bus. Horizons 14(6):73–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peltokorpi V (2008) Transactive memory systems. Rev. General Psych. 12(4):378–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rau D (2005) The influence of relationship conflict and trust on the transactive memory—Performance relation in top management teams. Small Group Res. 36(6):746–771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rau D (2006) Top management team transactive memory, information gathering, and perceptual accuracy. J. Bus. Res. 59(4):416–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Argote L (2011) Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):189–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Carley KM, Argote L (2006) The contingent effects of transactive memory: When is it more beneficial to know what others know? Management Sci. 52(5):671–682.Link, Google Scholar
• Richard PJ, Devinney TM, Yip GS, Johnson G (2009) Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. J. Management 35(3):718–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson KC, McDougall PP (2001) Entry barriers and new venture performance: A comparison of universal and contingency approaches. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):659–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson RB, Pearce JA (1988) Planned patterns of strategic behavior and their relationship to business-unit performance. Strategic Management J. 9(1):43–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shimizu K, Hitt MA (2004) Strategic flexibility: Organizational preparedness to reverse ineffective strategic decisions. Acad. Management Executive 18(4):44–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siemsen E, Roth A, Oliveira P (2010) Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organ. Res. Methods 13(3):456–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith KG, Collins CJ, Clark KD (2005) Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Acad. Management J. 48(2):346–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stam W, Elfring T (2008) Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra- and extraindustry social capital. Acad. Management J. 51(1):97–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (1996) Using Multivariate Statistics, 3rd ed. (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
• Tushman M, Romanelli E (1985) Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Cummings LL, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 171–222.Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Lancaster R (2003) Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Sci. 49(4):383–399.Link, Google Scholar
• Wegner DM (1987) Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Mullen B, Goethals GR, eds. Theories of Group Behavior (Springer, New York), 185–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner DM, Giuliano T, Hertel P (1985) Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. Ickes WJ, ed. Compatible and Incompatible Relationships (Springer, New York), 253–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Roberts KH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):357–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams JR (1992) How sustainable is your competitive advantage? Calif. Management Rev. 34(3):29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng YF (2012) Unlocking founding team prior shared experience: A transactive memory system perspective. J. Bus. Venturing 27(5):577–591.Crossref, Google Scholar