Translating Intentions to Behavior: The Interaction of Network Structure and Behavioral Intentions in Understanding Employee Turnover

References

• Abelson MA, Baysinger BD (1984) Optimal and dysfunctional turnover: Toward an organizational level model. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):331–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 50(2):179–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ajzen I (2002) Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 32(4):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Allen DG, Bryant PC, Vardaman JM (2010) Retaining talent: Replacing misconceptions with evidence-based strategies. Acad. Management Perspect. 24(2):48–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen DG, Weeks KP, Moffitt KR (2005) Turnover intentions and voluntary turnover: The moderating roles of self-monitoring, locus of control, proactive personality and risk aversion. J. Appl. Psych. 90(5):980–990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen DG, Hancock J, Vardaman JM, McKee D (2014) Analytical mindsets in turnover research. J. Organ. Behav. 35(1):61–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin TT, Bedell MD, Johnson JL (1997) The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Acad. Management J. 40(6):1369–1397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bickel WK, Yi RY, Landes RD, Hill PF, Baxter C (2011) Remember the future: Working memory training decreases delay discounting among stimulant addicts. Biol. Psychiatry 69(3):260–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M (2011) Paying more to get less: The effects of external hiring versus internal mobility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(3):369–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Halgin DS (2011) On network theory. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1168–1181.Link, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis (Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA).Google Scholar
• Brown BB (1978) Social and psychological correlates of help-seeking behavior among urban adults. Amer. J. Community Psych. 6(5):423–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cammann C, Fichman M, Jenkins GD, Klesh JR (1983) Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. Seashore SE, ed. Assessing Organizational Change: A Guide to Methods, Measures, and Practices (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 71–119.Google Scholar
• Chandler DW, Kram KE, Yip J (2011) An ecological systems perspective on mentoring at work: A review and future prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):519–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cobb S (1976) Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic Medicine 38(5):300–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Wills T (1985) Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psych. Bull. 98(2):310–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cojuharenco I, Patient D, Bashshur MR (2011) Seeing the “forest” or the “trees” of organizational justice. Effects of temporal perspective on employee concerns about unfair treatment at work. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 116(1):17–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook KS, Emerson RM (1978) Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 43(5):721–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coyne JC, DeLongis A (1986) Going beyond social support: The role of social relationships in adaptation. J. Consulting Clinical Psych. 54(3):454–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crossley CD, Bennett RJ, Jex SM, Burnfield JL (2007) Development of a global measure of job embeddedness and integration into a traditional model of voluntary turnover. J. Appl. Psych. 92(4):1031–1042.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalton DR, Krackhardt DM, Porter LW (1981) Functional turnover: An empirical assessment. J. Appl. Psych. 66(6):716–721.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawson JF (2014) Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. J. Bus. Psych. 29(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dekker D (2006) Measures of Simmelian tie strength, Simmelian brokerage, and the Simmelianly brokered. J. Soc. Structure 7(1):1–22.Google Scholar
• Estle SJ, Green L, Myerson J, Holt D (2006) Differential effects of amount on temporal and probability discounting of gains and losses. Memory Cognition 34(4):914–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feeley TH (2000) Testing a communication network model of employee turnover based on centrality. J. Appl. Comm. Res. 28(3):262–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feeley TH, Hwang J, Barnett GA (2008) Predicting employee turnover from friendship networks. J. Appl. Comm. Res. 36(1):56–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felps W, Mitchell TR, Hekman DR, Lee TW, Holtom BC, Harman WS (2009) Turnover contagion: How coworkers’ job embeddedness and job search behaviors influence quitting. Acad. Management J. 52(3):545–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. J. Econom. Literature 40(2):351–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1(3):215–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gouldner AW (1960) The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 25(2):161–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffeth RW, Hom PW, Gaertner S (2000) A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. J. Management 26(3):463–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffeth RW, Steel RP, Allen DG, Bryan N (2005) The development of a multidimensional measure of market cognitions: The employment opportunity index (EOI). J. Appl. Psych. 90(2):335–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins MC, Thomas DA (2001) Constellations and careers: Toward understanding the effects of multiple developmental relationships. J. Organ. Behav. 22(3):223–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holtom BC, Mitchell TR, Lee TW, Eberly MB (2008) Turnover and retention research: A glance at the past, a closer review of the present, and a venture into the future. Acad. Management Ann. 2:231–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hom PW, Griffeth RW (1991) Structural equations modeling a test of turnover theory: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. J. Appl. Psych. 76(3):350–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hom PW, Kinicki AJ (2001) Toward a greater understanding of how dissatisfaction drives employee turnover. Acad. Management J. 44(5):975–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hom PW, Mitchell TR, Lee TW, Griffeth RW (2012) Reviewing employee turnover: Focusing on proximal withdrawal states and an expanded criterion. Psych. Bull. 138(5):831–858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H (1993) Network centrality, power and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Acad. Management J. 36(3):471–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James L (1982) Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. J. Appl. Psych. 67:219–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA (1995) A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):265–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kivetz Y, Tyler TTR (2007) Tomorrow I’ll be me: The effect of time perspective on the activation of idealistic versus pragmatic selves. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 102(2):193–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt DA (1998) Simmelian ties: Super strong and sticky. Kramer RM, Neale MA, eds. Power and Influence in Organizations (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 21–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt DA (1999) The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Res. Sociol. Organ. 16:183–210.Google Scholar
• Krackhardt DA, Porter LW (1986) The snowball effect: Turnover embedded in communication networks. J. Appl. Psych. 71(1):50–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lankau MJ, Scandura TA (2002) An investigation of personal learning in mentoring relationships: Content, antecedents, and consequences. Acad. Management J. 45(4):779–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LeBreton JM, Tonidandel S, Krasikova DV (2013) Residualized relative importance analysis: A technique for the comprehensive decomposition of variance in higher order regression models. Organ. Res. Methods 16(3):449–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee TW, Mitchell TR (1994) An alternative approach: The unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Acad. Management Rev. 19(1):51–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee TW, Mitchell TR, Sablynski CJ, Burton JP, Holtom BC (2004) The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover. Acad. Management J. 47(5):711–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman N, Trope Y (1998) The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75(1):5–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Martin BA, Gnoth J, Strong C (2009) Temporal construal in advertising. J. Advertising 38(3):5–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell TR, Lee TW (2001) The unfolding model of voluntary turnover and job embeddedness: Foundations for a comprehensive theory of attachment. Res. Organ. Behav. 23:189–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell TR, Burch TC, Lee TW (2014) The need to consider time, level, and trends: A turnover perspective. J. Organ. Behav. 35(2):296–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell TR, Holtom BC, Lee TW, Sablynski CJ, Erez M (2001) Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1102–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mobley WH (1977) Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. J. Appl. Psych. 62(2):237–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mossholder KW, Settoon RP, Henagan SC (2005) A relational perspective on turnover: Examining structural, attitudinal, and behavioral predictors. Acad. Management J. 48(4):607–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne SC, Huffman AH (2005) A longitudinal examination of the influence of mentoring on organizational commitment and turnover. Acad. Management J. 48(1):158–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS, Cheong YF, Congdon RT, du Toit M (2011) HLM 7 (Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL).Google Scholar
• Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhoades L, Eisenberger R (2002) Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. J. Appl. Psych. 87(4):698–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rotter JB (1966) Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol. Monographs 80(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rousseau DM, Ho VT, Greenberg J (2006) I-deals: Idiosyncratic terms in employment relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):977–994.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rusbult CE, Farrell D (1983) A longitudinal test of the investment model: The impact on job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover of variations in rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments. J. Appl. Psych. 68(3):429–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson P (1937) A note on measurement of utility. Rev. Econom. Stud. 4(2):155–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sekiguchi T, Burton JP, Sablynski CJ (2008) The role of job embeddedness on employee performance: The interactive effects with leader-member exchange and organization-based self-esteem. Personnel Psych. 61(4):761–792.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Settoon RP, Mossholder KW (2002) Relationship quality and relationship context as antecedents of person-and task-focused interpersonal citizenship behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 87(2):255–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmel G (1950) Wolff KH, ed. The Sociology of George Simmel (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
• Soltis SM, Agneessens F, Sasovova Z, Labianca GJ (2013) A social network perspective on turnover intentions: The role of distributive justice and social support. Human Resource Management 52(4):561–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sparrowe RT, Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Kraimer ML (2001) Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad. Management J. 44(2):316–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steel RP (2002) Turnover theory at the empirical interface: Problems of fit and function. Acad. Management Rev. 27(3):346–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steel RP, König CJ (2006) Integrating theories of motivation. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):889–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steel RP, Lounsbury JW (2009) Turnover process models: Review and synthesis of a conceptual literature. Human Resource Management Rev. 19:271–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tonidandel S, LeBreton JM (2011) Determining the relative importance of predictors in logistic regression: An extension of relative weights analysis. Organ. Res. Methods 13(4):767–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M, Krackhardt D (2010) Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of knowledge. Acad. Management J. 53(1):167–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2003) Temporal construal. Psych. Rev. 110(3):403–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psych. Rev. 117(2):440–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vardaman JM, Allen DG, Renn RR, Moffitt KR (2008) Should I stay or should I go? The role of risk in employee turnover decisions. Human Relations 61(11):1531–1564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vardaman JM, Amis JM, Dyson B, Wright P, Randolph RVDG (2012) Interpreting change as controllable: The role of centrality and self-efficacy. Human Relations 65(7):835–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldman DA, Carter MZ, Hom PW (2012) A multilevel investigation of leadership and turnover behavior. J. Management, ePub ahead of print October 5, doi: 10.1177/0149206312460679.Google Scholar
• Williams KD (2007) Ostracism. Ann. Rev. Psych. 58:425–452.Crossref, Google Scholar