The Paradox of Corrupt Networks: An Analysis of Organizational Crime at Enron

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.0983

References

  • Aral S, Van Alstyne M (2011) The diversity-bandwidth trade-off. Amer. J. Sociol. 117(1):90–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, McEvily B, Reagans R (2003) Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. 49(4):571–582.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baker WE, Faulkner RR (1993) The social organization of conspiracy: Illegal networks in the heavy electrical equipment industry. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 58(6):837–860.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernard HR, Killworth PD, Sailer L (1980) Informant accuracy in social network data IV: A comparison of clique-level structure and behavioral and cognitive data. Soc. Networks 2(3):191–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonacich P (1987) Communication networks and collective action. Soc. Networks 9(4):389–396.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti SP, Cross R (2003) A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. 49(4):432–445.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brass DJ (1995) A social network perspective on human resources management. Ferris GR, ed. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 39–79.Google Scholar
  • Brass DJ, Butterfield KD, Skaggs B (1998) Relationships and unethical behavior: A social network perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 23(1):14–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson JS, Boumgarden P (2010) Structure and learning in self-managed teams: Why “bureaucratic” teams can be better learners. Organ. Sci. 21(3):609–624.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (2012) Network-related personality and the agency question: Multirole evidence from a virtual world. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(3):543–591.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carley KM (2006) Destabilization of covert networks. Computational Math. Organ. Theory 12(1):51–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clinard MB, Yeager PC (1980) Corporate Crime (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94:95–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook KS, Emerson RM (1978) Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 43(5):721–739.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cruickshank P, Ali MH (2007) Abu Musab Al Suri: Architect of the new Al Qaeda studies. Conflict Terrorism 30(1):1–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC, McManus S (2007) Methodological fit in management field research. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1155–1179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eichenwald K (2005) Conspiracy of Fools: A True Story (Broadway Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. 32(3):543–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Enron (1998–2000) Enron Annual Report 1998 (Enron Corporation, Houston).Google Scholar
  • Gino F, Bazerman MH (2009) When misconduct goes unnoticed: The acceptability of gradual erosion in others’ unethical behavior. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45(4):708–719.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goffman E (1970) Strategic Interaction (Prentice-Hall, New York).Google Scholar
  • Gouldner AW (1960) The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 25(2):161–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):481–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M (2007) The social construction of corruption. Nee V, Swedberg R, eds. On Capitalism (Stanford University Press, Stanford), 152–172.Google Scholar
  • Greve HR, Palmer D, Pozner JE (2010) Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):53–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):82–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heider F (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (Wiley, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds P, Kiesler S (1995) Communication across boundaries: Work, structure, and use of communication technologies in a large organization. Organ. Sci. 6(2):352–367.Google Scholar
  • Holland P, Leinhardt S (1971) Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Small Group Res. 2(2):107–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ingram P, Roberts PW (2000) Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(2):387–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Isenberg DJ (1986) Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 50(6):1141–1151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jick TD (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):602–611.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kish-Gephart JJ, Harrison DA, Treviño LK (2010) Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. J. Appl. Psych. 95(1):1–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kleinbaum AM (2012) Organizational misfits and the origins of brokerage in intrafirm networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(3):407–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D (1999) The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Res. Sociol. Organ. 16:183–210.Google Scholar
  • Langford IH, Lewis T (1998) Outliers in multilevel data. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. 161(2):121–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lim BC, Klein KJ (2006) Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. J. Organ. Behav. 27(4):403–418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maxwell JA (2004) Using qualitative methods for causal explanation. Field Methods 16(3):243–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McLean B, Elkind P (2004) Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Scandalous Fall of Enron (Penguin Group, New York).Google Scholar
  • Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Molm L, Schaefer D, Collett J (2007) The value of reciprocity. Soc. Psych. Quart. 70(2):199–217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Molm L, Takahashi D, Peterson G (2000) Risk and trust in social exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(5):1396–1427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Obstfeld D (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):1–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmer D, Maher MW (2006) Developing the process model of collective corruption. J. Management Inquiry 15(4):363–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A (2012) Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
  • Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richardson L (1988) Secrecy and status: The social construction of forbidden relationships. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 53(2):209–219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sasovova Z, Mehra A, Borgatti SP, Schippers MC (2010) Network churn: The effects of self-monitoring personality on brokerage dynamics. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(4):639–670.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simmel G (1906) The sociology of secrecy and of secret societies. Amer. J. Sociol. 11(4):441–498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simmel G (1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Snijders TA (2011) Statistical models for social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 37:131–153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Swartz M, Watkins S (2003) Power Failure: The Inside Story of the Collapse of Enron (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
  • Tortoriello M, Reagans R, McEvily B (2012) Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1024–1039.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Turner RH, Killian LM (1957) Collective Behavior (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Justice (2003a) Former Enron Treasurer Ben Glisan pleads guilty to conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud. Press release, September 10, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Justice (2003b) Justice Department expands charges against former Enron CFO Andrew Fastow. Press release, May 1, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Justice (2004) Former Enron chief financial officer Andrew Fastow pleads guilty to conspiracy to commit securities and wire fraud, agrees to cooperate with Enron investigation. Press release, January 14, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):35–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B (1999) Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 64(4):481–505.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vaughan D (1999) The dark side of organizations: Mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25:271–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.