Driving Performance via Exploration in Changing Environments: Evidence from Formula One Racing

References

• Abernathy WJ, Clark KB (1985) Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Res. Policy 14(1):3–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P (2005) Competition and innovation: An inverted U relationship. Quart. J. Econom. 120(2):701–728.Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Alexander C (1964) Notes on the Synthesis of Form (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Anand J, Oriani R, Vassolo RS (2010) Alliance activity as a dynamic capability in the face of a discontinuous technological change. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1213–1232.Link, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1998) Dynamic panel data estimation using DPD98 for GAUSS. Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.Google Scholar
• Ashford AA, Hall RP (2011) The importance of regulation-induced innovation for sustainable development. Sustainability 3(1):270–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashford AA, Ayers C, Stone RE (1985) Using regulation to change the market for innovation. Harvard Environ. Law Rev. 9(2):419–466.Google Scholar
• Aversa P (2013) Case study: Innovation in a competitive sector. Brawn GP and Red Bull rejected Kers. Financial Times (April 8), 14.Google Scholar
• Aversa P, Furnari S, Haefliger S (2015) Business model configurations and performance. A qualitative comparative analysis in Formula One racing, 2005–2013. Indust. Corporate Change 24(3):655–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2003) Managing in an age of modularity. Garud R, Kumaraswamy A, Langlois RN, eds. Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks, and Organizations, Chap. 5 (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Baltagi BH (2009) A Companion to Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (John Wiley & Sons, London).Google Scholar
• Bauer DJ, Curran PJ (2005) Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Res. 40(3):373–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JR, Wally S (2003) Strategic decision speed and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 24(11):1107–1129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Li SX, Usher JM (2000) Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains’ acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(4):766–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck N, Brüderl J, Woywode M (2008) Momentum or deceleration? Theoretical and methodological reflections on the analysis of organizational change. Acad. Management J. 51(3):413–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckman CM (2006) The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Acad. Management J. 49(4):741–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics 87(1):115–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Griffith R, Van Reenen J (1999) Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(3):529–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Kang J-H, Stuart TE (2007) Competitive crowding and risk taking in a tournament: Evidence from NASCAR racing. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(2):208–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourgeois LJ III, Eisenhardt KM (1988) Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Sci. 34(7):816–835.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1995) Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. 20(2):343–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brusoni S, Prencipe A (2001) Unpacking the black box of modularity: Technologies, products and organizations. Indust. Corporate Change 10(1):179–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brusoni S, Prencipe A (2006) Making design rules: A multidomain perspective. Organ. Sci. 17(2):179–189.Link, Google Scholar
• Brusoni S, Prencipe A, Pavitt K (2001) Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):597–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brusoni S, Marengo L, Prencipe A, Valente M (2007) The value and costs of modularity: A problem solving perspective. Eur. Management Rev. 4(2):121–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler RJ, Carney M (1986) Strategy and strategic choice: The case of telecommunications. Strategic Management J. 7(2):161–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Canales R (2013) Weaving straw into gold: Managing organizational tensions between standardization and flexibility in microfinance. Organ. Sci. 25(1):1–28.Link, Google Scholar
• Castellucci F, Ertug G (2010) What’s in it for them? Advantages of higher-status partners in exchange relationships. Acad. Management J. 53(1):149–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Child J (1972) Organization structure and strategies of control: A replication of the Aston study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 17(2):163–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West S, Aiken L (1983) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Social Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2009) Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(3):413–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, March JG (2001) Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organ. Sci. 12(5):523–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Dess G, Beard D (1984) Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(1):52–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economist, The (2009) Boost for Formula One: Racing cars borrow a trick from the Toyota Prius (May 20), http://www.economist.com/node/13350762.Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2004) Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. 50(2):159–173.Link, Google Scholar
• Ettlie JE, Bridges WP, O’Keefe RD (1984) Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Sci. 30(6):682–695.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2005) Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organ. Sci. 16(6):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D, Ocasio W (2007) Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organ. Sci. 18(3):523–536.Link, Google Scholar
• George G, Haas MR, Pentland A (2014) Big data and management. Acad. Management J. 57(2):321–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick CJ (1988) Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Acad. Management J. 31(1):9–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick CJ (1994) Pacing strategic change: The case of a new venture. Acad. Management J. 37(1):9–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geroski PA (1995) Market Structure, Corporate Performance and Innovative Activity (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Gino F, Pisano GP (2011) Why leaders don’t learn from success. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(4):68–74.Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 16(1):15–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregoire J (1990–2010) Who Works in Formula One (all editions between 1990 and 2010) (Who Works Sports Guides, London).Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Smith K, Shalley C (2006) The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. 49(4):693–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Abrahamson E (1995) Assessing managerial discretion across industries: A multimethod approach. Acad. Management J. 38(5):1427–1441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1977) The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(5):929–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen JJ, Van Den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Sci. 52(11):1661–1674.Link, Google Scholar
• Jenkins M (2010) Technological discontinuities and competitive advantage: A historical perspective on Formula 1 motor racing 1950–2006. J. Management Stud. 47(5):884–910.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jenkins M (2014) Innovate or imitate? The role of collective beliefs in competences in competing firms. Long Range Planning 47(4):173–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jenkins M, Floyd S (2001) Trajectories in the evolution of technology: A multi-level study of competition in Formula 1 racing. Organ. Stud. 22(6):945–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jenkins M, Tallman S (2010) The shifting geography of competitive advantage: Clusters, networks and firms. J. Econom. Geography 10(4):599–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kale P, Anand J (2006) Regulatory liberalization and the decline of emerging economy joint ventures: The case of India. Calif. Management Rev. 43(3):61–76.Google Scholar
• Katila R, Chen EL (2008) Effects of search timing on innovation: The value of not being in sync with rivals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):593–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Kartik V, Lane D (2003) Formula one motor racing. HBS Case 9-703-412, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Kim T, Rhee M (2009) Exploration and exploitation: Internal variety and environmental dynamism. Strategic Organ. 7(11):11–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S (1997) Industry life cycles. Indust. Corporate Change 6(1):145–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koza MP, Lewin AY (1998) The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. 9(3):255–264.Link, Google Scholar
• Laureiro-Martínez D, Brusoni S, Canessa N, Zollo M (2015) Understanding the exploration–exploitation dilemma: An MRI study of attention control and decision-making performance. Strategic Management J. 36(3):319–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laureiro-Martínez D, Canessa N, Brusoni S, Zollo M, Hare T, Alemanno F, Cappa SF (2014) Frontopolar cortex and decision-making efficiency: Comparing brain activity of experts with different professional background during an exploration–exploitation task. Front. Human Neurosci. 7:927. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00927.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levins R (1968) Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Marino A (2015) Three facets of organizational adaptation: Selection, variety, and plasticity. Organ. Sci. 26(3):743–755.Link, Google Scholar
• Lind JT, Mehlum H (2010) With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. 72(1):109–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke KD (2001) Grounded Theory in Management Research (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Maitlis S, Lawrence TB (2007) Triggers and enablers of sensegiving in organizations. Acad. Management J. 50(1):57–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG (1996) Continuity and change in theories of organizational action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(2):278–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (2006) Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence. Strategic Management J. 27(3):201–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marples DL (1961) The decisions of engineering design. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 8(2):55–71.Google Scholar
• McCarthy IP, Lawrence PR, Brian W, Brian RG (2010) A multidimensional conceptualization of environmental velocity. Acad. Management Rev. 35(4):604–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menard P, Cahier B, Roebuck N (2010) The Great Encyclopedia of Formula 1 (Chronosports, London).Google Scholar
• Nadkarni S, Narayanan V (2007a) Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The moderating role of industry clockspeed. Strategic Management J. 28(3):243–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadkarni S, Narayanan V (2007b) The evolution of collective strategy frames in high- and low-velocity industries. Organ. Sci. 18(4):688–710.Link, Google Scholar
• Nickell S (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica: J. Econometric Soc. 49(6):1417–1426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2004) A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. 15(6):617–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Peters TJ, Waterman RH (1982) In Search of Excellence: Lessons from American’s Best-Run Companies (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Pinch S, Henry N (1999) Paul Krugman’s geographical economics, industrial clustering and the British motor sport industry. Regional Stud. 33(9):815–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piola G (1992–2010) Formula 1: Technical Analysis (all editions between 1992 and 2010) (Giorgio Nada Editore, Milan).Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1996) America’s green strategy. Welford R, Starkey R, eds. Business and the Environment: A Reader, Chap. 5 (Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Levinthal DA (2012) Chasing a moving target: Exploitation and exploration in dynamic environments. Management Sci. 58(3):587–601.Link, Google Scholar
• Prencipe A (1997) Technological competencies and product’s evolutionary dynamics a case study from the aero-engine industry. Res. Policy 25(8):1261–1276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. 49(3):290–311.Link, Google Scholar
• Roodman D (2009a) A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. 71(1):135–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roodman D (2009b) How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata J. 9:86–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross J, Sharapov D (2015) When leaders follow: Avoiding dethronement through imitation. Acad. Management J. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT (2001) Incumbent’s advantage through exploting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):687–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sasabuchi S (1980) A test of a multivariate normal mean with composite hypotheses determined by linear inequalities. Biometrika 67(2):429–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shenkar O (2010) Copycats: How smart companies use imitation to gain a strategic edge. Strategic Direction 26(10):3–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2002) Evolution toward fit. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):125–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2007) Persuasion with case studies. Acad. Management J. 50(1):20–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2005) Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ. Sci. 16(2):101–122.Link, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1976) How complex are complex systems? PSA: Proc. Biennual Meeting of the Philosophy Sci. Assoc., 2(Symposia and invited papers), 507–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1999) Can there be a science of complex systems? Bar-Yam Y, ed. Unifying Themes in Complex Systems (Perseus Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB, Stuart TE (2000) Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):81–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spurgeon B (2010) Formula 1’s kinetic energy recovery system. About.com—Formula 1 and Other Car Racing. Last accessed April 27, 2015, http://formula1.about.com/od/car1/a/kers.htm.Google Scholar
• Spurgeon B (2011a) Formula 1 drivers are lightweight again. About.com—Formula 1 and Other Car Racing. Last accessed April 27, 2015, http://formula1.about.com/od/drivers/a/Driver_Weights.htm.Google Scholar
• Spurgeon B (2011b) Skills, thrills—and buttons—for F1 drivers. New York Times (April 8), http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/09/sports/autoracing/09iht-SRPRIX09.html?_r=0.Google Scholar
• Stewart LA (2011) The impact of regulation on innovation in the United States: A cross-industry literature review. Inform. Tech. Innovation, 1–29.Google Scholar
• Stigliani I, Ravasi D (2012) Organizing thoughts and connecting brains: Material practices and the transition from individual to group-level prospective sensemaking. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1232–1259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Romanelli E (1985) Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Res. Organ. Behav. 7:171–222.Google Scholar
• Walsh JP (1988) Selectivity and selective perception: An investigation of managers’ belief structures and information processing. Acad. Management J. 31(4):873–896.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wholey D, Brittain J (1989) Characterizing environmental variation. Acad. Management J. 32(4):867–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Windmeijer F (2005) A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. J. Econometrics 126(1):25–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiseman RM, Catanach C (1997) A longitudinal disaggregation of operational risk under changing regulations: Evidence from the savings and loan industry. Acad. Management J. 40(4):799–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin R (2008) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Yoffie DB, Rossano P (2012) Apple Inc. in 2012. HBS Case 712-490, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar