The Integration of Psychological and Network Perspectives in Organizational Scholarship

References

• Allen TJ (1984) Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (MIT Press Books, Cambridge).Google Scholar
• Archer MS (1995) Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyris C (1982) Reasoning, Learning, and Action: Individual and Organizational (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 85–101.Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Mount MK (1991) The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psych. 44(1): 1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsade SG, Gibson DE (2007) Why does affect matter in organizations? Acad. Management Perspect. 21(1):36–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsade SG, Knight A (2015) Group affect. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 2:21–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsade SG, O’Neill OA (2014) What’s love got to do with it? A longitudinal study of the culture of companionate love and employee and client outcomes in a long-term care setting. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(4):551–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bavelas A (1950) Communication patterns in task oriented groups. J. Acoustical Soc. America 22(6):725–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berscheid E (1985) Interpersonal attraction. Lindzey G, Aronson E, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology, 2nd ed. (Random House, New York), 413–484.Google Scholar
• Bonacich E (1972) A theory of ethnic antagonism: The split labor market. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 37(5):547–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonacich P (1987) Power and centrality: A family of measures. Amer. J. Sociol. 92(5):1170–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Everett MG (2006) A graph-theoretic perspective on centrality. Soc. Networks 28(4):466–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1991) Language and Symbolic Power (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Brands RA, Menges JI, Kilduff M (2015) The leader-in-social-network schema: Perceptions of network structure affect gendered attributions of charisma. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1210–1225.Link, Google Scholar
• Brass DJ (1984) Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(4): 518–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brin S, Page L (1998) The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Comput. Networks and ISDN Systems 30(1): 107–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2005) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll JB (1993) Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T, Lobo MS (2008) When competence is irrelevant: The role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):655–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T, Lobo MS (2014) Affective primacy in intraorganizational task networks. Organ. Sci. 26(2):373–389.Link, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T, Gino F, Kouchaki M (2014) The contaminating effects of building instrumental ties: How networking can make us feel dirty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(4):705–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS, Katz E, Menzel H (1966) Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study (Bobbs-Merril Company, Indianapolis).Google Scholar
• Conger JA, Kanungo RN (1987) Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Acad. Management Rev. 12(4):637–647.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa PT JR, McCrae RR (1997) Longitudinal stability in adult personality. Hogan R, Johnson JA, Briggs SR, eds. Handbook of Personality Psychology (Academic Press, Orlando, FL), 269–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeRue DS, Nahrgang JD, Ashford SJ (2015) Interpersonal perceptions and the emergence of leadership structures in groups: A network perspective. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1192–1209.Link, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2002) The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organ. Sci. 13(2):128–146.Link, Google Scholar
• Everett MG, Borgatti SP (1999) The centrality of groups and classes. J. Math. Sociol. 23(3):181–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Everett MG, Krackhardt D (2012) A second look at Krackhardt’s graph theoretical dimensions on informal organizations. Soc. Networks 34(2):159–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang R, Landis B, Zhang Z, Anderson MH, Shaw JD, Kilduff M (2015) Integrating personality and social networks: A meta-analysis of personality, network position, and work outcomes in organizations. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1243–1260.Link, Google Scholar
• Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1(3):215–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gangestad S, Snyder M (2000) Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psych. Bull. 126(4):530–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerbasi A, Porath CL, Parker A, Spreitzer G, Cross R (2015) Destructive de-energizing relationships: How thriving buffers their effect on performance. J. Appl. Psych., ePub ahead of print March 23, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, Vermeulen F (2003) A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2): 202–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, Dunlop P, Caprar DV (2015) Intra-individual identity combination: Bringing our understanding of multiculturalism to a new level of precision. Paper to be presented at the National Academy of Management Meetings, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
• Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (University of California Press, Oakland, CA).Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Pitre E (1990) Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Acad. Management Rev. 15(4):584–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg LR (1981) Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Rev. Personality Soc. Psych. 2(1):141–165.Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1979) The theory-gap in social network analysis. Holland PW, Leinhardt S, eds. Perspectives Soc. Network Res. (Academic Press, Waltham, MA), 501–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffeth RW, Hom PW, Gaertner S (2000) A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. J. Management 26(3):463–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):82–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heider F (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogue A, Steinberg L (1995) Homophily of internalized distress in adolescent peer groups. Developmental Psych. 31(6):897–906.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homans GC (1961) Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms (Harcourt, Brace and World, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Huff AS (1995) Cognition in organizations. The Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary of Organizational Behavior, 2nd ed., Vol. VI (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA), 64–66.Google Scholar
• Hunter JE, Hunter RF (1984) Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psych. Bull. 96(1):72–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• John OP, Srivastava S (1999) The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Pervin LA, John, OP, eds. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2nd ed. (Guilford Press, New York), 102–138.Google Scholar
• Kanfer R (1990) Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. Dunnette MD, Hough LM, eds. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2nd ed., Vol. 1 (Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA), 75–170.Google Scholar
• Kanfer R (1995) Motivation. The Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary of Organizational Behavior, 2nd ed., Vol. VI (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA), 330–336.Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Krackhardt D (1994) Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations. Acad. Management J. 37(1):87–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff MJ, Tsai W (2003) Social Networks and Organizations (Sage, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Crossland C, Tsai W, Krackhardt D (2008) Organizational network perceptions versus reality: A small world after all? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 107(1):15–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM, Jordan AH, Audia PG (2015) An altercentric perspective on the origins of brokerage in social networks: How perceived empathy moderates the self-monitoring effect. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1226–1242.Link, Google Scholar
• Kleinginna PR Jr., Kleinginna AM (1981) A categorized list of emotion definitions, with suggestions for a consensual definition. Motivation and Emotion 5(4):345–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1987) Cognitive social structures. Soc. Networks 9(2): 109–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1992) The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. Nohria N, Eccles R, eds. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (Harvard Business School Press, Boston), 216–239.Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1999) The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Res. Sociol. Organ. 16(1):183–210.Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (2010) Social networks. Levine JM, Hogg MA, eds. Encyclopedia of Group Processes and Intergroup Relations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 817–821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D, Stern RN (1988) Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Soc. Psych. Quart. 51(2):123–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Labianca G, Brass DJ (2006) Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3):596–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landy FJ (1985) Psychology of work behavior. Relations Industrielles/Indust. Relations 40(4):896–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS, Cohen-Charash Y (2001) Discrete emotions in organizational life. Payne RL, Cooper CL, eds. Emotions at Work: Theory, Res. Appl. Management (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 45–81.Google Scholar
• Leavitt H (1951) Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 46(1):38–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP (2002) Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation—A 35-year odyssey. Amer. Psych. 57(9):705–717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Mayhew BH (1980) Structuralism versus individualism 1: Part 1, Shadowboxing in the dark. Soc. Forces 59(2):335–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, John OP (1992) An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. J. Personality 60(2):175–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Kilduff M, Brass DJ (2001) The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):121–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell TR, Holtom BC, Lee TW, Sablynski CJ, Erez M (2001) Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1102–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreno JL (1961) The role concept, a bridge between psychiatry and sociology. Amer. J. Psychiatry 118(6):518–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norman WT (1963) Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 66(6):574–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Opsahl T, Agneessens F, Skvoretz J (2010) Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Soc. Networks 32(3):245–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly C (1989) Corporations, culture and commitment: Motivation and social control in organizations. California Management Rev. 31(4):9–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramarajan L (2014) Past, present and future research on multiple identities: Toward an intrapersonal network approach. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):589–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.Link, Google Scholar
• Reeve C (2007) Cognitive abilities. Rogelberg S, ed. Encyclopedia of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 77–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reis HT, Clark MS, Holmes JG (2004) Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. Mashek DJ, Aron AP, eds. Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 201–225.Google Scholar
• Roberts BW, Donnellan MB, Hill PL (2013) Personality trait development in adulthood. Tennen H, Suls J, Weiner IB, eds. Handbook of Psychology, 2nd ed., Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 5 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 183–196.Google Scholar
• Romney AK, Weller SC, Batchelder WH (1986) Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. Amer. Anthropologist 88(2):313–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russell JA (1980) A circumplex model of affect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 39(6):1161–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sasovova Z, Mehra A, Borgatti SP, Schippers MC (2010) Network churn: The effects of self-monitoring personality on brokerage dynamics. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(4):639–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt FL, Hunter J (2004) General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 86(1):162–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schulte M, Cohen NA, Klein KJ (2012) The coevolution of network ties and perceptions of psychological safety. Organ. Sci. 23(2):564–581.Link, Google Scholar
• Shaw ME (1964) Communication networks. Berkowitz L, ed. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. Vol. 1(Academic Press, Waltham, MA), 111–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherif M, Harvey OJ, White J, Hood WR, Sherif CW (1961) The Robbers Cave Experiment: Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation, Vol. 10 (University Book Exchange, Norman, OK).Google Scholar
• Simmel G (1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Smith EB, Menon T, Thompson L (2012) Status differences in the cognitive activation of social networks. Organ. Sci. 23(1):67–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Snyder M (1974) The self-monitoring of expressive behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 30(4):526–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stryker S, Burke PJ (2000) The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Soc. Psych. Quart. 63(4):284–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vardaman JM, Taylor SG, Allen DG, Gondo MB, Amis JM (2015) Translating intentions to behavior: The interaction of network structure and behavioral intentions in understanding employee turnover. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1177–1191.Link, Google Scholar
• Venkataramani V, Labianca G, Grosser T (2013) Positive and negative workplace relationships, social satisfaction, and organizational attachment. J. Appl. Psych. 98(6):1028–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(6):1063–1070.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wellman B, Berkowitz SD, eds. (1988) Social Structures: A Network Approach, Vol. 2 (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Williams KY, O’Reilly CA (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 20 (JAI Press, New York), 77–140.Google Scholar