The Travails of Identity Change: Competitor Claims and Distinctiveness of British Political Parties, 1970–1992

References

• Albert S, Whetten DA (1985) Organizational identity. Res. Organ. Behav. 7:263–295.Google Scholar
• Ansari SM, Fiss PC, Zajac EJ (2010) Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse. Acad. Management Rev. 35(1):67–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Rogers KM, Corley KG (2011) Identity in organizations: Exploring cross-level dynamics. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1144–1156.Link, Google Scholar
• Bara J (2005) A question of trust: Implementing party manifestos. Parliament Aff 58(3):585–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Haveman HA (1997) Love thy neighbor? Differentiation and agglomeration in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1990. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(2):304–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Korn HJ (1996) Competitive dynamics of interfirm rivalry. Acad. Management J. 39(2):255–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck N, Katz JN (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 89(3):634–647.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer MB (1991) The social self—On being the same and different at the same time. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B 17(5):475–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budge I, Robertson D, Hearl D (1987) Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budge I, Klingemann H, Volkens A, Bara J, Tanenbaum E, eds. (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–1998 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 19–51.Google Scholar
• Cappellari L, Jenkins SP (2003) Multivariate probit regression using simulated maximum likelihood. The Stata J. 3(3):278–294.Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Swaminathan A (2000) Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the US brewing industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):715–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen M-J (1996) Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Acad. Management Rev. 21(1):100–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen M-J, Miller D (2012) Competitive dynamics: Themes, trends, and a prospective research platform. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):135–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chreim S (2005) The continuity–change duality in narrative texts of organizational identity*. J. Management Stud. 42(3):567–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clarke HD (2009) Performance Politics and the British Voter (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clarke HD, Stewart MC (1984) Dealignment of degree—Partisan change in britain, 1974–83. J. Political 46(3):689–718.Google Scholar
• Corley KG, Gioia DA (2004) Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(2):173–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crewe I, Searing DD (1988) Ideological change in the British conservative party. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 82(2):362–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crewe I, Sarlvik B, Alt J (1977) Partisan de-alignment in Britain 1964-1974. Brit. J. Political Sci. 7(April):129–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Downs A (1957) An economic-theory of political-action in a democracy. J. Polit. Econ. 65(2):135–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Dukerich JM (1991) Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Acad. Management J. 34(3):517–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Sutton RI (1992) Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions—A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Acad. Management J. 35(4):699–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Kramer RM (1996) Members’ responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the business week rankings. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(3):442–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiol CM (1991) Managing culture as a competitive resource: An identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):191–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC, Kennedy MT, Davis GF (2012) How golden parachutes unfolded: Diffusion and variation of a controversial practice. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1077–1099.Link, Google Scholar
• Franklin MN (1984) How the decline of class voting opened the way to radical change in British politics. Brit. J. Political Sci. 14(04):483–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franklin MN (1985) The Decline of Class Voting in Britain: Changes in the Basis of Electoral Choice, 1964–1983 (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Thomas JB (1996) Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(3):370–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Schultz M, Corley KG (2000) Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):63–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Price KN, Hamilton AL, Thomas JB (2010) Forging an Identity: An insider-outsider study of processes involved in the formation of organizational identity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):1–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Patvardhan SD, Hamilton AL, Corley KG (2013) Organizational identity formation and change. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):123–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green J (2007) When voters and parties agree: Valence issues and party competition. Political Stud. London 55(3):629–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green J (2015) Party and voter incentives at the crowded centre of British politics. Party Political 21(1):80–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green J, Jennings W (2011) The dynamics of issue competence and vote for parties in and out of power: An analysis of valence in Britain, 1979–1997. Eur. J. Political Res. 51(4):469–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (1998) Managerial cognition and the mimetic adoption of market positions: What you see is what you do. Strategic Management J. 19(10):967–988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Polos L, Carroll GR (2007) Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes and Ecologies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Haveman HA, Rao H, Paruchuri S (2007) The winds of change: The progressive movement and the bureaucratization of thrift. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72(1):117–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica: J. Econometric Soc. 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holian DB (2004) He’s stealing my issues! Clinton’s crime rhetoric and the dynamics of issue ownership. Political Behav. 26(2):95–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Hannan MT (2005) Identities, genres, and organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 16(5):474–490.Link, Google Scholar
• Ingle S (2008) The British Party System: An Introduction (Taylor & Francis, New York).Google Scholar
• Iversen T (1994) Political leadership and representation in West European democracies: A test of three models of voting. Amer. J. Political Sci. 38(1):45–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janda K, Harmel R, Edens C, Goff P (1995) Changes in party identity—Evidence from party manifestos. Party Political 1(2):171–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karthikeyan SI, Wezel FC (2011) Identity By Repositioning: The Case of Liberal Democrats and Audience Attention in British Politics, 1950–2005 (Emerald, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
• Kennedy MT, Fiss PC (2009) Institutionalization, framing, and diffusion: The logic of tqm adoption and implementation decisions among us hospitals. Acad. Management J. 52(5):897–918.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ, Elfenbein HA, Staw BM (2010) The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition. Acad. Management J. 53(5):943–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG, Clemens ES, Fry M (2011) Identity realization and organizational forms: Differentiation and consolidation of identities among arizona’s charter schools. Organ. Sci. 22(3):554–572.Link, Google Scholar
• Klingemann H, Volkens A, Bara J, Budge I, McDonald MD (2006) Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD, 1990–2003 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Knight K (2006) Transformations of the concept of ideology in the twentieth century. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 100(4):619–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Livengood RS, Reger RK (2010) That’s our turf! Identity domains and competitive dynamics. Acad. Management Rev. 35(1):48–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mair P, Müller WC, Plasser F (2004) Political Parties and Electoral Change: Party Responses to Electoral Markets (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations—Formal-structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D, Chen M-J (1994) Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the US airline industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nag R, Corley KG, Gioia DA (2007) The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Acad. Management J. 50(4):821–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Hannan MT, Rao H (2011) Category reinterpretation and defection: Modernism and tradition in Italian winemaking. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1449–1463.Link, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Kocak O, Hsu G (2010) Introduction. Hsu G, Negro G, Kocak O, eds. Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 3–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norris P, Lovenduski J (2004) Why parties fail to learn: Electoral defeat, selective perception and British party politics. Party Political 10(1):85–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2005) Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(6):968–991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravasi D, Schultz M (2006) Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Acad. Management J. 49(3):433–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russell A, Fieldhouse E (2005) Neither Left Nor Right: The Liberal Democrats and the Electorate (Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK).Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1984) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Sherman DK, Cohen GL (2002) Accepting threatening information: Self–affirmation and the reduction of defensive biases. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 11(4):119–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang Y, Wezel FC (2015) Up to standard?: Market positioning and performance of Hong Kong films, 1975–1997. J. Bus. Vent 30(3):452–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (2009) Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of “the digital photography company.” Organ. Sci. 20(2):441–460.Link, Google Scholar
• UK Political Info (2015) General election turnout 1945–2015. Accessed on April 12, 2015, http://www.ukpolitical.info/Turnout45.htm.Google Scholar
• Watson I (2010) The different tribes of Liberal Democrats. BBC News (December 7), http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-11934740.Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1995) Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):60–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright A (2003) British Politics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Yu T, Cannella AA (2013) A comprehensive review of multimarket competition research. J. Management 39(1):76–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zellner A (1962) An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 57(298):348–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar