When the Bases of Social Hierarchy Collide: Power Without Status Drives Interpersonal Conflict

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1019

References

  • Amason AC (1996) Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management groups. Acad. Management J. 39(1):123–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson C, Berdahl JL (2002) The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. J. Personality Soc. Psych., 83(6):1362–1377.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andersson LM, Pearson CM (1999) Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Acad. Management Rev. 24(3):452–471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anicich EM, Swaab RI, Galinsky AD (2015) Hierarchical cultural values predict success and mortality in high-stakes teams. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112(5):1338–1343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aquino K, Douglas S (2003) Identity threat and antisocial behavior in organizations: The moderating effects of individual differences, aggressive modeling, and hierarchical status. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes. 90(1):195–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyris C (1962) Interpersonal Competence and Organizational Effectiveness (Dorsey Press, Homewood, IL).Google Scholar
  • Ashforth BE (2001) Role Transitions in Organizational Life: An Identity-Based Perspective (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Bendersky C, Hays NA (2012) Status conflict in groups. Organ. Sci. 23(2):323–340.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bendix R, Lipset SM, eds. (1966) Class, Status, and Power (Free Press, New York), 201–352.Google Scholar
  • Berger J, Rosenholtz SJ, Zelditch M (1980) Status organizing processes. Annual Rev. Soc. 6(August):479–508.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Biddle BJ (1979) Role Theory: Expectations, Identities, and Behaviors (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bies RJ (2001) Interactional (in)justice: The sacred and the profane. Greenberg J, Cropanzano R, eds. Advances in Organizational Justice (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 89–118.Google Scholar
  • Bies RJ, Tripp TM (1995) Beyond distrust: “Getting even” and the need for revenge. Kramer RM, Tyler T, eds. Trust in Organizations (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), 246–260.Google Scholar
  • Blader SL, Chen Y (2012) Differentiating the effects of status and power: A justice perspective. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 102(5):994–1014.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau PM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bloom M (1999) The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations. Acad. Management J. 42(1):25–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson JS, Reagans RE (2011) Power, status, and learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1182–1194.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen S, Lee-Chai AY, Bargh JA (2001) Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80(2):173–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cheng JT, Tracy JL, Henrich J (2010) Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evol. Human Behav. 31(5):334–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clegg SR, Courpasson D, Phillips N (2006) Power and Organizations (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  • Coie JD, Dodge KA, Coppotelli H (1982) Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Dev. Psych. 18(4):557–570.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox KB (1998) Antecedents and effects of intergroup conflict in the nursing unit. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.Google Scholar
  • CPP (2008) CPP Global Human Capital Report: Workplace conflict and how businesses can harness it to thrive. Mountain View, CA.Google Scholar
  • De Dreu CKW (2008) The virtue and vice of workplace conflict: Food for (pessimistic) thought. J. Organ Behav. 29(1):5–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Dreu CKW, Gelfand M (2008) Conflict in the workplace: Sources, functions, and dynamics across multiple levels of analysis. De Dreu CKW, Gelfand MJ, eds. The Psychology of Conflict and Conflict Management in Organizations (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York), 3–54.Google Scholar
  • De Dreu CKW, Van de Vliert E, eds. (1997) Using Conflict in Organizations (Sage, London), 101–105.Google Scholar
  • De Dreu CKW, Weingart LR (2003) Task versus relationship conflict, team performance and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4):741–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Wit FRC, Greer LL, Jehn KA (2012) The Paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 97(2):360–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dodge KA, Coie JD, Pettit GS, Price JM (1990) Peer status and aggression in boys’ groups: Developmental and contextual analyses. Child Dev. 61(5):1289–1309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Driskell JE, Webster M, Jr. (1997) Status and sentiment in task groups. Szmatka J, Skvoretz J, Berger J, eds. Status, Network, and Structure: Theory Development in Group Processes (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 179–200.Google Scholar
  • Elliott JR, Smith RA (2004) Race, gender, and workplace power. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(3):365–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fast NJ, Halevy N, Galinsky AD (2012) The destructive nature of power without status. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 48(1):391–394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felson RB (1982) Impression management and the escalation of aggression and violence. Soc. Psych. Quart. 45(4):245–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske ST (2010) Stratification. Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, Lindzey G, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology 5th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 941–982.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fragale AR, Overbeck JR, Neale MA (2011) Resources versus respect: Social judgments based on targets’ power and status positions. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 47(4):767–775.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frone MR (2000) Interpersonal conflict at work and psychological outcomes: Testing a model among young workers. J. Occup. Health Psych. 5(2):246–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galinsky AD, Gruenfeld DH, Magee JC (2003) From power to action. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 85(3):453–466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galinsky AD, Rucker DD, Magee JC (2015) Power. Mario M, Shaver P, Simpson J, Dovidio J, eds. Interpersonal Relations. APA Handbooks in Psychology, Vol. 3 (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 421–460.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galinsky AD, Magee JC, Gruenfeld DH, Whitson JA, Liljenquist KA (2008) Social power reduces the strength of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(6):1450–1466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garandeau CF, Cillessen AH (2006) From indirect aggression to invisible aggression: A conceptual view on bullying and peer group manipulation. Aggression and Violent Behav. 11(6):612–625.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • George D, Mallery P (2003) SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 11.0 Update, 4th ed. (Allyn Bacon, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Goodman E, Huang B, Schafer-Kalkhoff T, Adler NE (2007) Perceived socioeconomic status: A new type of identity that influences adolescents’ self-rated health. J. Adolescent Health 41(5):479–487.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gosling SD, Rentfrow PJ, Swann Jr. WB (2003) A very brief measure of the big five personality domains. J. Res. Personality 37(6):504–528.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenberg J (1988) Equity and workplace status: A field experiment. J. Appl. Psych. 73(4):606–613.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guinote A, Weick M, Cai A (2012) Does power magnify the expression of dispositions? Psych. Sci. 23(5):475–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halevy N, Katz JJ (2013) Conflict templates thinking through interdependence. Curr. Dir. Psych. Sci. 22(3):217–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halevy N, Chou E, Galinsky AD (2011) A functional model of hierarchy: Why, how and when hierarchical differentiation enhances group performance. Organ. Psych. Rev. 1(1):32–52.Google Scholar
  • Halevy N, Chou E, Galinsky AD, Murnighan JK (2012) When hierarchy wins: Evidence from the National Basketball Association. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 3(4):398–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halevy N, Cohen TR, Chou EY, Katz JJ, Panter AT (2014) Mental models at work: Cognitive causes and consequences of conflict in organizations. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 40(1):92–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick DC, Cannella AA (1993) Relative standing: A framework for understanding departures of acquired executives. Acad. Management J. 36(4):733–762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haslam N (2006) Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 10(3):252–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayes AF (2012) My macros and code for SPSS and SAS. Retrieved November 1, 2015, http://www.afhayes.com/spss-sas-and-mplus-macros-and-code.html.Google Scholar
  • Hecht MA, LaFrance M (1998) License or obligation to smile: Power, sex and smiling. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 24(12):1326–1336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helmreich RL (2000) On error management: Lessons from aviation. Brit. J. Manage. 320(7237):781–785.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirsh JB, Galinsky AD, Zhong CB (2011) Drunk, powerful, and in the dark: How general processes of disinhibition produce both prosocial and antisocial behavior. Pers. Psych. Sci. 6(5):415–427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hodson G, Hewstone M, eds. (2012) Advances in Intergroup Contact (Psychology Press, New York), 113–132.Google Scholar
  • Hoffman E, McCabe K, Shachat K, Smith V (1994) Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games Econom. Behav. 7(3):346–380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Homans GC (1974) Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, Revised ed. (Harcourt Brace, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Jehn KA (1995) A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):256–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jehn KA, Mannix EA (2001) The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad. Management J. 44(2):238–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jehn KA, Northcraft GB, Neale MA (1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in work groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):741–763.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Judge TA, Livingston BA, Hurst C (2012) Do nice guys—and gals—really finish last? The joint effects of sex and agreeableness on income. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 102(2):390–407.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahn WA (1990) Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad. Management J. 33(4):692–724.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelley HH (1979) Personal Relationships: Their Structures and Processes (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Keltner D, Gruenfeld DH, Anderson C (2003) Power, approach and inhibition. Psych. Rev. 110(2):265–284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kifer Y, Heller D, Perunovic WE, Galinsky AD (2013) The good life of the powerful: The experience of power and authenticity enhance subjective well-being. Psych. Sci. 24(3):280–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD (2013) From the ephemeral to the enduring: How approach-oriented mindsets lead to greater status. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 105(5):816–831.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kraus MW, Chen S, Keltner D (2011) The power to be me: Power elevates self-concept consistency and authenticity, J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 47(5):974–980.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ku G, Wang CS, Galinsky AD (2010) Perception through a perspective-taking lens: Differential effects on judgment and behavior. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 46(5):792–798.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lammers J, Galinsky AD, Gordijn EH, Otten S (2008) Illegitimacy moderates the effects of power on approach. Psych. Sci. 19(6):558–564.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lancelotta GX, Vaughn S (1989) Relation between types of aggression and sociometric status: Peer and teacher perceptions. J. Ed. Psych. 81(1):86–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langdon FJ (1966) Modern Offices: A User Survey (National Building Studies Research Paper No. 41, Ministry of Technology, Building Research Station) (Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London), 101–115.Google Scholar
  • Laschinger HKS, Finegan J (2005) Using empowerment to build trust and respect in the workplace: A strategy for addressing the nursing shortage. Nursing Econ. 23(1):6–13.Google Scholar
  • Leary MR (2010) Affiliation, acceptance, and belonging: The pursuit of interpersonal connection. Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, Lindzey G, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2, 5th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 864–897.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leary MR, Baumeister RF (2000) The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. Zanna MP, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 32 (Academic Press, San Diego), 1–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leary MR, Twenge JM, Quinlivan E (2006) Interpersonal rejection as a determinant of anger and aggression. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 10(2):111–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lipsey MW, Wilson DB (2001) Practical Meta-Analysis, Vol. 49 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Macdonald D (1999) The “professional” work of experienced physical education teachers. Res. Quart. Exercise and Sport 70(1):41–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Magee JC, Galinsky AD (2008) Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):351–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mäkelä K, Hirvensalo M, Whipp PR (2014) Should I stay or should I go? Physical education teachers’ career intentions. Res. Quart. Exercise and Sport 85(2):234–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maner JK, Mead NL (2010) The essential tension between leadership and power: When leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 99(3):482–497.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mannix E, Neale MA (2005) What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psych. Sci. Pub. Int. 6(2):31–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mead NL, Maner JK (2012) On keeping your enemies close: Powerful leaders seek proximity to ingroup power-threats. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 102(3):576–591.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meier LL, Gross S (2015) Episodes of incivility between subordinates and supervisors: Examining the role of self-control and time with an interaction-record diary study. J. Organ Behav. 36(8):1096–1113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller DT (2001) Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Rev. Psych. 52(1):527–555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moreira H, Sparkes AC, Fox K (1995) Physical education teachers and job commitment: A preliminary analysis. Eur. Physical Ed. Rev. 1(2):122–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mowday RT, Steers RM, Porter LW (1979) Measurement of organizational commitment. J. Voc. Behav. 14(2):224–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neeley TB (2013) Language matters: Status loss and achieved status distinctions in global organizations. Organ. Sci. 24(2):476–497.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Olson-Buchanan JB, Boswell WR (2008) An integrative model of experiencing and responding to mistreatment at work. Acad. Management Rev. 33(1):76–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prinstein MJ, Cillessen AH (2003) Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quart. 49(3):310–342.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway CL (1991) The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Soc. Forces 70(2):367–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway CL (2001) Gender, status, and leadership. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):627–655.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ronay R, Greenaway K, Anicich EM, Galinsky AD (2012) The path to glory is paved with hierarchy: When hierarchical differentiation increases group effectiveness. Psych. Sci. 23(6):669–677.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenbaum ME, Tucker IF (1962) The competence of the model and the learning of imitation and nonimitation. J. Experiment. Psych. 63(2):183–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh-Manoux A, Adler NE, Marmot MG (2003) Subjective social status: Its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II study. Soc. Sci. Medicine 56(6):1321–1333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Twenge JM, Baumeister RF, Tice DM, Stucke TS (2001) If you can’t join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(6):1058–1069.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vidmar N (2001) Retribution and revenge. Handbook of Justice Research in Law (Springer, New York), 31–63.Google Scholar
  • Wade JB, O’Reilly CAI, Pollock TG (2006) Overpaid CEOs and underpaid managers: Fairness and executive compensation. Organ. Sci. 17(5):527–544.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Whipp PR, Tan G, Yeo PT (2007) Experienced physical education teachers reaching their “use-by date” powerless and disrespected. Res. Quart. Exercise and Sport 78(5):487–499.Google Scholar
  • Willer R (2009) A status theory of collective action. Thye SR, Lawler EJ, eds. Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 26 (Emerald, London), 133–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wolf WC, Fligstein ND (1979a) Sex and authority in the workplace: The causes of sexual inequality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 44(2):235–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wolf WC, Fligstein ND (1979b) Sexual stratification: Differences in power in the work setting. Soc. Forces 58(1):94–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.