Learning by Hiring: The Effects of Scientists’ Inbound Mobility on Research Performance in Academia

References

• Adams JD, Clemmons JR (2011) The role of search in university productivity: Inside, outside, and interdisciplinary dimension. Indust. Corporate Change 20(1):215–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Gango M, Ziedonis R (2009) Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: Implications for knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility. Strategic Management J. 30(13):1349–1374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert CM (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida P, Kogut B (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. 45(7):905–917.Link, Google Scholar
• Almeida P, Dokko G, Rosenkopf L (2003) Startup size and the mechanisms of external learning: Increasing opportunity and decreasing ability? Res. Policy 32(2):301–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992) Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. 3(3):321–341.Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Gambardella A (1998) Evolution of industry structure in the chemical industry. Arora A, Landau R, Rosenberg N, eds. Chemicals and Long-Term Economic Growth (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 379–413.Google Scholar
• Aschhoff B, Grimpe C (2014) Contemporaneous peer effects, career age and the industry involvement of academics in biotechnology. Res. Policy 43(2):367–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Zivin JSG, Wang J (2010) Superstar extinction. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2):549–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC (2011) Free-riding on power laws: Questioning the validity of the impact factor as a measure of research quality in organization studies. Organization 18(4):449–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• BCST (Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology), DELS (Division on Earth and Life Studies) (2007) International Benchmarking of U.S. Chemical Engineering Research Competitiveness (National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tushman M (2002) Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(4):676–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bercovitz J, Feldman M (2008) Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organ. Sci. 19(1):69–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Boeker W (1997) Executive migration and strategic change: The effect of top manager movement on product-market entry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(2):213–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouty I (2000) Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Acad. Management J. 43(1):50–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer MB, Weber JG (1994) Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 66(2):268–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buunk BP, Zurriaga R, Peiro JM, Nauta A, Gosalvez I (2005) Social comparisons at work as related to a cooperative social climate and to individual differences in social comparison orientation. Appl. Psych.: An Internat. Rev. 54(1):61–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (1998) Regression Analysis of Count Data (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carayol N, Matt M (2004) Does research organization influence academic production? Laboratory level evidence from a large European university. Res. Policy 33(8):1081–1102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chemical Engineering Faculty Directory (2004) American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York.Google Scholar
• Cole J, Cole S (1971) Measuring the quality of sociological research: problems in the use of the “science citation index.” Amer. Sociol. 6(1):23–29.Google Scholar
• CPSMA (Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications), DEPS (Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences) (1988) Frontiers in Chemical Engineering: Research Needs and Opportunities (National Academy Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P, David PA (1994) Towards a new economics of science. Res. Policy 23(5):487–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deeds DL, DeCarolis D, Coombs J (2000) Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures: An empirical analysis of new biotechnology firms. J. Bus. Venturing 15(3):211–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dokko G, Rosenkopf L (2010) Social capital for hire? Mobility of technical professionals and firm influence in wireless standards committees. Organ. Sci. 21(3):677–695.Link, Google Scholar
• Dokko G, Wilk SL, Rothbard NP (2009) Unpacking prior experience: How career history affects job performance. Organ. Sci. 20(1):51–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Dundar H, Lewis DR (1995) Departmental productivity in American universities: Economies of scale and scope. Econom. Ed. Rev. 14(2):119–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felps W, Mitchell TR, Hekman DR, Lee TW, Holtom BC, Harman WS (2009) Turnover contagion: How coworkers’ job embeddedness and job search behaviors influence quitting. Acad. Management J. 52(3):545–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2):117–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Fox MF, Mohapatra S (2007) Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral-granting departments. J. Higher Ed. 78(5):542–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galunic DC, Rodan S (1998) Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management J. 19(12):1193–1201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garcia-Vega M (2006) Does technological diversification promote innovation? An empirical analysis for European firms. Res. Policy 35(2):230–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ge C, Huang K, Png IPL (2016) Engineer/scientist careers: Patents, online profiles, and misclassification bias. Strategic Management J. 37(1):232–253Google Scholar
• Gibson DE, Lawrence BS (2010) Women’s and men’s career referents: How gender composition and comparison level shape career expectations. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1159–1175.Link, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2000) Econometric Analysis, 4th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Lee L (2009) Hiring stars and their colleagues: Exploration and exploitation in professional service firms. Organ. Sci. 20(4):740–758.Link, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Lee L, Nanda A (2008) Can they take it with them? The portability of star knowledge workers’ performance. Management Sci. 54(7):1213–1230.Link, Google Scholar
• Haeussler C (2011) Information-sharing in academia and the industry: A comparative study. Res. Policy 40(1):105–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagstrom WO (1971) Inputs, outputs, and the prestige of university science departments. Sociol. Ed. 44(4):375–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. Working Paper 8498 National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hansen MT, Mors ML, Lovas B (2005) Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Acad. Management J. 48(5):776–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hasan S, Bagde S (2013) The mechanics of social capital and academic performance in an Indian college. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 78(6):1009–1032.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman J, Hall BH, Griliches Z (1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica 52(4):909–938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G (2007) The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management J. 28(4):331–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huckman RS, Pisano GP (2006) The firm specificity of individual performance: Evidence from cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 52(4):473–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaminski D, Geisler C (2012) Survival analysis of faculty retention in science and engineering by gender. Science 335(6070):864–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz JS, Martin BR (1997) What is research collaboration? Res. Policy 26(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kehoe RR, Tzabbar D (2015) Lightning the way or stealing the shine? An examination of the duality in star scientists’ effects on firm innovative performance. Strategic Management J. 36(5):709–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenney M, Goe WR (2004) The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: A comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford. Res. Policy 33(5):691–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M (1990) The interpersonal structure of decision making: A social comparison approach to organizational choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 47(2):270–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM, Stuart TE, Tushman ML (2013) Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1316–1336.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Kruglanski AW, Mayseless O (1990) Classic and current social comparison research: Expanding the perspective. Psych. Bull. 108(2):195–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kyvik S (1995) Are big university departments better than small ones? Higher Ed. 30(3):295–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Cockburn IM, Henderson R (2004) Do firms change capabilities by hiring new people? A study of the adoption of science-based drug discovery. Baum JAC, McGahan AM, eds. Business Strategy over the Industry Lifecycle (Advances in Strategic Management, Volume 21) (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 133–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Drori I (2012) Collaborating for knowledge creation and application: The case of nanotechnology research programs. Organ. Sci. 23(3):704–724.Link, Google Scholar
• Luwel M, Moed HF (1998) Publication delays in the science field and their relationship to the ageing of scientific literature. Scientometrics 41(1–2):29–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski CF (2000) Economic analysis of social interactions. J. Econom. Perspect. 14(3):115–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maurer I, Bartsch V, Ebers M (2011) The value of intra-organizational social capital: How it fosters knowledge transfer, innovation performance, and growth. Organ. Stud. 32(2):157–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadyen MA, Cannella AA (2004) Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Acad. Management J. 47(5):735–746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller DG (2006) Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 27(7):601–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller DJ, Fern MJ, Cardinal LB (2007) The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms. Acad. Management J. 50(2):308–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molleman E, Nauta A, Bruunk BP (2007) Social comparison-based thoughts in groups: Their associations with interpersonal trust and learning outcome. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 37(6):1163–1180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):242–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nesta L, Saviotti PP (2005) Coherence of the knowledge base and the firm’s innovative performance: Evidence from the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. J. Indust. Econom. 53(1):123–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oettl A (2012) Reconceptualizing stars: Scientific helpfulness and peer performance. Management Sci. 58(6):1122–1140.Link, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly III CA, Caldwell DF, Barnett WP (1989) Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Admin. Sci. Quart. 34(1):21–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly III CA, Main BG, Crystal GS (1988) CEO compensation as tournament and social comparison: A tale of two theories. Admin. Sci. Quart. 33(2):257–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palomeras N, Melero E (2010) Markets for inventors: Learning-by-hiring as a driver of mobility. Management Sci. 56(5):881–895.Link, Google Scholar
• Paruchuri S, Nerkar A, Hambrick DC (2006) Acquisition integration and productivity losses in the technical core: Disruption of inventors in acquired companies. Organ. Sci. 17(5):545–562.Link, Google Scholar
• Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR (1999) Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perretti F, Negro G (2006) Filling empty seats: How status and organizational hierarchies affect exploration versus exploitation in team design. Acad. Management J. 49(4):759–777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Drazin R (2002) Overcoming resource constraints on product innovation by recruiting talent from rivals: A study of the mutual fund industry, 1986–94. Acad. Management J. 45(3):491–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R (2011) Close encounters: Analyzing how social similarity and propinquity contribute to strong network connections. Organ. Sci. 22(4):835–849.Link, Google Scholar
• Ritter SK (2001) The changing face of chemical engineering: Century-old discipline is ripe for expansion into material and biomedical product development. Chemical and Engineering News (June 4) http://pubs.acs.org/cen/education/7923/7923education.html.Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1998) Technological change in chemicals: The role of university-industry relations. Arora A, Landau R, Rosenberg N, eds. Chemicals and Long-Term Economic Growth (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 193–230.Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49(6):751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rovner SL (2005) Trends in academic R&D spending: Spending by the chemical research sector grew 7.9% in 2003, beating 10-year average. Chemical and Engineering News (October 31) http://pubs.acs.org/cen/science/83/8344sci1.html.Google Scholar
• Rynes SL, Orlitzki MO, Bretz Jr RD (1997) Experienced hiring versus college recruiting: Practices and emerging trends. Personnel Psych. 50(2):309–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J, Agrawal A (2011) Recruiting for ideas: How firms exploit the prior inventions of new hires. Management Sci. 57(1):129–150.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith RH (2000) Assimilative and contrastive emotional reactions to upward and downward social comparisons. Suls J, Wheeler L, eds. Handbook of Social Comparison: Theory and Research (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press, New York), 173–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Somaya D, Williamson IO, Lorinkova N (2008) Gone but not lost: The different performance impacts of employee mobility between cooperators versus competitors. Acad. Management J. 51(5):936–953.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song J, Almeida P, Wu G (2003) Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. 49(4):351–365.Link, Google Scholar
• Stapel DA, Koomen W (2005) Competition, cooperation, and the effects of others on me. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88(6):1029–1038.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stapel DA, Marx DM (2007) Distinctiveness is key: How different types of self-other similarity moderate social comparison effects. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 33(3):439–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Ding WW (2006) When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 112(1):97–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Subramaniam M, Youndt M (2005) The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Acad. Management J. 48(3):450–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tartari V, Perkmann M, Salter A (2014) In good company: The influence of peers on industry engagement by academic scientists. Res. Policy 43(7):1189–1203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomson Reuters. Journal citation reports (science edition 2000). Accessed March 15, 2011, http://thomsonreuters.com/en/products-services/scholarly-scientific-research/research-management-and-evaluation/journal-citation-reports.html.Google Scholar
• Thomson Reuters. Science citation index expanded. Accessed August 16, 2010, http://thomsonreuters.com/en/products-services/scholarly-scientific-research/scholarly-search-and-discovery/science-citation-index-expanded.html.Google Scholar
• Tzabbar D (2009) When does scientist mobility affect technological repositioning? Acad. Management J. 52(5):873–896.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tzabbar D, Aharonson BS, Amburgey TL (2013) When does tapping external sources of knowledge result in knowledge integration? Res. Policy 42(2):481–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilkinson SL (2000) Starting from scratch: New professors share their experiences. Chemical and Engineering News (June 19) http://pubs.acs.org/cen/coverstory/7825/7825scit1.html.Google Scholar
• Wood RE, Bandura A (1989) Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Acad. Management Rev. 14(3):361–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yayavaram S, Chen W (2015) Changes in firm knowledge couplings and firm innovation performance: The moderating role of technological complexity. Strategic Management J. 36(3):377–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. 27(2):185–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenger T, Lawrence B (1989) Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communications. Acad. Management J. 32(2):353–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR (1997) Present at the biotechnological revolution: Transformation of technological identity for a large incumbent pharmaceutical firm. Res. Policy 26(4–5):429–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Armstrong JS (2002) Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Sci. 48(1):138–153.Link, Google Scholar