User-Industry Spinouts: Downstream Industry Knowledge as a Source of New Firm Entry and Survival

References

• Adams P, Fontana R, Malerba F (2013) The magnitude of innovation by demand in a sectoral system: The role of industrial users in semiconductors. Res. Policy 42(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R (2006) Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(4):98–107.Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Audretsch DB (2001) Does entry size matter? The impact of the life cycle and technology on firm survival. J. Indust. Econom. 49(1):21–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Shah S (2014) Knowledge sources of entrepreneurship: Firm formation by academic, user and employee innovators. Res. Policy 43(7):1109–1133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Echambadi R, Franco A, Sarkar M (2004) Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin–out generation, development and survival. Acad. Management J. 47(4):501–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida P, Dokko G, Rosenkopf L (2003) Startup size and the mechanisms of external learning: Increasing opportunity and decreasing ability? Res. Policy 32(2):301–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Nandkumar A (2011) Cash-out or flameout! Opportunity cost and entrepreneurial strategy: Theory and evidence from the information security industry. Management Sci. 57(10):1844–1860.Link, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, von Hippel E (2011) Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1399–1417.Link, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, Heinerth C, von Hippel E (2006) How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study. Res. Policy 35(9):1291–1313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus B, Agarwal R (2007) The role of pre-entry experience, entry timing, and product technology strategies in explaining firm survival. Management Sci. 53(12):1887–1902.Link, Google Scholar
• Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE (1980) Regression Diagnostics (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berchicci L, King A, Tucci C (2011) Does the apple always fall close to the tree? The geographical proximity choice of spin-outs. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 5(2):120–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berkovitz J, Feldman M (2008) Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organ. Sci. 19(1):69–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhaskarabhatla A, Klepper S (2014) Latent submarket dynamics and industry evolution: Lessons from the U.S. laser industry. Indust. Corporate Change 23(6):1381–1415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bogers M, Afuah A, Bastian B (2010) Users as innovators: A review, critique, and future research directions. J. Management 36(4):857–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braun E, MacDonald S (1982) Revolution in Miniature: The History and Impact of Semiconductor Electronics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Brown C, Linden G (2009) Chips and Change: How Crisis Reshapes the Semiconductor Industry (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brittan JW, Freeman J (1986) Entrepreneurship in the semiconductor industry. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Bruderl J, Preisendorfer P, Ziegler R (1992) Survival chances of newly founded business organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 57(2):227–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buenstorf G (2007) Evolution on the shoulders of giants: Entrepreneurship and firm survival in the German laser industry. Rev. Indust. Organ. 30(3):179–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton MD, Sørensen JB, Beckman CM (2002) Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. Lounsbury M, Ventresca MM, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 19 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 229–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll G, Bigelow L, Seidel D, Tsai L (1996) The fates of de novo and de alio producers in the American automobile industry, 1885–1981. Strategic Management J. 17(S1):117–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Wernerfelt B (1991) The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence. Strategic Management J. 12(1):33–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji A (2009) Spawned with a silver spoon? Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry. Strategic Management J. 30(2):185–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji A, Fabrizio K (2012) How do product users influence corporate invention? Organ. Sci. 23(4):971–987.Link, Google Scholar
• Chatterji A, Fabrizio K (2013) Using users: When does external knowledge enhance corporate product innovation? Strategic Management J. 35(10):1427–1445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji A, Fabrizio K, Mitchell W, Schulman K (2008) Physician–industry cooperation in the medical device industry. Health Affairs 27(6):1532–1543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen PL, Williams C, Agarwal R (2012) Growing pains: Pre-entry experience and the challenges of transition to incumbency. Strategic Management J. 33(3):252–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C (1993) The rigid disk drive industry: A history of commercial and technological turbulence. Bus. History Rev. 67(4):531–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clarysse B, Wright M, Van de Velde E (2011) Entrepreneurial origin, technological knowledge, and the growth of spin-off companies. J. Management Stud. 48(6):1420–1442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockburn I, McGarvie MJ (2011) Entry and patenting in the software industry. Management Sci. 57(5):915–933.Link, Google Scholar
• Corsino M, Gabriele R (2011) Product innovation and firm growth: Evidence from the integrated circuit industry. Indust. Corporate Change 20(1):29–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Figueiredo JM, Silverman BS (2012) Firm survival and industry evolution in vertically related populations. Management Sci. 58(9):1632–1650.Link, Google Scholar
• Dencker J, Gruber M, Shah S (2009) Pre-entry knowledge, learning, and the survival of new firms. Organ. Sci. 20(3):516–537.Link, Google Scholar
• Dunne T, Roberts MJ, Samuelson L (1988) Patterns of firm entry and exit in U.S. manufacturing industries. RAND J. Econom. 19(4):495–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans DS (1987) The relationship between firm growth, size, and age: Estimates for 100 manufacturing industries. J. Indust. Econom. 35(4):567–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fairlie R, Chatterji A (2013) High-tech entrepreneurship in Silicon Valley: Opportunities and opportunity costs. J. Econom. Management Strategy 22(2):365–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fauchart E, Gruber M (2011) Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Acad. Management J. 54(5):935–957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feeser H, Willard G (1990) Founding strategy and performance: A comparison of high and low growth high tech firms. Strategic Management J. 11(2):87–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M, Feller I, Bercovitz J, Burton R (2002) Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American research universities. Management Sci. 48(1):105–121.Link, Google Scholar
• Franco A, Filson D (2006) Spin-outs: Knowledge diffusion through employee mobility. RAND J. Econom. 37(4):841–860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franco AM, Sarkar MB, Agarwal R, Echambadi R (2009) Swift and smart: The moderating effects of technological capabilities on the market pioneering-firm survival relationship. Management Sci. 55(11):1842–1860.Link, Google Scholar
• Frischmann BM, Madison MJ, Strandburg KJ eds. (2014) Governing Knowledge Commons (Oxford University Press, New York), 1–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geroski P (1995) What do we know about entry? Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 13(4):421–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gimeno J, Folta T, Cooper A, Woo C (1997) Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):750–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gompers P, Kovner A, Lerner J, Scharfstein D (2010) Performance persistence in entrepreneurship. J. Financial Econom. 96(1):18–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haefliger S, Jager P, von Krogh G (2010) Under the radar: Industry entry by user entrepreneurs. Res. Pol. 39(9):1198–1213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C, Lieberman MB (2002) The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Indust. Corporate Change 11(4):725–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins M, Gulati R (2003) Getting off to a good start. The effects of the upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organ. Sci. 14(3):244–263.Link, Google Scholar
• Holbrook D, Cohen W, Hounshell A, Klepper S (2000) The nature, sources, and consequences of firm differences in the early history of the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1017–1041.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu DH, Ziedonis RH (2013) Resources as dual sources of advantage: Implications for valuing entrepreneurial-firm patents. Strategic Management J. 34(7):761–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu DH, Roberts E, Eesley C (2007) Entrepreneurs from technology-based universities: Evidence from MIT. Res. Policy 36(5):768–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• IC Insights (2007) The McClean Report—A complete analysis and forecast of the integrated circuit industry. Technical Report, IC Insights Inc., Scottsdale, AZ.Google Scholar
• Jenkins SP (2004) Survival analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Frederiksen L (2006) Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organ. Sci. 17(1):45–63.Link, Google Scholar
• Jong S (2006) How organizational structures in science shape spin-off firms: The biochemistry departments of Berkeley, Stanford, and UCSF and the birth of the biotech industry. Indust. Corporate Change 15(2):251–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khessina O, Carroll GG (2008) Product demography of de novo and de alio firms in the optical disk drive industry, 1983–1999. Organ. Sci. 19(1):25–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim DJ, Kogut B (1996) Technological platforms and diversification. Organ. Sci. 7(3):283–301.Link, Google Scholar
• Klepper S (2001) Employee startups in high-tech industries. Indust. Corporate Change 10(3):639–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S (2002) The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the U.S. automobile industry. Indust. Corporate Change 11(4):645–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S (2007) Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of Detroit as the capital of the U.S. automobile industry. Management Sci. 53(4):616–631.Link, Google Scholar
• Klepper S (2009) Spinoffs: A review and synthesis. Eur. Management Rev. 6(3):159–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S, Simons K (2000) The making of an oligopoly: Firm survival and technological change in the evolution of the U.S. tire industry. J. Political Econom. 108(4):728–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S, Sleeper SS (2005) Entry by focal spinouts. Management Sci. 51(8):191–1306.Link, Google Scholar
• Knight RM (1989) Technological innovation in Canada: A comparison of independent entrepreneurs and corporate innovators. J. Bus. Venturing 4(4):281–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lockett A, Siegel D, Wright M, Ensley MD (2005) The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications. Res. Policy 34(7):1043–1057.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lüthje C, Herstatt C, von Hippel E (2005) User-innovators and “local” information: The case of mountain biking. Res. Policy 34(6):951–965.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malerba F (1985) Demand structure and technological change: The case of the European semiconductor industry. Res. Policy 14(5):283–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mata J, Portugal P, Guimaraes P (1995) The survival of new plants: Start-up conditions and post-entry evolution. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 13(4):459–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mody C (2006) Corporations, universities and instrumental communities: Commercializing probe microscopy 1981–1996. Tech. Culture 47(1):5–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore G, Davis K (2004) Learning the silicon valley way. Bresnahan T, Gambardella A, eds. Building High-Tech Clusters: Silicon Valley and Beyond (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 7–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1):14–37.Link, Google Scholar
• Phillips BD, Kirchhoff BA (1989) Formation, growth, and survival: Small firm dynamics in the U.S. economy. Small Bus. Econom. 1(1):65–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ (2002) A genealogical approach to organizational life chances: The parent-progeny transfer among Silicon Valley law firms, 1946–1996. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(3):474–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M (1998) Competitive Advantage (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Riggs W, von Hippel E (1994) Incentives to innovate and the sources of innovation: The case of scientific instruments. Res. Policy 23(4):459–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1982) Inside the Black Box (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Saxenian A (1990) Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley. California Management Rev. 33(1):89–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah SK (2005) From innovation to firm formation in the windsurfing, skateboarding, and snowboarding industries. Working paper, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign.Google Scholar
• Shah SK, Mody CM (2009) Innovation, social structure and the creation of new industries. The 2009 West Coast Research Symposium (WCRS), University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
• Shah S, Tripsas M (2016) When do user-innovators start firms? Towards a theory of user entrepreneurship. Harhoff D, Lakhani K, eds. Revolutionizing Innovation: Users, Communities, and Open Innovation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA). Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Shah SK, Tripsas M (2007) The accidental entrepreneur: The emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 1(1–2):123–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah SK, Smith SW, Reedy EJ (2012) Who are user entrepreneurs? Findings on innovation, founder characteristics and firm characteristics. Report, Kauffman Foundation, Kansas City, MO.Google Scholar
• Shane S (2000) Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ. Sci. 11(4):448–469.Link, Google Scholar
• Shane S (2004) Academic Entrepreneurship: University Focal Spinouts and Wealth Creation (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shane S, Khurana R (2003) Bringing individuals back in: The effects of career experience on new firm founding. Indust. Corporate Change 12(3):519–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrader R, Simon M (1997) Corporate versus independent new ventures: Resource, strategy, and performance differences. J. Bus. Venturing 12(1):47–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sleeper SD (1998) The role of firm capabilities in the evolution of the laser industry: The making of a high tech market. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Audia PG (2000) The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States. Amer. J. Soc. 106(2):424–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (2007) Customer preference discontinuities: A trigger for radical technological change. Managerial Decision Econom. 29(2–3):79–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vohora A, Wright M, Lockett A (2004) Critical junctures in the growth in university high-tech spinout companies. Res. Policy 33(1):147–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1988) The Sources of Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1994) “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Sci. 40(4):429–439.Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1998) Economics of product development by users: The impact of “sticky” local information. Management Sci. 44(5):629–644.Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (2005) Democratizing Innovation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wennberg K, Widlund J, Wright M (2011) The effectiveness of university knowledge spillovers: Performance differences between university spinoffs and corporate spinoffs. Res. Policy 40(8):1128–1143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whetten AD, Godfrey PC, eds. (1998) Identity in Organizations: Building Theory Through Conversations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Winston Smith S, Shah S (2013) Do innovative users generate more useful insights? An analysis of corporate venture capital investments in the medical device industry. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 7(2):151–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter S (1987) Knowledge and competences as strategic assets. Teece D, ed. The Competitive Challenge (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA), 159–184.Google Scholar