Sincerity in Corporate Philanthropy, Stakeholder Perceptions and Firm Value

References

• Adams M, Hardwick P (1998) An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. J. Management Stud. 35(5):641–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arya B, Zhang GY (2009) Institutional reforms and investor reactions to CSR announcements: Evidence from an emerging economy. J. Management Stud. 46(7):1089–1112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balotti RF, Hanks JJ (1999) Giving at the office: A reappraisal of charitable contributions by corporations. Bus. Lawyer 54(3):965–996.Google Scholar
• Barnett ML, Salomon RM (2006) Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management J. 27(11):1101–1122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berman SL, Wicks AC, Kotha S, Jones TM (1999) Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Acad. Management J. 42(5):488–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brammer S, Millington A (2005) Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis. J. Bus. Ethics 61(1):29–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bremmer RH (1987) American Philanthropy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Choi J, Wang HL (2009) Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management J. 30(8):895–907.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christmann P, Taylor G (2006) Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 37(6):863–878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickinson V (2011) Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle. The Accounting Rev. 86(6):1969–1994.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong M, Hirshleifer D, Richardson S, Teoh SH (2006) Does investor misvaluation drive the takeover market? J. Finance 61(2):725–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunn E, Norton M (2013) Happy Money: The Science of Smarter Spending (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Edwards EO, Bell PW (1961) The Theory and Measurement of Business Income (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Ertug G, Castellucci F (2013) Getting what you need: How reputation and status affect team performance, hiring, and salaries in the NBA. Acad. Management J. 56(2):407–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C (2013) Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Acad. Management J. 56(3):758–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman RE (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman, Boston).Google Scholar
• Freeman RE, Auster ER (2011) Values, authenticity, and responsible leadership. J. Bus. Ethics 98(S1):15–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine (September 13), 32–33.Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J (1997) An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the twin cities, 1979–81, 1987–89. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):445–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J, Burt RS (1991) Interorganization contagion in corporate philanthropy. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(1):88–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godfrey PC (2005) The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 30(4):777–798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godfrey PC, Merrill CB, Hansen JM (2009) The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management J. 30(4):425–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gort M, Klepper S (1982) Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Econom. J. 92(367):630–653.Google Scholar
• Graves SB, Waddock SA (1994) Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Acad. Management J. 37(4):1034–1046.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haley UCV (1991) Corporate contributions as managerial masques: Reframing corporate contributions as strategies to influence society. J. Management Stud. 28(5):485–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Keim GD (2001) Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management J. 22(2):125–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong H, Kacperczyk M (2009) The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. J. Financial Econom. 93(1):15–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson RA, Greening DW (1999) The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Acad. Management J. 42(5):564–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B (1982) Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica 50(3):649–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koh P-S, Qian C, Wang H (2014) Firm litigation risk and the insurance value of corporate social performance. Strategic Management J. 35(10):1464–1482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lev B, Petrovits C, Radhakrishnan S (2010) Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management J. 31(2):182–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin M (1999) Philip Morris’ new campaign echoes medical experts. LA Times (October 13), http://articles.latimes.com/1999/oct/13/business/fi-21803.Google Scholar
• Liedtka J (2008) Strategy making and the search for authenticity. J. Bus. Ethics 80(2):237–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma QZ, Whidbee DA, Zhang AW (2011) Value, valuation, and the long-run performance of merged firms. J. Corporate Finance 17(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mackey A, Mackey TD, Barney JB (2007) Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):817–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madsen PM, Rodgers ZJ (2015) Looking good by doing good: The antecedents and consequences of stakeholder attention to corporate disaster relief. Strategic Management J. 36(5):776–794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Margolis JD, Walsh JP (2001) People and Profits? The Search for a Link Between a Company’s Social and Financial Performance (Psychology Press, East Sussex, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Margolis JD, Walsh JP (2003) Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):268–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Qian C (2014) Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organ Sci. 25(1):127–148.Link, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Glynn MA, Davis GF (2007) Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):925–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonnell M-H, Wohlgezogen F, Zajac EJ (2011) Rich language for poor firms: The symbolic management of bankruptcy. Acad. Management Best Paper Proc., San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
• McShane L, Cunningham P (2012) To thine own self be true? Employees’ judgments of the authenticity of their organization’s corporate social responsibility program. J. Bus. Ethics 108(1):81–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McWilliams A, Siegel D (2000) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management J. 21(5):603–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muller A, Kräussl R (2011) Doing good deeds in times of need: A strategic perspective on corporate disaster donations. Strategic Management J. 32(9):911–929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neiheisel SR (1994) Corporate Strategy and the Politics of Goodwill: A Political Analysis of Corporate Philanthropy in America (Peter Lang Publishing, New York).Google Scholar
• Norton MI, Avery J (2014) Making charity pay. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(10):26.Google Scholar
• Ohlson JA (1995) Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Res. 11(2):661–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organ. Stud. 24(3):403–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paine LS (2002) Value Shift (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Peasnell KV (1982) Some formal connections between economic values and yields and accounting numbers. J. Bus. Finance and Accounting 9(3):361–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource-Dependence Perspective (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Kramer MR (2002) The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(12):56–68.Google Scholar
• Preinreich GAD (1938) Annual survey of economic theory: The theory of depreciation. Econometrica 6(3):219–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramchander S, Schwebach RG, Staking KIM (2012) The informational relevance of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from DS400 index reconstitutions. Strategic Management J. 33(3):303–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosen S, Simon J, Vincent JR, MacLeod W, Fox M, Thea DM (2003) AIDS is your business. Harvard Bus. Rev. 81(2):80–87.Google Scholar
• Sen S, Bhattacharya CB (2001) Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J. Marketing Res. 38(2):225–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharfman M (1994) Changing institutional rules: The evolution of corporate philanthropy, 1883–1953. Bus. Soc. 33(3):236–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Short JL, Toffel MW (2010) Making self-regulation more than merely symbolic: The critical role of the legal environment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):361–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simons T (2002) Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus. Organ. Sci. 13(1):18–35.Link, Google Scholar
• Spence M (1977) Entry, capacity, investment, and oligopolistic pricing. Bell J. Econom. 8(2):534–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence M (1979) Investment strategy and growth in a new market. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilcsik A, Marquis C (2013) Punctuated generosity: How mega-events and natural disasters affect corporate philanthropy in U.S. communities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(1):111–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waddock SA, Graves SB (1997) The corporate social performance—Financial performance link. Strategic Management J. 18(4):303–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang HL, Qian CL (2011) Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Acad. Management J. 54(6):1159–1181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang HL, Choi JP, Li JT (2008) Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organ. Sci. 19(1):143–159.Link, Google Scholar
• Weaver GR, Trevino LK, Cochran PL (1999) Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Acad. Management J. 42(5):539–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1985) The dynamics of prices and market shares over the product life cycle. Management Sci. 31(8):928–939.Link, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1994) substance and symbolism in CEOs long-term incentive plans. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):367–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wokutch RE, Spencer BA (1987) Corporate saints and sinners: The effects of philanthropic and illegal activity on organizational performance. California Management Rev. 29(2):62–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ, Westphal JD (1995) Accounting for the explanations of CEO compensation: Substance and symbolism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):283–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang G (2006) Market valuation and employee stock options. Management Sci. 52(9):1377–1393.Link, Google Scholar
• Zott C, Huy QN (2007) How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1):70–105.Crossref, Google Scholar