How to Share “A Really Good Secret”: Managing Sharing/Secrecy Tensions Around Scientific Knowledge Disclosure

References

• Agrawal A, Henderson R (2002) Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Sci. 48(1):44–60.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderton C (2005) Craig Anderton, composer and engineer. An Oral History Conducted in 2005 (National Association of Music Merchants Resource Center, Carlsbad, CA).Google Scholar
• Arora A, Fosfuri A, Gambardella A (2001) Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow K (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 29(3):155–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• AUTM (Association of University Technology Managers) (2014) U.S. Licensing Survey Summary (AUTM, Northbrook, IL).Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Ding W, Stuart T (2009) The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output. J. Indust. Econom. 57(4):637–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bar-Gill O, Parchomovsky G (2003) The value of giving away secrets. Virginia Law Rev. 89(8):1857–1895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bekkers R, Freitas IMB (2008) Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Res. Policy 37(10):1837–1853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blumenthal D, Campbell E, Causino N, Louis KS (1996) Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. New England J. Medicine 335(23):1734–1739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blumenthal D, Campbell E, Anderson MS, Causino N, Louis KS (1997) Withholding research results in academic life science: Evidence from a national survey of faculty. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 277(15):1224–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouty I (2000) Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Acad. Management J. 43(1):50–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyer HW (2001) Recombinant DNA research at UCSF and commercial application at Genentech. Oral history conducted in 1994 by Sally Smith Hughes. Regional Oral History Office, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P (2001) Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organ. Sci. 12(2):198–213.Link, Google Scholar
• Cambrosio A, Keating P (1988) “Going monoclonal”: Art, science, and magic in the day-to-day use of hybridoma technology. Soc. Problems 35(3):244–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell E, Weissman S, Causino N, Blumenthal D (2000) Data withholding in academic medicine: Characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials. Res. Policy 29(2):303–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell E, Clarridge B, Gokhale M, Birenbaum L, Hilgartner S, Blumenthal D (2002) Data withholding in academic genetics: Evidence from a national survey. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 287(4):473–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cape R (2006) Ronald E. Cape, M.B.A., Ph.D.: Biotech pioneer and co-founder of Cetus. Oral history conducted in 2003 by Sally Smith Hughes. Regional Oral History Office, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Cockburn I, Henderson R (1998) Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. J. Indust. Econom. 46(2):157–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen SN (2009) Science, biotechnology, and recombinant DNA: A personal history. Oral history conducted in 1995 by Sally Smith Hughes. Regional Oral History Office, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper w7552, http://www.nber.org/papers/w7552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2002) Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Sci. 48(1):1–23.Link, Google Scholar
• Cook SD, Brown JS (1999) Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organ. Sci. 10(4):381–400.Link, Google Scholar
• Cook-Deegan RM, McCormack SJ (2001) Patents, secrecy, and DNA. Science 293(5528):217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costas J, Grey C (2014) Bringing secrecy into the open: Towards a theorization of the social processes of organizational secrecy. Organ. Stud. 35(10):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowan R, David P, Foray D (2000) The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Indust. Corporate Change 9(2):211–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crea R (2004) DNA chemistry at the dawn of commercial biotechnology. Oral history conducted in 2002 by Sally Smith Hughes. Regional Oral History Office, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P, David PA (1994) Toward a new economics of science. Res. Policy 23(5):487–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis G, Greve H (1997) Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(1):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doll JJ (1998) Biotechnology: The patenting of DNA. Science 280(5364):689–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K, Graebner M (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fauchart E, von Hippel E (2008) Norms-based intellectual property systems: The case of French chefs. Organ. Sci. 19(2):187–201.Link, Google Scholar
• Fine GA, Holyfield L (1996) Secrecy, trust, and dangerous leisure: Generating group cohesion in voluntary organizations. Soc. Psych. Quart. 59(1):22–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fini R, Lacetera N (2010) Different yokes for different folks: Individual preferences, institutional logics, and the commercialization of academic research. Libecap GD, Thursby M, Hoskinson S, eds. Spanning Boundaries and Disciplines: University Technology Commercialization in the Idea Age, Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth, Vol. 21 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedland R, Alford RR (1991) Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. Powell W, DiMaggio P, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 232–263.Google Scholar
• Furman JL, Stern S (2011) Climbing atop the shoulders of giants: The impact of institutions on cumulative research. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):1933–1963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furman JL, Murray F, Stern S (2010) More for the research dollar. Nature 468(7325):757–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R (1997) On the distinction between know-how, know-why, and know-what. Adv. Strategic Management 14:81–101.Google Scholar
• Geroski PA (2000) Models of technology diffusion. Res. Policy 29(4): 603–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goeddel D (2003) Scientist at Genentech, CEO at Tularik. Oral history conducted in 2001 and 2002 by Sally Smith Hughes. Regional Oral History Office, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Helmers C, Rogers M, Sena V (2014) The choice between formal and informal intellectual property: A review. J. Econom. Literature 52(2):375–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heller M, Eisenberg R (1998) Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Sci. 280(5364):698–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg AM (1998) Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Rev. Econom. Statist. 80(1):119–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heyneker HL (2004) Molecular geneticist at UCSF and Genentech, entrepreneur in biotechnology. Oral history conducted in 2002 by Sally Smith Hughes, Ph.D. Regional Oral History Office, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Hicks D (1995) Published papers, tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge. Indust. Corporate Change 4(2):401–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong W, Walsh JP (2009) For money or glory? Commercialization, competition, and secrecy in the entrepreneurial university. Sociol. Quart. 50(1):145–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hughes SS (2001a) Making dollars out of DNA: The first major patent in biotechnology and the commercialization of molecular biology, 1974–1980. Isis 92(3):541–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hughes SS (2001b) Regional characteristics of biotechnology in the United States: Perspectives of three industry insiders. Oral histories with Hugh A. D’Andrade, David P. Holveck, and Edward E. Penhoet conducted in 1998 and 1999. Regional Oral History Office, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Janowicz-Panjaitan M, Noorderhaven NG (2009) Trust, calculation, and interorganizational learning of tacit knowledge: An organizational roles perspective. Organ. Stud. 30(10):1021–1044.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kachra A, White RE (2008) Know-how transfer: The role of social, economic/competitive, and firm boundary factors. Strategic Management J. 29(4):425–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2011) Strategy and PowerPoint: An inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making. Organ. Sci. 22(2):320–346.Link, Google Scholar
• Kenney M (1988) Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Kiley TD (2002) Genentech legal counsel and vice president, 1976–1988, and entrepreneur. Oral history conducted in 2000 and 2001 by Sally Smith Hughes. Regional Oral History Office, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Kleid DG (2002) Scientist and patent agent at Genentech. Oral history conducted in 2001 and 2002 by Sally Smith Hughes. Regional Oral History Office, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Kleinman D (2003) Impure Cultures: University Biology and the World of Commerce (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison).Google Scholar
• Kornberg A (1998) Biochemistry at Stanford, biotechnology at DNAX. Oral history conducted in 1997 by Sally Smith Hughes. Regional Oral History Office, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Krimsky S (2003) Science in the Private Interest: How the Lure of Profits Has Corrupted the Virtue of Biomedical Research (Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD).Google Scholar
• Levin D, Cross R (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. 50(11):1477–1490.Link, Google Scholar
• Liebeskind JP, Oliver A (1998) From handshake to contract: Trust, intellectual property and the social structure of academic research. Lane C, Bachmann R, eds. Trust Within and Between Organizations: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Applications (Oxford University Press, New York), 118–145.Google Scholar
• Marshall L, Frith S (2013) Music and Copyright (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1942) Science and technology in a democratic order. J. Legal Political Sociol. 1(1–2):115–126.Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Mowery D, Nelson R, Sampat B, Ziedonis A (2001) The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. Res. Policy 30(1):99–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F (2010) The oncomouse that roared: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of productive tension at the boundary of overlapping institutions. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(2):341–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F, O’Mahony S (2007) Exploring the foundations of cumulative innovation: Implications for organization science. Organ. Sci. 18(6):1006–1021.Link, Google Scholar
• Murray F, Stern S (2007) Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 63(4):648–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson AJ (2012) Putting university research in context: Assessing alternative measures of production and diffusion at Stanford. Res. Policy 41(4):678–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson AJ (2015) The Sound of Innovation: Stanford and the Computer Music Revolution (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson AJ (2016) Managing collaborations at the university-industry interface: An exploration of the diffusion of PCR and rDNA. Bechky B, Elsbach K, eds. Qualitative Organizational Research: Best Papers from the Davis Conference on Qualitative Research, Vol. 3 (Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC), 53–90.Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J (2003) From separate systems to a hybrid order: Accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities. Res. Policy 32(6):1081–1104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parchomovsky G (2000) Publish or perish. Michigan Law Rev. 98(4):926–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pénin J (2007) Open knowledge disclosure: An overview of the evidence and economic motivations. J. Econom. Surveys 21(2):326–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennica D (2004) Diane Pennica, Ph.D: t-PA and other research contributions at Genentech. Oral history conducted in 2003 by Sally Smith Hughes. Regional Oral History Office, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Polanyi M (1967) The Tacit Dimension (Routledge & Paul, London).Google Scholar
• Popp Berman E (2011) Creating the Market University (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Sandholtz K (2012) Amphibious entrepreneurs and the emergence of organizational forms. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 6(2):94–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Snellman K (2004) The knowledge economy. Annual Rev. Sociol. 30:199–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Koput K, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):116–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabinow P (1996) Making PCR: A Story of Biotechnology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riggs A (2006) Arthur D. Riggs: City of Hope’s contribution to early Genentech research. Oral history conducted in 2005 by Sally Smith Hughes. Regional Oral History Office, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (2010) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Sauermann H, Stephan P (2013) Conflicting logics? A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science. Organ. Sci. 24(3):889–909.Link, Google Scholar
• Schroeder M (1994) Manfred Schroeder, electrical engineer. Oral history conducted in 1994 by Frederik Nebeker. IEEE History Center, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
• Scotchmer S (1991) Standing on the shoulders of giants: Cumulative research and the patent law. J. Econom. Perspectives 5(1):29–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapin S (2010) Never Pure: Historical Studies of Science as If It Was Produced by People with Bodies, Situated in Time, Space, Culture, and Society, and Struggling for Credibility and Authority (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Google Scholar
• Shapiro C (2001) Navigating the patent thicket: Cross licenses, patent pools, and standard setting. Jaffe A, Lerner J, Stern S, eds. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 1 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 119–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smithsonian Institution (1993) History of the polymerase chain reaction. Interviews conducted in 1992 and 1993 by Ramunas Kondratas. National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Stephan P (2012) How Economics Shapes Science (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephan P, Gurmu S, Sumell AJ, Black G (2007) Who’s patenting in the university? Evidence from the survey of doctorate recipients. Econom. Innov. New Tech. 16(2):71–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern S (2004) Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Sci. 50(6):835–853.Link, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Swanson R (2000) Robert S. Swanson: Cofounder, CEO, and chairman of Genentech, Inc., 1976–1996. Oral history conducted in 1996 and 1997 by Sally Smith Hughes. Regional Oral History Office, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thursby J, Thursby M (2002) Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Sci. 48(1):90–104.Link, Google Scholar
• Thursby J, Thursby M (2003) Industry/university licensing: Characteristics, concerns and issues from the perspective of the buyer. J. Tech. Transfer 28(3–4):207–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Spiro J (2005) Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(2):447–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP, Hong W (2003) Secrecy is increasing in step with competition. Nature 422(6934):801–802.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP, Arora A, Cohen WM (2003) Effects of research tool patents and licensing on biomedical innovation. National Research Council, ed. Patents in the Knowledge-based Economy (National Academies Press, Washington, DC), 285–341.Google Scholar
• Walsh JP, Cohen WM, Cho C (2007) Where excludability matters: Material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research. Res. Policy 36(8):1184–1203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams H (2013) Intellectual property rights and innovation: Evidence from the human genome. J. Political Econom. 121(1):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright M, Clarysse B, Lockett A, Knockaert M (2008) Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries. Res. Policy 37(8):1205–1223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin R (2008) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Armstrong J (1998) Geographically localized knowledge: Spillovers or markets? Econom. Inquiry 36(1):65–86.Crossref, Google Scholar