Integrative Capabilities, Vertical Integration, and Innovation Over Successive Technology Lifecycles

References

• Abernathy W, Clark KB (1985) Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Res. Policy 14(1):3–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Afuah A (2001) Dynamic boundaries of the firm: Are firms better off being vertically integrated in the face of a technological change? Acad. Management J. 44(6):1211–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Gort M (2002) Firm and product life cycles and firm survival. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(2):184–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aggarwal VA, Hsu DH (2009) Modes of cooperative R&D commercialization by start-ups. Strategic Management J. 30(8):835–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amit R, Schoemaker PJH (1993) Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management J. 14(1):33–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman ML (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L (1999) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA).Google Scholar
• Argyres NS (1999) The impact of information technology on coordination: Evidence from the B-2 “Stealth” Bomber. Organ. Sci. 10(2):162–180.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Bigelow L (2010) Innovation, modularity and vertical de-integration: Evidence from the early U.S. auto industry. Organ. Sci. 21(4):842–853.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Liebeskind JP (1999) Contractual commitments, bargaining power, and governance inseparability: Incorporating history into transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):49–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armour HO, Teece DJ (1980) Vertical integration and technological innovation. Rev. Econom. Statist. 62(3):470–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Bokhari FAS (2007) Open versus closed firms and the dynamics of industry evolution. J. Indust. Econom. 55(3):499–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules, Vol. 1: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–331.Link, Google Scholar
• Brusoni S, Prencipe A, Pavitt K (2001) Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):597–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Business Week (2004) At P&G, it’s “360-degree innovation.” (October 11), http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2004-09-30/at-p-and-g-its-360-degree-innovation.Google Scholar
• Castanias RP, Helfat CE (1991) Managerial resources and rents. J. Management 17(1):155–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen P, Williams C, Agarwal R (2012) Growing pains: Pre-entry experience and the challenge of transition to incumbency. Strategic Management J. 33(3):252–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough HW, Kusunoki K (2001) The modularity trap: Innovation, technology phase shifts and the resulting limits of virtual organizations. Nonaka I, Teece DJ, eds. Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and Utilization (SAGE, London, Thousand Oaks, CA), 202–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Verlinden M, Westerman G (2002) Disruption, disintegration, and the dissipation of differentiability. Indust. Corporate Change. 11(5):955–993.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark HH (1996) Using Language (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colfer L, Baldwin C (2010) The mirroring hypothesis: Theory, evidence and exceptions. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Corts KS (1997) The ready-to-eat breakfast cereal industry in 1994(A). Case Number 9-795-191, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Dosi G, Nelson RR, Winter SG (2000) The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):660–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Kale P, Singh H (2001) How to make strategic alliances work: The role of the alliance function. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 42(4):37–43.Google Scholar
• Fixson SK, Park JK (2008) The power of integrality: Linkages between product architecture, innovation, and industry structure. Res. Policy 37(8):1296–1316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franco A, Sarkar MB, Agarwal R, Echambadi R (2009) Swift and smart: The moderating effects of technological capabilities on the market pioneering-firm survival relationship. Management Sci. 55(11):1842–1860.Link, Google Scholar
• Gort M, Klepper S (1982) Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Econom. J. 92(367):630–653.Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(Winter):109–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Lieberman MB (2002) The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Indust. Corporate Change 11(4):725–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2003) The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management J. 24(10):997–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2015) Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 36(6):831–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Raubitschek RS (2000) Product sequencing: Co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):961–979.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Teece DJ (1987) Vertical integration and risk reduction. J. Law, Econom. Organ. 3(1):47–67.Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Winter SG (2011) Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (n)ever-changing world. Strategic Management J. 32(11):1243–1250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Finkelstein S, Mitchell W, Peteraf MA, Singh H, Teece DJ, Winter SW (2007) Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
• Henderson R (1994) The evolution of integrative capability: Innovation in cardiovascular drug discovery. Indust. Corporate Change 3(3):607–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Cockburn I (1994) Measuring competence: Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. 15(S1):63–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill CWL, Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE (1992) Cooperative versus competitive structures in related and unrelated diversified firms. Organ. Sci. 3(4):501–521.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G (2005) How much you know versus how well I know you: Selecting a supplier for a technically innovative component. Strategic Management J. 26(1):75–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M, Clark KB (1994) Integration and dynamic capability: Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Indust. Corporate Change 3(3):557–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• IBM Archives (2015) Mainframes product profiles. Accessed July 2, 2015, http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/mainframe/mainframe_profiles.html.Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG (2005) Industry change through vertical disintegration: How and why markets emerged in mortgage banking. Acad. Management J. 48(3):465–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Winter SG (2005) The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: Explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management J. 26(5):395–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, MacDuffie JP, Tae CJ (2015) Agency, structure, and the dominance of OEMs: Change and stability in the automotive sector. Strategic Management J. ePub ahead of print October 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.2426.Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R (2013) Persistence of integration in the face of specialization: How firms navigated the winds of disintegration and shaped the architecture of the semiconductor industry. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1195–2013.Link, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Adner R (2012) What firms make vs. what they know: How firms’ production and knowledge boundaries affect competitive advantage in the face of technological change. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1227–1248.Link, Google Scholar
• King AA, Tucci CL (2002) Incumbent entry into new market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management Sci. 48(2):171–186.Link, Google Scholar
• Klepper S (1997) Industry life cycles. Indust. Corporate Change 6(1):119–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois RN (1992) Transaction-cost economics in real time. Indust. Corporate Change 1(1):99–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Leiblein MJ, Miller DJ (2003) An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm. Strategic Management J. 24(9):839–859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberman MB (1987) The learning curve, diffusion, and competitive strategy. Strategic Management J. 8(5):441–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macher JT (2004) Vertical disintegration and process innovation in semiconductor manufacturing: Foundries vs. integrated producers. Working paper, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Martin X, Salomon R (2003) Knowledge transfer capacity and its implications for the theory of the multinational corporation. J. Internat. Bus. 34(4):356–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer KJ, Salomon RM (2006) Capabilities, contractual hazards, and governance: Integrating resource-based and transaction cost perspectives. Acad. Management J. 49(5):942–959.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monteverde K (1995) Technical dialog as an incentive for vertical integration in the semiconductor industry. Management Sci. 41(10):1624–1638.Link, Google Scholar
• Moore G (1965) Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 38(8):114–117.Google Scholar
• Moore G (1975) Progress in digital integrated electronics. Reprinted, IEEE, IEDM Tech Digest, 11–13.Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Nicholson W, Snyder C (2011) Microeconomic Theory: Basic Principles and Extensions, 11th ed. (Cengage Learning, Boston).Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Silverman BS (2003) Why firms want to organize efficiently and what keeps them from doing so: Inappropriate governance, performance, and adaptation in a deregulated industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(3):433–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano GP (1990) The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):153–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poppo L, Zenger T (1998) Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge-based, and measurement explanations for make-or-buy decisions in information services. Strategic Management J. 19(9):853–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Singh H, Chaudhuri S (2009) Integrating acquired capabilities: When structural integration is (un)necessary. Organ. Sci. 20(2):313–328.Link, Google Scholar
• Qian L, Agarwal R, Hoetker G (2012) Configuration of value chain activities. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1330–1349.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom RS (2000) Leadership, capabilities, and technological change: The transformation of NCR in the electronic era. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1083–1103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez R, Mahoney JT (1996) Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. 17(Winter):63–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Steensma HK (2002) Disentangling the theories of firm boundaries: A path model and empirical test. Organ. Sci. 13(4):387–401.Link, Google Scholar
• Shea C (2007) General Mills. Presentation, Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.Google Scholar
• Srikanth K, Puranam P (2014) The firm as a coordination system: Evidence from software services offshoring. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1253–1271.Link, Google Scholar
• Stadler C, Helfat CE, Verona G (2013) The impact of dynamic capabilities on resource access and development. Organ. Sci. 24(6):1782–1804.Link, Google Scholar
• Stigler GJ (1951) The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market. J. Political Econom. 59(3):185–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strojwas M (2005) An empirical study of vertical integration in the semiconductor industry. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Takeishi A (2002) Knowledge partitioning in the interfirm division of labor: The case of automotive product development. Organ. Sci. 13(3):321–338.Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor A, Helfat CE (2009) Organizational linkages for surviving technological change: Complementary assets, middle management, and ambidexterity. Organ. Sci. 20(4):718–739.Link, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1988) Technological change and the nature of the firm. Dosi Get al., eds. Technical Change and Economic Theory (Pinter, London), 256–281.Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1996) Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 31(2):193–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Nadler DA (1978) Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad. Management Rev. 3(3):613–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheelwright S, Clark K (1992) Revolutionizing Product Development (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Winter SG (2003) Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 24(10):991–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolter C, Veloso FM (2008) The effects of innovation on vertical structure: Perspectives on transaction costs and competences. Acad. Management Rev. 33(3):586–605.Crossref, Google Scholar