Shots Fired! Switching Between Practices in Police Work

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1048

References

  • Algemeen Nederlands Persbureau (ANP) (2011) KLPD betreurt ontkomen daders Stanley Hillis. Accessed April 22, 2011, http://www.ad.nl/ad/nl/1041/Amsterdam/article/detail/1899419/2011/03/03/KLPD-betreurt-ontkomen-daders-Stanley-Hillis.dhtml.Google Scholar
  • Baker T, Nelson RE (2005) Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(3):329–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2006) Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):3–21.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA, Okhuysen GA (2011) Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handle surprises. Acad. Management J. 54(2):239–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bigley GA, Roberts KH (2001) The incident command system: High reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1281–1299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bouty I, Godé C, Drucker-Godard C, Lièvre P, Nizet J (2012) Coordination practices in extreme situations. Eur. Management J. 30(6):475–489.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowker GC, Star SL (2002) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • C2000 Expert Group (2009) Eindrapportage [final report]. Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties, Den Haag, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  • Callon M, Law J (1995) Agency and the hybrid collectif. South Atlantic Quart. 94(December):481–507.Google Scholar
  • Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clarke A (2005) Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn (Sage, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cornelissen JP, Mantere S, Vaara E (2014) The contraction of meaning: The combined effect of communication, emotions, and materiality on sensemaking in the Stockwell shooting. J. Management Stud. 51(July):699–736.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cunha M, Clegg S, Kamoche K (2006) Surprises in management and organization: Concept, Sources and a Typology. British J. Management 17(4):317–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davison RM, Martinsons MG, Kock N (2004) Principles of canonical action research. Inform. Systems J. 14(1):65–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eberl P, Geiger D, Aßländer M (2015) Repairing trust in an organization after integrity violations: The ambivalence of organizational rule adjustments. Organ. Stud. 36(9):1123–1142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1993) High reliability organizations meet high velocity environments: Common dilemmas in nuclear power plants, aircraft carriers, and microcomputer firms. Roberts KH, ed. New Challenges to Understanding Organizations (Macmillan, New York), 117–135.Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evered R, Louis MR (1981) Alternative perspectives in the organizational sciences: “Inquiry from the inside” and “inquiry from the outside”. Acad. Management Rev. 6(3):385–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S, Xiao Y (2006) Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Sci. 52(8):1155–1169.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS, Orlikowski WJ (2011) Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1240–1253.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L (1950) Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing (Harper, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittell J (2002) Coordinating mechanisms in care providing groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Management Sci. 48(11):1408–1426.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gittell JH, Weiss L (2004) Coordination networks within and across organisations: A multi-level framework. J. Management Stud. 41(1):127–153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittell JH, Seidner R, Wimbush J (2010) A relational model of how high-performance work systems work. Organ. Sci. 21(2):490–506.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grabar H (2013) Boston is one of the best prepared U.S. cities to handle a crisis. Atlantic CityLab (April 19), http://www.citylab.com/politics/2013/04/boston-one-best-prepared-us-cities-handle-crisis/5308/.Google Scholar
  • Janis IL (1972) Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2008) Knowledge collaboration among professionals protecting national security: Role of transactive memories in ego-centered knowledge networks. Organ. Sci. 19(2):260–276.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jarzabkowski PA, Lê JK, Feldman MS (2012) Toward a theory of coordinating: Creating coordinating mechanisms in practice. Organ. Sci. 23(4):907–927.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kaghan WN, Lounsbury M (2006) Artifacts, articulation work, and institutional residue. Rafaeli A, Pratt MG, eds. Artifacts and Organizations (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), 259–278.Google Scholar
  • Kellogg K, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2006) Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in post-bureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):22–44.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klein H, Myers M (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quart. 23(1):67–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lampel J, Shapira Z (2001) Judgmental errors, interactive norms and the difficulty of detecting strategic surprises. Organ. Sci. 12(5):599–611.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence P, Lorsch J (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2011) When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordances, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quart. 35(1):147–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM, Bailey DE (2008) Transformational technologies and the creation of new work practices: Making implicit knowledge explicit in task-based offshoring. MIS Quart. 32(2):411–436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2010) What’s under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):1–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Majchrzak A, Jarvenpaa SL, Hollingshead AB (2007) Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organ. Sci. 18(1):147–161.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Majchrzak A, More PHB, Faraj S (2012) Transcending knowledge differences in cross-functional teams. Organ. Sci. 23(4):951–970.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Sproull LS, Tamuz M (1991) Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organ. Sci. 2(1):1–13.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miner AS, Bassoff P, Moorman C (2001) Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(2):304–337.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myers MD, Klein HK (2011) A set of principles for conducting critical research in information systems. MIS Quart. 35(1):17–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nicolini D (2013) Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Okhuysen G, Bechky B (2009) Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):463–502.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ (2002) Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3):249–273.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ (2005) Material works: Exploring the situated entanglement of technological performativity and human agency. Scandinavian J. Inform. Systems 17(1):183–186.Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ (2010) Practice in research: Phenomenon, perspective and philosophy. Golsorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D, Vaara E, eds. The Cambridge Handbook on Strategy as Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 23–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perrow C (1999) Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Quarantelli EL (2007) Disaster crisis management: A summary of research findings. J. Management Stud. 25(4):373–385.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reckwitz A (2002) Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. Eur. J. Soc. Theory 5(2):243–263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rico R, Sanchez-Manzanares M, Gibson CB (2008) Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge-based approach. Acad. Management J. 33(1):163–184.Google Scholar
  • Rochlin GI (1999) Safe operation as a social construct. Ergonomics 42(11):1549–1560.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rochlin GI, LaPorte TR, Roberts KH (1987) The self-designing high-reliability organization: Aircraft carrier flight operations at sea. Naval War College Rev. 40(4):76–90.Google Scholar
  • Schatzki TR (2001) Introduction: Practice theory. Schatzki TR, Cetina KK, von Savigny E, eds. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (Routledge, London), 1–14.Google Scholar
  • Stasser G, Titus W (2003) Hidden profiles: A brief history. Psych. Inquiry 14(3):304–313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stasser G, Stewart DD, Wittenbaum GM (1995) Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 31(3):244–265.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw BM, Sandelands LE, Dutton JE (1981) Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26(4):501–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (McGraw-Hill, New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Tuertscher P, Garud R, Kumaraswamy A (2014) Justification and interlaced knowledge at ATLAS, CERN. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1579–1608.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven AH, Delbecq AL, Koenig R (1976) Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 41(2):322–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Maanen J (1979) The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):539–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vaughan D (1996) The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Vlaar PWL, van Fenema PC, Tiwari V (2008) Co-creating understanding and value in distributed work: How members of onsite and offshore ISD vendor teams give, make, demand and break sense. MIS Quart. 32(2):227–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE (1990) The vulnerable system: An analysis of the Tenerife air disaster. J. Management 16(3):571–593.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE (1993) The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(4):628–652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE, Roberts KH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):357–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K, Sutcliffe K (2007) Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty (Jossey-Bass, London).Google Scholar
  • Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13(3):339–351.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.