Inside the “Hybrid” Iron Cage: Political Origins of Hybridization

References

• Abelson RP (1959) Modes of resolution of belief dilemmas. J. Conflict Resolution 3(4):343–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong EA (2005) From struggle to settlement: The crystallization of a field of lesbian/gay organizations in San Francisco, 1969–1973. Davis GF, McAdam D, Scott WR, Zald MN, eds. Social Movements and Organization Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 161–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartley T (2007) Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(2):297–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JA (1996) Organizational ecology. Clegg SR, Hardy DC, Lawrence T, Nord WR, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies (SAGE, London), 77–114.Google Scholar
• Besharov ML, Smith WK (2014) Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Acad. Management Rev. 39(3):364–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biddle BJ (1986) Recent development in role theory. Annual Rev. Sociol. 12:67–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordt R (1997) The Structure of Women’s Nonprofit Organizations (Indiana University Press, Bloomington).Google Scholar
• Carroll GR (1984) Dynamics of publisher succession in newspaper organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(1):93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR (1985) Concentration and specialization: Dynamics of niche width in populations of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 90(6):1262–1283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Hannan MT (2000) The Demography of Corporations and Industries (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, NJ).Google Scholar
• D’Aunno T, Sutton RI, Price R (1991) Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: A study of drug abuse treatment centers. Acad. Management J. 34(3):636–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David RJ, Sine WD, Haveman HA (2013) Seizing opportunity in emerging fields: How institutional entrepreneurs legitimated the professional form of management consulting. Organ. Sci. 24(2):356–377.Link, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ (1991) Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: U.S. art museums 1920–1940. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 267–292.Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dixit A, Grossman GM, Gul F (2000) The dynamics of political compromise. J. Political Econom. 108(3):531–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dowell G, Swaminathan A (2000) Racing and back-pedalling into the future: New product introduction and organizational mortality in the US bicycle industry, 1880–1918. Organ. Sci. 21(2):405–431.Google Scholar
• Earl J (2003) Tanks, tear gas, and taxes: Toward a theory of movement repression. Sociol. Theory 21(1):44–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earl J (2011) Political repression: Iron fists, velvet gloves, and diffuse control. Annual Rev. Sociol. 37:261–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earl J, Soule SA, McCarthy J (2003) Protest under fire? Explaining the policing of protest. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(4):581–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards RC (1979) Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Eisinger PK (1973) The conditions of protest behavior in American cities. Amer. Political. Sci. Rev. 67(1):11–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fligstein N (1996) A political-cultural approach to market institutions. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(4):656–673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fligstein N, McAdam D (2012) A Theory of Fields (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gamson WA (1991) Commitment and agency in social movements. Sociol. Forum 6(1):27–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gedajlovic E, Carney M, Chrisman JJ, Kellermanns FW (2012) The adolescence of family firm research. J. Management 38(4): 1010–1037.Google Scholar
• Giugni MG (1998) Was it worth for the effort? The outcomes and consequences of social movements. Annual Rev. Sociol. 24: 371–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mejia LR, Takács-Haynes K, Núñez-Nickel M, Jacobson KJL, Moyano-Fuentes J (2007) Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1):106–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Diaz AM, Li SX, Lorente JC (2010) The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organ. Sci. 21(2):521–539.Link, Google Scholar
• Gutmann A, Thompson D (2010) The mindsets of political compromise. Perspect. Politics 8(4):1125–1143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman JH (1977) The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(5):929–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman JH (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(2):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman JH (1989) Organizational Ecology (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859): 1243–1248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman HA (1992) Between a rock and a hard place: Organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(1):48–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman HA, Rao H (2006) Hybrid forms and the evolution of thrifts. Amer. Behavioral Scientist 49(7):974–986.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Sine WD, Tolbert PS (2009) From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):635–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirschman AO (1970) Exit Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Huber PJ (1967) The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Le Cam LM, Neyman J, eds. Proc. 5th Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. Probability. (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA), 221–233.Google Scholar
• Isaac L (2002) To counter “the very devil” and more: The making of independent capitalist militia in the gilded age. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(2):353–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jenkins JC, Eckert CM (1986) Channeling black insurgency: Elite patronage and professional social movement organizations in the development of the black movement. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(6):812–829.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeong GH, Miller GJ, Sobel AC (2009) Political compromise and bureaucratic structure: The political origins of the federal reserve system. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 25(2):472–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• JoongAng Education Institute (1985–2006) Annual Directory of Entrance Examinations for Universities (Seoul, Korea).Google Scholar
• Kelly D, Amburgey AT (1991) Organizational inertia and momentum: A dynamic model of strategic change. Acad. Management J. 34(3):591–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim TY, Shin D, Oh H, Jeong YC (2007) Inside the iron cage: Organizational political dynamics and institutional changes in presidential selection systems in Korean universities, 1985–2002. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(2):286–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG (2008) A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):395–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG, Cornwall M (2005) Specialists and generalists: Learning strategies in the woman suffrage movement, 1866–1918. Coy PG, ed. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, Vol. 26 (Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Bingley, UK), 1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG, Soule SA (2007) Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):413–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King MD, Haveman HA (2008) Antislavery in America: The press, the pulpit, and the rise of antislavery societies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):492–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korea Herald, The (2006) What hinders reformat Korea University? (December 12) 4.Google Scholar
• Kriesi H (1996) The organizational structure of new social movements in a political context. McAdam D, McCarthy JD, Zald MN, eds. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framing (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 152–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kyosu-Newpaper (2004) Changes in direct voting systems. (May 12) 2.Google Scholar
• Leitterstorf M, Rau S (2014) Socioemotional wealth and IPO underpricing of family firms. Strategic Management J. 35(5):751–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lofland J (1996) Social Movement Organizations (Aldine De Gruyter, New York).Google Scholar
• Long JS, Freese J (2001) Predicted probability for count models. Stata J. 1(1):51–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAdam D (1982) Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• McAdam D, Scott WR (2005) Organizations and movements. Davis GF, McAdam D, Scott WR, Zald MN, eds. Social Movements and Organization Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 4–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAdam D, McCarthy JD, Zald MN (1996) Introduction: Opportunities, mobilizing structures and framing processes—Toward a synthesis, comparative perspective on social movements. McAdam D, McCarthy JD, Zald MN, eds. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framing (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCarthy JD, Zald MN (1977) Resource mobilization theory and social movements: A partial theory. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(6):1212–1241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer DS, Staggenborg S (1996) Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity. Amer. J. Sociol. 101(6): 1628–1660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer DS, Whittier N (1994) Social movement spillover. Soc. Problems 41(2):277–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I (2006) Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Bus. Rev. 10(1):73–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education Human Resource Department (1985–2006) Statistical Yearbook of Education (Ministry of Education, Seoul, Korea).Google Scholar
• Minkoff DC (2002) The emergence of hybrid organizational forms: Combining identity-based service provision and political action. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quart. 31(3):377–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moe TM (1989) The politics of bureaucratic structure. Chubb JE, Peterson PE, eds. Can the Government Govern? (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC), 267–329.Google Scholar
• Morelli M (1999) Demand competition and policy compromise in legislative bargaining. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 93(4):809–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mottl TL (1980) The analysis of countermovements. Soc. Problems 27(5):620–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oberschall A (1979) Protracted conflict. Zald MN, McCarthy JD, eds. The Dynamics of Social Movements (Winthrop, Cambridge, MA), 45–70.Google Scholar
• Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. 16(1):145–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver PE, Marwell G (1988) The paradox of group size in collective action: A theory of the critical mass. II. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 53(1):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson M (1965) The Logic of Collective Action (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olzak S (1989) Analysis of events in the study of collective action. Annual Rev. Sociol. 15:119–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Pichardo NA (1995) The power elite and elite-driven countermovements: The Associated Farmers of California during the 1930s. Sociol. Forum 10(1):21–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociology 98(4):829–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1980) Competitive Strategy (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2005) Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(6):968–991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Morrill C, Zald MN (2000) Power plays: Social movements, collective action, and new organizational forms. Res. Organ. Behav. 22:239–281.Google Scholar
• Schneiberg M, Soule SA (2005) Institutionalization as a contested, multilevel process: The case of rate regulation in American fire insurance. Davis GF, McAdam D, Scott WR, Zald MN, eds. Social Movements and Organization Theory (Cambridge University Press, New York), 122–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1949) TVA and the Grass Roots (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Sewell WH (1992) A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmel G (1950) Superordination and subordination. Wolff KH, trans. and ed. The Sociology of Georg Simmel (Free Press, Glencoe, IL), 181–306 (orig. German edn. 1908).Google Scholar
• Singh JV, House RJ, Tucker DJ, David J (1986) Organizational change and organizational mortality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(4):587–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soule SA, Earl J (2001) The enactment of state-level hate crime law in the United States: Intrastate and interstate factors. Sociol. Perspect. 44(3):281–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strang D, Jung DI (2005) Organizational change as an orchestrated social movement: Recruitment to a quality initiative. Davis G, McAdam D, Scott WR, Zald M, eds. Social Movement and Organization Theory (Cambridge University Press, New York), 208–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sul H (2002) Serious problems in functioning of private universities due to family control. Report, Education Law Reform Commission (The National Assembly of the Republic of Korea, Seoul).Google Scholar
• Tilly C (1978) From Mobilization to Revolution (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective: Foundations, Research, and Theoretical Elaboration (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner RH (1990) Role change. Annual Rev. Sociol. 16:87–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Useem B, Zald MN (1987) From pressure group to social movement: Efforts to promote use of nuclear power. Zald MN, McCarthy JD, eds. Social Movements in an Organizational Society (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ), 273–288.Google Scholar
• White H (1982) Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica 50(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Zald MN, Berger MA (1978) Social movements in organizations: Coup d’Etat, insurgency, and mass movements. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(4):823–861.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zald MN, Useem B (1987) Movement and countermovement interaction: Mobilization, tactics, and state involvement. Zald MN, McCarthy JD, eds. Social Movements in an Organizational Society (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ), 247–272.Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zysman J (1994) How institutions create historically rooted trajectories of growth. Indust. Corporate Change 3(1):243–283.Crossref, Google Scholar