Inertia in Routines: A Hidden Source of Organizational Variation

References

• Abd El-Razek ME, Bassioni HA, Mobarak AM (2008) Causes of delay in building construction projects in Egypt. J. Construction Engrg. Management 134(2):831–841.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abell P, Felin T, Foss N (2008) Building micro-foundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links. Managerial Decision Econom. 29(2):489–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Borys B (1996) Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(2):61–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1999) Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. 10(2):43–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Amburgey TL, Kelly D, Barnett WP (1993) Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(2):51–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L (1999) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 22(2):1123–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Axelrod R, Cohen MD (2000) Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Singh JV (1994) Evolutionary Dynamics in Organizations (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Becker MC (2005) The concept of routines: Some clarifications. Cambridge J. Econom. 29(2):249–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker MC, Knudsen T, March JG (2006) Schumpeter, Winter, and the sources of novelty. Indust. Corporate Change 15(2):353–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bigley GA, Roberts KH (2001) The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Acad. Management J. 44(2):1281–1299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J, Gibson C (2004) Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 45(4):47–55.Google Scholar
• Birnholtz JP, Cohen D, Cohen MD, Hoch SV (2007) Organizational character: On the regeneration of camp poplar grove. Organ. Sci. 18(2):315–332.Link, Google Scholar
• Boumgarden P, Nickerson J, Zenger TR (2012) Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance. Strategic Management J. 33(2):587–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA (1994) Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(1):24–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler BS, Gray PH (2006) Reliability, mindfulness, and information systems. MIS Quart. 30(2):211–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell DT (1960) Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychol. Rev. 67(6):380–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Hannan MT (2000) The Demography of Corporations and Industries (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen EL, Katila R (2008) Rival interpretations of balancing exploration and exploitation. Shane S, ed. Handbook of Technology and Innovation Management (John Wiley & Sons, New York),197–214.Google Scholar
• Cohen MD (2007) Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organ. Stud. 28(2):773–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, Bacdayan P (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. 5(2):554–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Cooper RG, Kleinschmidt EJ (1986) An investigation into the new product process: Steps, deficiencies, and impact. J. Product Innovation Management 3(2):71–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings JN, Espinosa JA, Pickering CK (2009) Crossing spatial and temporal boundaries in globally distributed projects: A relational model of coordination delay. Inform. Systems Res. 20(2):420–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Cyert R, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Doloi H, Sawhney A, Iyer KC, Rentala S (2012) Analysing factors affecting delays in Indian construction projects. Internat. J. Project Management 30(2):479–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal DA (2004a) Bounded rationality and the search for organizational architecture: An evolutionary perspective on the design of organizations and their evolvability. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(3):404–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal DA (2004b) Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. 50(2):159–173.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11(2):611–629.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):94–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2008) Routine dynamics. Barry D, Hansen H, eds. SAGE Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA),302–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galunic DC, Rodan S (1998) Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management J. 19(2):1193–1201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(2):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick CJG, Hackman JR (1990) Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 47(1):65–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert CG (2005) Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. 48(5):741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gündüz M, Nielsen Y, Özdemir M (2013) Quantification of delay factors using the relative importance index method for construction projects in Turkey. J. Management Engrg. 29(2):133–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta AK, Smith KG, Shalley CE (2006) The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. 49(2):693–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(2):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1989) Organizations and social structure. Organ. Ecol. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA), 3–27.Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(2):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodgson GM, Knudsen T (2010) Generative replication and the evolution of complexity. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 75(2):12–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland J (1975) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville JA (2005) The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. 16(2):618–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Jones G (2013) Organizational Theory, Design and Change, 7th ed. (Prentice Hall, London).Google Scholar
• Kauffman SA (1993) The Origins of Order: Self Organization and Selection in Evolution (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M (1992) Performance and interaction routines in multinational corporations. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 23(2):133–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA (2007) Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. 18(2):39–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Srikanth K (2014) Coordinated exploration: Organizing joint search by multiple specialists to overcome mutual confusion and joint myopia. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(2):409–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. 13(S1):111–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1991) Organizational adaptation and environmental selection—Interrelated processes of change. Organ. Sci. 2(2):140–145.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(2):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Posen HE (2007) Myopia of selection: Does organizational adaptation limit the efficacy of population selection? Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(2):586–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Rerup C (2006) Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 17(2):502–513.Link, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Limayem M, Hirt SG, Cheung CMK (2007) How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance. MIS Quart. 31(2):705–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKay RB, Chia R (2013) Choice, chance, and unintended consequences in strategic change: A process understanding of the rise and fall of NorthCo automotive. Acad. Management J. 56(2):208–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(2):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1936) The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 1(2):894–904.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom PR, Roberts J (1992) Economics, Organization and Management (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Moorman C, Miner A (1998) Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):698–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray KB, Häubl G (2007) Explaining cognitive lock-in: The role of skill-based habits of use in consumer choice. J. Consumer Res. 34(1):77–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2002) Being efficiently fickle: A dynamic theory of organizational choice. Organ. Sci. 13(2):547–566.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (1996) Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 7(2):63–92.Link, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF (1980) Bounded rationality in budgetary research. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 74(2):354–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT (2003a) Conceptualizing and measuring variety in the execution of organizational work processes. Management Sci. 49(7):857–879.Link, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT (2003b) Sequential variety in work processes. Organ. Sci. 14(2):528–540.Link, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS (2005) Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Indust. Corporate Change 14(2):793–815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS (2008) Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Inform. Organ. 18(4):235–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Rueter HH (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(2):484–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Hærem T, Hillison D (2010) Comparing organizational routines as recurrent patterns of action. Organ. Stud. 31(7):917–940.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Hærem T, Hillison D (2011) The (n)ever changing world: Stability and change in organizational routines. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1369–1383.Link, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS, Becker MC, Liu P (2012) Dynamics of organizational routines: A generative model. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1484–1508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plowman DA, Baker LT, Beck TE, Kulkarni M, Solansky ST, Travis DV (2007) Radical change accidentally: The emergence and amplification of small change. Acad. Management J. 50(2):515–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polites GL, Karahanna E (2012) Shackled to the status quo: The inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. MIS Quart. 36(2):21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polites GL, Karahanna E (2013) The embeddedness of information systems habits in organizational and individual level routines: Development and disruption. MIS Quart. 37(2):221–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pressman JL, Wildavsky A (1984) Implementation, 3rd ed. (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Rerup C, Feldman MS (2011) Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Acad. Management J. 54(2):577–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6):824–844.Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. 49(2):290–311.Link, Google Scholar
• Rumelt RP (1995) Inertia and transformation. Montgomery CA, ed. Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Towards a Synthesis (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA), 101–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salvato C, Rerup C (2011) Beyond collective entities: Multi-level research on organizational routines and capabilities. J. Management 37(2):468–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez R, Mahoney JT (1996) Modularity, flexibility and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):63–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Levinthal DA (2003) Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. 14(2):650–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2005) Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ. Sci. 16(2):101–122.Link, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision Making Processes in Administrative Organizations (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1991) Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(2):125–134.Link, Google Scholar
• Singh JV, House RJ, Tucker DJ (1986) Organizational change and organizational mortality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(2):587–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, O’Reilly III CA (1996) Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif. Management Rev. 38(2):8–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Roberts KH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(2):357–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter SG, Szulanski G (2001) Replication as strategy. Organ. Sci. 12(2):730–743.Link, Google Scholar