Organizational Structure and Performance Feedback: Centralization, Aspirations, and Termination Decisions

References

• Audia PG, Brion S (2007) Reluctant to change: Self-enhancing responses to diverging performance measures. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 102(2):255–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Greve HR (2006) Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Sci. 52(1):83–94.Link, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Sorenson O (2001) Aspirations, performance and organizational change: A multi-level analysis. Working paper, London Business School, London.Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Locke EA, Smith KG (2000) The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Acad. Management J. 43(5):837–853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartlett CA, Ghoshal S (1990) Managing innovation in the transnational corporation. Bartlett CA, Doz Y, Hedlund G, eds. Managing the Global Firm (Routledge, London), 215–255.Google Scholar
• Baum JA, Dahlin KB (2007) Aspiration performance and railroads’ patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organ. Sci. 18(3):368–385.Link, Google Scholar
• Baum JA, Rowley TJ, Shipilov AV, Chuang Y-T (2005) Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(4):536–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum R, Wally S (2003) Strategic decision speed and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 24(11):1107–1129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tripsas M (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management J. 33(3):277–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J, Nobel R, Ridderstråle J (2002) Knowledge as a contingency variable: Do the characteristics of knowledge predict organization structure? Organ. Sci. 13(3):274–289.Link, Google Scholar
• Blettner DP, He ZL, Hu S, Bettis RA (2014) Adaptive aspirations and performance heterogeneity: Attention allocation among multiple reference points. Strategic Management J. 32(12):1426–1436.Google Scholar
• Blossfeld H-P, Golsch K, Rohwer G (2007) Event History Analysis with Stata (Psychology Press, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Boumgarden P, Nickerson J, Zenger TR (2012) Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance. Strategic Management J. 33(6):587–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouquet C, Birkinshaw J (2008) Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. Acad. Management J. 51(3):577–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyle E, Shapira Z (2012) The liability of leading: Battling aspiration and survival goals in the Jeopardy! Tournament of Champions. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1100–1113.Link, Google Scholar
• Bromiley P (1991) Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. 34(1):37–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bromiley P (2005) The Behavioral Foundations of Strategic Management (Blackwell, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
• Bromiley P, Harris JD (2014) A comparison of alternative measures of organizational aspirations. Strategic Management J. 35(3):338–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bromiley P, Wiseman RM (1989) Risk taking by declining organizations. Discussion paper, Strategic Management Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1995) Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. 20(2):343–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS (2003) Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(4):557–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton RM, Obel B (2004) Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardinal LB, Turner SF, Fern MJ, Burton RM (2011) Organizing for product development across technological environments: Performance trade-offs and priorities. Organ. Sci. 22(4):1000–1025.Link, Google Scholar
• Chang S-J (2011) Sony vs. Samsung: The Inside Story of the Electronics Giants’ Battle for Global Supremacy (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Child J (1972) Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology 6(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen M, Knudsen T (2010) Design of decision-making organizations. Management Sci. 56(1):71–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2012) Organizational structure as a determinant of performance: Evidence from mutual funds. Strategic Management J. 33(6):611–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar F, Eggers J (2013) Organizational decision making: An information aggregation view. Management Sci. 59(10):2257–2277.Link, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, NJ).Google Scholar
• de Figueiredo J, Kyle M (2006) Surviving the gales of creative destruction: The determinants of product turnover. Strategic Management J. 27(3):241–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Figueiredo JM, Teece DJ (1996) Mitigating procurement hazards in the context of innovation. Indust. Corporate Change 5(2):537–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, March JG (2001) Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organ. Sci. 12(5):523–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Desai VM (2016) The behavioral theory of the (governed) firm: Corporate board influences on organizations’ responses to performance shortfalls. Acad. Management J. 59(3):860–879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Egelhoff WG (1988) Strategy and structure in multinational corporations: A revision of the stopford and wells model. Strategic Management J. 9(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP (2012) All experience is not created equal: Learning, adapting, and focusing in product portfolio management. Strategic Management J. 33(3):315–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. 32(3):543–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forlani D (2002) Risk and rationality: The influence of decision domain and perceived outcome control on managers’ high-risk decisions. J. Behavioral Decision Making 15(2):125–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Dokko G (2015) Learning to let go: Social influence, learning, and the abandonment of corporate venture capital practices. Strategic Management J. 37(8):1558–1577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Joseph J (2013) Corporate structure and performance feedback: Aspirations and adaptation in M-form firms. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1102–1119.Link, Google Scholar
• Galbraith JR (1974) Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces 4(3):28–36.Link, Google Scholar
• Galbraith JR (1977) Organization Design (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2005) Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organ. Sci. 16(6):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D, Ocasio W (2007) Perspective—Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie school’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organ. Sci. 18(3):523–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Gilbert CG (2005) Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. 48(5):741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenstein SM, Wade JB (1998) The product life cycle in the commercial mainframe computer market, 1968–1982. RAND J. Econom. 29(4):772–789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (1995) Jumping ship: The diffusion of strategy abandonment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(4):444–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (1998) Performance aspirations and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):58–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grohsjean T, Kretschmer T, Stieglitz N (2012) Reinforcement learning in strategic decision making. Working paper, Imperial College London, London.Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Puranam P, Tushman M (2012) Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management J. 33(6):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guler I (2007) Throwing good money after bad? Political and institutional influences on sequential decision making in the venture capital industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(2):248–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(2):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansell S (2009) How Sanjay Jha overhauled Motorola’s culture. New York Times (October 29), http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/how-sanjay-jha-overhauled-motorolas-culture/?_r=0.Google Scholar
• Hayward ML, Shimizu K (2006) De-commitment to losing strategic action: Evidence from the divestiture of poorly performing acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 27(6):541–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heimeriks KH, Bingham CB, Laamanen T (2015) Unveiling the temporally contingent role of codification in alliance success. Strategic Management J. 36(3):462–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson AD, Stern I (2004) Selection-based learning: The coevolution of internal and external selection in high-velocity environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(1):39–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Cockburn I (1994) Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. 15(S1):63–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isenberg DJ (1986) Thinking and managing: A verbal protocol analysis of managerial problem solving. Acad. Management J. 29(4):775–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaccard J, Turrisi R (2003) Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jordan AH, Audia PG (2012) Self-enhancement and learning from performance feedback. Acad. Management Rev. 37(2):211–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A, Beckman CM, Moliterno TP (2015) Disentangling risk and change internal and external social comparison in the mutual fund industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):228–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S (2006) Modularity in organizational structure: The reconfiguration of internally developed and acquired business units. Strategic Management J. 27(9):799–823.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S, Kaul A (2015) Structural recombination and innovation: Unlocking internal knowledge synergy through structural change. Organ. Sci. 26(2):439–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Khandwalla PN (1973) Viable and effective organizational designs of firms. Acad. Management J. (16):481–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klingebiel R (2012) Options in the implementation plan of entrepreneurial initiatives: Examining firms’ attainment of flexibility benefit. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 6(4):307–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klingebiel R, Joseph J (2016) Entry timing and innovation strategy in feature phones. Strategic Management J. 37(6):1002–1020.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lant TK (1992) Aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Sci. 38(5):623–644.Link, Google Scholar
• Lehman DW, Hahn J, Ramanujam R, Alge BJ (2011) The dynamics of the performance-risk relationship within a performance period: The moderating role of deadline proximity. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1613–1630.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Shapira Z (1987) Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Sci. 33(11):1404–1418.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Shapira Z (1992) Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psych. Rev. 99(1):172–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• McGrath R, Nerkar A (2004) Real options reasoning and a new look at the R&D investment strategies of pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management J. 25(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mezias SJ, Chen Y-R, Murphy PR (2002) Aspiration-level adaptation in an american financial services organization: A field study. Management Sci. 48(10):1285–1300.Link, Google Scholar
• Miller KD, Chen W-R (2004) Variable organizational risk preferences: Tests of the March-Shapira model. Acad. Management J. 47(1):105–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell W (1994) The dynamics of evolving markets: The effects of business sales and age on dissolutions and divestitures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(4)575–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moliterno TP, Wiersema MF (2007) Firm performance, rent appropriation, and the strategic resource divestment capability. Strategic Management J. 28(11):1065–1087.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Brien KJ (2010) Nokia’s new chief faces culture of complacency. New York Times (September 26), http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/27/technology/27nokia.html.Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (2011) Attention to attention. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1286–1296.Link, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Joseph J (2005) An attention-based theory of strategy formulation: Linking micro-and macroperspectives in strategy processes. Szulanski G, Porac J, Doz Y, eds. Strategy Process, Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 22 (Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Bingley, UK), 39–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker A, Ward A (2010) Fight is on to halt the fall from grace. Financial Times (September 10), https://next.ft.com/content/cd304c5e-bd04-11df-954b-00144feab49a.Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Levinthal DA (2012) Chasing a moving target: Exploitation and exploration in dynamic environments. Management Sci. 58(3):587–601.Link, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Raveendran M, Knudsen T (2012) Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Singh H, Zollo M (2006) Organizing for innovation: Managing the coordination-autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions. Acad. Management J. 49(2):263–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rerup C (2009) Attentional triangulation: Learning from unexpected rare crises. Organ. Sci. 20(5):876–893.Link, Google Scholar
• Rerup C, Feldman MS (2011) Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Acad. Management J. 54(3):577–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhee L, Ocasio WC, Kim T-H (2014) Attention to member firm performance in hierarchical business groups: The effects of relevance. Working paper, KAIST College of Business, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. 49(3):290–311.Link, Google Scholar
• Schoonhoven CB, Eisenhardt KM, Lyman K (1990) Speeding products to market: Waiting time to first product introduction in new firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(S1):177–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sengul M, Obloj T (2014) A behavioral theory of multiunit firms. Working paper, Boston College, Boston.Google Scholar
• Shapira Z (1993) Ambiguity and risk taking in organizations, Camerer C, Kunreuther H, eds. Making Decisions About Liability and Insurance (Springer, New York), 89–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shimizu K (2007) Prospect theory, behavioral theory, and the threat-rigidity thesis: Combinative effects on organizational decisions to divest formerly acquired units. Acad. Management J. 50(6):1495–1514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin HH, Stulz RM (1998) Are internal capital markets efficient? Quart. J. Econom. 113(2):531–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shinkle GA (2012) Organizational aspirations, reference points, and goals building on the past and aiming for the future. J. Management 38(1):415–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Levinthal DA (2005) Escaping real (non-benign) competency traps: Linking the dynamics of organizational structure to the dynamics of search. Strategic Organ. 3(1):85–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2005) Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ. Sci. 16(2):101–122.Link, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB, Stuart TE (2000) Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):81–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O (2000) Letting the market work for you: An evolutionary perspective on product strategy. Strategic Management J. 21(5):577–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw BM, Sandelands LE, Dutton JE (1981) Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26(4)501–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe KM (1994) What executives notice: Accurate perceptions in top management teams. Acad. Management J. 37(5):1360–1378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Nadler DA (1978). Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad. Management Rev. 3(3):613–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vancil RF (1978) Decentralization: Management Ambiguity by Design (Dow Jones-Irwin, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Vidal E, Mitchell W (2015) Adding by subtracting: The relationship between performance feedback and resource reconfiguration through divestitures. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1101–1118.Link, Google Scholar
• Vissa B, Greve HR, Chen WR (2010) Business group affiliation and firm search behavior in India: Responsiveness and focus of attention. Organ. Sci. 21(3):696–712.Link, Google Scholar