Knowledge Utilization, Coordination, and Team Performance

References

• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Akgun A, Byrne J, Keskin H (2005) Knowledge networks in new product development projects: A transactive memory perspective. Inform. Management 42(8):1105–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson CG, Lindsay JJ, Bushman BJ (1999) Research in the psychological laboratory: Truth or triviality? Current Directions Psych. Sci. 8(1):3–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L (1982) Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Admin. Sci. Quart. 27(3):420–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Epple D (1990) Learning curves in manufacturing. Science 247(4945):920–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Gruenfeld DH, Naquin C (2001) Group learning in organizations. Turner ME, ed. Groups at Work: Advances in Theory and Research (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), 369–411.Google Scholar
• Austin J (2003) Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy in group performance. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):866–878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2006) Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):3–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Bliese PD (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 349–381.Google Scholar
• Boh WF, Slaughter AS, Espinosa JA (2007) Learning from experience in software development: A multilevel analysis. Management Sci. 53(8):1315–1331.Link, Google Scholar
• Brislin RW (1970) Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J. Cross-Cultural Psych. 1(3):185–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll TN, Gormley TJ, Bilardo VJ, Burton RM, Woodman KL (2006) Designing a new organization at NASA: An organization design process using simulation. Organ. Sci. 17(2):202–214.Link, Google Scholar
• Clark HH, Marshall CR (1981) Definite reference and mutual knowledge. Joshi AK, Webber LB, Sag IA, eds. Elements of Discourse Understanding (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 10–63.Google Scholar
• Dane E (2010) Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 35(4):579–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dearborn DC, Simon HA (1958) Selective perception: A note on the departmental identifications of executives. Sociometry 21(2):140–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeChurch LA, Mesmer-Magnus JR (2010) The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 95(1):32–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunbar RL, Starbuck WH (2006) Learning to design organizations and learning from designing them. Organ. Sci. 17(2):171–178.Link, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Dillon JR, Roloff KS (2007) Three perspectives on team learning: Outcome improvement, task mastery, and group process. Acad. Management Ann. 1(1):269–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2004) Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. 50(2):159–173.Link, Google Scholar
• Fang C, Lee J, Schilling MA (2010) Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 21(3):625–642.Link, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Sproull L (2000) Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. 46(12):685–716.Link, Google Scholar
• Flueckiger GE (1976) Specialization, learning by doing and the optimal amount of learning. Economic Inquiry 14(3):389–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Argote L, Miron-Spektor E, Todorova G (2010) First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes 111(2):102–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gittell JH (2002) Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Management Sci. 48(11):1408–1426.Link, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, ed. (1990) Groups That Work (and Those That Don’t): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Hill GW (1982) Group versus individual performance: Are N + 1 heads better than one? Psych. Bull. 91(3):517–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Pfeffer J (2003) Why organizations don’t “know what they know”: Cognitive and motivational factors affecting the transfer of expertise. Ackerman M, Pipek V, Wulf V, eds. Beyond Knowledge Management: Sharing Expertise (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 3–26.Google Scholar
• Hinsz VB, Tindale RS, Vollrath DA (1997) The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psych. Bull. 121(1):43–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead AB (1998) Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 34(5):423–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James LR (1982) Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. J. Appl. Psych. 67(2):219–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King A, de Rond M (2011) Boat race: Rhythm and the possibility of collective performance. British J. Soc. 62(4):565–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SW, Ilgen DR (2006) Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 7(3):77–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krauss RM, Fussell SR (1990) Mutual knowledge and communicative effectiveness. Galegher J, Kraut RE, Egido C, eds. Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technical Bases of Collaborative Work (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 111–146.Google Scholar
• Kretschmer T, Puranam P (2008) Integration through incentives within differentiated organizations. Organ. Sci. 19(6):860–875.Link, Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (1999) Culture and language. J. Political Econom. 107(S6):S95–S126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leavitt HJ (1996) The old days, hot groups, and managers’ lib. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(2):288–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D, Warglien M (1999) Landscape design. Designing for location action in complex worlds. Organ. Sci. 10(3):342–357.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis K (2003) Measuring transactive memory systems in the field, scale development and validation. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4):587–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K, Lange D, Gillis L (2005) Transactive memory systems, learning, learning transfer. Organ. Sci. 16(6):581–598.Link, Google Scholar
• Liang DW, Moreland R, Argote L (1995) Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory system. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 21(4):384–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounamaa PH, March JG (1987) Adaptive coordination of a learning team. Management Sci. 33(1):107–123.Link, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A, Baldwin C, Rusnak R (2012) Exploring the duality between product and organizational architectures: A test of the “mirroring” hypothesis. Res. Policy 41(8):1309–1324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• McGrath JE (1984) Groups: Interaction and Performance (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Michinov E, Olivier-Chiron E, Rusch E, Chiron B (2008) Influence of transactive memory on perceived performance, job satisfaction and identification in anaesthesia teams. British J. Anaesthesia 100(3):372–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, O’Reilly CA (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. 20(January):77–140.Google Scholar
• Pisano GP, Bohmer RMJ, Edmondson AC (2001) Organizational differences in rates of learning: Evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 47(6):752–768.Link, Google Scholar
• Polanyi M (1967) The Tacit Dimension (Anchor Books, Garden City, New York).Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Raveendran M, Knudsen T (2012) Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing what to do and knowing who knows what. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.Link, Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Argote L (2011) Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions antecedents and consequences. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):189–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philosophical Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
• Tasa K, Whyte G (2005) Collective efficacy and vigilant problem solving in group decision making: A non-linear model. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 96(2):119–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Taylor DW, Berry CP, Block CH (1958) Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitates or inhibits creative thinking? Admin. Sci. Quart. 3(1):23–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M, Katz R (1980) External communication and project performance: An investigation into the role of gatekeeper. Management Sci. 26(11):1071–1085.Link, Google Scholar
• Weber RA, Camerer CF (2003) Cultural conflict and merger failure: An experimental approach. Management Sci. 49(4):400–415.Link, Google Scholar
• Wegner DM (1987) Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Mullen B, Goethals GR, eds. Theories of Group Behavior, Vol. 9 (Springer, New York), 185–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner DM, Giuliano T, Hertel P (1985) Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. Ickes WJ, ed. Compatible and Incompatible Relationships (Springer, New York), 253–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW, Hackman JR, Jerde TJ, Chabris CF, Bennett SL, Kosslyn SM (2007) Using brain-based measures to compose teams: How individual capabilities and team collaboration strategies jointly shape performance. Soc. Neuroscience 2(2):96–105.Crossref, Google Scholar