Social Business Hybrids: Demand Externalities, Competitive Advantage, and Growth Through Diversification

References

• Adams R, Licht A, Sagiv L (2011) Shareholders and stakeholders: How do directors decide? Strategic Management J. 32(12): 1331–1355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Quart. J. Econom. 105(3):715–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• André R (2012) Assessing the accountability of the benefit corporation: Will this new gray sector organization enhance corporate social responsibility? J. Bus. Ethics 110(1):133–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Recent developments in the economics of price discrimination. Blundell R, Newey WK, Persson T, eds. Advances in Economics and Econometrics, Econometric Society Monographs, Vol. 2 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 97–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth B, Mael F (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):20–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett ML (2007) Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):794–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Dorado S (2010) Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of microfinance commercial organizations. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1419–1440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Lee M (2014) Advancing research in hybrid organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):397–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Sengul M, Pache AC, Model J (2015) Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Acad. Management J. 58(6):1658–1685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JR, Locke EA (2004) The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. J. Appl. Psych. 89(4):587–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belk RW (1988) Possessions and the extended self. J. Consumer Res. 15(2):139–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benjamin DJ, Choi JJ, Strickland AJ (2010) Social identity and preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1913–1928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowen H, Wiersema M (2005) Foreign-based competition and corporate diversification strategy. Strategic Management J. 26(12): 1153–1171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral L, Mata J (2003) On the evolution of the firm size distribution: Facts and theory Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(4):1075–1090.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatain O, Zemsky P (2007) The horizontal scope of the firm: Organizational tradeoffs vs. buyer-supplier relationships. Management Sci. 53(4):550–565.Link, Google Scholar
• Dierickx I, Cool K (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. 35(12):1504–1511.Link, Google Scholar
• Dosi G (1988) Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. J. Econom. Literature 26(3):1120–1171.Google Scholar
• Fosfuri A, Giarratana M, Roca E (2015) Walking a slippery line: Investments in social values and product longevity. Strategic Management J. 36(11):1750–1760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gecas V (1982) The self-concept. Annual Rev. Sociol. 8(August):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert BA, McDougall PP, Audretsch DB (2006) New venture growth: A review and extension. J. Management 32(6):926–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haigh N, Walker J, Bacq S, Kickul J (2015) Hybrid organizations: Origins, strategies, impacts and implications. California Management Rev. 57(3):5–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hashai N (2015) Within-industry diversification and firm performance: An S-shaped hypothesis. Strategic Management J. 36(9): 1378–1400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Havemann H, Rao H (2006) Hybrid forms and the evolution of thrifts. Amer. Behav. Scientist 49(7):974–986.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C, Eisenhardt K (2004) Inter-temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity and the dynamics of diversification. Strategic Management J. 25(13):1217–1232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C, Lieberman M (2002) The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of the pre-history. Indust. Corporate Change 11(4):725–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Ireland RD, Camp SM, Sexton DL (2001) Strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):479–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoskisson R, Turk T (1990) Corporate restructuring: Governance and control limits of internal market. Acad. Management Rev. 15(3): 72–87.Google Scholar
• Ibarra H (1999) Provisional self: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4): 764–791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ireland RD, Hitt MA, Sirmon DG (2003) A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. J. Management 29(6):963–989.Google Scholar
• Jay J (2010) Navigating paradox of a mechanism of change and innovation paradox in hybrid organizations. Acad. Management J. 56(1):137–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones TM (1995) Instrumental stakeholder theory—A synthesis of ethics and economics. Acad. Management Rev. 20(2):404–437.Google Scholar
• Kaul A, Luo J (2015) The economic case for CSR: When profit-maximizing firms have an advantage in the provision of social goods. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Kraatz M, Block E (2008) Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. Greenwood Ret al. eds. Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, London), 243–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee M (2014) Mission and markets? The viability of hybrid social ventures. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Lee M, Jay J (2015) Strategic responses to hybrid social ventures. California Management Rev. 57(3):126–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee BH, Hiatt S, Lounsbury M (2016) Market mediators and the tradeoffs of legitimacy-seeking behaviors in a nascent category. Working paper MOR 04.16, Marshall School of Business, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Lepoutre J, Justo R, Terjesen S, Bosma N (2013) Designing a global standardized methodology for measuring social enterpreneurship activity: The global enterpreneurship monitor social enterpreneurship study. Small Bus. Econom. 40(3):693–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markides C (1992) Consequences of corporate refocusing: Ex ante evidence. Acad. Management J. 35(2):398–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markides C, Williamson P (1996) Corporate diversification and organizational structure. Acad. Management J. 39(2):340–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Lounsbury M (2007) Vive la resistance: competing logics and the consolidation of U.S. community banking. Acad. Management J. 50(4):799–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Glynn MA, Davis GF (2007) Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3): 925–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maurer CC, Bansal P, Crossan MM (2011) Creating economic value through social values: Introducing a culturally informed resource-based view. Organ. Sci. 22(2):432–448.Link, Google Scholar
• McGuire WJ (1984) Search for the self: Going beyond self-esteem and the reactive self. Zucker RA, Aronoff J, Rabin AI, eds. Personality and the Prediction of Behavior (Academic Press, New York), 73–120.Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(August): 415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McWilliams A, Siegel DS (2001) Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 26(1): 117–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Kilduff M, Brass DJ (1998) At the margins: A distinctiveness approach to the social identity and social networks of underrepresented groups. Acad. Management J. 41(4):441–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell MF (2000) The scope and organization of production: Firm dynamics over the learning curve. RAND J. Econom. 31(1): 180–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore AG (1991) Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling High-Tech Products to Mainstream Customers (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
• Moss TW, Short JC, Payne GT, Lumpkin GT (2011) Dual identities in social ventures: An exploratory study. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 35(4):805–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muniz A, O’Guinn T (2001) Brand community. J. Consumer Res. 27(4):412–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2010) Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on invest judgments of new venture plausibility. Acad. Management Rev. 36(3):479–499.Google Scholar
• Ott K (2014) Fearless Chocolate announces its closure. Candy Industry Magazine (December 3), http://www.candyindustry.com/articles/86531-fearless-chocolate-announces-its-closure?v=preview.Google Scholar
• Pache A, Santos F (2013) When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting to institutional demands. Acad. Management Rev. 35(3):455–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palazzo G, Basu K (2007) The Ethical backlash of corporate branding. J. Bus. Ethics 73(4):333–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palich LE, Cardinal LB, Miller CC (2000) Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: An Examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management J. 21(2):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage—A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. 14(3):179–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1996) What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(6):61–78.Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Kramer MR (2011) Creating shared value. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(1/2):62–77.Google Scholar
• Ravasi D, Rindova V, Dalpiaz E (2012) The cultural side of value creation. Strategic Organ. 10(3):231–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reed A (2002) Social identity as a useful perspective for self-concept-based consumer research. Psych. Marketing 19(3):235–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Petkova AP (2007) When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations. Organ. Sci. 18(2):217–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Sakhartov A, Folta T (2014) Resource relatedness, redeployability, and firm value. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1781–1797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santalò J, Becerra M (2008) Competition from specialized firms and the diversification—Performance linkage. J. Finance 63(2): 851–883.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos F, Pache AC, Birkholz C (2015) Making hybrids work: Aligning business models and organizational design for social enterprises. California Management Rev. 57(3):36–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen S, Bhattacharya C (2001) Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J. Marketing Res. 38(2):225–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shih M, Pittinsky TL, Ambady N (1999) Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psych. Sci. 10(1):81–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silverman B (1999) Technological resources and the direction of corporate diversification: Toward an integration of resource-based view theory and transaction costs economics. Management Sci. 45(8):1109–1124.Link, Google Scholar
• Sirmon DG, Hitt MA, Arregle JLet al. (2010) The dynamic interplay of capability strengths and weaknesses: Investigating the bases of temporary competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. 31(13):1386–1409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stark D (2009) The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stets JE, Burke PJ (2000) Identity theory and social identity theory. Soc. Psych. Quart. 63(3):224–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Austin WG, Worchel S, eds. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Brooks-Cole, Monterey, CA), 33–47.Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1982) Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(1):39–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torelli CJ, Monga AB, Kaikati AM (2012) Doing poorly by doing good: Corporate social responsibility and brand concepts. J. Consumer Res. 38(5):948–963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tracey P, Jarvis O (2006) Case study: An enterprising failure. Why a promising social franchise collapsed. Stanford Soc. Innovation Rev. 4(1):66–70.Google Scholar
• Wan W, Hoskisson R, Short J, Yiu D (2011) Resource-based theory and corporate diversification: Opportunities and accomplishments. J. Management 37(5):1335–1368.Google Scholar
• Wang H, Barney J (2006) Employee incentives to make firm specific investments: Implications for resource-based-view theories on corporate diversification. Acad. Management Rev. 31(2): 466–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu B (2013) Opportunity costs, industry dynamics, and corporate diversification: Evidence from the cardiovascular medical device industry, 1976–2004. Strategic Management J. 34(11): 1265–1287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ye G, Priem R, Alshwer LA (2012) Achieving demand-side synergy from strategic diversification: How combining mundane assets can leverage consumer utilities. Organ. Sci. 23(1):207–224.Link, Google Scholar