Growing New Corporate Businesses: From Initiation to Graduation

References

• Adner R, Levinthal DA (2004) What is not a real option: Considering boundaries for the application of real options to business strategy. Acad. Management Rev. 29(1):74–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert C (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baghai M, Coley S, White D (2000) The Alchemy of Growth: Practical Insights for Building the Enduring Enterprise (Da Capo Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Barnett ML (2008) An attention-based view of real options reasoning. Acad. Management Rev. 33(3):606–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J, Gupta K (2013) Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies. Acad. Management Perspect. 27(4):287–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boumgarden P, Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2012) Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation and organizational performance. Strategic Management J. 33(6):587–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouquet C, Birkinshaw J (2008) Managing power in the multinational corporation: How low-power actors gain influence. J. Management 34(3):477–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowman EH, Hurry D (1993) Strategy through the option lens: An integrated view of resource investments and the incremental-choice process. Acad. Management Rev. 18(4):760–782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowman EH, Moskowitz GT (2001) Real options analysis and strategic decision making. Organ. Sci. 12(6):772–777.Link, Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA (2001) Strategy Is Destiny: How Strategy-Making Shapes a Company’s Future (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Campbell A, Park R (2005) The Growth Gamble: When Leaders Should Bet Big on New Businesses and How to Avoid Expensive Failures (Nicolas Brealey Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2004) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Castrogiovanni GJ (2002) Organization task environments: Have they changed fundamentally over time? J. Management 28(2):129–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D, Hardy C (1996) Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Acad. Management J. 39(5):1120–1153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duncan R (1976) The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. Killman RH, Pondy LR, Sleven D, eds. The Management of Organization (North Holland, New York), 167–188.Google Scholar
• Fiol CM (1995) Thought worlds colliding: The role of contradiction in corporate innovation processes. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 19(3):71–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folta TB (1998) Governance and uncertainty: The tradeoff between administrative control and commitment. Strategic Management J. 19(11):1007–1028.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fontana A, Frey JH (1998) Interviewing: The art of science. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 47–78.Google Scholar
• Gardner HK, Anand N, Morris T (2008) Chartering new territory: Diversification, legitimacy, and practice area creation in professional service firms. J. Organ. Behav. 29(8):1101–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J (2004) The antecedents, consequences and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. 47(2):209–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert CG (2005) Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. 48(5):741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert CG (2006) Change in the presence of residual fit: Can competing frames coexist? Organ. Sci. 17(1):150–167.Link, Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies of Qualitative Research (Wiedenfeld and Nicholson, London).Google Scholar
• Golden BR (1992) The past is the past—Or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Acad. Management J. 35(4):848–860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1995) Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(4):619–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Puranam P (2009) Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organ. Sci. 20(2):422–440.Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta AK, Smith KG, Shalley CE (2006) The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. 49(4):693–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guler I (2007) Throwing good money after bad? Political and institutional influences on sequential decision making in the venture capital industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(2):248–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Van den Steen E (2015) Why do firms have “purpose?’’ The firm’s role as a carrier of identity and reputation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(5):326–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Im G, Rai A (2008) Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganizational relationships. Management Sci. 54(7):1281–1296.Link, Google Scholar
• Jansen J, Simsek Z, Cao Q (2012) Ambidexterity and performance in multiunit contexts: Cross-level moderating effects of structural and resource attributes. Strategic Management J. 33(11): 1286–1303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen J, Van Den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Sci. 52(11):1661–1674.Link, Google Scholar
• Jansen J, Tempelaar M, Van den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2009) Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organ. Sci. 20(4):797–811.Link, Google Scholar
• Junni P, Sarala R, Tars V, Tarba S (2013) Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Acad. Management Perspect. 27(4):299–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Tripsas M (2008) Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Res. Policy 37(5):790–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim WC, Mauborgne R (2005) Blue ocean strategy: From theory to practice. California Management Rev. 47(3):105–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies of theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Rosenkopf L (2006) Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad. Management J. 49(4):797–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Stettner U, Tushman ML (2010) Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):109–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Lee T (1999) Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) Myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14(August):319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Y, Chi T (2013) Venture capitalists’ decision to withdraw: The role of portfolio configuration from a real option lens. Strategic Management J. 34(11):1351–1366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majd S, Pindyck RS (1987) Time to build, option value, and investment decisions. J. Financial Econom. 18(1):7–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• McGrath RG (1997) A real options logic for initiating technology positioning investments. Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):13–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath RG, Nerkar A (2004) Real options reasoning and a new look at the R&D investment strategies of pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management J. 25(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath RG, Ferrier WJ, Mendelow A (2004) Real options as engines of choice and heterogeneity. Acad. Management Rev. 29(1):86–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller CM, Cardinal LB, Glick WH (1997) Retrospective reports in organizational research: A reexamination of recent evidence. Acad. Management J. 40(1):189–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller KD, Shapira Z (2004) An empirical test of heuristics and biases affecting real option valuation. Strategic Management J. 25(3):269–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mom T, Van den Bosch F, Volberda H (2009) Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and indirect effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organ. Sci. 20(4):812–828.Link, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2002) Being efficiently fickle: A dynamic theory of organizational choice. Organ. Sci. 13(5):547–566.Link, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2004) The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(4):74–81.Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2008) Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Res. Organ. Behav. 28(1):185–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2013) Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Acad. Management Perspect. 27(4): 324–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA, Harreld JB, Tushman ML (2009) Organizational ambidexterity: IBM and emerging business opportunities. California Management Rev. 51(4):75–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raffaelli R, Glynn MA, Tushman ML (2015) Organizational identity as a strategic resource: Building dynamic capabilities for innovation. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Raisch S (2008) Balanced structures: Designing organizations for profitable growth. Long Range Planning 41(5):483–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raisch S, Birkinshaw J (2008) Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J. Management 34(3): 375–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raisch S, Birkinshaw J, Probst G, Tushman ML (2009) Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ. Sci. 20(4):685–695.Link, Google Scholar
• Rowley J (2002) Using case studies in research. Management Res. News 25(1):16–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sapienza HJ, Gupta AK (1994) Impact of agency risk and task uncertainty on venture capitalist-CEO interaction. Acad. Management J. 37(6):1618–1632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schildt HA, Maula MVJ, Keil T (2005) Explorative and exploitative learning from external corporate ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 29(4):493–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2002) Evolution toward fit. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1): 125–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Levinthal DA (2003) Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. 14(6):650–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Simsek Z, Heavey C, Veiga JF, Souder D (2009) A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. J. Management Stud. 46(5):864–894.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Tushman ML (2005) Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. 16(5):522–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Stettner U, Lavie D (2014) Ambidexterity under scrutiny: Exploration and exploitation via internal organization, alliances, and acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 35(13):1903–1929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss AL, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Strebel P (1987) Organizing for innovation over an industry cycle. Strategic Management J. 8(2):117–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (1996) Exploring stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(2):27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (2009) Technology, identity and inertia through the lens of the digital photography company. Organ. Sci. 20(2):440–461.Link, Google Scholar
• Tsai W (2000) The formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic Management J. 21(9):925–939.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W (2002) Social structure of “coopetition’’ within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organ. Sci. 13(2):179–190.Link, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, O’Reilly CA (1996) Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Rev. 38(4):8–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A (2007) Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J (1979) Reclaiming qualitative methods for organizational research: A preface. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):520–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volberda H, Lewin A (2003) Co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: From evolution to coevolution. J. Management Stud. 40(8):2111–2136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang HL, Li JT (2008) Untangling the effects of overexploration and overexploitation on organizational performance: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. J. Management 34(5):925–951.Google Scholar
• Westerman G, McFarlan FW, Iansiti M (2006) Organization design and effectiveness over the innovation life cycle. Organ. Sci. 17(2):230–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Yin RK (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Zimmermann A, Raisch S, Birkinshaw J (2015) How is ambidexterity initiated? The emergent charter definition process. Organ. Sci. 26(2):1–21.Google Scholar
• Zook C, Allen J (2003) Growth outside the core. Harvard Bus. Rev. 81(12):66–75.Google Scholar