A Laughing Matter: Patterns of Laughter and the Effectiveness of Working Dyads

References

• Adelswärd V (1989) Laughter and dialogue: The social significance of laughter in institutional discourse. Nord. J. Linguist. 12(2):107–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adelswärd V, Oberg BM (1998) The function of laughter and joking in negotiation activities. Humor 11(4):411–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, NJ).Google Scholar
• Ansfield ME (2007) Smiling when distressed: When a smile is a frown turned upside down. Personality Soc. Psych. B 33(6):763–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bachorowski JA, Owren MJ (2001) Not all laughs are alike: Voiced but not unvoiced laughter readily elicits positive affect. Psych. Sci. 12(3):252–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bachorowski JA, Smoski MJ, Owren MJ (2001) The acoustic features of human laughter. J. Acoustical Soc. Amer. 110(3):1581–1597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bales RF (1950) Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups (Addison-Wesley, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6): 1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Stewart GL, Neubert MJ, Mount MK (1998) Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. J. Appl. Psych. 83(3):377–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsade SG, Gibson DE (1998) Group emotion: A view from top and bottom. Gruenfeld D, Mannix E, Neale M, eds. Research on Managing Groups and Teams (JAI Press, Stamford, CT), 81–102.Google Scholar
• Barsade SG, Knight AP (2015) Group affect. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 2(1):21–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsade SG, Ward A, Turner J, Sonnenfeld J (2000) To your heart’s content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(4):802–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel CA, Saavedra R (2000) The collective construction of work group methods. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(2):197–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown NM, Moren CR (2009) Background emotional dynamics of crew resource management: Shame emotions and coping responses. Internat. J. Aviation Psych. 13(3):269–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS, Boumgarden P (2010) Structure and learning in self-managed teams: Why “bureaucratic” teams can be better learners. Organ. Sci. 21(3):609–624.Link, Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS, Sutcliffe KM (2002) Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Acad. Management J. 45(5):875–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrne D (1971) The Attraction Paradigm (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Carmeli A, Tishler A, Edmondson AC (2012) CEO relational leadership and strategic decision quality in top management teams: The role of team trust and learning from failure. Strategic Organ. 10(1):31–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen S, Shechter D, Chaiken S (1996) Getting at the truth or getting along: Accuracy- vs. impression-motivated heuristic and systematic information processing. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 71(2): 262–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coates AJ (1997) The Ethics of War (Manchestor United Press, Manchestor, UK).Google Scholar
• Coates J (2007) Talk in a play frame: More on laughter and intimacy. J. Pragmatics. 39(1):29–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P (1983) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Collins CJ, Smith KG (2006) Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high technology firms. Acad. Management J. 49(3):544–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper CL, Sloan S (1985) Occupational and psychosocial stress among commercial aviation pilots. J. Occupational Medicine 27(8):570–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darwin CR (1872) The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals (Murray, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis JA, Spaeth JL, Huson C (1961) A technique for analyzing the effects of group composition. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 26(2):215–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW, Weingart LR (2003) Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4):741–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devereux PG, Ginsburg GP (2001) Sociality effects on the production of laughter. J. General Psych. 128(2):227–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Digman JM (1990) Personality structure: The emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Rev. Psych. 41:417–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Digman JM (1997) Higher-order factors of the Big Five. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 73(6):1246–1256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2003) Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. J. Management Stud. 40(6):1419–1452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2004) Learning from failure in health care: Frequent opportunities, pervasive barriers. Quality Safety Health Care 13(6):3–9.Google Scholar
• Edmondson A, Lei Z (2014) Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 1:23–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ekman P (1997) Should we call it expression or communication? Innovation 10(4):333–344.Google Scholar
• Foushee HC, Helmreich RL (1988) Group interaction and flight crew performance. Wiener EL, Nagel DC, eds. Human Factors in Aviation (Academic, San Diego), 189–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George JM (1995) Leader positive mood and group performance: The case of customer service. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 25(9):778–794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glenn P (1989) Initiating shared laughter in multi-party conversations. Western J. Speech Comm. 53(2):127–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glenn P (2003) Laughter in Interaction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glenn P (2010) Interviewer laughs: Shared laughter and asymmetries in employment interviews. J. Pragmatics 42(6):1458–1498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Gostick A, Christopher S (2008) The Levity Effect: Why It Pays to Lighten Up (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Gray AW, Parkinson B, Dunbar RI (2015) Laughter’s influence on the intimacy of self-disclosure. Human Nature Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective 26(1):28–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graziano WG, Tobin RM (2002) Agreeableness: Dimension of personality or social desirability artefact? J. Personality 70(5):695–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld DH, Mannix EA, Williams KY, Neale MA (1996) Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 67(1):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haakana M (2001) Laughter as a patient’s resource: Dealing with delicate aspects of medical interaction. Interdisciplinary J. Stud. Discourse 12(1-2):187–219.Google Scholar
• Haakana M (2002) Laughter in medical interaction: From quantification to analysis, and back. J. Sociolinguistics 6(2):207–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR (1987) The design of work team. Lorsch JW, ed. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 315–342.Google Scholar
• Hackman JR (2011) Colloborative Intelligence: Using Teams to Solve Hard Problems (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Hay J (2000) Functions of humor in the converstions of men and women. J. Pragmatics 32(6):709–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayworth D (1928) The social origin and function of laughter. Psych. Rev. 35(5):367–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holt E (2010) The last laugh: Shared laughter and topic termination. J. Pragmatics 42(6):1513–1525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh T (2010) Delivering Happiness: A Path to Profits, Passion, and Purpose (Business Plus, New York).Google Scholar
• Ilgen DR, Hollenbeck JR, Johnson M, Jundt D (2005) Teams in organizations: From IPO models to IMOI models. Annual Rev. Psych. 56:517–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ilies R, Wagner DT, Morgeson EP (2007) Explaining affective linkages in teams: Individual differences in susceptibility to contagion and individualism-collectivism. J. Appl. Psych. 92(4):1140–1148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaccard J, Turrisi R (2003) Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression, 2nd ed. (Sage, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janis IL (1982) Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes (Houghton Mifflin, New York).Google Scholar
• Jefferson G (1979) A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. Psathas G, ed. Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (Irvington Publishers, New York), 79–95.Google Scholar
• Jefferson G (1984) On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. Atkinson JM, Heritage JC, eds. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 346–369.Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Shah PP (1997) Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 72(4):775–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• John OP, Donahue EM, Kentle RL (1991) The Big Five inventory—Versions 4a and 54. Working paper, Institute of Personality and Social Research, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley. Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (1973) Attention and Effort (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Kanfer R, Ackerman PL (1989) Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. J. Appl. Psych. 74(4):657–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kangasharju H, Nikko T (2009) Emotions in organizations joint laughter in workplace meetings. J. Bus. Comm. 46(1):100–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Laport K, Waller MJ (2013) The role of positive affectivity in team effectiveness during crisis. J. Organ. Behav. 34(4):473–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelley T, Littman J (2001) The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity from IDEO, America’s Leading Design Firm (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Kelly JR, Barsade SG (2001) Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 86(1): 99–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keltner DG, Bonanno A (1997) A study of laughter and dissociation: Distinct correlates of laughter and smiling during bereavement. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 73(4):687–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keltner DG, Young RC, Heerey EA, Oemig C, Monarch ND (1998) Teasing in hierarchical and intimate relations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75(5):1231–1247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keyton J, Beck SJ (2010) Perspectives: Examining communication as macrocognition in STS. Human Factors 52(2):335–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight A (2015) Mood at the midpoint: Affect and change in exploratory search over time in teams that face a deadline. Organ. Sci. 26(1):99–118.Link, Google Scholar
• Knight A, Eisenkraft N (2015) Positive is usually good, negative is not always bad: The effects of group affect on social integration and task performance. J. Appl. Psych. 100(4):1214–1227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SWJ, Bell BS (2003) Work groups and teams in organizations. Borman WC, Ilgen DR, Klimoski RJ, eds. Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 12 (Wiley, London), 333–375.Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SWJ, Ilgen DR (2006) Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 7(3):77–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lauer RH, Lauer JC, Kerr ST (1990) The long-term marriage: Perceptions of stability and satisfaction. Internat. J. Aging Human Development 31(3):189–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavin D, Maynard DW (2001) Standardization vs. rapport: Respondent laughter and interviewer reaction during telephone surveys. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 66(3):453–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leary MR (1990) Responses to social exclusion: Social anxiety, jealousy, loneliness, depression, and low self-esteem. J. Soc. Clinical Psych. 9(2):221–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lei Z, Waller M, Hagen J, Kaplan S (2016) Team adaptiveness in team dynamic contexts: Contextualizing the roles of interaction patterns and in-process planning. Group Organ. Management 41(4):491–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LePine JA, Van Dyne L (1998) Predicting voice behavior in work groups. J. Appl. Psych. 83(6):853–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LePine JA, Van Dyne L (2001) Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with Big Five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. J. Appl. Psych. 86(2):326–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin DZ, Kurtzberg TR, Phillips KW, Lount Jr RB (2010) The role of affect in knowledge transfer. Group Dynamics.: Theory, Res., Practice 14(2):123–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis PN, Gallois C (1984) Disagreements, refusals, or negative feelings: Perception of negatively assertive messages from friends and strangers. Behav. Therapy 15(4):353–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lombard M, Snyder-Duch J, Bracken CC (2002) Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Comm. Res. 28(4):587–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovelace KD, Shapiro L, Weingart LR (2001) Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Acad. Management J. 44(4):779–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loyd DL, Wang CS, Phillips KW, Lount RB (2013) Social category diversity promotes premeeting elaboration: The role of relationship focus. Organ. Sci. 24(3):757–772.Link, Google Scholar
• Magee JC, Tiedens LZ (2006) Emotional ties that bind: The roles of valence and consistency of group emotion in inferences of cohesiveness and common fate. Personality Soc. Psych. B 32(12):1703–1715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Heffner TS, Goodwin GF, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA (2000) The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J. Appl. Psych. 85(2):273–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer JD, Roberts RD, Barsade SG (2008) Human abilities: Emotional intelligence. Annual Rev. Psych. 59:507–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, Costa PT (1987) Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 52(1):81–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mesmer-Magnus JR, DeChurch LA (2009) Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 94(2):535–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nembhard IM, Edmondson A (2006) Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J. Organ. Behav. 27(7):941–966.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newcombe AF, Brady JE (1982) Mutuality in boys’ friendship relations. Child Development 53(2):392–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norrick NR (1994) Involvement and joking in conversation. J. Pragmatics. 22(3–4):409–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Neill O, Rothbard N (2015) Is love all you need? The effects of emotional culture, suppression, and work–family conflict on firefighter risk taking and health. Acad. Management J., ePub ahead of print December 14, http://:dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oosterhof A, Van der Vegt G, Van de Vliert E, Sanders K (2009) Valuing skill differences: Perceived skill complementarity and dyadic helping behaviour in teams. Group Organ. Management 34(5):536–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osborne K, Chapman AJ (1977) Suppression of adult laughter: An experimental approach. Chapman AJ, Foot HC, eds. It’s a Funny Thing, Humor (Elmsford, Pergamon, NY), 429–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owren MJ, Rendall D (2001) Sound on the rebound: Bringing form and function back to the forefront in understanding nonhuman primate vocal signaling. Evololutionary Anthropology 10(2):58–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owren MJ, Bachorowski JA (2003) Reconsidering the evolution of nonlinguistic communication: The case of laughter. J. Nonverbal Behav. 27(3):183–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearsall MJ, Ellis APJ, Evans JM (2008) Unlocking the effects of gender faultlines on team creativity: Is activation the key? J. Appl. Psych. 93(1):225–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Loyd DL (2006) When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 99(2):143–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Northcraft GB, Neale MA (2006) Surface-level diversity and decision-making in groups: When does deep-level similarity help? Group Processes Intergroup Relations 9(4):467–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Mannix EA, Neale MA, Gruenfeld DH (2004) Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. J. Experimental Soc. Psych. 40(4):497–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollio HR, Bainum CK (1983) Are funny groups good at solving problems? A methodological evaluation and some preliminary results. Small Group Res. 14(4):379–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Zyphur MJ, Zhang Z (2010) A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psych. Methods 15(3):209–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Provine RR (1992) Contagious laughter: Laughter is a sufficient stimulus for laughs and smiles. Bull. Psychonomic Soc. 30(1):1–4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Provine RR (1993) Laughter punctuates speech: Linguistic, social and gender context of laughter. Ethology 95(4):291–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Provine RR (1996) Laughter. Amer. Sci. 84(1):38–45.Google Scholar
• Provine RR (2001) Laughter: A Scientific Investigation (Viking Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Provine RR, Fischer KR (1989) Laughing, smiling, and talking: Relation to sleeping and social context in humans. Ethology 83(4): 295–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragan SL (1990) Verbal play and multiple goals in gynaecological exam interaction. J. Language Soc. Psych. 9(1–2):67–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robert C, Wilbanks JE (2012) The wheel model of humor: Humor events and affect in organizations. Human Relations 65(9):1071–1099.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson DT, Smith-Lovin L (2001) Getting a laugh: Gender, status, and humor in task discussions. Soc. Forces 80(1):123–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruch W (1993) Exhilaration and humor. Lewis M, Haviland JM, eds. The Handbook of Emotions (Guilford Publications, New York), 605–616.Google Scholar
• Ruch W, Ekman P (2001) The expressive pattern of laughter. Kaszniak AW, ed. Emotion, Qualia, and Consciousness (Word Scientific, Tokyo), 426–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Burks J (2002) Protestant relational ideology and (in)attention to relational cues in work settings. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(4):919–929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Burks J (2005) Protestant relational ideology: The cognitive underpinnings and organizational implications of an American anomaly. Kramer R, Staw B, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 26 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 265–305.Google Scholar
• Schultz H (2011) Onward: How Starbucks Fought for Its Life Without Losing Its Soul (Rodale, New York).Google Scholar
• Siemsen E, Roth AV, Balasubramanian S, Anand G (2009) The influence of psychological safety and confidence in knowledge on employee knowledge sharing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(3):429–447.Link, Google Scholar
• Simons TL, Peterson RS (2000) Task conflict and relational conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. J. Appl. Psych. 85(1):102–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snijders TAB, Kenny D (1999) The social relations model for family data: A multilevel approach. Personal Relationship 6(4):471–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sohrab SG, Waller MJ, Kaplan S (2015) Exploring the hidden-profile paradigm: A literature review and analysis. Small Group Res. 46(5):489–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spoor JR, Kelly JR (2004) The evolutionary significance of affect in groups: Communication and group bonding. Group Process Intergroup Relations 7(4):398–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stachowski AA, Kaplan SA, Waller MJ (2009) The benefits of flexible team interaction during crisis. J. Appl. Psych. 94(6):1536–1543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stanton N (1996) Simulators: A review of research and practice. Stanton N, ed. Human Factors in Nuclear Safety (Taylor & Francis, London), 117–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stasser G, Titus W (1985) Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 48(6):1467–1478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stasser G, Titus W (2003) Hidden profiles: A brief history. Psych. Inquiry 14(3):304–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sunstein CR, Hastie R (2014) Wiser: Getting Beyond Groupthink to Make Groups Smarter (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Swaab RI, Phillips KW, Diermeier D, Medvec VH (2008) The pros and cons of dyadic side conversations in small groups: The impact of group norms and task type. Small Group Res. 39(3): 372–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tamir M (2009) What do people want to feel and why? Pleasure and utility in emotion regulation. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 18(2):101–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tamir M, Mitchell C, Gross JJ (2008) Hedonic and instrumental motives in anger regulation. Psych. Sci. 19(4):324–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas-Hunt MC, Phillips KW (2004) When what you know is not enough: The effects of gender on expert’s influence within work groups. Personality Soc. Psych. B 30(2):1585–1598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiedens L (2001) The effect of anger on the hostile inferences of aggressive and nonaggressive people: Specific emotions, cognitive processing, and chronic accessibility. Motivation Emotion 25(3):233–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Totterdell P (2000) Catching moods and hitting runs: Mood linkage and subjective performance in professional sport teams. J. Appl. Psych. 85(6):848–859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Twenge JM, Baumeister RF, Tice DM, Stucke TS (2001) If you can’t join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(6):1058–1069.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Hoof JARAM (1972) A comparative approach to the phylogeny of laughing and smiling. Hinde RA, ed. Nonverbal Communication (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 209–237.Google Scholar
• Van Kleef GA (2009) How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 18(3):184–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner H, Lee V (1999) Facial behavior alone and in the presence of others. Philippot P, Feldman RS, Coats EJ, eds. The Social Context of Nonverbal Behavior (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 262–286.Google Scholar
• Waller MJ (1999) The timing of adaptive group responses to nonroutine events. Acad. Management J. 42(2):127–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waller MJ, Gupta N, Giambatista R (2004) Effects of adaptive behaviors and shared mental model development on control crew performance. Management Sci. 50(11):1534–1544.Link, Google Scholar
• Walter F, Bruch H (2008) The positive group affect spiral: A dynamic model of the emergence of positive affective similarity in work groups. J. Organ. Behav. 29(2):239–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisfeld GE (1993) The adaptive value of humor and laughter. Ethology Sociobiology 14(2):141–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams LA, DeSteno D (2009) Pride: Adaptive social emotion or seventh sin? Psych. Sci 20(3):284–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wittenbaum GM, Hubbell AP, Zuckerman C (1999) Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77(5):967–978.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaccaro SJ, Lowe CA (1988) Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: Evidence for multidimensionality. J. Soc. Psych. 128(4):547–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Zyphur MJ, Preacher KJ (2009) Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions. Organ. Res. Methods 12(4):695–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zijlstra FRH, Waller MJ, Phillips SI (2012) Setting the tone: Early interaction patterns in swift-starting teams as a predictor of effectiveness. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psych. 21(5):749–777.Crossref, Google Scholar