Do Political Connections Buffer Firms from or Bind Firms to the Government? A Study of Corporate Charitable Donations of Chinese Firms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1084

References

  • Agrawal A, Knoeber CR (2001) Do some outside directors play a political role? J. Law Econom. 44(1):179–198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron DP (1995) Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. California Management Rev. 37(2):47–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron DP, Diermeier, D (2007) Introduction to the special issue on nonmarket strategy and social responsibility. J. Econom. Management Strategy 16(3):539–545.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron DP, Harjoto MA, Jo H (2011) The economics and politics of corporate social performance. Bus. Politics 13(2):1.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barth JR, Caprio G, Levine R (2008) Rethinking Bank Regulation: Till Angels Govern (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Schoar A, Thesmar D (2007) Banking deregulation and industry structure: Evidence from the French banking reforms of 1985. J. Finance 62(2):597–628.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhalla A, Yao S, Zhang Z (2003) Regional economic performance in China. Econom. Transition 11(1):25–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boddewyn JJ, Brewer TL (1994) International-business political behavior: New theoretical directions. Acad. Management Rev. 19(1):119–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boisot M, Child J (1996) From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China’s emerging economic order. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(4):600–628.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boubakri N, Cosset JC, Saffar W (2008) Political connections of newly privatized firms. J. Corporate Finance 14(5):654–673.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1979) A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica 47(5):1287–1294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown W, Helland E, Kiholm-Smith J (2006) Corporate philanthropic practices. J. Corporate Finance 12(5):855–877.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caprio L, Croci E (2008) The determinants of the voting premium in Italy: The evidence from 1974 to 2003. J. Bank Finance 32(11):2433–2443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen CJ, Li Z, Su X, Sun Z (2011) Rent-seeking incentives, corporate political connections, and the control structure of private firms: Chinese evidence. J. Corporate Finance 17(2):229–243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chin MK, Hambrick DC, Treviño LK (2013) Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(2):197–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • China Charity Information Centre (2007–2014) China Charity report. Accessed April 10, 2016, http://www.zmcs.org.cn/.Google Scholar
  • Choi JP, Thum M (2009) The economics of politically-connected firms. Internat. Tax Public Finance 16(5):605–620.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi SJ, Jia N, Lu J (2014) The structure of political institutions and effectiveness of corporate political lobbying. Organ. Sci. 26(1):158–179.Google Scholar
  • Claessens S, Feijen E, Laeven L (2008) Political connections and preferential access to finance: The role of campaign contributions. J. Financial Econom. 88(3):554–580.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemens ES, Guthrie D (2010) Politics and Partnerships: The Role of Voluntary Associations in America’s Political Past and Present (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Correia MM (2014) Political connections and SEC enforcement. J. Accounting Econom. 57(2):241–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis GF, Greve HR (1997) Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(1):1–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davies H, Walters P (2004) Emergent patterns of strategy, environment and performance in a transition economy. Strategic Management J. 25(4):347–364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dehejia RH, Wahba S (2002) Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Rev. Econom. Statist. 84(1):151–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delmas MA, Lim J, Nairn-Birch N (2016) Corporate environmental performance and lobbying. Acad. Management Discoveries 2(2):175–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dickson B (2003) Red Capitalists in China: The Party, Private Entrepreneurs, and Prospects for Political Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dieleman M, Boddewyn JJ (2012) Using organization structure to buffer political ties in emerging markets: A case study. Organ. Stud. 33(1):71–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eaton S (2013) Political economy of the advancing state: The case of China’s airlines reform. China J. 69(1):1324–9347.Google Scholar
  • Faccio M (2006) Politically connected firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):369–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fan G, Wang X, Zhu H (2011) NERI Index of Marketization of China’s Provinces (Economic Science Press, Beijing).Google Scholar
  • Fan JP, Wong TJ, Zhang T (2007) Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. J. Financial Econom. 84(2):330–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fei X (1992) From the Soil: The Foundation of Chinese Society (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
  • Firth M, Rui OM, Wu W (2011) The effects of political connections and state ownership on corporate litigation in China. J. Law Econom. 54(3):573–607.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fligstein N, Zhang J (2011) A new agenda for research on the trajectory of Chinese capitalism. Management Organ. Rev. 7(1):39–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foster K (2001) Associations in the embrace of an authoritative state: State domination of society? Stud. Comparative Internat. Development 35(4):84–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galaskiewicz J (1997) An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the twin cities, 1979–81, 1987–89. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):445–471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallagher KS (2006) Limits to leapfrogging in energy technologies? Evidence from the Chinese automobile industry. Energy Policy 34(4):383–394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ginsburg T, Moustafa T (2008) Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant RM, Jammine AP, Thomas H (1988) Diversity, diversification, and profitability among British manufacturing companies, 1972–1984. Acad. Management J. 31(4):771–801.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R, Raynard M, Kodeih F, Micelotta ER, Lounsbury M (2011) Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):317–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guthrie D, McQuarrie M (2008). Providing for the public good: Corporate-community relations in the era of the receding welfare state. City Commun. 7(2):113–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):193–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46(6):1251–1271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haveman HA, Jia N, Shi J, Wang Y (2016) The dynamics of political embeddedness in China. Admin. Sci. Quart., ePub ahead of print June 23, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0001839216657311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hillman AJ (2005) Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the bottom line? J. Management 31(3):464–481.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hillman AJ, Keim GD, Schuler D (2004) Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. J. Management 30(6):837–857.Google Scholar
  • Hillman AJ, Zardkoohi A, Bierman L (1999) Corporate political strategies and firm performance: Indications of firm-specific benefits from personal service in the US government. Strategic Management J. 20(1):67–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoskisson RE, Eden L, Lau CM, Wright M (2000) Strategy in emerging economies. Acad. Management J. 43(3):249–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jin Y (2005) Institutional interpretation of wage inequality across industries. Statist. Res. 22(4):10–15.Google Scholar
  • Kostka G, Zhou J (2013) Government-business alliances in state capitalist economies: Evidence from low-income markets in China. Bus. Politics 15(2):245–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kozhikode RK, Li JT (2012) Political pluralism, public policies, and organizational choices: Banking branch expansion in India, 1948–2003. Acad. Management J. 55(2):339–359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lancaster T (2000) The incidental parameter problem since 1948. J. Econometrics 95(2):391–413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lester RH, Hillman A, Zardkoohi A, Cannella AA (2008) Former government officials as outside directors: The role of human and social capital. Acad. Management J. 51(5):999–1013.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li H, Zhang Y (2007) The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: Evidence from China’s transition economy. Strategic Management J. 28(8):791–804.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li J, Tang Y (2010) CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Acad. Management J. 53(1):45–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li X, Liang X (2015) A Confucian social model of political appointments among Chinese private-entrepreneurs. Acad. Management J. 58(2):592–617.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li JJ, Poppo L, Zhou KZ (2008) Do managerial ties in China always produce value? Competition, uncertainty, and domestic vs. foreign firms. Strategic Management J. 29(4):383–400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li H, Meng L, Wang Q, Zhou LA (2008) Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms. J. Development Econom. 87(2):283–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Linton R (1936) The Study of Man: An Introduction (Appleton-Century, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Ma D, Parish W (2006) Tocquevillian moments: Charitable contributions by Chinese private entrepreneurs. Social Forces 85(2):943–964.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ma X, Tong TW, Fitza M (2013) How much does subnational region matter to foreign subsidiary performance? Evidence from Fortune global 500 corporations’ investment in China. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 44(1):66–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marquis C, Battilana J (2009) Acting globally but thinking locally? The enduring influence of local communities on organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 29(December):283–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marquis C, Qian C (2014) Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organ. Sci. 25(1):127–148.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marquis C, Raynard M (2015) Institutional strategies in emerging markets. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):291–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGinnis A, Pellegrin J, Shum Y, Teo J, Wu J (2009) The Sichuan earthquake and the changing landscape of CSR in China. Knowledge@Wharton (April 20), http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/the-sichuan-earthquake-and-the-changing-landscape-of-csr-in-china/.Google Scholar
  • McWilliams A, Van Fleet DD, Cory KD (2002) Raising rivals’ costs through political strategy: An extension of resource-based theory. J. Management Stud. 39(5):707–724.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mellahi K, Frynas JG, Sun P, Siegel D (2016) A review of the nonmarket strategy literature: Toward a multi-theoretical integration. J. Management 42(1):143–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Navarro P (1988) Why do corporations give to charity? J. Bus. 61(1):65–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. 16(1):145–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ortega DL, Wang HH, Olynk NJ, Wu L, Bai J (2011) Chinese consumers’ demand for food safety attributes: A push for government and industry regulations. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 94(2):489–495.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palazzo G, Richter U (2005) CSR business as usual? The case of the tobacco industry. J. Bus. Ethics 61(4):387–401.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng MW, Luo Y (2000) Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Acad. Management J. 43(3):486–501.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Salancik G (1978) The External Control of Organizations (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Robinson JA, Verdier T (2013) The political economy of clientelism. Scandinavian J. Econom. 115(2):260–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sauerwald S, Lin ZJ, Peng MW (2016) Board social capital and excess CEO returns. Strategic Management J. 37(3):498–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schuler DA, Rehbein K, Cramer RD (2002) Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach. Acad. Management J. 45(4):659–672.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Servaes H, Tamayo A (2013) The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Sci. 59(5):1045–1061.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shi W, Markóczy L, Stan CV (2014) The continuing importance of political ties in China. Acad. Management Perspect. 28(1):57–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shleifer A, Vishny R (1994) Politicians and firms. Quart. J. Econom. 109(4):995–1025.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song L, Yang J, Zhang Y (2011) State-owned enterprises’ outward investment and the structural reform in China. China World Econom. 19(4):38–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stark R (2007) Sociology, 10th ed. (Cengage Learning, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Sun P, Mellahi K, Wright M. (2012) The value of corporate political ties. Acad. Management Perspect. 26(3):68–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun P, Mellahi K, Wright M, Xu H (2015) Political tie heterogeneity and the impact of adverse shocks on firm value. J. Management Stud. 52(8):1036–1063.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swanson DL (1999) Toward an integrative theory of business and society: A research strategy for corporate social performance. Acad. Management Rev. 24(3):506–521.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas AS, Litschert RJ, Ramaswamy K (1991) The performance impact of strategy-manager coalignment: An empirical examination. Strategic Management J. 12(7):509–522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Wang F (2011) The fact of philanthropic donation in Shenmu. 21st Century Business Herald (April 21), http://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/20110426/00399748570.shtml.Google Scholar
  • Wang H, Qian C (2011) Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder responses and political access. Acad. Management J. 54(6):1159–1181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Werner T (2015) Gaining access by doing good: The effect of sociopolitical reputation on firm participation in public policymaking. Management Sci. 61(8):1989–2011.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • West LA, Wong CP (1995) Fiscal decentralization and growing regional disparities in rural China: Some evidence in the provision of social services. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 11(4):70–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu W, Wu C, Zhou C, Wu J (2012) Political connections, tax benefits and firm performance: Evidence from China. J. Accounting Public Policy 31(3):277–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xin KR, Pearce JL (1996) Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Acad. Management J. 39(6):1641–1658.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu F, Yu X (2011) Corporate lobbying and fraud detection. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 46(6):1865–1891.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang W (2012) Coercive donation is a hurt to philanthropy. People’s Daily (May 16), http://society.people.com.cn/GB/1063/17896781.html.Google Scholar
  • Zheng W, Singh K, Mitchell W (2015) Buffering and enabling: The impact of interlocking political ties on firm survival and sales growth. Strategic Management J. 36(11):1615–1636.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou KZ, Poppo L (2010) Exchange hazards, relational reliability, and contracts in China: The contingent role of legal enforceability. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41(5):861–881.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.