Organization Design, Proximity, and Productivity Responses to Upward Social Comparison

References

• Adams J (1963) Towards an understanding of inequity. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 67(5):422–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aristotle (2010)Cope EM, Sandys JE, eds. Aristotle: Rhetoric, Vol. 2. Cambridge Library Collection–Classics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Ashkanasy N (2003) Emotions in organizations: A multi-level perspective. Dansereau F, Yammarino FJ, eds. Multi-Level Issues in Organizational Behavior and Strategy (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 9–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker G, Gibbs M, Holmstrom B (1994) The internal economics of the firm: Evidence from personnel data. Quart. J. Econom. 109(4):881–919.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsäde SG, Gibson DE (1998) Group emotion: A view from top and bottom. Res. Managing Groups Teams 1(82):81–102.Google Scholar
• Bartel A, Ichniowski C, Shaw K (2004) Using “insider econometrics” to study productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):217–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Ze’ev A (1992) Envy and inequality. J. Philos. 89(11):551–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M, Briscoe F, Fernandez-Mateo I, Sterling A (2013) The employment relationship and inequality: How and why changes in employment practices are reshaping rewards in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):61–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Binmore K, Shaked A (2010) Experimental economics: Where next? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 73(1):87–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casas-Arce P, Martinez-Jerez F (2009) Relative performance compensation, contests, and dynamic incentives. Management Sci. 55(8):1306–1320.Link, Google Scholar
• Che Y, Yoo S (2001) Optimal incentives for teams. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):525–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen-Charash Y (2009) Episodic envy. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 39(9):2128–2173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen-Charash Y, Mueller J (2007) Does perceived unfairness exacerbate or mitigate interpersonal counterproductive work behaviors related to envy? J. Appl. Psych. 92(3):666–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohn A, Fehr E, Herrmann B, Schneider F (2014) Social comparison and effort provision: Evidence from a field experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 12(4):877–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, Greenberg J, Zapata-Phelan C (2005) What is organizational justice? A historical overview. Greenberg J, Colquitt JA, eds. Handbook of Organizational Justice (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 3–58.Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Goldman B, Folger R (2003) Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness. J. Organ. Behav. 24(8):1019–1024.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Stefano G, King A, Verona, G (2014) Kitchen confidential? Norms of the use of transferred knowledge in gourmet cuisine. Strategic Management J. 35(11):1645–1670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunn J, Ruedy N, Schweitzer M (2012) It hurts both ways: How social comparisons harm affective and cognitive trust. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 117(1):2–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Shapira Z (2010) Entrepreneurial finance meets organizational reality: Comparing investment practices and performance of corporate and independent venture capitalists. Strategic Management J. 31(9):990–1017.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Englmaier F, Wambach A (2010) Optimal incentive contracts under inequity aversion. Games Econom. Behav. 69(2):312–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Heckman JJ (2009) Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science 326(5952):535–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (2010) On inequity aversion: A reply to Binmore and Shaked. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 73(1):101–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Naef M, Schmidt K (2006) Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1912–1917.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2):117–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fliessbach K, Weber B, Trautner P, Dohmen T, Sunde U, Elger CE, Falk A (2007) Social comparison affects reward-related brain activity in the human ventral striatum. Science 318(5854):1305–1308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forrester J (1997) Dispatches for the Freud Wars (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Fowler JH, Christakis NA (2008) Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: Longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. British Medical J. 337:a2338.Google Scholar
• Fox S, Spector PE (1999) A model of work frustration-aggression. J. Organ. Behav. 20(6):915–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank DH, Obloj T (2014) Firm-specific human capital, organizational incentives, and agency costs: Evidence from retail banking. Strategic Management J. 35(9):1279–1301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey BS (2007) Awards as compensation. Eur. Management Rev. 4(1):6–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gartenberg C, Wulf J (2017) Pay harmony? Social comparison and performance compensation in multi-business firms. Organ. Sci. 28(1):39–55.Link, Google Scholar
• Gatignon H, Robertson TS (1985) A propositional inventory for new diffusion research. J. Consumer Res. 11(4):849–867.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbs M (1996) Promotions and incentives. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Gino F, Pierce L (2009) Dishonesty in the name of equity. Psych. Sci. 20(9):1153–1160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Pierce L (2010) Lying to level the playing field: Why people may dishonestly help or hurt others to create equity. J. Bus. Ethics 95(S1):89–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J (1994) Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban. J. Appl. Psych. 79(2):288–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grund C, Sliwka D (2005) Envy and compassion in tournaments. J. Econom. Management Strategy 14(1):187–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gubler T, Larkin I, Piercen L (2016) Motivational spillovers from awards: Crowding out in a multitasking environment. Organ. Sci. 27(2):286–303.Link, Google Scholar
• Harbring C, Irlenbusch B (2008) How many winners are good to have?: On tournaments with sabotage. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 65(3–4):682–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B, Milgrom P (1994) The firm as an incentive system. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(4):972–991.Google Scholar
• Khan AK, Quratulain S, Bell CM (2014) Episodic envy and counterproductive work behaviors: Is more justice always good? J. Organ. Behav. 35(1):128–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kulik CT, Ambrose ML (1992) Personal and situational determinants of referent choice. Acad. Management Rev. 17(2):212–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lahiri S (2003) Resampling Methods for Dependent Data (Sinpring-Verlag, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larkin I, Pierce L, Gino F (2012) The psychological costs of pay-for-performance: Implications for the strategic compensation of employees. Strategic Management J. 33(10):1194–1214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler III EE (2003) Pay practices in Fortune 1000 corporations. WorldatWork J. 12(4):45–54.Google Scholar
• Lawrence B (2006) Organizational reference groups: A missing perspective on social context. Organ. Sci. 17(1):80–100.Link, Google Scholar
• Lazear E, Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. 89(5):841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine DI (1993) What do wages buy? Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):462–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieblich A (1971) Antecedents of envy reaction. J. Personality Assessment 35(1):92–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lind EA, Tyler TR (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luttmer EFP (2005) Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quart. J. Econom. 120(3):963–1002.Google Scholar
• Mikula G, Scherer KR, Athenstaedt U (1998) The role of injustice in the elicitation of differential emotional reactions. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 24(7):769–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom PR, Roberts J (1988) An economic approach to influence activities in organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 94:S154–S179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Möller J, Marsh H (2013) Dimensional comparison theory. Psych. Rev. 120(3):544–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mui V (1995) The economics of envy. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 26(3):311–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neumann R, Strack F (2000) “Mood contagion”: The automatic transfer of mood between persons. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79(2):211–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2008) Envy, comparison costs, and the economic theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 29(13):1429–1449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orrison A, Schotter A, Weigelt K (2004) Multiperson tournaments: An experimental examination. Management Sci. 50(2):268–279.Link, Google Scholar
• Oyer P (1998) Fiscal year ends and nonlinear incentive contracts: The effect on business seasonality. Quart. J. Econom. 113(1):149–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parrott WG, Smith RH (1993) Distinguishing the experiences of envy and jealousy. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64(6):906–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Langton N (1993) The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):382–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pigou A (1920) The Economics of Welfare (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Rawley E, Simcoe TS (2010) Diversification, diseconomies of scope, and vertical contracting: Evidence from the taxicab industry. Management Sci. 56(9):1534–1550.Link, Google Scholar
• Rawls J (1971) A Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salovey P (1991) The Psychology of Jealousy and Envy (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Salovey P, Rodin J (1991) Provoking jealousy and envy: Domain relevance and self-esteem threat. J. Soc. Clinical Psych. 10(4):395–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaubroeck J, Lam SS (2004) Comparing lots before and after: Promotion rejectees' invidious reactions to promotees. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 94(1):33–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J (2005) Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Sci. 51(5):756–770.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith HJ, Spears R, Oyen M (1994) “People like us:” The influence of personal deprivation and group membership salience on justice evaluations. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 30(3):277–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith R (1991) Envy and the sense of injustice. Salovey P, ed. The Psychology of Jealousy and Envy (Guilford Press, New York),79–112.Google Scholar
• Smith R, Kim S (2007) Comprehending envy. Psych. Bull. 133(1):46–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tai K, Narayanan J, McAllister D (2012) Envy as pain: Rethinking the nature of envy and its implications for employees and organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 37(1):107–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor SE, Lobel M (1989) Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psych. Rev. 96(4):569–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenger T (1992) Why do employers only reward extreme performance? Examining the relationships among performance, pay, and turnover. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(2):198–219.Crossref, Google Scholar