How Performance Incentives Shape Individual Exploration and Exploitation: Evidence from Microdata

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1104

References

  • Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992) Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. 3(3):321–341.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Epple D (1990) Learning curves in manufacturing. Science 247(4945):920–924.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bantel KA, Jackson SE (1989) Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management J. 10(S1):107–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barney J, Felin T (2013) What are microfoundations? Acad. Management Perspect. 27(2):138–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barney JB, Ketchen DJ, Wright M (2011) The future of resource-based theory: Revitalization or decline? J. Management 37(5):1299–1315.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartel AP (1995) Training, wage growth, and job performance: Evidence from a company database. J. Labor Econom. 13(3):401–425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum CF (2008) Stata tip 63: Modeling proportions. Stata J. 8(2):299–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumann O, Stieglitz N (2014) Rewarding value-creating ideas in organizations: The power of low-powered incentives. Strategic Management J. 35(3):358–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bebchuk LA, Fried JM (2010) Paying for long-term performance. University Pennsylvania Law Rev. 158(7):1915–1959.Google Scholar
  • Becker GS (1962) Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. J. Political Econom. 70(5):9–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman CM, Haunschild PR, Phillips DJ (2004) Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organ. Sci. 15(3):259–275.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bergstresser D, Philippon T (2006) CEO incentives and earnings management. J. Financial Econom. 80(3):511–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boumgarden P, Nickerson J, Zenger TR (2012) Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance. Strategic Management J. 33(6):587–610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burgelman RA (1994) Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(1):24–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burns N, Kedia S (2006) The impact of performance-based compensation on misreporting. J. Financial Econom. 79(1):35–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cadsby CB, Song F, Tapon F (2007) Sorting and incentive effects of pay for performance: An experimental investigation. Acad. Management J. 50(2):387–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell BA, Coff R, Kryscynski D (2012) Rethinking sustained competitive advantage from human capital. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):376–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cappelli P (1999) The New Deal at Work: Managing the Market-Driven Workforce (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Cappelli P (2000) A market-driven approach to retaining talent. Harvard Bus. Rev. 78(1):103–111.Google Scholar
  • Castanias RP, Helfat CE (1991) Managerial resources and rents. J. Management 17(1):155–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Castanias RP, Helfat CE (2001) The managerial rents model: Theory and empirical analysis. J. Management 27(6):661–678.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cattani G (2006) Technological pre-adaptation, speciation, and emergence of new technologies: How Corning invented and developed fiber optics. Indust. Corporate Change 15(2):285–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen WR, Miller KD (2007) Situational and institutional determinants of firms’ R&D search intensity. Strategic Management J. 28(4):369–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chng DHM, Rodgers MS, E Shih, Song XB (2012) When does incentive compensation motivate managerial behaviors? An experimental investigation of the fit between incentive compensation, executive core self-evaluation, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 33(12):1343–1362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coff RW (1997) Human assets and management dilemmas: Coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. Acad. Management Rev. 22(2):374–402.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coradi A, Heinzen M, Boutellier R (2015) A longitudinal study of workspace design for knowledge exploration and exploitation in the research and development process. Creativity Innovation Management 24(1):55–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Dane E, Pratt MG (2007) Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Acad. Management Rev. 32(1):33–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danneels E, Sethi R (2011) New product exploration under environmental turbulence. Organ. Sci. 22(4):1026–1039.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J, March JG (2001) Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organ. Sci. 12(5):523–538.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ederer F, Manso G (2013) Is pay for performance detrimental to innovation? Management Sci. 59(7):1496–1513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Egelman CD, Epple D, L Argote, Fuchs ER (2017) Learning by doing in multiproduct manufacturing: Variety, customizations, and overlapping product generations. Management Sci., 63(2):405–423.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):57–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Furr NR, Bingham CB (2010) CROSSROADS—Microfoundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1263–1273.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ejermo O, Schubert T (2014) Do higher wages reduce inventors job turnover? The role of utility, status and signaling effects. Presentation, 2014 DRUID Society Conference, DRUID Society, June 16, Aalborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
  • Epple D, Argote L, Devadas R (1991) Organizational learning curves: A method for investigating intra-plant transfer of knowledge acquired through learning by doing. Organ. Sci. 2(1):58–70.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fang C, Lee J, Schilling MA (2010) Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 21(3):625–642.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T, Foss NJ (2005) Strategic organization: A field in search of micro-foundations. Strategic Organ. 3(4):441–455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flyvbjerg B (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12(2):219–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frank DH, Obloj T (2014) Firm-specific human capital, organizational incentives, and agency costs: Evidence from retail banking. Strategic Management J. 35(9):1279–1301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gambardella A, Panico C, Valentini G (2015) Strategic incentives to human capital. Strategic Management J. 36(1):37–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gardner TM (2005) Interfirm competition for human resources: Evidence from the software industry. Acad. Management J. 48(2):237–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ge C, Huang KW, Png IP (2016) Engineer/scientist careers: Patents, online profiles, and misclassification bias. Strategic Management J. 37(1):232–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J (2004) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. 47(2):209–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, Potters J (1997) An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):631–645.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodman LA (1960) On the exact variance of products. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 55(292):708–713.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene CN, Podsakoff PM (1978) Effects of removal of a pay incentive: A field experiment. Acad. Management Proc. (Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY), 206–210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR (2003) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR (2007) Exploration and exploitation in product innovation. Indust. Corporate Change 16(5):945–975.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gujarati DN (1995) Basic Econometrics 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Gulati R, Puranam P (2009) Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organ. Sci. 20(2):422–440.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta AK, Smith KG, Shalley CE (2006) The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. 49(4):693–706.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hatch NW, Dyer JH (2004) Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. 25(12):1155–1178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild PR, Sullivan BN (2002) Learning from complexity: Effects of prior accidents and incidents on airlines’ learning. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(4):609–643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He Z-L, Wong PK (2004) Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ. Sci. 15(4):481–494.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2015) Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 36(6):831–850.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B, Milgrom P (1991) Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 7(January):24–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1644–1655.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jain A (2013) Learning by doing and the locus of innovative capability in biotechnology research. Organ. Sci. 24(6):1683–1700.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jansen JJ, Van Den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Sci. 52(11):1661–1674.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kretschmer T, Puranam P (2008) Integration through incentives within differentiated organizations. Organ. Sci. 19(6):860–875.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lavie D, Rosenkopf L (2006) Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad. Management J. 49(4):797–818.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lavie D, Stettner U, Tushman ML (2010) Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):109–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP (2000a) The power of incentives. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(2):410–414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP (2000b) Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(5):1346–1361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D, March JG (1981) A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Economic Behav. Organ. 2(4):307–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14(August):319–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manso G (2011) Motivating innovation. J. Finance 66(5):1823–1860.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Sproull LS, Tamuz M (1991) Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organ. Sci. 2(1):1–13.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marino A, Aversa P, Mesquita L, Anand J (2015) Driving performance via exploration in changing environments: Evidence from Formula One racing. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1079–1100.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath RG (2001) Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Acad. Management J. 44(1):118–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mincer J (1962) On-the-job training: Costs, returns, and some implications. J. Political Econom. 70(5):50–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mom TJ, Van Den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2007) Investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. J. Management Stud. 44(6):910–931.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mom TJ, Van Den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2009) Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organ. Sci. 20(4):812–828.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Monsell S (2003) Task switching. Trends Cognitive Sci. 7(3):134–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mors ML (2010) Innovation in a global consulting firm: When the problem is too much diversity. Strategic Management J. 31(8):841–872.Google Scholar
  • Mosakowski E (1997) Strategy making under causal ambiguity: Conceptual issues and empirical evidence. Organ. Sci. 8(4):414–442.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Narayanan M (1996) Form of compensation and managerial decision horizon. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 31(04):467–491.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2002) Being efficiently fickle: A dynamic theory of organizational choice. Organ. Sci. 13(5):547–566.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nohria N, Gulati R (1996) Is slack good or bad for innovation? Acad. Management J. 39(5):1245–1264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Obloj T, Sengul M (2012) Incentive life-cycles learning and the division of value in firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):305–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Reilly C, Tushman M (2013) Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present and future. Acad. Management Perspect. 27(4):324–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2004) The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(4):74–83.Google Scholar
  • Oxley J, Pandher G (2016) Equity-based incentives and collaboration in the modern multibusiness firm. Strategic Management J. 37(7):1379–1394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Papke LE, Wooldridge JM (1996) Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. J. Appl. Econometrics 11(6):619–632.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Papke LE, Wooldridge JM (2008) Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates. J. Econometrics 145(1):121–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR (1999) Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perryman AA, Combs JG (2012) Who should own it? An agency-based explanation for multi-outlet ownership and co-location in plural form franchising. Strategic Management J. 33(4):368–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phelps CC (2010) A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Acad. Management J. 53(4):890–913.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Posen HE, Levinthal DA (2012) Chasing a moving target: Exploitation and exploration in dynamic environments. Management Sci. 58(3):587–601.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Prendergast C (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econom. Literature 37(1):7–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Puranam P, Stieglitz N, Osman M, Pillutla MM (2015) Modelling bounded rationality in organizations: Progress and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):337–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raisch S, Birkinshaw J (2008) Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J. Management 34(3):375–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raisch S, Birkinshaw J, Probst G, Tushman ML (2009) Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ. Sci. 20(4):685–695.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rhee M, Kim T (2014) Great vessels take a long time to mature: Early success traps and competences in exploitation and exploration. Organ. Sci. 26(1):180–197.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rogan M, Mors ML (2014) A network perspective on individual-level ambidexterity in organizations. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1860–1877.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling MA, Vidal P, Ployhart RE, Marangoni A (2003) Learning by doing something else: Variation, relatedness, and the learning curve. Management Sci. 49(1):39–56.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schoonhoven CB, Eisenhardt KM, Lyman K (1990) Speeding products to market: Waiting time to first product introduction in new firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):177–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaw JD, Gupta N (2007) Pay system characteristics and quit patterns of good, average, and poor performers. Personnel Psych. 60(4):903–928.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shearer B (2004) Piece rates, fixed wages and incentives: Evidence from a field experiment. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71(2):513–534.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sidhu JS, Commandeur HR, Volberda HW (2007) The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation. Organ. Sci. 18(1):20–38.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N, Levinthal DA (2003) Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. 14(6):650–669.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1987) Making management decisions: The role of intuition and emotion. Acad. Management Executive (1987–1989) 1(1):57–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sobel ME (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Soc. Methodology 13:290–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staats BR, Gino F (2012) Specialization and variety in repetitive tasks: Evidence from a Japanese bank. Management Sci. 58(6): 1141–1159.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stettner U, Lavie D (2014) Ambidexterity under scrutiny: Exploration and exploitation via internal organization, alliances, and acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 35(13):1903–1929.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sweller J (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Sci. 12(2):257–285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trevor CO, Gerhart B, Boudreau JW (1997) Voluntary turnover and job performance: Curvilinearity and the moderating influences of salary growth and promotions. J. Appl. Psych. 82(1):44–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman ML, O’Reilly CA (1996) Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Rev. 38(4):8–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uotila J, Maula M, Keil T, Zahra SA (2009) Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management J. 30(2):221–231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Von Nordenflycht A (2010) What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Acad. Management Rev. 35(1):155–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiersma E (2007) Conditions that shape the learning curve: Factors that increase the ability and opportunity to learn. Management Sci. 53(12):1903–1915.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Winter SG, Cattani G, Dorsch A (2007) The value of moderate obsession: Insights from a new model of organizational search. Organ. Sci. 18(3):403–419.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wiseman RM, Gomez-Mejia LR (1998) A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Acad. Management Rev. 23(1):133–153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2003) Cluster-sample methods in applied econometrics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(2):133–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yeung N, Monsell S (2003) Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: the role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance 29(2):455–469.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zenger TR, Lazzarini SG (2004) Compensating for innovation: Do small firms offer high-powered incentives that lure talent and motivate effort? Managerial Decision Econom. 25(6–7):329–345.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zenger TR, Marshall C (2000) Determinants of incentive intensity in group-based rewards. Acad. Management J. 43(2):149–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang X, Bartol KM, Smith KG, Pfarrer MD, Khanin DM (2008) CEOs on the edge: Earnings manipulation and stock-based incentive misalignment. Acad. Management J. 51(2):241–258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13(3):339–351.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.