Do Investors Care About Director Tenure? Insights from Executive Cognition and Social Capital Theories

References

• Acharya AG, Pollock TG (2013) Shoot for the stars? Predicting the recruitment of prestigious directors at newly public firms. Acad. Management J. 56(5):1396–1419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Ferreira D (2007) A theory of friendly boards. J. Finance 62(1):217–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Kwon S (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. 27(1):17–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Nasser T (2012) Blockholders on boards and CEO compensation, turnover and firm valuation. Amer. Finance Assoc. (AFA) 2012 Chicago Meetings, Austin, TX.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilar FJ (1967) Scanning the Business Environment (MacMillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Bebchuk LA, Fried JM (2010) Paying for long-term performance. University Pennsylvania Law Rev. 158(7):1915–1959.Google Scholar
• Belliveau MA, O’Reilly CA, Wade JB (1996) Social capital at the top: Effects of social similarity and status on CEO compensation. Acad. Management J. 39(6):1568–1593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berle AA, Means GC (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property (MacMillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Boivie S, Graffin S, Pollock T (2012) Time for me to fly: Predicting director exit at large firms. Acad. Management J. 55(6):1334–1359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boivie S, Bednar MK, Aguilera RV, Andrus JL (2016) Are boards designed to fail? The implausibility of effective board monitoring. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):319–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boivie S, Lange D, McDonald ML, Westphal JD (2011) Me or we: The effects of CEO organizational identification on agency costs. Acad. Management J. 54(3):551–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borokhovich KA, Brunarski KR, Donahue MS, Harman YS (2006) The importance of board quality in the event of a CEO death. Financial Rev. 41(3):307–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd BK (1994) Board control and CEO compensation. Strategic Management J. 15(5):335–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandes P, Goranova M, Hall S (2008) Navigating shareholder influence: Compensation plans and the shareholder approval process. Acad. Management Perspect. 22(1):41–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell B, Coff R, Kryscynski D (2012) Rethinking sustained competitive advantage from human capital. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):376–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Westphal JD (2001) The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Acad. Management J. 44(4):639–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo ST (2003) Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):432–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen G, Crossland C, Luo S (2014) Making the same mistake all over again: CEO overconfidence and corporate resistance to corrective feedback. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1513–1535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coles JL, Daniel ND, Naveen L (2014) Co-opted boards. Rev. Financial Studies 27(6):1751–1796.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Combs JG, Skill MS (2003) Managerialist and human capital explanations for key executive pay premiums: A contingency perspective. Acad. Management J. 46(1):63–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connelly BL, Certo ST, Ireland RD, Reutzel CR (2011) Signaling theory: A review and assessment. J. Management 37(1):39–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conyon M, Peck S (1998) Board control, remuneration committees, and top management compensation. Acad. Management J. 41(2):146–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford AJ, Ezzell JR, Miles JA (1995) Bank CEO pay-performance relations and the effects of deregulation. J. Bus. 68(2):231–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui H, Mak YT (2002) The relationship between managerial ownership and firm performance in high R&D firms. J. Corporate Finance 8(4):313–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daily CM (1996) Governance patterns in bankruptcy reorganizations. Strategic Management J. 17(5):355–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeFond ML, Hann RN, Hu X (2005) Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors? J. Accounting Res. 43(2):153–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demb A, Neubauer F (1992) The corporate board: Confronting the paradoxes. Long Range Planning 25(3):9–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devers CE, Cannella AA, Reilly GP, Yoder ME (2007) Executive compensation: A multidisciplinary review of recent developments. J. Management 33(6):1016–1072.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Directors & Boards (2008) Director term limits come up for review. Accessed January 13, 2017, http://sites.udel.edu/wccg/files/2012/11/DB-Ray-Troubh-Term-Limits-Cover-and-Article.pdf.Google Scholar
• Falato A, Kadyrzhanova D, Lel U (2014) Distracted directors: Does board busyness hurt shareholder value? J. Financial Econom. 113(3):404–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faleye O (2007) Classified boards, firm value, and managerial entrenchment. J. Financial Econom. 83(2):501–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faleye O, Hoitash R, Hoitash U (2011) The costs of intense board monitoring. J. Financial Econom. 101(1):160–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E, French K (1998) The capital asset pricing model: Theory and evidence. J. Econom. Perspect. 18(3):25–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Boyd BK (1998) How much does the CEO matter? The role of managerial discretion in the setting of CEO compensation. Acad. Management J. 41(2):179–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC (1989) Chief executive compensation: A study of the interaction of markets and political processes. Strategic Management J. 10(2):121–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Mooney AC (2003) Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better. Acad. Management Executive 17(2):101–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC, Cannella AA (2009) Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Fischer HM, Pollock TG (2004) Effects of social capital and power on surviving transformational change: The case of initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. 47(4):463–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fogel K, Ma L, Morck R (2014) Powerful independent directors. Working paper 19809, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Forbes DP, Milliken FJ (1999) Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Acad. Management Rev. 24(3):489–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Francis T, Lublin JS (2016a) Boards get more independent, but ties endure. Wall Street Journal (January 19), http://www.wsj.com/articles/boards-get-more-independent-but-ties-endure-1453234607.Google Scholar
• Francis T, Lublin JS (2016b) Big investors question corporate board tenures. Wall Street Journal (March 23), http://www.wsj.com/articles/big-investors-question-corporate-board-tenures-1458761857.Google Scholar
• Golden BR, Zajac EJ (2001) When will boards influence strategy? Inclination × Power = Strategic change. Strategic Management J. 22(12):1087–1111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graffin SD, Ward AJ (2010) Certifications and reputation: Determining the standard of desirability amidst uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 21(2):331–346.Link, Google Scholar
• Graffin SD, Boivie S, Carpenter MA (2013) Examining CEO succession and the role of heuristics in early-stage CEO evaluation. Strategic Management J. 34(4):383–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haas S (2015) A closer look at the emerging debate over board tenure. National Association of Corporate Directors (March 24), https://www.nacdonline.org/Magazine/Article.cfm?ItemNumber=13585.Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Fukutomi GD (1991) The seasons of a CEO’s tenure. Acad. Management Rev. 16(4):719–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Quigley TJ (2014) Toward more accurate contextualization of the CEO effect on firm performance. Strategic Management J. 35(4):473–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Geletkanycz MA, Fredrickson JW (1993) Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management J. 14(6):401–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison JR (1987) The strategic use of corporate board committees. California Management Rev. 30(1):109–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes RM, Schaefer S (1999) How much are differences in managerial ability worth? J. Accounting Econom. 27(2):125–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill CW, Phan P (1991) CEO tenure as a determinant of CEO pay. Acad. Management J. 34(3):707–717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman A, Dalziel T (2003) Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependency perspectives. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):383–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman A, Nicholson G, Shropshire C (2008) Directors’ multiple identities, identification, board monitoring and resource provision. Organ. Sci. 19(3):441–456.Link, Google Scholar
• Hillman A, Shropshire C, Certo ST, Dalton DR, Dalton CM (2011) What I like about you: A multilevel study of shareholder discontent with director monitoring. Organ. Sci. 22(3):675–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoang C, Tygesson G, Ibok I (2016) Board refreshment: Investors respond to trends in mandatory retirement age and tenure with more stringent voting policies. (April 11), https://www.dorsey.com/newsresources/publications/client-alerts/2016/04/investors-mandatory-retirement-age-and-tenure.Google Scholar
• Huang S (2013) Zombie boards: Board tenure and firm performance Working paper, Singapore Management University, Singapore.Google Scholar
• Hymowitz C, Green J (2013) Corporate directors get older, hold their seats longer. Bloomberg Businessweek (June 20), http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-05-23/corporate-directors-get-older-hold-their-seats-longer.Google Scholar
• Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) (2015) ISS analytics. Accessed July 25, 2016, https://www.issgovernance.com/.Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Meckling WF (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Murphy KJ (1990) CEO incentives—It’s not how much you pay, but how. Harvard Bus. Rev. 68(3):138–153.Google Scholar
• Johnson BW, Magee R, Nagarajan N, Newman H (1985) An analysis of the stock price reaction to sudden executive death: Implications for the management labor market. J. Accounting Econom. 7(1–3):151–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson SG, Schnatterly K, Hill AD (2012) Board composition beyond independence, social capital, human capital, and demographics. J. Management 39(1):232–262.Google Scholar
• Katz R (1982) The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 27(1):81–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz DA, McIntosh LA (2014) Renewed focus on corporate director tenure. New York Law J. (May 22), http://www.wlrk.com/webdocs/wlrknew/AttorneyPubs/WLRK.23346.14.pdf.Google Scholar
• Kesner IF (1988) Directors’ characteristics and committee membership: An investigation of type, occupation, tenure, and gender. Acad. Management J. 31(1):66–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khurana R (2002) Searching for a Corporate Savior: The Irrational Quest for Charismatic CEOs (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim K, Mauldin E, Patro S (2014) Outside directors and board advising and monitoring performance. J. Accounting Econom. 57(2):110–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kor YY, Sundaramurthy C (2009) Experience-based human capital and social capital of outside directors. J. Management 35(4):981–1006.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kroll M, Walters BA, Wright P (2008) Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes. Strategic Management J. 29(4):363–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li J, Hambrick DC (2005) Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Acad. Management J. 48(5):794–813.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lorsch JW, MacIver E (1989) Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America’s Corporate Boards (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Lublin JS (2014) For older board members, the pressure to move on. Wall Street Journal (December 23), http://www.wsj.com/articles/for-older-board-members-the-pressure-to-move-on-1419362515.Google Scholar
• Main B, O’Reilly CA, Wade J (1995) The CEO, the board of directors and executive compensation: Economic and psychological perspectives. Indust. Corporate Change 4(2):293–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcel JJ, Barr PS, Duhaime IM (2011) The influence of executive cognition on competitive dynamics. Strategic Management J. 32(2):115–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald ML, Westphal JD (2003) Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs’ advice networks and firms’ strategic responses to poor performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald ML, Khanna P, Westphal J (2008) Getting them to think outside of the circle: Corporate governance, CEOs’ external advice networks and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 51(3):453–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McWilliams A, Siegel D (1997) Event studies in management research: Theoretical and empirical issues. Acad. Management J. 40(3):626–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D (1990) The Icarus Paradox (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
• Miller D (1991) Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management Sci. 37(1):34–52.Link, Google Scholar
• Murphy M (2013) U.S. companies shun term limits for directors. Wall Street Journal (September 10), http://blogs.wsj.com/cfo/2013/09/10/u-s-companies-shun-term-limits-for-directors/.Google Scholar
• Musteen M, Datta DK, Kemmerer B (2010) Corporate reputation: Do board characteristics matter? British J. Management 21(2):498–510.Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):242–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nguyen DB, Nielsen K (2010) The value of independent directors: Evidence from sudden deaths. J. Financial Econom. 98(3):550–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh H, Labianca G, Chung MH (2006) A multilevel model of group social capital. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3):569–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park SH, Westphal JD, Stern I (2011) Set up for a fall the insidious effects of flattery and opinion conformity toward corporate leaders. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(2):257–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PwC) (2016) Annual Corporate Directors Survey—The swinging pendulum: Board governance in the age of shareholder empowerment. Accessed January 13, 2017, https://www.pwc.com/us/en/corporate-governance/annual-corporate-directors-survey/assets/pwc-2016-annual-corporate-directors–survey.pdf.Google Scholar
• Quigley TJ, Hambrick DC (2015) Has the “CEO effect” increased in recent decades? A new explanation for the great rise in America’s attention to corporate leaders. Strategic Management J. 36(6):821–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Davis GF, Ward A (2000) Embeddedness, social identity and mobility: Why firms leave the NASDAQ and join the New York Stock Exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(2):268–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rutherford MA, Buchholtz AK, Brown JA (2007) Examining the relationships between monitoring and incentives in corporate governance. J. Management Stud. 44(3):414–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salas JM (2010) Entrenchment, governance, and the stock price reaction to sudden executive deaths. J. Banking Finance 34(3):656–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauerwald S, Lin ZJ, Peng MW (2014) Board social capital and excess CEO returns. Strategic Management J. 37(3):498–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seidel MD, Westphal JD (2004) Research impact: How seemingly innocuous social cues in a CEO survey can lead to change in board of director network ties. Strategic Organ. 2(3):227–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen W, Cannella AA (2002) Revisiting the performance consequences of CEO succession: The impacts of successor type, post succession senior executive turnover, and departing CEO tenure. Acad. Management J. 45(4):717–733.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slovin MB, Sushka ME (1993) Ownership concentration, corporate control activity, and firm value: Evidence from the death of inside blockholders. J. Finance 48(4):1293–1321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith KG, Guthrie JP, Chen MJ (1989) Strategy, size and performance. Organ. Stud. 10(1):63–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sonnenfeld J (1988) The Hero’s Farewell: What Happens When CEOs Retire (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• SpencerStuart Board Index (2015) Spencer Stuart Board Index 2015. Accessed January 13, 2017, https://www.spencerstuart.com/∼/media/pdf%20files/research%20and%20insight%20pdfs/ssbi-2015_110215-web.pdf.Google Scholar
• Staw BM (1976) Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 16(1):27–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundaramurthy C, Pukthuanthong K, Kor Y (2014) Positive and negative synergies between the CEO’s and the corporate board’s human and social capital: A study of biotechnology firms. Strategic Management J. 35(6):845–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Virany B, Romanelli E (1985) Executive succession, strategic reorientations, and organization evolution: The minicomputer industry as a case in point. Tech. Soc. 7(2):297–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vafeas N (2003) Length of board tenure and outside director independence. J. Bus. Finance Accounting 30(7):1043–1064.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wade J, O’Reilly III CA, Chandratat I (1990) Golden parachutes: CEOs and the exercise of social influence. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):587–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wade JB, Porac JF, Pollock TG, Graffin SD (2006) The burden of celebrity: The impact of CEO certification contests on CEO pay and performance. Acad. Management J. 49(4):643–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh J, Seward JK (1990) On the efficiency of internal and external corporate governance mechanisms. Acad. Management Rev. 15(3):421–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wanous JP (1980) Organizational Entry: Recruitment, Selection and Socialization of Newcomers (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Ward AJ, Brown JA, Graffin SD (2009a) Under the spotlight: Institutional investors and firm responses to the Council of Institutional Investors’ Annual Focus List. Strategic Organ. 7(2):107–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward AJ, Brown JA, Rodriguez D (2009b) Governance bundles and the substitutability and complementarity of governance mechanisms. Corporate Governance: International Rev. 17(5):525–661.Google Scholar
• Westphal JD (1999) Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Acad. Management J. 42(1):7–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Fredrickson JW (2001) Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy. Strategic Management J. 22(12):1113–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1995) Who shall govern? CEO/Board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):60–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Withers MC, Hillman AJ, Cannella Jr AA (2012) A multidisciplinary review of the director selection literature. J. Management 38(1):243–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Worrell DL, Davidson WN, Chandy PR, Garrison SL (1986) Management turnover through deaths of key executives: Effects on investor wealth. Acad. Management J. 29(4):674–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu DH (2014) Group polarization in board decisions about CEO compensation. Organ. Sci. 25(2):552–571.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu D, Westphal J (2014) How directors’ prior experience with other demographically similar CEOs affects their appointments onto corporate boards and the consequences for CEO compensation. Acad. Management J. 57(3):791–813.Crossref, Google Scholar