Near Misses in the Breakthrough Discovery Process

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1134

References

  • Ahringer J, Rosenquist TA, Lawson DN, Kimble J (1992) The Caenorhabditis elegans sex determining gene fem-3 is regulated post-transcriptionally. Euro. Molecular Biol. Organ. J. 11(6):2303–2310.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amabile TM (1983) The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(2):357–376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azoulay P, Graff Zivin JS, Manso G (2011) Incentives and creativity: Evidence from the academic life sciences. RAND J. Econom. 42(3):527–554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berson JA (1992) Discoveries missed, discoveries made: Creativity, influence, and fame in chemistry. Tetrahedron 48(1):3–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikard M (2015) Peer-based knowledge validation: A hurdle to the flow of academic science to inventors. Working paper, London Business School, London.Google Scholar
  • Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell DT, Overman ES (1988) Methodology and Epistemology for Social Science: Selected Papers (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Collins R (1998) The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Corbin JM, Strauss AL (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd ed. (Sage Publications, Los Angeles).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Czarniawska B (1999) Writing Management: Organization Theory as a Literary Genre (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res. Policy 11(3):147–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyson FJ (1972) Missed opportunities. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 78(5):635–652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fire A (2007) Gene silencing by double stranded RNA. Grandin K, ed. Les Prix Nobel (Nobel Foundation, Stockholm), 198–233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC (1998) Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391(6669):806–811.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R, Nayyar PR, Shapira Z, eds. (1997) Technological choices and the inevitability of errors. Technological Innovation: Oversights and Foresights (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 20–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gieryn TF, Hirsh RF (1983) Marginality and innovation in science. Soc. Stud. Sci. 13(1):87–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Girotra K, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2010) Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. 56(4):591–605.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Golden BR (1992) The past is the past—Or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Acad. Management J. 35(4):848–860.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo S, Kemphues KJ (1995) par-1, a gene required for establishing polarity in C. elegans embryos, encodes a putative Ser/Thr kinase that is asymmetrically distributed. Cell 81(4):611–620.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman JR (2009) The perils of positivity. J. Organ. Behav. 30(2):309–319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jones BF (2009) The burden of knowledge and the “death of the Renaissance man”: Is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(1):283–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S, Vakili K (2015) The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1435–1457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knorr-Cetina K (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krol ARvd, Leon AM, Beld M, Mol JNM, Stuitje AR (1990) Flavonoid genes in petunia: Addition of a limited number of gene copies may lead to a suppression of gene expression. Plant Cell 2(4):291–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuhn TS (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Latour B, Woolgar S (1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Lederberg J (1988) Pandemic as a natural evolutionary phenomenon. Soc. Res. 5(3):343–359.Google Scholar
  • Lee RC, Feinbaum RL, Ambros V (1993) The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell 75(5):843–854.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D, Swap WC (1999) When Sparks Fly: Igniting Creativity in Groups (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Locke K, Golden-Biddle K, Feldman MS (2008) Perspective—Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organ. Sci. 19(6):907–918.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Margolis H (1993) Paradigms and Barriers: How Habits of Mind Govern Scientific Belief (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • McEvily B, Zaheer A (1999) Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management J. 20(12):1133–1156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mello C (2007) Return to the RNAi world: Rethinking gene expression and evolution. Grandin K, ed. Les Prix Nobel (Nobel Foundation, Stockholm), 242–258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton RK (1957) Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. Amer. Soc. Rev. 22(6):635–659.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miles MB, Huberman AM (1984) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Napoli C, Lemieux C, Jorgensen R (1990) Introduction of a chimeric chalcone synthase gene into petunia results in reversible co-suppression of homologous genes in trans. Plant Cell 2(4):279–289.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Obstfeld D (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):100–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palauqui J-C, Vaucheret H (1998) Transgenes are dispensable for the RNA degradation step of cosuppression. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 95(16):9675–9680.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peirce CS (1931–1958) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vols. 1–8 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Popper KR (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Ratcliff F, Harrison BD, Baulcombe DC (1997) A similarity between viral defense and gene silencing in plants. Science 276(5318):1558–1560.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Romano N, Macino G (1992) Quelling: Transient inactivation of gene expression in Neurospora crassa by transformation with homologous sequences. Molecular Microbiology 6(22):3343–3353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenberg N (1974) Science, invention and economic growth. Econom. J. 84(333):90–108.Google Scholar
  • Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (Harper Perennial, New York).Google Scholar
  • Simonton DK (1989) Age and creative productivity: Nonlinear estimation of an information-processing model. Internat. J. Aging Human Development 29(1):23–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simonton DK (1999) Origins of Genius: Darwinian Perspectives on Creativity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Singh J, Fleming L (2010) Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. 56(1):41–56.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor A, Greve HR (2006) Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Acad. Management J. 49(4):723–740.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thagard P (1992) Conceptual Revolutions (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):35–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE (2005) Organizing and failures of imagination. Inernat. Public Management J. 8(3):425–438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weisberg R (1988) Problem solving and creativity. Sternberg RJ, ed. The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 148–176.Google Scholar
  • Weisberg R (1999) Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. Sternberg R, ed. Handbook of Creativity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 226–250.Google Scholar
  • Whittington KB, Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2009) Networks, propinquity, and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1):90–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827):1036–1039.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zheng L, Zhang J, Carthew RW (1995) Frizzled regulates mirror-symmetric pattern formation in the Drosophila eye. Development 121(9):3045–3055.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.