Measuring Up? Persistence and Change in Analysts’ Evaluative Schemas Following Technological Change

References

• Adner R, Helfat CE (2003) Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management J. 24(10):1011–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Helfat CE (2009) Strategic renewal of organizations. Organ. Sci. 20(2):281–293.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman M (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ (2007) The incumbent discount: Stock market categories and response to radical technological change. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):703–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ (2010) Securities analysts and incumbent response to radical technological change: Evidence from digital photography and internet telephony. Organ. Sci. 21(1):42–62.Link, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Ranganathan R (2012) Offsetting illegitimacy? How pressures from securities analysts influence incumbents in the face of new technologies. Acad. Management J. 55(1):213–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Ranganathan R (2013) Divergent reactions to convergent strategies: Investor beliefs and analyst reactions during technological change. Organ. Sci. 24(2):378–394.Link, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tripsas M (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: the evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management J. 33(3):277–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beunza D, Garud R (2007) Calculators, lemmings, or frame makers: The role of securities analysts. Sociol. Rev. 55(S2):13–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bingham CB, Kahl SJ (2013) The process of schema emergence: Assimilation, deconstruction, unitization and the plurality of analogies. Acad. Management J. 56(1):14–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown K, Latour A (2004) Heavy toll: Phone industry faces upheaval as ways of calling change fast: Cable, internet, wireless hurt the value of old networks, threaten a business model, echoes of railroad’s ordeal. Wall Street Journal (August 25) A1.Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Bower JL (1996) Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. 17(3):197–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corbin J, Strauss A (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed. (SAGE Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P (1997) Culture and cognition. Annual Rev. Sociol. 23(1):263–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC, Zajac EJ (2006) The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Acad. Management J. 49(6):1173–1193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2012) Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organ. Sci. 23(1):267–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2015) Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 36(6):831–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Clark K (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G (2006) Evaluative schemas and the attention of critics in the US film industry. Indust. Corporate Change 15(3):467–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Hannan MT (2005) Identities, genres, and organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 16(5):474–490.Link, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Roberts PW, Swaminathan A (2012) Evaluative schemas and the mediating role of critics. Organ. Sci. 23(1):83–97.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahl SJ, Grodal S (2016) Discursive strategies and radical technological change: Multilevel discourse analysis of the early computer (1947–1958). Strategic Management J. 37(1):149–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Tripsas M (2008) Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Res. Policy 37(5):790–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy MT (2008) Getting counted: Markets, media, and reality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 73(2):270–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Labianca G, Gray B, Brass DJ (2000) A grounded model of organizational schema change during empowerment. Organ. Sci. 11(2):235–257.Link, Google Scholar
• Latour A (2003) Internet phone service threatens industry’s giants. Wall Street Journal (November 28) B1.Google Scholar
• Levinthal D (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Rao H (2004) Sources of durability and change in market classifications: A study of the reconstitution of product categories in the American mutual fund industry, 1944–1985. Soc. Forces 82(3):969–999.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Munir KA (2005) The social construction of events: A study of institutional change in the photographic field. Organ. Stud. 26(1):93–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. 16(1):145–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock TG, Rindova VP, Maggitti PG (2008) Market watch: Information and availability cascades among the media and investors in the U.S. IPO market. Acad. Management J. 51(2):335–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG (2012) Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhee E, Fiss P (2014) Framing controversial actions: Regulatory focus, source credibility, and stock market reaction to poison pill adoption. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1734–1758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosa JA, Porac JF, Runser-Spanjol J, Saxon MS (1999) Sociocognitive dynamics in a product market. J. Marketing 63(4):64–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor P (2002) Get me a line online: Conventional phone services have remained unrivalled by net-based offerings–until now. Financial Times (December 24) 7.Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (2009) Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of “The Digital Photography Company.” Organ. Sci. 20(2):441–460.Link, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10/11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1994) Substance and symbolism in CEOs’ long-term incentive plans. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):367–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin RK (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Zuckerman E (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman E (2000) Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):591–619.Crossref, Google Scholar