Blurring the Boundaries: The Interplay of Gender and Local Communities in the Commercialization of Social Ventures

References

• Aldrich HE, Fiol CM (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. 19(4):645–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almandoz J (2014) Founding teams as carriers of competing logics. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(3):442–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashcraft KL (2013) The glass slipper: “Incorporating” occupational identity in management studies. Acad. Management Rev. 38(1):6–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atwater L, Brett J, Waldman D, DiMare L, Hayden M (2004) Men’s and women’s perceptions of the gender typing of management subroles. Sex Roles 50(3):191–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Austin J, Stevenson H, WeiSkillern J (2006) Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 30(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Dorado S (2010) Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1419–1440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Lee M (2014) Advancing research on hybrid organizing. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):397–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Lee M, Walker J, Dorsey C (2012) In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Soc. Innovation Rev. 10(3):51–55.Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Sengul M, Pache AC, Model J (2015) Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Acad. Management J. 58(6):1658–1685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beaman L, Duflo E, Pande R, Topalova P (2012) Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: A policy experiment in India. Science 335(6068):582–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE (1980) Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besharov ML, Smith WK (2014) Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Acad. Management Rev. 39(3):364–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Billing YD (2011) Are women in management victims of the phantom of the male norm? Gender Work Organ. 18(3):298–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blair-Loy M (1999) Career patterns of executive women in finance: An optimal matching analysis. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1346–1397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bosma N, Hessels J, Schutjens V, Praag MV, Verheul I (2012) Entrepreneurship and role models. J. Econom. Psych. 33(2):410–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowen DD, Hisrich RD (1986) The female entrepreneur: A career development perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 11(2):393–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bromley P, Meyer JW (2015) Hyper-Organization: Global Organizational Expansion (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks AW, Huang L, Kearney SW, Murray FE (2014) Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(12):4427–4431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brush CG (1992) Research on women business owners: Past trends, a new perspective and future directions. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 16(14):5–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryson JM (1988) A strategic planning process for public and non-profit organizations. Long Range Planning 21(1):73–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buttner EH, Rosen B (1992) Rejection in the loan application process: Male and female entrepreneurs’ perceptions and subsequent intentions. J. Small Bus. Management 30(1):58–65.Google Scholar
• Carter NM, Allen K (1997) Size determinants of women-owned businesses: Choice or barriers to resources? Entrepreneurship Regional Development 9(3):211–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cejka MA, Eagly AH (1999) Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 25(4):413–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan CC, Anteby M (2016) Task segregation as a mechanism for within-job inequality women and men of the Transportation Security Administration. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(2):184–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cicchetti D, Grove W (1991) Thinking Clearly about Psychology: Essays in Honor of Paul E. Meehl: Matters of Public Interest, Vol. 1 (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).Google Scholar
• Cliff JE, Langton N, Aldrich HE (2005) Walking the talk? Gendered rhetoric vs. action in small firms. Organ. Stud. 26(1):63–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen SL, Bunker KA (1975) Subtle effects of sex role stereotypes on recruiters’ hiring decisions. J. App. Psych. 60(5):566–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ (2001) Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(6):1691–1730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ (2004) Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(1):93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cuddy AJ, Fiske ST, Glick P (2004) When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. J. Soc. Issues 60(4):701–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta N (2011) Ingroup experts and peers as social vaccines who inoculate the self-concept: The stereotype inoculation model. Psych. Inquiry 22(4):231–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davidsson P (2006) Nascent entrepreneurship: Empirical studies and developments. Foundations Trends Entrepreneurship 2(1):1–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis GF, Marquis C (2005) Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organ. Sci. 16(4):332–343.Link, Google Scholar
• de Bruin A, Brush CG, Welter F (2007) Advancing a framework for coherent research on women’s entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 31(3):323–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Tocqueville A (2012) Democracy in America (Liberty Fund, Indianapolis). [Schleifer JT, trans.; 1st ed. 1835.]Google Scholar
• Dees JG (1998) Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Bus. Rev. 76(1):54–69.Google Scholar
• Defourny J, Nyssens M (2006) Social Enterprise: At the Crossroads of Market, Public Policies and Civil Society (Routledge, London, UK).Google Scholar
• Diekman AB, Eagly AH (2000) Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 26(10):1171–1188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Anheier HK (1990) The sociology of nonprofit organizations and sectors. Annual Rev. Sociol. 16(1):137–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding WW, Murray F, Stuart TE (2013) From bench to board: Gender differences in university scientists’ participation in corporate scientific advisory boards. Acad. Management J. 56(5):1443–1464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Downey HK, Chacko TI, McElroy JC (1979) Attribution of the “causes” of performance: A constructive, quasi-longitudinal replication of the Staw (1975) study. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 24(3):287–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Karau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3):573–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Steffen VJ (1984) Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 46(4):735–754.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eden D (2002) Replication, meta-analysis, scientific progress, and AMJ’s publication policy. Acad. Management J. 45(4):841–826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eikenberry AM, Kluver JD (2004) The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Admin. Rev. 64(2):132–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely RJ (1995) The power in demography: Women’s social constructions of gender identity at work. Acad. Management J. 38(3):589–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely R, Padavic I (2007) A feminist analysis of organizational research on sex differences. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1121–1143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• England P (2006) Toward gender equality: Progress and bottlenecks. Blau FD, Brinton MC, Grusky DB, eds. The Declining Significance of Gender? (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 245–264.Google Scholar
• Fantasia R, Hirsch EL (1995) Culture in rebellion: The appropriation and transformation of the veil in the Algerian revolution. Johnston H, Klandermans B, eds. Social Movements and Culture (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis), 144–159.Google Scholar
• Fauchart E, Gruber M (2011) Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Acad. Management J. 54(5):935–957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foster W, Bradach J (2005) Should nonprofits seek profits? Harvard Bus. Rev. 83(2):92–100.Google Scholar
• Frumkin P (2002) On Being Nonprofit: A Conceptual and Policy Primer (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J, Barringer SN (2012) Social enterprises and social categories. Gidron B, Hasenfeld Y, eds. Social Enterprises: An Organizational Perspective (Palgrave Macmillan, New York), 47–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J, Burt RS (1991) Interorganization contagion in corporate philanthropy. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(1):88–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J, Bielefeld W, Dowell M (2006) Networks and organizational growth: A study of community based nonprofits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):337–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghani E, Kerr WR, O’Connell SD (2014) Political reservations and women’s entrepreneurship in India. J. Development Econom. 108(1):138–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene PG, Brush CG, Hart MM, Saparito P (2001) Patterns of venture capital funding: Is gender a factor? Venture Capital 3(1):63–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimes M (2010) Strategic sensemaking within funding relationships: The effects of performance measurement on organizational identity in the social sector. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 34(4):763–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grønbjerg KA (1991) Managing grants and contracts: The case of four nonprofit social service organizations. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quart. 20(1):5–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grønbjerg KA, Paarlberg L (2001) Community variations in the size and scope of the nonprofit sector: Theory and preliminary findings. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quart. 30(4):684–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta VK, Bhawe NM (2007) The influence of proactive personality and stereotype threat on women’s entrepreneurial intentions. J. Leadership Organ. Stud. 13(4):73–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall PD (2006) A historical overview of philanthropy, voluntary associations, and nonprofit organizations in the United States, 1600–2000. Steinberg R, ed. The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT), 32–65.Google Scholar
• Hallett T (2010) The myth incarnate. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(1):52–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halpern RP (2006) Workforce Issues in the Nonprofit Sector: Generational Leadership Change and Diversity (American Humanics, Kansas City, MO).Google Scholar
• Hansmann H (1980) The role of non–profit enterprise. Yale Law J. 89(5):835–901.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harding R (2006) Social entrepreneurship monitor. Report, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Project, Global Entrepreneurship Research Association, London.Google Scholar
• Haveman HA, Beresford LS (2012) If you’re so smart, why aren’t you the boss? Explaining the persistent vertical gender gap in management. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 639(1):114–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman H, Rao H (2006) Hybrid forms and the evolution of thrifts. Amer. Behavioral Sci. 49(7):974–986.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hechavarria DM, Ingram A, Justo R, Terjesen S (2012) Are women more likely to pursue social and environmental entrepreneurship? Hughes KD, Jennings JE, eds. Global Women’s Entrepreneurship Research: Diverse Settings, Questions and Approaches (Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Cheltenham, UK), 135–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Block CJ, Martell RF, Simon MC (1989) Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. J. Appl. Psych. 74(6):935–942.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendrick C (1990) Replications, strict replications, and conceptual replications: Are they important? J. Soc. Behav. Personality 5(4):41–49.Google Scholar
• Hochschild AR, Machung A (1989) The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home (Viking Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Hwang H, Powell WW (2009) The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(2):268–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2011) Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106(493):345–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Irvine L, Vermilya JR (2010) Gender work in a feminized profession: The case of veterinary medicine. Gender Soc. 24(1):56–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jay J (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Acad. Management J. 56(1):137–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jennings JE, Brush C (2013) Research on women entrepreneurs: Challenges to (and from) the broader entrepreneurship literature? Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):663–715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk AJ (2013) Social influence and entrepreneurship: The effect of university peers on entrepreneurial entry. Organ. Sci. 24(3):664–683.Link, Google Scholar
• Kalleberg AL, Leicht KT (1991) Gender and organizational performance: Determinants of small business survival and success. Acad. Management J. 34(1):136–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalnins A, Williams M (2014) When do female-owned businesses out-survive male-owned businesses? A disaggregated approach by industry and geograph. J. Business Venturing. 29(6):822–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Vanderbrug J (2014) The rise of gender capitalism. Stanford Soc. Innovation Rev. 12(3):36–41.Google Scholar
• Katz J, Gartner WB (1988) Properties of emerging organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 13(3):429–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC (2009) Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):657–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly CW, Chase LJ, Tucker RK (1979) Replication in experimental communication research: An analysis. Human Comm. Res. 5(4):338–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kemery ER, Bedeian AG, Mossholder KW, Touliatos J (1985) Outcomes of role stress: A multisample constructive replication. Acad. Management J. 28(2):363–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerlin JA (2006) Social enterprise in the United States and Europe: Understanding and learning from the differences. Voluntas 17(3):246–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerlin JA, Pollack TH (2011) Nonprofit commercial revenue: A replacement for declining government grants and private contributions? Amer. Rev. Public. Admin. 41(6):686–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkham LM, Loft A (1993) Gender and the construction of the professional accountant. Accounting Organ. Soc. 18(6):507–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larsson R (1993) Case survey methodology: Quantitative analysis of patterns across case studies. Acad. Management J. 36(6):1515–1546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Light P (2008) The Search for Social Entrepreneurship (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Little RJA, Rubin DB (1987) Statistical Analysis with Missing Data (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Loscocco KA, Robinson J, Hall RH, Allen JK (1991) Gender and small business success: An inquiry into women’s relative disadvantage. Soc. Forces 70(1):65–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M (2007) A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Acad. Management J. 50(2):289–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lucas JW (2003) Status processes and the institutionalization of women as leaders. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(3):464–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lykken DT (1968) Statistical significance in psychological research. Psych. Bull. 70(3):151–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marini MM, Brinton MC (1984) Sex typing in occupational socialization. Reskin BF, ed. Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations, Remedies (National Academy Press, Washington, DC), 192–232.Google Scholar
• Marlow S, Patton D (2005) All credit to men? Entrepreneurship, finance, and gender. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 29(6):717–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C (2003) The pressure of the past: Network imprinting in intercorporate communities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(4):655–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Battilana J (2009) Acting globally but thinking locally? The enduring influence of local communities on organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 29(1):283–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Lounsbury M (2007) Vive la résistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of US community banking. Acad. Management J. 50(4):799–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Davis GF, Glynn MA (2013) Golfing alone? Corporations, elites, and nonprofit growth in 100 American communities. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1–19.Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Glynn MA, Davis GF (2007) Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):925–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin CL, Ruble D (2004) Children’s search for gender cues: Cognitive perspectives on gender development. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 13(2):67–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin J (2000) Hidden gendered assumptions in mainstream organizational theory and research. J. Management Inquiry 9(2):207–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin PY (2004) Gender as social institution. Soc. Forces 82(4):1249–1273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCarthy KD (2001) Women, Philanthropy, and Civil Society (Indiana University Press, Bloomington).Google Scholar
• McGrath JE (1981) Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. Amer. Behavioral Sci. 25(2):179–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGregor J, Tweed D (2002) Profiling a new generation of female small business owners in New Zealand: Networking, mentoring and growth. Gender Work Organ. 9(4):420–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McNatt DB, Judge TA (2004) Boundary conditions of the Galatea effect: A field experiment and constructive replication. Acad. Management J. 47(4):550–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molotch H (1976) The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(2):309–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moss TW, Short JC, Payne GT, Lumpkin GT (2011) Dual identities in social ventures: An exploratory study. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 35(4):805–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odendahl T, O’Neill M (1994) Women and Power in the Nonprofit Sector (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Ott JS, Dicke LA (2001) Challenges facing public sector management in an era of downsizing, devolution, dispersion and empowerment—And accountability? Public Organ. Rev. 1(3):321–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pache AC, Santos F (2013) Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Acad. Management J. 56(4):972–1001.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF, Powell WW (2012) The Emergence of Organizations and Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peterman NE, Kennedy J (2003) Enterprise education: Influencing students’ perceptions of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 28(2):129–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1973) Size, composition, and function of hospital boards of directors: A study of organization-environment linkage. Admin. Sci. Quart. 18(3):349–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips A (2005) Dilemmas of gender and culture: The judge, the democrat and the political activist. Eisenberg A, Spinner-Halev J, eds. Minorities within Minorities: Equality, Rights and Diversity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 113–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piore MJ, Sabel CF (1984) The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Post C, Byron K (2015) Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1546–1571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Sandholtz KW (2012) Amphibious entrepreneurs and the emergence of organizational forms. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 6(2):94–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Steinberg R (2006) The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Gammal DL, Simard C (2005) Close encounters: The circulation and reception of managerial practices in the San Francisco Bay area nonprofit community. Czarniawska-Joerges B, Sevón G, eds. Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects and Practices Travel in a Global Economy (CBS Press, Copenhagen), 233–258.Google Scholar
• Putnam RD (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of the American Community (Simon and Schuster, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2005) Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(6):968–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reay T, Golden-Biddle K, Germann K (2006) Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and microprocesses of change. Acad. Management J. 49(5):977–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Renzulli LA, Aldrich H, Moody J (2000) Family matters: Gender, networks, and entrepreneurial outcomes. Soc. Forces 79(2):523–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reskin BF, Roos PA (1990) Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women’s Inroad into Male Occupations (Temple University Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Richardson JG, Hatcher BW (1983) The feminization of public school teaching 1870–1920. Work Occupations 10(1):81–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (2001) Gender, status, and leadership. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):637–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (2009) Framed before we know it: How gender shapes social relations. Gender Soc. 23(2):145–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (2011) Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (2013) Why status matters for inequality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Correll SJ (2004) Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender Soc. 18(4):510–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Correll SJ (2006) Consensus and the creation of status beliefs. Soc. Forces 85(1):431–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, England P (2007) Sociological approaches to sex discrimination in employment. Crosby FJ, Stockdale MS, Ropp SA, eds. Sex Discrimination in the Workplace: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA), 189–211.Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Smith–Lovin L (1999) The gender system and interaction. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25(1):191–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Backor K, Li YE, Tinkler JE, Erickson KG (2009) How easily does a social difference become a status distinction? Gender matters. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):44–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robb AM, Watson J (2012) Gender differences in firm performance: Evidence from new ventures in the United States. J. Bus. Venturing 27(5):544–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Glick P (2001) Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):743–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Phelan JE (2008) Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 28(1):61–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M (2010) The Entrepreneurial Group: Social Identities, Relations, and Collective Action (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M, Aldrich HE, Carter NM (2003) The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(2):195–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salamon LM, Anheier HK (1997) Defining the nonprofit sector: A cross-national analysis (Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK).Google Scholar
• Saxenian A (1996) Beyond boundaries: Open labor markets and learning in Silicon Valley. Arthur MB, Rousseau DM, eds. The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era (Oxford University Press, New York), 23–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schein VE (2001) A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):675–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sczesny S (2003) A closer look beneath the surface: Various facets of the think-manager-think-male stereotype. Sex Roles 49(7–8):353–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharir M, Lerner M (2006) Gauging the success of social ventures initiated by individual social entrepreneurs. J. World Bus. 41(1):6–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skocpol T (2003) Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life (University of Oklahoma Press, Norman).Google Scholar
• Smith SR, Lipsky M (1993) Nonprofits for Hire: The Welfare State in the Age of Contracting (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Social Security Administration (2016) National data on the relative frequency of given names in the population of U.S. births where the individual has a social security number. Accessed July 31, 2017, https://www.ssa.gov/oact/babynames/limits.html.Google Scholar
• Stone P (2007) Opting Out? Why Women Really Quit Careers and Head Home (University of California Press, Berkeley).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Sorenson O (2003) Liquidity events and the geographic distribution of entrepreneurial activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):175–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thébaud S (2010) Masculinity, bargaining, and breadwinning: Understanding men’s housework in the cultural context of paid work. Gender Soc. 24(3):330–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thébaud S (2015) Business as plan B? Institutional foundations of gender inequality in entrepreneurship across 24 industrialized countries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):671–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thébaud S, Sharkey AJ (2016) Unequal hard times: The influence of the Great Recession on gender bias in entrepreneurial financing. Sociol. Sci. 3(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Themudo NS (2009) Gender and the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quart. 38(4):663–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilcsik A, Marquis C (2013) Punctuated generosity: How mega–events and natural disasters affect corporate philanthropy in U.S. communities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(1):111–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Townsend DM, Hart TA (2008) Perceived institutional ambiguity and the choice of organizational form in social entrepreneurial ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 32(4):685–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tracey P, Phillips N, Jarvis O (2011) Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organ. Sci. 22(1):60–80.Link, Google Scholar
• Urban Institute (2008) The NCCS-GuideStar National Nonprofit Research Database. National Center for Charitable Statistics, Urban Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Urban Institute (2014) Statistics of income. National Center for Charitable Statistics, Urban Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (1995) Frequently occurring surnames from census 1990. Accessed July 31, 2017, https://www.census.gov/topics/population/genealogy/data/1990_census/1990_census_namefiles.html.Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2007) Survey of business owners and self-employed persons (SBO). Accessed July 31, 2017, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/sbo.html.Google Scholar
• Walker ET, McCarthy JD (2010) Legitimacy, strategy, and resources in the survival of community-based organizations. Soc. Problems 57(3):315–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisbrod BA (1998) To Profit or Not to Profit: The Commercial Transformation of the Nonprofit Sector (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• West C, Zimmerman DH (1987) Doing gender. Gender Soc. 1(2):125–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams CL (1992) The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions. Soc. Problems 39(3):253–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wry T, York J (2017) An identity-based approach to social enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. 42(3):437–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang T, Aldrich HE (2014) Who’s the boss? Explaining gender inequality in entrepreneurial teams. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):303–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young DR (2009) Alternative perspectives on social enterprise. Cordes J, Steuerle E, eds. Nonprofits and Business (Urban Institute Press, Washington, DC), 21–46.Google Scholar