Beyond the Startup Stage: The Founding Team’s Human Capital, New Venture’s Stage of Life, Founder–CEO Duality, and Breakthrough Innovation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1152

References

  • Ahuja G, Lampert CM (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):521–543.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich HE, Wiedenmayer G (1993) From traits to rates: An ecological perspective on organizational founding. Katz JA, Brockhaus RH, eds. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, Vol. 1 (Emerald Group Publishing, Ltd., Bingley, UK), 145–195.Google Scholar
  • Amburgey TL (1986) Multivariate point process models in social research. Soc. Sci. Res. 15(2):190–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amburgey TL, Miner AS (1992) Strategic momentum: The effects of repetitive, positional, and contextual momentum on merger activity. Strategic Management J. 13(5):335–348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L (1999) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (Kluwer, Norwell, MA).Google Scholar
  • Arvanitis S, Stucki T (2012) What determines the innovation capability of firm founders? Indust. Corporate Change 21(4):1049–1084.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Autio E, Sapienza HJ, Almeida JG (2000) Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Acad. Management J. 43(5):909–924.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron RA, Ensley MD (2006) Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Sci. 52(9):1331–1344.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baum JA, Silverman BS (2004) Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups. J. Bus. Venturing 19(3):411–436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker GS (1964) Human Capital (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Beckman CM, Burton MD (2008) Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organ. Sci. 19(1):3–24.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman CM, Burton MD, O’Reilly C (2007) Early teams: The impact of team demography on VC financing and going public. J. Bus. Venturing 22(2):147–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman C, Eisenhardt K, Kotha S, Meyer A, Rajagopalan N (2012) Technology entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 6(2):89–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blossfeld HP, Rohwer G (2002) Techniques of Event History Modeling: New Approaches to Causal Analysis, 2nd ed. (LEA Publishers, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Boeker W (1989) The development and institutionalization of subunit power in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 34(3):388–410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boeker W, Karichalil R (2002) Entrepreneurial transitions: Factors influencing founder departure. Acad. Management J. 45(4):818–826.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Box TM, White MA, Barr SH (1993) A contingency model of new manufacturing performance. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 18(2):31–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Braguinsky S, Hounshell D (2016) History and nanoeconomics in strategy and industry evolution research: Lessons from the Meiji-Era Japanese cotton spinning industry. Strategic Management J. 37(1):45–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brüderl J, Preisendörfer P, Ziegler R (1992) Survival chances of newly founded business organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 57(2):227–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brush CG, Greene PG, Hart MM (2001) From initial idea to unique advantage: The entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. Acad. Management Executive 15(1):64–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burgelman RA (1991) Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organ. Sci. 2(3):239–262.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burton MD, Beckman CM (2007) Leaving a legacy: Position imprints and successor turnover in young firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72(2):239–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll GR (1983) A stochastic model of organizational mortality: Review and reanalysis. Soc Sci. Res. 12(4):303–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandler AD (1962) Strategy and Structure (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Chandler GN (1996) Business similarity as a moderator of the relationship between pre-ownership experience and venture performance. Entrepreneurship: Theory Practice 20(3):51–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chow S-C, Sho J, Wang H (2008) Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research, 2nd ed. (Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
  • Coff R, Kryscynski D (2011) Drilling for micro-foundations of human capital based competitive advantage. J. Management 37(5):1429–1443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colombo MG, Grilli L (2005) Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Res. Policy 34(6):795–816.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conger JA, Kanungo RN (1987) Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Acad. Management Rev. 12(4):637–647.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper AC, Gimeno-Gascon FJ, Woo CY (1994) Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. J. Bus. Venturing 9(5):371–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R, March J (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Damanpour F (1991) Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad. Management J. 34(3):555–590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davidsson P, Honig B (2003) The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Venturing 18(3):301–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Dreu CKW (2006) When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. J. Management 32(1):83–107.Google Scholar
  • De Jong SB, Van der Vegt GS, Bunderson JS, Molleman E (2010) Power asymmetry and learning in teams: The moderating role of performance feedback. Organ. Sci. 21(2):347–361.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • De Wit FRC, Greer LL, Jehn KA (2012) A meta-analysis of the relationship between diversity, conflict, and team performance. J. Appl. Psych. 92(2):360–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delmar F, Shane S (2006) Does experience matter? The effect of founding team experience on the survival and sales of newly founded ventures. Strategic Organ. 4(3):215–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dodge HR, Fullerton S, Robbins JE (1994) Stage of organizational life cycle and competition as mediators of problem perception in small business. Strategic Management J. 15(2):121–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dollinger MJ (1984) Environmental boundary spanning and information processing effects on organizational performance. Acad. Management J. 27(2):351–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eggers JP, Kaplan S (2009) Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organ. Sci. 20(2):461–477.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Bourgeois LJI (1988) Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Acad. Management J. 31(4):737–770.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Kahwajy JL, Bourgeois LJ (1997) How management team can have a good fight. Harvard Bus. Rev. 75(4):77–85.Google Scholar
  • Esteve-Pérez S, Mañez-Castillejo JA (2008) The resource-based theory of the firm and firm survival. Small Bus. Econom. 30(3):231–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fahlenbrach R (2009) Founder-CEOs, investment decisions, and stock market performance. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 44(2):439–466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein S (1992) Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 35(3):505–538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Floyd SW, Lane PJ (2000) Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):154–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geletkanycz MA, Hambrick DC (1997) The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):654–681.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • George G (2005) Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Acad. Management J. 48(4):661–676.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbert BA, McDougall PP, Audretsch DB (2006) New venture growth: A review and extension. J. Management 32(6):926–950.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gruber M, MacMillan IC, Thompson JD (2008) Look before you leap: Market opportunity identification in emerging technology firms. Management Sci. 54(9):1652–1665.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gruber M, MacMillan IC, Thompson JD (2012) From minds to markets how human capital endowments shape market opportunity identification of technology start-ups. J. Management 38(5):1421–1449.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta AK, Sapienza HJ (1992) Determinants of venture capital firms’ preferences regarding the industry diversity and geographic scope of their investments. J. Bus. Venturing 7(5):347–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper No. 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Hambrick DC, Geletkanycz MA, Fredrickson JW (1993) Top executive commitment to the status quo: A test of some of its determinants. Strategic Management J. 14(6):410–418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT, Freeman J (1989) Organizational Ecology (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haveman HA, Khair MV (2004) Survival beyond succession? The contingent impact of founder succession on organizational failure. J. Bus. Venturing 19(3):437–463.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haynes KT, Hillman A (2010) The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management J. 31(11):1145–1163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt M, Tyler BB (1991) Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives’. Strategic Management J. 12(5):327–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt MA, Biermant L, Shimizu K, Kochhar R (2001) Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Acad. Management J. 44(1):13–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Honoré F (2014) From common ground to breaking new ground: Founding team’s prior shared experience and start-up performance. CES Working Paper 14-39, Center for Economic Studies, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Jehn KA, Bendersky C (2003) Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Kramer RM, Staw B, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 25 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 187–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kazanjian RK (1988) Relation of dominant problems to stage of growth in technology-based new ventures. Acad. Management J. 31(2):257–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kazanjian RK, Drazin R (1989) An empirical test of a stage of growth progression model. Management Sci. 35(12):1489–1503.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kazanjian RK, Drazin R (1990) A stage-contingent model of design and growth for technology based new ventures. J. Bus. Venturing 5(3):137–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kitchener KS, King PM (1981) Reflective judgment: Concepts of justification and their relationship to age and education. J. Appl. Developmental Psych. 2(2):89–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kotha R, George G (2012) Friends, family, or fools: Entrepreneur experience and its implications for equity distribution and resource mobilization. J. Bus. Venturing 27(5):525–543.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J (1995) Patenting in the shadow of competitors. J. Law Econom. 38(2):563–595.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Magee JC, Milliken FJ, Lurie AR (2010) Power differences in the construal of a crisis: The immediate aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 36(3):354–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGahan AM, Silverman BS (2006) Profiting from technological innovation by others: The effect of competitor patenting on firm value. Res. Policy 35(8):1222–1242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath RG, Chen M, MacMillan IC (1998) Multimarket maneuvering in uncertain spheres of influence: Resource diversion strategies. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):724–740.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D (1996) Configurations revisited. Strategic Management J. 17(7):505–512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D, Friesen PH (1977) Strategy-making in context: Ten empirical archetypes. J. Management Stud. 14(3):253–280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moch MK, Pondy LR (1977) The structure of chaos: Organized anarchy as a response to ambiguity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(2):351–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson T (2003) The persistence of founder influence: Management, ownership, and performance effects at initial public offerings. Strategic Management J. 24(8):707–724.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olson PD, Bokor DW (1995) Strategy process-content interaction: Effects on growth performance in small start-up firms. J. Small Bus. Management 33(1):34.Google Scholar
  • Park HD, Tzabbar D (2016) Venture capital, CEOs’ sources of power, and innovation novelty at different life stages of a new venture. Organ. Sci. 27(2):336–353.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pitcher P, Smith AD (2001) Top management team heterogeneity: Personality, power, and proxies. Organ. Sci. 12(1):1–18.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rubenson GC, Gupta AK (1996) The initial succession: A contingency model of founder tenure. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 21(2):21–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapira Z (1995) Risk Taking (Russell Sage, New York).Google Scholar
  • Simons TL, Peterson RS (2000) Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. J. Appl. Psych. 85(1):102–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sirmon DG, Hitt MA, Ireland RD, Gilbert BA (2011) Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. J. Management 37(5):1390–1412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith A, Houghton SM, Hood JN, Ryman JA (2006) Power relationships among top managers: Does top management team power distribution matter for organizational performance? J. Bus. Res. 59(5):622–629.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith KG, Mitchell TR, Summer CE (1985) Top level management priorities in different stages of the organizational life cycle. Acad. Management J. 28(4):799–820.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stone-Romero EF, Alliger GM, Aguinis H (1994) Type II error problems in the use of moderated multiple regression for the detection of moderating effects of dichotomous variables. J. Management 20(1):167–178.Google Scholar
  • Sutton RI, Hargadon A (1996) Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(4):685–718.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor A, Greve HR (2006) Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Acad. Management J. 49(4):723–740.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tzabbar D (2009) When does scientist recruitment affect technological repositioning? Acad. Management J. 52(5):873–896.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tzabbar D, Kehoe RR (2014) Can opportunity emerge from disarray? An examination of exploration and exploitation following star scientist turnover. J. Management 40(2):449–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tzabbar D, Kehoe RR (2016) Winning by star light or star might? Quality human capital, resource orchestration and team performance. Strategic Management Soc. (SMS) 36th Annual Conf., September 17–20, Berlin.Google Scholar
  • Tzabbar D, Vestal A (2015) Bridging the social chasm in geographically distributed R&D teams: The moderating effects of relational strength and status asymmetry on the novelty of team innovation. Organ. Sci. 26(3):811–829.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ucbasaran D, Westhead P, Wright M (2009) The extent and nature of opportunity identification by experienced entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Venturing 24(2):99–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatraman N (1989) The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad. Management Rev. 14(3):423–444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Voss ZG, Cable DM, Voss GB (2006) Organizational identity and firm performance: What happens when leaders disagree about “who we are?” Organ. Sci. 17(6):741–755.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Waldman GG, Ramirez RA, House PP (2001) Does leadership matter? Acad. Management J. 44(1):134–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman N (2003) Founder-CEO succession and the paradox of entrepreneurial success. Organ. Sci. 14(2):149–172.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman N (2006) Stewards, agents, and the founder discount: Executive compensation in new ventures. Acad. Management J. 49(5):960–976.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wright PM, Coff R, Moliterno TP (2014) Strategic human capital: Crossing the great divide. J. Management 40(2):353–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu S, Levitas E, Priem RL (2005) CEO tenure and company invention under differing levels of technological dynamism. Acad. Management J. 48(5):859–873.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zahra SA (2005) Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Bus. Rev. 18(1):23–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. 27(2):185–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zahra SA, Filatotchev I, Wright M (2009) How do threshold firms sustain corporate entrepreneurship? The role of boards and absorptive capacity. J. Bus. Venturing 24(3):248–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker LG, Darby M, Brewer M (1998) Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):290–306.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.