Emergent Leadership Structures in Informal Groups: A Dynamic, Cognitively Informed Network Model

References

• Ancona D, Bresman H (2013) X-Teams: How to Build Teams That Lead, Innovate, and Succeed (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Asch SE (1956) Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psych. Monographs: General Appl. 70(9):1–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atwater LE, Dionne SD, Avolio B, Camobreco JE, Wau AL (1999) A longitudinal study of the leadership development process: Individual differences predicting leader effectiveness. Human Relations 52(12):1543–1562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin MW (1992) Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psych. Bull. 112:461–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balkundi P, Kilduff M (2006) The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership. Leadership Quart. 16:941–961.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A (2001) Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Rev. Psych. 52:1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brands RA (2013) Cognitive social structures in social network research: A review. J. Organ. Behav. 34:82–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brands RA, Menges JI, Kilduff M (2015) The leader-in-social-network schema: Perceptions of network structure affect gendered attribution of charisma. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1210–1225.Link, Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Cooper DJ, Fatas E (2007) Leadership and overcoming coordination failure with asymmetric costs. Experiment. Econom. 10:269–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brashears ME (2013) Social influence network theory: A sociological examination of group dynamics. Friedkin NE, Johnsen EC, eds. Journal of Mathematical Sociology (Cambridge University Press, New York), 192–193.Google Scholar
• Brown DJ (2012) Leadership and followership from a social cognition perspective: A dual process account. Rumsey MG, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Leadership (Oxford, UK), 103–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carson JB, Tesluk PE, Marrone JA (2007) Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Acad. Management J. 50:1217–1234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter DR, DeChurch LA, Braun MT, Contractor NS (2015) Social network approaches to leadership: An integrative conceptual review. J. Appl. Psych. 100(3):597–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T, Carley KM, Krackhardt D (1999) Positive affectivity and accuracy in social network perception. Motivation Emotion 23:285–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crockett WH (1982a) Schemas, affect, and communication. Donohew L, Sypher HE, Higgins ET, eds. Communication, Social Cognition, and Affect (Lawence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 33–52.Google Scholar
• Crockett WH (1982b) Balance, agreement, and positivity in the cognition of small social structures. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 15:1–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denis JL, Langley A, Sergi V (2012) Leadership in the plural. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):211–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeRue SD, Ashford SJ (2010) Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 35:627–647.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeRue SD, Nahrgang JD, Ashford SJ (2015) Interpersonal perceptions and the emergence of leadership structures in groups: A network perspective. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1192–1209.Link, Google Scholar
• DeSoto CB (1960) Learning a social structure. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 60:417–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elliott JR, Haney TJ, Sams-Abiodun P (2010) Limits to social capital: Comparing network assistance in two New Orleans neighborhoods devastated by Hurricane Katrina. Sociol. Quart. 51:624–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emery C (2012) Uncovering the role of emotional abilities in leadership emergence. A longitudinal analysis of leadership networks. Soc. Networks 34(4):429–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emery C, Calvard TS, Pierce ME (2013) Leadership as an emergent group process: A social network study of personality leadership. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 16(1):28–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epitropaki O, Martin R (2004) Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: Factor structure, generalizability, and stability over time. J. Appl. Psych. 89:293–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM (1991) Structural bases of leadership in intraorganizational networks. Soc. Psych. Quart. 54:36–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L, Hutte HA (1954) An experimental investigation of the effect of unstable interpersonal relations in a group. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 49:513–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske AP (1991) Structures of Social Life: The Four Elementary Forms of Human Relations (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Fiske AP (1992) The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psych. Rev. 99:689–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske AP, Rai TS (2014) Virtuous Violence: Hurting and Killing to Create, Sustain, End, and Honor Social Relationships (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ, Wiltermuth SS (2010) Who’s with me? False consensus, brokerage, and ethical decision making in organizations. Acad. Management J. 53:1074–1089.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ, Reagans RE, Amanatullah ET, Ames DR (2006) Helping one’s way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91:1123–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foschi M, Sigerson K, Lai L, Foschi R (1990) A computerized setting for expectation states research. West Coast Conf. Small Group Res., Portland, OR.Google Scholar
• Freeman LC (1992) Filling in the blanks: A theory of cognitive categories and the structure of social affiliation. Soc. Psych. Quart. 55:118–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawronski B, Walther E, Blank H (2005) Cognitive consistency and the formation of interpersonal attitudes: Cognitive balance affects the encoding of social information. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 41(6):618–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould RV (2003) Collision of Wills: How Ambiguity About Social Rank Breeds Conflict (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hasan S, Bagde S (2015) Peers and network growth: Evidence from a natural experiment. Management Sci. 61(10):2536–2547.Link, Google Scholar
• Hebl MR, Tickle J, Heatherton TF (2000) Awkward moments in interactions between nonstigmatized and stigmatized individuals. Heatherton TF, Kleck R, Hull JG, Hebl M, eds. Social Psychology of Stigma (Guilford, New York), 275–306.Google Scholar
• Heider F (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (John Wiley and Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henley NM, Horsfall RB, DeSoto CB (1969) Goodness of figure and social structure. Psych. Rev. 76:194–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horowitz MJ (1988) Person schemas. Horowitz MJ, ed. Person Schemas and Maladaptive Interpersonal Patterns (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 13–32.Google Scholar
• Howard JA (1994) A social cognitive conception of social structure. Soc. Psych. Quart. 57:210–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hummon NP, Doreian P (2003) Some dynamics of social balance processes: Bringing Heider back into balance theory. Soc. Networks 25:17–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H, Kilduff M, Tsai W (2005) Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontier of organizational network research. Organ. Sci. 16:359–371.Link, Google Scholar
• Janicik GA, Larrick RP (2005) Social network schemas and the learning of incomplete networks. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88:348–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karakowsky L, Siegel JP (1999) The effects of proportional representation and gender orientation of the task on emergent leadership behavior in mixed-gender work groups. J. Appl. Psych. 84:620–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kark R, Van Dijk D (2007) Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: The role of the self-regulatory focus in leadership processes. Acad. Management Rev. 32:500–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff G, Anderson C, Willer R (2013) Consensus and contribution: Shared status hierarchies promote group success. IRLE Working Paper 145-13, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Krackhardt D (1994) Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations. Acad. Management J. 37:87–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Crossland C, Tsai W, Krackhardt D (2008) Organizational network perceptions versus reality: A small world after all? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 107:15–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1990) Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35:342–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1994) Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations. Carley K, Prietula M, eds. Computational Organization Theory (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 89–111.Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D, Kilduff M (1999) Whether close or far: Social distance effects on perceived balance in friendship networks. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 76(5):770–782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin LJ (2009a) Formation and stabilization of vertical hierarchies among adolescents: Towards a quantitative ethology of dominance among humans. Soc. Psych. Quart. 72:241–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin LJ (2009b) Social Structures (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Kilduff M, Brass DJ (2001) The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for the workplace performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46:121–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Smith BR, Dixon AL, Robertson B (2006) Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. Leadership Quart. 17:232–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moliterno TP, Mahoney DA (2011) Network theory of organization: A multilevel approach. J. Management 37:443–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA (1999) The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Acad. Management Rev. 24(2):249–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgeson FP, DeRue SD, Karam EP (2010) Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. J. Management Rev. 36:5–39.Google Scholar
• Northouse PG (2012) Leadership: Theory and Practice (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (2006) Linking social structure and interpersonal behavior: A theoretical perspective on cultural schemas and social relations. Soc. Psych. Quart. 69:5–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg M (1989) Society and the Adolescent Self-Image (Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, CT).Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Burks J, Nisbett RE, Ybarra O (2000) Cultural styles, relationship schemas, and prejudice against out-groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79:174–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schubert TW (2005) Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 89(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz B (2009) Collective forgetting and the symbolic power of oneness: The strange apotheosis of Rosa Parks. Soci. Psych. Quart. 72:123–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shelly RK, Troyer L (2001) Emergence and completion of structure in initially undefined or partially defined groups. Soc. Psych. Quart. 64:318–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simpson B, Markovsky B, Steketee M (2011) Power and the perception of social networks. Soc. Networks 33:166–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith ER, Collins EC (2009) Contextualizing person perception: Distributed social cognition. Psych. Rev. 116(2):343–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith EB, Menon T, Thompson L (2012) Status differences in the cognitive activation of social networks. Organ. Sci. 23:67–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Snijders TAB, van de Bunt GG, Steglich CEG (2010) Introduction to actor-based models for network dynamics. Soc. Networks 32:44–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snyder M (1974) Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 30:526–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taggar S, Hackett R, Saha S (1999) Leadership emergence in autonomous work teams: Antecedents and outcomes. Personnel Psych. 52:899–926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Troyer L, Younts CW (1997) Whose expectations matter? The relative power of first- and second-order expectations in determining social influence. Amer. J. Sociol. 103:692–732.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker CJ (1976) The employment of vertical and horizontal social schemata in the learning of a social structure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 33:132–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wellman N, Ashford SJ, DeRue DS, Sanchez-Burks J (2011) To lead or not to lead? The impact of alternative leadership-structure schemas on leadership behavior. 2011 Annual Meeting Acad. Management, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
• Yukl G (2009) Leadership in organizations (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar